the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Transformations in Exposure to Debris Flows in Post-Earthquake Sichuan, China
Abstract. Post-earthquake debris flows can exceed volumes of 1 x 106m3 and pose significant challenges to downslope recovery zones. These stochastic hazards form when intense rain remobilises coseismic landslide material. We investigate the relationship between changing exposure and hazard of post-2008 debris flows in three gullies in Sichuan province, China. These were selected based on the number of post-earthquake check dams – Cutou (2), Chediguan (2) and Xiaojia (none). Using high resolution satellite images, we developed a multitemporal building inventory from 2005 to 2019, comparing it to spatial distribution of previous debris flows and future modelled events. Post-earthquake urban development in Cutou and Chediguan increased exposure to a major debris flow in 2019 with inundation impacting 40 % and 7 % of surveyed structures respectively. We simulated future debris flow runouts using LAHARZ to investigate the role of check dams in mitigating three flow volumes – 104m3 (low), 105m3 (high) and 106m3 (extreme). Our simulations show check dams effectively mitigate exposure to low and high flow events but prove ineffective for extreme events with 59 % of buildings in Cutou, 22 % in Chediguan and 33 % in Xiaojia significantly affected. We verified our analyses through employing a statistical exposure model, adapted from a social vulnerability equation. Cutou's exposure increased by 64 % in 2019, Chediguan's by 52 % whilst only 2 % for Xiaojia in 2011, highlighting that extensive grey infrastructure correlates with higher exposure to extreme debris flows, but less so to smaller events. Our work suggests the presence of check dams increases the perception of exposure reduction downstream, however, ultimately produces a levee effect that raises exposure to large events.
- Preprint
(1460 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2277', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Dec 2024
This paper focuses on the changes in debris flow risk exposure in Sichuan following the Wenchuan earthquake, presenting significant scientific value and practical applications. By utilizing multi-temporal satellite data, simulation tools, and an exposure model, the study thoroughly investigates the risk mitigation effectiveness of check dams and their potential "levee effect" on disaster exposure. The manuscript is almost well structured and written. However, some minor issues should be addressed before publication in NHESS.
Specific comments are as follows:
1. Lines 143-226: The methodology section should include the rationale for the selection of model parameters and provide a sensitivity analysis to enhance the credibility of the model results.
2. Could authors further explain how the "levee effect" influence exposure of large-scale debris flow events?
3. Expand the analysis of the Xiaojia area to explore the specific reasons for its low exposure changes, such as natural terrain barriers, land-use planning, or building quality.
4. The introduction and conclusion sections should better align with the research objectives.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2277-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Isabelle Utley, 18 Jan 2025
We would like to thank the reviewer for their insightful and constructive comments on our manuscript. The reviewer has highlighted several areas of the manuscript that required clarification, particularly regarding the explanation of the levee effect and the implementation of methodological parameters. In response to these suggestions, we have significantly expanded the methods section and added two new paragraphs to provide a clearer explanation of these analyses. Additionally, we have added a dedicated paragraph to explain the levee effect and adjusted the introduction and conclusion to ensure better alignment with our research objectives and improve overall clarity. We provide specific responses to each of the reviewer’s comments in the attached pdf.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Isabelle Utley, 18 Jan 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2277', Omar F. Althuwaynee, 15 Dec 2024
The presented problem statement is interesting to shed more light on the significance of engineering solution, and the authors had the chance to drive forward using the available inventories. However, I found that the manuscript prepared in narrative style rather than bring more technical details about the processing and research modeling hypothesis.
For instance:
- Line 217 The facility value and related parameters selection were overlooked, and that increase the vagueness of application process in case the reader was interesting in similar application design.
- The justification of using -1 to +2 as unit of measure to be inserted and its quantification relationship to vulnerability value is missing.
- LAHARZ simulation, data processing, assumption and technical details were missing
- Fig.7 and the amount of buildings,types, and degree of vulnerability in term of economical or physical were missing
- Maps and figures are very simple and the conclusion was almost predicable, as I am still looking for scientific argument and proves that may increase the credibility of research contribution.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2277-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Isabelle Utley, 18 Jan 2025
We want to thank the reviewer for their helpful comments. The reviewer has raised important points regarding the explanation of the LAHARZ model, the parameterisation of exposure analysis, and the presentation of vulnerability data. In response, we have expanded several sections of the manuscript and edited Figure 7 to include additional details on building numbers and vulnerability levels. We have also worked to align our research objectives more clearly with our scientific arguments. We provide specific responses to each of the reviewer’s comments in the attached pdf.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Isabelle Utley, 18 Jan 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
219 | 64 | 93 | 376 | 5 | 3 |
- HTML: 219
- PDF: 64
- XML: 93
- Total: 376
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 3
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1