Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2821
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2821
18 Sep 2024
 | 18 Sep 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

Estimating seasonal bulk density of level sea ice using the data derived from in situ and ICESat-2 synergistic observations during MOSAiC

Yi Zhou, Xianwei Wang, Ruibo Lei, Arttu Jutila, Donald K. Perovich, Luisa von Albedyll, Dmitry V. Divine, Yu Zhang, and Christian Haas

Abstract. Satellite retrievals of Arctic sea ice thickness typically assume fixed values of sea ice bulk density (IBD), overlooking its seasonal evolution and spatial heterogeneity, which are influenced by factors such as the age, deformation, brine, and air inclusions of the sea ice. This study investigates the seasonal variability of IBD during the Arctic freezing season from October to April, across the Distributed Network (DN) scale of the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition. To estimate IBD, we combined sea ice and snow observations from ice mass balance buoys, snow pits, repeated transects, and ice cores, together with high-resolution along-track freeboard data obtained from airborne laser scanning (ALS) and the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2). Assuming hydrostatic equilibrium, IBDs were determined for the level ice components of the MOSAiC ice floes, which consisted predominantly of second-year ice (SYI). Our results revealed significant seasonal variability of the IBD with two main phases during the MOSAiC freezing season at scales of DN (~ 50 km), L-sites (~ 25 km), and Main Coring Site (MCS, ~ 50 m). Throughout the freezing season, the mean IBD estimated at the DN scale (910 ± 7 kg m−3) was close to that of the SYI cores at the MCS (912 ± 2 kg m−3), highlighting the SYI-dominated regional ice properties. We also identified that sea ice freeboard, along with the ratios of ice freeboard to total freeboard or ice freeboard to thickness, are critical indicators to determine IBD at the scale of tens of kilometers. We have therefore developed parameterizations for IBD that are expected to be applicable throughout the freezing season for the SYI region, which is also the ice type that currently dominates the central Arctic Ocean. The proposed parameterizations have the potential to optimize basin-scale IBD estimation and improve satellite-derived sea ice thickness.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Yi Zhou, Xianwei Wang, Ruibo Lei, Arttu Jutila, Donald K. Perovich, Luisa von Albedyll, Dmitry V. Divine, Yu Zhang, and Christian Haas

Status: open (until 06 Nov 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2821', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Oct 2024 reply
Yi Zhou, Xianwei Wang, Ruibo Lei, Arttu Jutila, Donald K. Perovich, Luisa von Albedyll, Dmitry V. Divine, Yu Zhang, and Christian Haas

Data sets

Scale-related bulk density of level sea ice during the MOSAiC freezing season (October 2019 to April 2020) Yi Zhou et al. https://zenodo.org/records/13690816

Yi Zhou, Xianwei Wang, Ruibo Lei, Arttu Jutila, Donald K. Perovich, Luisa von Albedyll, Dmitry V. Divine, Yu Zhang, and Christian Haas

Viewed

Total article views: 153 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
127 21 5 153 18 1 1
  • HTML: 127
  • PDF: 21
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 153
  • Supplement: 18
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Sep 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Sep 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 146 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 146 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 05 Oct 2024
Download
Short summary
This study examines how the bulk density of Arctic sea ice varies seasonally, a factor often overlooked in satellite measurements of sea ice thickness. From October to April, we found significant seasonal variations in sea ice bulk density at different spatial scales using direct observations as well as airborne and satellite data. New models were then developed to indirectly predict sea ice bulk density. This advance can improve our ability to monitor changes in Arctic sea ice.