Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2782
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2782
12 Sep 2024
 | 12 Sep 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Technical Note: Recommendations for Diagnosing Cloud Feedbacks and Rapid Cloud Adjustments Using Cloud Radiative Kernels

Mark Zelinka, Li-Wei Chao, Timothy Myers, Yi Qin, and Stephen Klein

Abstract. The cloud radiative kernel method is a popular approach to quantify cloud feedbacks and rapid cloud adjustments to increased CO2 concentrations, and to partition contributions from changes in cloud amount, altitude, and optical depth. However, because this method relies on cloud property histograms derived from passive satellite sensors or produced by passive satellite simulators in models, changes in obscuration of lower-level clouds by upper-level clouds can cause apparent low cloud feedbacks and adjustments even in the absence of changes in lower-level cloud properties. Here, we provide a methodology for properly diagnosing the impact of changing obscuration on cloud feedbacks and adjustments and quantify these effects across climate models. Averaged globally and across global climate models, properly accounting for obscuration leads to weaker positive feedbacks from lower-level clouds and stronger positive feedbacks from upper-level clouds while simultaneously removing a mostly artificial anti-correlation between them. Given that the methodology for diagnosing cloud feedbacks and adjustments using cloud radiative kernels has evolved over several papers, and obscuration effects have only occasionally been considered in recent papers, this paper serves to establish recommended best practices and to provide a corresponding code base for community use.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Mark Zelinka, Li-Wei Chao, Timothy Myers, Yi Qin, and Stephen Klein

Status: open (until 24 Oct 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Mark Zelinka, Li-Wei Chao, Timothy Myers, Yi Qin, and Stephen Klein
Mark Zelinka, Li-Wei Chao, Timothy Myers, Yi Qin, and Stephen Klein

Viewed

Total article views: 114 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
87 20 7 114 1 1
  • HTML: 87
  • PDF: 20
  • XML: 7
  • Total: 114
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Sep 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Sep 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 110 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 110 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 05 Oct 2024
Download
Short summary
Clouds lie at the heart of uncertainty in both climate sensitivity and radiative forcing, making it imperative to properly diagnose their radiative effects. Here we provide a recommended methodology and code base for the community to use in performing such diagnoses using cloud radiative kernels. We show that properly accounting for changes in obscuration of lower-level clouds by upper-level is important for accurate diagnosis and attribution of cloud feedbacks and adjustments.