the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Technical note: A comparative study of chemistry schemes for volcanic sulfur dioxide in Lagrangian transport simulations: a case study of the 2019 Raikoke eruption
Abstract. Lagrangian transport models are important tools to study the sources, spread, and life time of air pollutants. In order to simulate the transport of reactive atmospheric pollutants, the implementation of efficient chemistry and mixing schemes is necessary to properly represent the lifetime of chemical species. Based on a case study simulating long-range transport of volcanic sulfur dioxide (SO2) for the 2019 Raikoke eruption, this study compares two chemistry schemes implemented in the Lagrangian transport model Massive-Parallel Trajectory Calculations (MPTRAC). The explicit scheme represents first-order and pseudo-first-order loss processes of SO2 based on prescribed reaction rates and climatological oxidant fields, i. e., the hydroxyl radical in the gas phase and hydrogen peroxide in the aqueous phase. Furthermore, an implicit scheme with a reduced chemistry mechanism for volcanic SO2 decomposition has been implemented, targeting the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UT/LS) region. Considering non-linear effects of the volcanic SO2 chemistry in the UT/LS region, we found that the implicit solution yields a better representation of the volcanic SO2 lifetime while the first-order explicit solution has better computational efficiency. By analysing the dependence between the oxidants and SO2 concentrations, correction formulas are derived to adjust the oxidant fields used in the explicit solution, leading to a good trade-off between computational efficiency and accuracy. We consider this work to be an important step forward to support future research on emission source reconstruction involving non-linear chemical processes.
- Preprint
(3002 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (extended)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2596', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Nov 2024
reply
Review of “Technical note: A comparative study of chemistry schemes for volcanic sulfur dioxide in Lagrangian transport simulations: a case study of the 2019 Raikoke eruption” by Mingzhao Liu et. al.
The authors enhance the MPTRAC model by introducing and evaluating two chemistry schemes for simulating volcanic SO2. The explicit scheme models first-order and pseudo-first-order SO2 loss processes, while the implicit scheme, tailored for SO2 transport in the UT/LS, employs a reduced chemical mechanism. The Raikoke eruption serves as a case study. The implicit scheme provides a more accurate representation of SO2 lifetime, albeit at a higher computational cost. The paper is well-written, with clear figures supporting the text and conclusions. I believe the paper is publishable, pending the authors' response to my query regarding the implicit chemical mechanism. Specifically, I'm unclear about its derivation and validation. Are there any prior studies that have employed this mechanism?
Minor questions/comments:
1st sentence. Not clear what is driven by wind and velocity fields, models or aerosols? Please rephrase.
Line 83: reference on TROPOMI is missing
1st sentence in Sec. 2.2.2 does not correlate with what is shown in Fig. 1.
Line 149: please see my major question above.
Table 1: what is prod?
Line 184: please expand ‘ESA’?
Line 208: Please include evolution of SO2 plume evolution computed using explicit and corrected explicit schemes in Fig 3 and 4.
Line 209: maybe replace “movement” by ‘transport’?
Line 212: ‘... the model results begin to lose…’. Please use different wording.
Line 240: Please rephrase the 1st sentence (situation the SO2 plumes?)
Line 258: ‘transport’ simulations?
Line 267: Please specify which gases CAMS assimilates. I do not think that is assimilates OH and H2O2.
Line 271: Please remove Fig 8 or add analysis of what is shown there.
Fig 9. Not clear on MPTRAC figures. How they obtained? Is it SO2 free run? Is it implicit, explicit or explicit with correction chemistry?
Line 340: Please include this correction test in the manuscript. It will strengthen the publication.
Sec 4: Summary and conclusions can be shortened and avoid repetitions.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2596-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
142 | 34 | 15 | 191 | 7 | 5 |
- HTML: 142
- PDF: 34
- XML: 15
- Total: 191
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1