Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2603
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2603
26 Aug 2024
 | 26 Aug 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Direct calibration using atmospheric particles and performance evaluation of PSM 2.0 for sub-10 nm particle measurements

Yiliang Liu, Arttu Yli-Kujala, Fabian Schmidt-Ott, Sebastian Holm, Lauri Ahonen, Tommy Chan, Joonas Enroth, Joonas Vanhanen, Runlong Cai, Tuukka Petäjä, Markku Kulmala, Yang Chen, and Juha Kangasluoma

Abstract. Particle Size Magnifier is widely used for the measuring nano-sized particles. Here we calibrated the newly developed Particle Size Magnifier version 2.0 (PSM 2.0). 1–10 nm particles with different compositions were used, including metal particles, organic particles generated in the laboratory and atmospheric particles collected in Helsinki and Hyytiälä, respectively. Noticeable difference among the calibration curves was observed. Atmospheric particles from Hyytiälä required higher DEG supersaturation to be activated compared to metal particles (standard calibration particles) and other types of particles. This suggests that chemical composition differences introduce measurement uncertainties and highlight the importance of in-situ calibration. The size resolution of PSM 2.0 was characterized using metal particles. The maximum size resolution was observed at 2–3 nm. PSM 2.0 was then operated in Hyytiälä in parallel with a Half-mini Differential Mobility Particle Sizer (DMPS). During new particle formation (NPF) events, comparable total particle concentrations were observed between Half-mini DMPS and PSM 2.0 based on Hyytiälä atmospheric particle calibration. Meanwhile, applying the calibration with metal particles to atmospheric measurements would cause an overestimation of 3–10 nm particles. In terms of the particle size distributions, similar patterns were observed between DMPS and PSM when using the calibration of Hyytiälä atmospheric particles. In summary, PSM 2.0 is a powerful instrument for measuring sub-10 nm particles and can achieve more precise particle size distribution measurements with proper calibration.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Yiliang Liu, Arttu Yli-Kujala, Fabian Schmidt-Ott, Sebastian Holm, Lauri Ahonen, Tommy Chan, Joonas Enroth, Joonas Vanhanen, Runlong Cai, Tuukka Petäjä, Markku Kulmala, Yang Chen, and Juha Kangasluoma

Status: open (until 01 Oct 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Yiliang Liu, Arttu Yli-Kujala, Fabian Schmidt-Ott, Sebastian Holm, Lauri Ahonen, Tommy Chan, Joonas Enroth, Joonas Vanhanen, Runlong Cai, Tuukka Petäjä, Markku Kulmala, Yang Chen, and Juha Kangasluoma
Yiliang Liu, Arttu Yli-Kujala, Fabian Schmidt-Ott, Sebastian Holm, Lauri Ahonen, Tommy Chan, Joonas Enroth, Joonas Vanhanen, Runlong Cai, Tuukka Petäjä, Markku Kulmala, Yang Chen, and Juha Kangasluoma

Viewed

Total article views: 64 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
39 20 5 64 13 2 2
  • HTML: 39
  • PDF: 20
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 64
  • Supplement: 13
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Aug 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Aug 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 90 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 90 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 31 Aug 2024
Download
Short summary
Accurate measurement of nanoparticles is crucial for understanding their impact on new particle formation and climate change. In our study, we calibrated the Particle Size Magnifier version 2.0, a novel instrument designed for nanoparticle analysis, using both lab-generated and atmospheric particles. Significant differences were observed in the calibration results, with direct calibration using atmospheric particles enhancing measurement accuracy.