the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Southwestward propagating quasi-biweekly oscillations over the South-West Indian Ocean during boreal winter: Characteristics and propagation mechanism
Abstract. An analysis of outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) and winds over the South-West Indian Ocean (SWIO) yields regular, poleward propagating, large-scale, convectively coupled systems of alternating cyclonic and anticyclonic circulation with a quasi-biweekly period during boreal winter. Composites from 30 years (1980/81–2009/10) of OLR and reanalysis data show well-formed rotational gyres in the lower troposphere (700 hPa) that can be tracked from near the equator to almost 30° S appearing west of Sumatra and propagating towards Madagascar, i.e., with mean southwest propagation. The gyres show a marked northwest-southeast tilt, giving rise to a northeast-southwest oriented wavetrain. The scale of the gyres is about 30°–35°, their period is 14–18 days and they have a westward phase speed of approximately 3.5 ms-1. The group velocity of these wave packets is near-zero. In early stages, the gyres are associated with weak convection, but when they move poleward and cross 10° S, convective coupling is enhanced. Velocity fields and OLR indicate that the maxima of moist convective activity lies in the eastern sector of the gyres and a comparison between column-integrated moisture and OLR anomalies shows they are highly collocated, indicating the applicability of the moisture mode framework. A moisture budget reveals that once the gyres reach 10°–20° S, moistening is mainly due to northerlies in the eastern sector of the cyclonic gyre acting on the meridional gradient of background moisture, which eventually gives rise to anomalous convection in this region. This moistening process continues up to 30° S while the gyres traverse southwestward. Subsequently, background easterlies advect anomalous moisture and along with moistening via so-called 'column-processes', convection is observed to extend inside the gyre from the eastern side. A vorticity budget reveals that the β effect plays a leading role in the south-westward propagation, horizontal advection assists the westward movement of vorticity anomalies due to prevailing easterlies and moist coupling (via stretching) is important in reducing the speed of propagation of this mode. In fact, the relatively slow southwestward movement of the system is because moist coupling reduces the effect of β and horizontal advection terms. Moreover, as convection primarily takes place on the eastern side of the vortex, and somewhat inside the vortex too, it also follows a southwestward path along with the QBWO vortices.
- Preprint
(6763 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2391', Anonymous Referee #1, 23 Aug 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2391', Anonymous Referee #2, 14 Sep 2024
Based on the observation and reanalysis datasets, this study found a southwestern-propagating QBWO mode over the Southwest Indian Ocean characterized by the coupled convection and circulation anomalies, which have a typical period of 14-18 days and westward phase speed of approximately 3.5 m/s. A vorticity budget analysis reveals that the beta effect plays a leading role in southwestward propagation, while the moisture mode is essential in reducing the speed of propagation of the QBWO by acting against the beta effect of the vortex. The results are interesting and reliable. This paper is well-written and organized. Nevertheless, some improvements can still be made to improve the quality and clarity of the paper. I recommend a major revision for this round.
Comments:
- The author did not provide any power spectrum analysis but directly used a 10-25-day window to filter variables. If a more common 10-20 days filtering window is used, will it affect the results? If the authors want to validate the necessity of a 10-25-day window, it is recommended to add power spectrum analysis.
- It is suggested that when analyzing moisture mode and vorticity dynamics, a profile section along the QBWO propagation path can be made, and then the evolution of different terms against time can be directly analyzed. This can avoid situations like Figures 5-7, which only present a one-day distribution.
- Horizontal moisture advection (Eq. 5): Horizontal advection includes two components, zonal and meridional advection. Typically, zonal advection guides QBWO to propagate westward, while meridional advection leads QBWO to propagate northward/southward. The author should further decompose the specific roles of these two components. In addition, time scales lower than 10 days should also be included to explore some scale interactions with synoptic waves.
- L352-L354: As shown in Figure 7e, the relative vorticity has a quasi-barotropic structure, so the vorticity integration from 1000hPa to at least 300hPa is suggested. Why did the authors choose the levels between 850hPa and 500hPa that have the strongest moisture signals to integrate vorticity? Is there a significant correlation or direct causal relationship between vorticity and moisture at these pressure levels?
Minors:
- Figure 2: I suggest to add the propagation path indicators for convection and low-level circulation.
- Figure 3b: Only the positive V-wind anomalies have complete westward movement characteristics from 75E to 30E, while the negative ones before and after that are more like the standing waves and stop moving westward when reaching 50E. This may be attributed to the averaged latitude band (5-25S).
- Figure 4 caption: The overlaid wind is at 850hPa or 700hPa. Why is it a different level from Figure 2?
- L129: discussion ‘ans’ conclusion à ‘and’
- L180: northeast-southwest –> northwest-southeast?
- L198: the low level (700hPa) circulations?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2391-RC2 - AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Sambrita Ghatak, 28 Feb 2025
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2391', Anonymous Referee #1, 23 Aug 2024
Recommendation: Major revision
The authors do a comprehensive study on the dynamics of quasi-biweekly oscillations (QBWO) over the southern Indian Ocean. They find that moisture is central to their dynamics, and the beta effect critical to its propagation. The results here further support the notion that moisture is important to understand tropical dynamics, and I welcome this type of contribution. My main concern with the paper is that it is long and windy. The authors spend a significant amount of time describing the figures and the literature, often at the expense of getting to the point. I think the paper will benefit substantially from some thinning. Because of this I recommend major revisions. Below are my recommendations for the authors to consider.
- Introduction is too long. With the exception of the last paragraph, the second half of the introduction (lines 90-124) do not add much to the context of the paper. The first few pagraphs motivate the paper, but then we go to talk about QBWO and its impacts. I think all these things can be summarized in a few sentences in the first two paragraphs, and once the discussion about how moisture mode theory may apply to QBWO then the authors can motivate the study and move to the next section. So much discussion here is not necessary.
- Figure 2 contains 12 panels showing the daily evolution of the QBWO. Yet the system doesn’t change all that much from day to day. Showing panels every other day can make this figure look less cluttered.
- From the discussion, it seems like you don’t need to show both Figs. 5 and 6. Just focus on one of them. A summary figure like Fig. 9 of Mayta and Adames Corraliza (cited by the authors) can inform other days.
- Figure 7 might need to be split. Panels a-d all show the moisture budget. However, in panels ( e) and (f) it might be more useful to show the moisture anomalies rather than the tendency as it is more in line with what the authors discuss in the text.
- 8 and 9: Same comment as figs. 5 and 6.
- 11-13: Only need to show one. Can show a summary plot like I mentioned above for Figs 5 and 6.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2391-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2391', Anonymous Referee #2, 14 Sep 2024
Based on the observation and reanalysis datasets, this study found a southwestern-propagating QBWO mode over the Southwest Indian Ocean characterized by the coupled convection and circulation anomalies, which have a typical period of 14-18 days and westward phase speed of approximately 3.5 m/s. A vorticity budget analysis reveals that the beta effect plays a leading role in southwestward propagation, while the moisture mode is essential in reducing the speed of propagation of the QBWO by acting against the beta effect of the vortex. The results are interesting and reliable. This paper is well-written and organized. Nevertheless, some improvements can still be made to improve the quality and clarity of the paper. I recommend a major revision for this round.
Comments:
- The author did not provide any power spectrum analysis but directly used a 10-25-day window to filter variables. If a more common 10-20 days filtering window is used, will it affect the results? If the authors want to validate the necessity of a 10-25-day window, it is recommended to add power spectrum analysis.
- It is suggested that when analyzing moisture mode and vorticity dynamics, a profile section along the QBWO propagation path can be made, and then the evolution of different terms against time can be directly analyzed. This can avoid situations like Figures 5-7, which only present a one-day distribution.
- Horizontal moisture advection (Eq. 5): Horizontal advection includes two components, zonal and meridional advection. Typically, zonal advection guides QBWO to propagate westward, while meridional advection leads QBWO to propagate northward/southward. The author should further decompose the specific roles of these two components. In addition, time scales lower than 10 days should also be included to explore some scale interactions with synoptic waves.
- L352-L354: As shown in Figure 7e, the relative vorticity has a quasi-barotropic structure, so the vorticity integration from 1000hPa to at least 300hPa is suggested. Why did the authors choose the levels between 850hPa and 500hPa that have the strongest moisture signals to integrate vorticity? Is there a significant correlation or direct causal relationship between vorticity and moisture at these pressure levels?
Minors:
- Figure 2: I suggest to add the propagation path indicators for convection and low-level circulation.
- Figure 3b: Only the positive V-wind anomalies have complete westward movement characteristics from 75E to 30E, while the negative ones before and after that are more like the standing waves and stop moving westward when reaching 50E. This may be attributed to the averaged latitude band (5-25S).
- Figure 4 caption: The overlaid wind is at 850hPa or 700hPa. Why is it a different level from Figure 2?
- L129: discussion ‘ans’ conclusion à ‘and’
- L180: northeast-southwest –> northwest-southeast?
- L198: the low level (700hPa) circulations?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2391-RC2 - AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Sambrita Ghatak, 28 Feb 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
284 | 87 | 22 | 393 | 22 | 50 |
- HTML: 284
- PDF: 87
- XML: 22
- Total: 393
- BibTeX: 22
- EndNote: 50
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Recommendation: Major revision
The authors do a comprehensive study on the dynamics of quasi-biweekly oscillations (QBWO) over the southern Indian Ocean. They find that moisture is central to their dynamics, and the beta effect critical to its propagation. The results here further support the notion that moisture is important to understand tropical dynamics, and I welcome this type of contribution. My main concern with the paper is that it is long and windy. The authors spend a significant amount of time describing the figures and the literature, often at the expense of getting to the point. I think the paper will benefit substantially from some thinning. Because of this I recommend major revisions. Below are my recommendations for the authors to consider.