Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2674
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2674
26 Sep 2024
 | 26 Sep 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

A thicker, rather than thinner, East Antarctic Ice Sheet plateau during the Last Glacial Maximum

Cari Rand, Richard S. Jones, Andrew N. Mackintosh, Brent Goehring, and Kat Lilly

Abstract. In this study, we present a surface-exposure chronology of past ice-thickness change derived from in-situ cosmogenic-14C dating at a site on the edge of the East Antarctic plateau, 380 km inland from the Antarctic coastline. Our knowledge of how the Antarctic ice sheet has responded to Quaternary climate change relies on a combination of geological data and ice-sheet modeling. At the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), observations and models suggest that increased ice-sheet volume was accommodated by thicker ice near the coast and grounding-line advance towards the continental-shelf edge. In contrast, the ice sheet interior maintained a relatively stable thickness until present, with ice-core evidence even suggesting thinner ice relative to today. However, the magnitude of these thickness changes, and the location dividing thicker versus thinner ice at the LGM is poorly constrained. Geological reconstructions of past ice thickness in Antarctica mostly come from surface-exposure data using cosmogenic nuclides that are relatively insensitive records of ice-cover changes on timescales of tens of thousands of years. This can lead to inaccurate records of LGM ice thickness, particularly towards the East Antarctic plateau, where cold-based non-erosive ice may inhibit bedrock erosion. Samples saturated with 14C at 1912 m a.s.l. indicate that the summit of Nunatak 1921 was exposed during the LGM, while unsaturated samples indicate that thinning subsequently occurred, with some (25–45 %) post-LGM thinning recorded at ~15–11 ka and most (55–75 %) recorded during the Holocene. These results imply that at least part of the interior East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) was thicker at the LGM than it is now, and that gradual ice-sheet thinning began ~15 ka. Ice-sheet models that do not account for this thickness change would inaccurately characterize the LGM geometry of the EAIS and underestimate its contributions to deglacial sea-level rise.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Cari Rand, Richard S. Jones, Andrew N. Mackintosh, Brent Goehring, and Kat Lilly

Status: open (until 07 Nov 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Cari Rand, Richard S. Jones, Andrew N. Mackintosh, Brent Goehring, and Kat Lilly
Cari Rand, Richard S. Jones, Andrew N. Mackintosh, Brent Goehring, and Kat Lilly

Viewed

Total article views: 108 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
83 21 4 108 9 1 1
  • HTML: 83
  • PDF: 21
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 108
  • Supplement: 9
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Sep 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Sep 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 86 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 86 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 05 Oct 2024
Download
Short summary
In this study, we determine how recently samples from a mountain in East Antarctica were last covered by the East Antarctic ice sheet.  By examining concentrations of carbon-14 in rock samples, we determined that all but the summit of the mountain was buried under glacial ice within the last 15 thousand years.  Other methods of estimating past ice thicknesses are not sensitive enough to capture ice cover this recent, so we were previously unaware that ice at this site was thicker at this time.