the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Estimation of the 3-D geoelectric field at the Earth's surface using Spherical Elementary Current Systems
Abstract. The geoelectric field drives geomagnetically induced currents (GIC) in technological conductor networks, which can affect the performance of critical ground infrastructure such as electric power transmission grids. The three-dimensional (3-D) electric field at the Earth's surface consists of an external divergence-free (DF) part due to temporally and spatially varying ionospheric and magnetospheric currents, an internal DF part due to temporally and spatially varying telluric currents, and a curl-free (CF) part due to charge accumulation at ground conductivity gradients. We have developed a new method for estimating these contributions. The external and internal parts of the DF electric field are calculated from the time derivative of the external and internal parts of the observed ground magnetic field, respectively, using DF two-dimensional (2-D) Spherical Elementary Current Systems (SECS). The horizontal surface CF electric field is calculated from the known surface DF electric field using coefficients that linearly relate the DF electric field to the CF electric field. The coefficiens were obtained from the 3-D induction model PGIEM2G (Kruglyakov and Kuvshinov, 2018). The calculations are carried out in the time domain and only two consecutive time steps of the observed magnetic field are needed to compute the surface electric field. The external part of the DF electric field is valid at and below the ionosphere, the internal part at and above the Earth's surface, and the CF part at the Earth's surface. A dense magnetometer network is a requirement for reliable results. The external and internal parts of the DF electric field are generally oppositely directed and have comparable amplitudes, both on the ground and in the ionosphere, indicating that both contributions are significant for the total DF electric field. The largest peaks of total DF electric field tend to occur when either the external or internal contribution is temporarily suppressed. At a given location, a DF electric field with a given amplitude can result in a total surface electric field amplitude with an orders of magnitude difference depending on the direction of the DF electric field with respect to the locally dominant conductivity gradient structure. The electric field calculation is computationally light, facilitating operational implementation of a near-real time 3-D surface electric field monitoring and derivation of long electric field time series.
- Preprint
(18537 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(9833 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2831', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Oct 2024
Review comments on the manuscript egusphere-2024-2831, entitled: Estimation of the 3-D geoelectric field at the Earth's surface using Spherical Elementary Current Systems
 by Liisa Juusola et al.The authors tried to derive the geoelectric field at the Earth's surface from magnetic field variations measured in the vicinity. The various components of the E-field are estimated with the help of the SECS approach and by using the 3-D induction model PGIEM2G. This approach is applied to IMAGE Magnetometer Network area. Convincing results are obtained in this way, which compare quite favorably with GIC measurements in gas pipelines. The computational design of the framework is suitable for running it in near-real time for estimating space weather hazards, resulting from GICs in the Fenno-Scandian region.
In spite of these generally positive ratings, the study would gain, when improvements were made in a number of cases.
Â
Open issues
- One thing, the authors obviously have not taken into account is the effect of prompt penetrating electric fields on the geoelectric field. As shown by Brändlein et al. (2012) doi:10.1029/2012JA018008, the ionospheric Hall current, driven by the prompt penetration field, causes ground-based magnetic signatures, but it does not cause geoelectric fields on the ground. At mid-latitudes significant effects of this process can be observed. I am not aware that anyone has studied this effect at auroral latitudes. This point should be discussed.
- Table 3: Larges ground E-fields are predicted at the end of 7 Sep. 2017 for a location close to the transformer of Namsos. It should be checked if measurements of ground currents are available at that station. In case there are, they should be compared with the predictions. This would make the study much more convincing and relevant for application.
- In the Introduction it is mentioned that a second layer is introduces below the Earth's surface. From the following sections it is not clear what this extra layer physically represents. How does it account for lateral conductivity variations?
- Another statement is that the radial component of EDF is not required to be zero. What is the effect of that assumption? What does it physically imply? These two latter assumptions are pointed out as important assets of the presented approach. Therefore, they should be better explained to the readers.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2831-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Liisa Juusola, 05 Dec 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-2831/egusphere-2024-2831-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2831', Anonymous Referee #2, 10 Nov 2024
The authors describe a new set of techniques to model the geoelectric field using curl free as well as the divergence free geomagnetic field. They work through a series of simplification of Maxwell's equations to derive the relationships and point out interesting insights into the induced geoelectric field properties. The model does require a good representation of the ground conductivity which can be a limitation for many other locations. Overall this is an excellent contribution to the research area and will be interesting to apply in locations outside the Scandinavian region.
Minor comments:
Abstract: I would not have a citation embedded in the abstract ((Kruglyakov & Kuvshinov, 2018)
Line 9: coefficients
Line 17: with orders of magnitude
Line 24: , a solid understanding
Line 25: scarce
Line 28: A couple of more linking sentences would be useful. E.g. To achieve an intercomparison of results we ... "do things ..."
Line 52: surface
Line 150: You make an excellent point about the induced fields tending to cancel each other out.
Line 188: geoelectric
Line 300: It is not entirely clear at this point that the SMAP model with PGIEM2G is a prerequisite for the modelling to work to compute CF from DF. Can you clarify that here?
Line 347: good data are available
Figure 3 caption: Last sentence says Bx, By, Bz but that is -B_theta, B_phi, -B_r rather than r, theta, phi as written.
Figure 5: Conductivity is in a diverging blue-white-red color scale - could you change it to a linear one (i.e. no white in the middle). This applies to other figures or plots with linear increasing rather than positive/negative variations
Figure 10: similar comment about linearly increasing colors. Also there doesn't seem to be any red in the plots.
Figure 18: the label on the colorbars are not legibleÂ
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2831-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Liisa Juusola, 05 Dec 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-2831/egusphere-2024-2831-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Liisa Juusola, 05 Dec 2024
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
199 | 71 | 27 | 297 | 20 | 4 | 4 |
- HTML: 199
- PDF: 71
- XML: 27
- Total: 297
- Supplement: 20
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1