https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2302
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2302
| 31 Jul 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

# Selecting allometric equations to estimate forest biomass from plot- rather than individual-level predictive performance

Nicolas Picard, Noël Fonton, Faustin Boyemba Bosela, Adeline Fayolle, Joël Loumeto, Gabriel Ngua Ayecaba, Bonaventure Sonké, Olga Diane Yongo Bombo, Hervé Martial Maïdou, and Alfred Ngomanda

Abstract. In a context of global change, it is essential to quantify and monitor the carbon stored in forests. Allometric equations are mathematical models that predict the biomass of a tree from dendrometrical characteristics that are easier to measure, such as tree diameter, height or wood density. Various model forms have been proposed for allometric equations. Moreover, the model choice has a critical influence on the estimate of the biomass of a forest. So far, model selection for allometric equations has been performed based on the tree-level predictive performance of the models. Yet, allometric equations are used to estimate the biomass of plots rather than individual trees. The distribution of trees sampled for establishing allometric equations often differs from the forest structure. Moreover, at the plot-level, the residual individual errors for different trees can cancel off. Therefore, we expect the plot-level predictive performance of a model to differ from its tree-level performance. Using a dataset giving the observed biomass of 844 trees in central Africa and a null model for the size distribution of trees in the forest, we simulated forest plots between 0.1 and 50 ha in area. Then, using a Monte Carlo approach, we calculated the mean sum of squares (MSS) of the differences between observed and predicted plot biomass. We showed that MSS could be well approximated by a three-term formula, where the first term corresponded to bias, the second one to the tree residual error, and the third one to the uncertainty on model coefficients. For small plots (≤ 0.1 ha), the plot-level predictive performance was dominated by the tree residual error term. Model selection based on plot-level predictive performance was then consistent with that based on tree-level performance. For large plots, this term vanished. Model selection based on plot-level performance could then differ from that based on tree-level performance. In the case of large plots, chains of models that combined a general equation to predict biomass and local equations to predicts some of the predictors of the biomass equation could provide a good trade-off between the bias and the uncertainty on model coefficients. We recommend using plot-level rather than tree-level predictive performance to select allometric equations. The three-term formula that we developed provides an easy way to assess the effect of plot size on model selection and to balance the respective contributions of bias, tree residual error, and the uncertainty on model coefficients.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Nicolas Picard, Noël Fonton, Faustin Boyemba Bosela, Adeline Fayolle, Joël Loumeto, Gabriel Ngua Ayecaba, Bonaventure Sonké, Olga Diane Yongo Bombo, Hervé Martial Maïdou, and Alfred Ngomanda

Status: open (until 15 Sep 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Nicolas Picard, Noël Fonton, Faustin Boyemba Bosela, Adeline Fayolle, Joël Loumeto, Gabriel Ngua Ayecaba, Bonaventure Sonké, Olga Diane Yongo Bombo, Hervé Martial Maïdou, and Alfred Ngomanda
Nicolas Picard, Noël Fonton, Faustin Boyemba Bosela, Adeline Fayolle, Joël Loumeto, Gabriel Ngua Ayecaba, Bonaventure Sonké, Olga Diane Yongo Bombo, Hervé Martial Maïdou, and Alfred Ngomanda

## Viewed

Total article views: 132 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
82 43 7 132 3 3
• HTML: 82
• PDF: 43
• XML: 7
• Total: 132
• BibTeX: 3
• EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 31 Jul 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 31 Jul 2024)

## Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 170 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 170 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
• 1
1

Latest update: 14 Aug 2024