the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Spring-neap tidal cycles modulate the strength of the carbon source at the estuary-coast interface
Abstract. Estuaries are dynamic environments with large biogeochemical variability modulated by tides, linking land to the coastal ocean. The carbon cycle at this land-sea interface can be better constrained by increasing the frequency of observations and by identifying the influence of tides with respect to the spring-neap variability. Here we use FerryBox measurements from a Ship-of-Opportunity travelling between two large temperate estuaries in the North Sea and find that the spring-neap tidal cycle drives a large percentage of the biogeochemical variability, in particular in inorganic and organic carbon concentrations at the land-sea interface in the outer estuaries and the adjacent coastal region. Of particular importance to carbon budgeting is the up to 74 % increase (up to 43.0 ± 17.1 mmol C m-2 day-1) in the strength of the estuarine carbon source to the atmosphere estimated during spring tide in a macrotidal estuary. We describe the biogeochemical processes occurring during both spring and neap tidal stages, their net effect on the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in seawater, and the ratios of dissolved inorganic to dissolved organic carbon concentrations. Surprisingly, while the two example outer estuaries in this study differ in the timing of the variability, the metabolic state progression and the observed phytoplankton species distribution, an increase in the strength of the potential carbon source to the atmosphere occurs at both outer estuaries on roughly 14-day cycles, suggesting that this is an underlying characteristic essential for the correct estimation of carbon budgets in tidally-driven estuaries and the nearby coastal regions. Understanding the functioning of estuarine systems and quantifying their effect on coastal seas should improve our current biogeochemical models and therefore future carbon exchange and budget predictability.
- Preprint
(1807 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(461 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 04 Jan 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2643', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 Oct 2024
reply
The manuscript investigates the influence of spring-neap tidal cycles on carbon dynamics in two North Sea estuarine systems (Humber and Elbe), presenting a comparative analysis supported by field observations. While the study benefits from a comprehensive dataset, several fundamental issues need to be addressed before the manuscript can be considered for publication. Below are the major concerns:
Major Comments:
1. Data Visualization
Consider implementing standardized cartographic conventions for improved clarity and scientific rigor.
- The cartographic elements in Figures 1, 3i, and 5i exhibit significant technical deficiencies in their presentation. The water mass trajectory plots lack scientific justification and supporting methodological documentation.
- The box plots require statistical significance indicators for between-group comparisons.
- The tidal range representations (blue lines, Figures 3 & 5) need proper measurement annotations and methodological context.
2. Analytical Depth and Data Integration
The Discussion section currently provides only cursory analysis of parameter relationships. The study relies heavily on literature values rather than leveraging the original dataset, quantitative assessment of individual contributors to carbon flux variations is inadequately addressed. Recommend incorporating detailed statistical analysis of the collected data to derive system-specific carbon flux contributions.
3. Methodological Documentation
- The FerryBox measurement system requires more comprehensive documentation,suggest including:
- Detailed technical diagrams of the FerryBox installation
- Systematic workflow documentation
- Quality control procedures
- Calibration protocols
- The air-water CO2 flux calculation methodology should either be integrated into the results and discussion or removed entirely
4. Conceptual Framework and Literature Context
The Introduction requires structural reorganization. Current emphasis on general estuarine carbon flux heterogeneity should be condensed. Recommend expanding the discussion of spring-neap tidal influences on carbon dynamics. Strengthen the articulation of the study's novel contributions to the field.
I will save minor comments this time because the current type of this manuscript would need a significant improvement.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2643-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Vlad Macovei, 20 Dec 2024
reply
We thank the reviewer for reading and commenting on our manuscript. We were planning on waiting for comments from a second reviewer before producing a revised manuscript, but since we don’t currently have a second reviewer and the discussion period for the manuscript is soon closing, we briefly outline here how we will address the first reviewer’s comments. A fully-detailed response to all comments and updated tracked changes manuscript will follow.
We will improve the visualization deficits outlined by the reviewer, including the maps, box plots and tidal representations.
We will better use our dataset to derive carbon fluxes, but it must be kept in mind that the dataset is limiting to accurately determine individual contributions. The scope of our manuscript was to highlight that this tidally-driven variability exists and must not lead to false conclusions (e.g. we see a positive correlation between chlorophyll and pCO2).
We will add details on the quality control, methodology and calibrations, but we will likely not include diagrams of the FerryBox installation, since this is outside the scope of this article. Instead, we will direct the reader to publications that describe such installations. Furthermore, FerryBoxes are well established ocean observation instruments, with many peer-reviewed publications making use of data collected by them. We will provide some examples for the readers.
We will reduce the CO2 flux calculation description and move it to another section.
We will streamline the Introduction where indicated and expand the spring-neap influence on carbon part. However, there are not that many studies published specifically on this aspect, which is exactly what makes the contribution of this current manuscript important.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2643-AC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
240 | 125 | 14 | 379 | 29 | 6 | 6 |
- HTML: 240
- PDF: 125
- XML: 14
- Total: 379
- Supplement: 29
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1