the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Temporal Characteristics and Atmospheric Drivers of Onsets and Terminations of Soil Moisture Droughts in Europe
Abstract. Many studies have focused on understanding the drivers of soil moisture droughts in Europe when the events have already intensified. Still, how atmospheric circulation changes throughout the entire life cycle of droughts, particularly during the transition periods to drought initiation and termination, has not been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, this study investigates temporal characteristics and atmospheric circulation associated with onsets (a transition period from a normal condition to drought) and terminations (a transition period from drought to a normal condition) of soil moisture droughts in Europe during 1980–2020. The typical duration, preferred seasons of occurrence, and atmospheric circulation during onsets and terminations are examined. The regions of study are central (CEU) and Mediterranean (MED) Europe, and soil moisture from ERA5-Land, GLEAM version 3, SoMo.ml, Noah-LSM, and a simulation from the Community Land Model version 5 (CLM-TRENDY) are utilized.
Our findings indicate that the duration of onsets and terminations depends on the dataset: the five soil moisture datasets exhibit different mean duration of onsets and terminations, with ERA5-Land showing shorter and GLEAM longer duration across Europe. Nevertheless, within the same dataset, onsets and terminations exhibit similar durations, implying that onsets and terminations can occur at the same speed. Regarding the preferred seasons for onsets and terminations, onsets occur more during the wet seasons, specifically summer in CEU and autumn and winter in MED. Nevertheless, the frequencies of occurrence during these seasons only slightly exceed that during other seasons. Terminations tend to occur more during the driest seasons. For atmospheric circulation, onsets come with large-scale anticyclonic atmospheric circulation patterns. Terminations do not exhibit a dominant mean circulation pattern over the region where terminations occur but instead show geopotential height anomalies with reduced magnitudes in Europe and a high-pressure system over the North Atlantic. The anticyclonic circulation during onsets is anomalously persistent and shows linkages with the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). Positive NAO occurs much more frequently during onsets compared to other drought phases. This finding implies an important role for this large-scale mode of variability in initiating dry periods by reducing soil moisture and its potential to serve as an early warning for droughts during the period prior to the events.
- Preprint
(20450 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(29316 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-252', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Feb 2024
General remarks
In this study, the durations of soil moisture drought onsets and terminations in Europe are investigated in terms of their dependence on precipitation sums, evapotranspiration rates and atmospheric drivers. For this purpose, five different soil moisture datasets are analyzed for the two sub-regions central Europe and Mediterranean Europe, over the period 1980-2020. Results show that onsets and terminations of droughts have comparable durations in each soil moisture dataset. Onsets occur mainly during the wet seasons, while terminations mainly occur during the dry seasons. However, differences between the five soil moisture datasets are quite large, highlighting the dependency of the durations on the different atmospheric forcings and the impact of the Land Surface Model used to produce these datasets.
The manuscript is clearly structured and its topic fits to the scope of NHESS. However, there are some issues which need to be addressed by the authors before the manuscript is ready for publication.
Major Comments
- The manuscript describes the different factors influencing onsets and terminations of droughts (precipitation and evapotranspiration) and how they differ between the datasets. However, there is almost no discussion of how exactly these differences in the precipitation and evapotranspiration lead to the differences in drought onsets and terminations in the datasets. I think a figure analogous to 7a and 7b for evapotranspiration would help to better understand the differences in the datasets. One would see how the water balances in the respective models look like in the onset and termination seasons and conclusions can be drawn about which processes are important for the duration of the onsets and terminations and which are not.
- The description of the influence of the NAO on onsets and terminations of droughts is confusing. Positive and negative NAO phases have different effects in northern and southern Europe at different times of the year. In winter, a negative NAO means warm and humid conditions in central and northern Europe, but at the same time cold and dry conditions in southern Europe. With a negative NAO, the opposite is the case. In summer, on the other hand, a positive NAO results in warm and dry conditions in northern and central Europe, but cold and humid conditions in southern Europe. One can link a positive NAO in summer in northern Europe with anticyclonic conditions, but not in winter. I think this needs to be made clearer here. It sounds as if a positive NAO is always associated with anticyclonic conditions. This is the case for the drought onsets in summer in CEU, but does not apply the other way around. Since the NAO is particularly important in winter, a positive NAO is generally associated with strong westerlies. This potential confusion in the manuscript should be avoided, by clearly indicating which region, which season and which NAO phase is meant.
- The Discussion section is not really a discussion. It is just a summary of the results and some conclusions are drawn. I think that this manuscript needs a more detailed discussion of the results, setting the results of this study in context to the studies mentioned in the introduction. Where do the results agree with other studies, what is new?
Minor Comments
Line 101-103: This sentence is almost exactly repeated at the beginning of chapter 2. Delete one of them.
Line 469-470: Why is influence of NAO on soil moisture droughts low? There is a strong positive correlation. Positive NAO, positive soil moisture anomaly. Isn’t this the reason why onsets occur rarely during DJF. So NAO has a strong impact on the onset development in preventing it.
Line 482: positive NAO = weakening of westerlies -> In CEU in summer, should be mentioned
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-252-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Woon Mi Kim, 17 Mar 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-252', Anonymous Referee #2, 22 May 2024
The investigation of drought periods, their beginning, end and duration is interesting. Dividing the study area into several sections for analysis is a good idea. However, several improvements are needed in each section of the manuscript. Therefore, I reject the manuscript at this stage.
The introduction lacks a thorough review of the literature on droughts, their processes and the relationship with the NAO in Europe. Important publications for Europe are also not mentioned. The author mentions droughts in India that are related to ENSO. But that is a completely different area with a different climate. It does not fall within the scope here.
In the methods, I find no reference to how the data sets with different grid sizes are made comparable. This is an important point. The difference in results could be due to this very difference.
The relationship between droughts and the NAO is not very strong. The start and end of a drought could also be more of a local phenomenon.
A U-test to complement the t-test might be more appropriate.
The results section needs to be restructured to improve readability.
The discussion section lacks a thorough discussion of the underlying processes based on previous findings. Also, convincing arguments for the link with the NAO are missing.Many sentences are too general and lack a quantitative measure.
The English language is in great need of improvement.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-252-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Woon Mi Kim, 18 Jun 2024
Response to the reviewer 2
We would like to thank the reviewer for his/her comments and appreciate the time he/she dedicated to reviewing our manuscript. In the supplement, we provide our responses to the reviewer's comments.
Sincerely,
Woon Mi Kim on behalf of all authors
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Woon Mi Kim, 18 Jun 2024
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-252', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Feb 2024
General remarks
In this study, the durations of soil moisture drought onsets and terminations in Europe are investigated in terms of their dependence on precipitation sums, evapotranspiration rates and atmospheric drivers. For this purpose, five different soil moisture datasets are analyzed for the two sub-regions central Europe and Mediterranean Europe, over the period 1980-2020. Results show that onsets and terminations of droughts have comparable durations in each soil moisture dataset. Onsets occur mainly during the wet seasons, while terminations mainly occur during the dry seasons. However, differences between the five soil moisture datasets are quite large, highlighting the dependency of the durations on the different atmospheric forcings and the impact of the Land Surface Model used to produce these datasets.
The manuscript is clearly structured and its topic fits to the scope of NHESS. However, there are some issues which need to be addressed by the authors before the manuscript is ready for publication.
Major Comments
- The manuscript describes the different factors influencing onsets and terminations of droughts (precipitation and evapotranspiration) and how they differ between the datasets. However, there is almost no discussion of how exactly these differences in the precipitation and evapotranspiration lead to the differences in drought onsets and terminations in the datasets. I think a figure analogous to 7a and 7b for evapotranspiration would help to better understand the differences in the datasets. One would see how the water balances in the respective models look like in the onset and termination seasons and conclusions can be drawn about which processes are important for the duration of the onsets and terminations and which are not.
- The description of the influence of the NAO on onsets and terminations of droughts is confusing. Positive and negative NAO phases have different effects in northern and southern Europe at different times of the year. In winter, a negative NAO means warm and humid conditions in central and northern Europe, but at the same time cold and dry conditions in southern Europe. With a negative NAO, the opposite is the case. In summer, on the other hand, a positive NAO results in warm and dry conditions in northern and central Europe, but cold and humid conditions in southern Europe. One can link a positive NAO in summer in northern Europe with anticyclonic conditions, but not in winter. I think this needs to be made clearer here. It sounds as if a positive NAO is always associated with anticyclonic conditions. This is the case for the drought onsets in summer in CEU, but does not apply the other way around. Since the NAO is particularly important in winter, a positive NAO is generally associated with strong westerlies. This potential confusion in the manuscript should be avoided, by clearly indicating which region, which season and which NAO phase is meant.
- The Discussion section is not really a discussion. It is just a summary of the results and some conclusions are drawn. I think that this manuscript needs a more detailed discussion of the results, setting the results of this study in context to the studies mentioned in the introduction. Where do the results agree with other studies, what is new?
Minor Comments
Line 101-103: This sentence is almost exactly repeated at the beginning of chapter 2. Delete one of them.
Line 469-470: Why is influence of NAO on soil moisture droughts low? There is a strong positive correlation. Positive NAO, positive soil moisture anomaly. Isn’t this the reason why onsets occur rarely during DJF. So NAO has a strong impact on the onset development in preventing it.
Line 482: positive NAO = weakening of westerlies -> In CEU in summer, should be mentioned
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-252-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Woon Mi Kim, 17 Mar 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-252', Anonymous Referee #2, 22 May 2024
The investigation of drought periods, their beginning, end and duration is interesting. Dividing the study area into several sections for analysis is a good idea. However, several improvements are needed in each section of the manuscript. Therefore, I reject the manuscript at this stage.
The introduction lacks a thorough review of the literature on droughts, their processes and the relationship with the NAO in Europe. Important publications for Europe are also not mentioned. The author mentions droughts in India that are related to ENSO. But that is a completely different area with a different climate. It does not fall within the scope here.
In the methods, I find no reference to how the data sets with different grid sizes are made comparable. This is an important point. The difference in results could be due to this very difference.
The relationship between droughts and the NAO is not very strong. The start and end of a drought could also be more of a local phenomenon.
A U-test to complement the t-test might be more appropriate.
The results section needs to be restructured to improve readability.
The discussion section lacks a thorough discussion of the underlying processes based on previous findings. Also, convincing arguments for the link with the NAO are missing.Many sentences are too general and lack a quantitative measure.
The English language is in great need of improvement.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-252-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Woon Mi Kim, 18 Jun 2024
Response to the reviewer 2
We would like to thank the reviewer for his/her comments and appreciate the time he/she dedicated to reviewing our manuscript. In the supplement, we provide our responses to the reviewer's comments.
Sincerely,
Woon Mi Kim on behalf of all authors
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Woon Mi Kim, 18 Jun 2024
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
329 | 92 | 29 | 450 | 62 | 21 | 21 |
- HTML: 329
- PDF: 92
- XML: 29
- Total: 450
- Supplement: 62
- BibTeX: 21
- EndNote: 21
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1