Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2905
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2905
07 Oct 2024
 | 07 Oct 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

Comparison of high-resolution climate reanalysis datasets for hydro-climatic impact studies

Raul R. Wood, Joren Janzing, Amber van Hamel, Jonas Götte, Dominik L. Schumacher, and Manuela I. Brunner

Abstract. Continuous high-quality meteorological information is needed to describe and understand extreme hydro-climatic events, such as droughts and floods. Information of highest quality relying on observations is often only available on a national level and for few meteorological variables. As an alternative, large-scale climate reanalysis datasets blending model simulations with observations are often used. However, their performance can be biased due to coarse spatial resolution, model uncertainty, and data assimilation biases. Previous studies on the performance of reanalysis datasets either focused on the global scale, on single variables, or on few aspects of the hydro-climate. Therefore, we here conduct a comprehensive spatio-temporal evaluation of different precipitation, temperature and snowfall metrics for four state-of-the-art reanalysis datasets (ERA5, ERA5-Land, CERRA-Land, and CHELSA-v2.1) over complex terrain. We consider climatologies of mean and extreme climate metrics, daily to inter-annual variability, as well as the consistency in long term trends. Further, we compare the representation of extreme events, namely the intensity and severity of the 2003 and 2018 droughts, as well as the 1999 and 2005 floods in Switzerland. The datasets generally show a satisfactory performance for most of these characteristics, exceptions being the representation of snowfall (solid precipitation) and the number of wet days in ERA5 and ERA5-Land. Our results show clear differences in the representation of precipitation among datasets and a substantial improvement of the representation of precipitation in CERRA-Land compared to the other datasets. In contrast to precipitation, temperature is more comparable among datasets, with CERRA-Land and CHELSA showing smaller biases yet a clear increase of bias with elevation. All datasets are able to identify the 2003 and 2018 drought events, however, ERA5, ERA5-Land, and CHELSA overestimate their intensity and severity, while CERRA-Land underestimates it. The 1999 and 2005 floods are overall well represented by all datasets, with CERRA-Land showing the best agreement with observations and the other datasets overestimating the spatial extent of the events. We conclude that overall, CERRA-Land is the most reliable dataset and suitable for a broad range of analyses, particularly for regions where snow processes are relevant and for applications where the representation of daily to inter-annual precipitation variability is important.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Raul R. Wood, Joren Janzing, Amber van Hamel, Jonas Götte, Dominik L. Schumacher, and Manuela I. Brunner

Status: open (until 02 Dec 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2905', Laurent Strohmenger, 01 Nov 2024 reply
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2905', Anonymous Referee #2, 04 Nov 2024 reply
Raul R. Wood, Joren Janzing, Amber van Hamel, Jonas Götte, Dominik L. Schumacher, and Manuela I. Brunner
Raul R. Wood, Joren Janzing, Amber van Hamel, Jonas Götte, Dominik L. Schumacher, and Manuela I. Brunner

Viewed

Total article views: 307 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
228 70 9 307 32 6 7
  • HTML: 228
  • PDF: 70
  • XML: 9
  • Total: 307
  • Supplement: 32
  • BibTeX: 6
  • EndNote: 7
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 Oct 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 Oct 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 291 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 291 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 08 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
Continuous and high-quality meteorological datasets are crucial to study extreme hydro-climatic events. We here conduct a comprehensive spatio-temporal evaluation of precipitation and temperature from four climate reanalysis datasets, focusing on mean and extreme metrics, variability, trends, and the representation of droughts and floods over Switzerland. Our analysis shows that all datasets have some merit when limitations are considered, and that one dataset performs better than the others.