the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
New submodel for emissions from Explosive Volcanic ERuptions (EVER v1.1) within the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy, version 2.55.1)
Abstract. We present a methodological study to document the operation of a new submodel for tracer emissions from Explosive Volcanic ERuptions (EVER v1.1), developed within the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy, version 2.55.1). EVER calculates additional tendencies of gaseous and aerosol tracers based on volcanic emission source parameters, aligned to specific sequences of volcanic eruptions. It allows for the mapping of size-resolved volcanic ash to number and mass of different size modes, and the employment of various vertical emission profiles. The new submodel is evaluated in atmospheric simulations with the ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Model (EMAC) coupling the general circulation model ECHAM5 to EVER and other MESSy submodels, using satellite observations of SO2 column amounts and mixing ratios as well as aerosol optical properties following the explosive eruption of the Nabro volcano (Eritrea) in 2011. Sensitivity studies explore perturbations of the emission source parameters, such as plume location, emitted mass, plume altitude, vertical distribution, and timing of the emission. We integrate information from a volcanic SO2 emission inventory, additional satellite observations, and our findings from the sensitivity studies to establish a historical standard setup for volcanic eruptions impacting stratospheric SO2 from 1990 to 2023. We advocate for this to be a standardized setup in all simulations within the MESSy framework concentrating on the upper troposphere and stratosphere in this period. Additionally, we demonstrate the applicability of the new submodel for the simulation of degassing volcanoes, with further potential applications in studies on volcanic ash, wildfires, solar geoengineering, and atmospheric transport processes.
- Preprint
(2986 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(734 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2200', Juan Antonio Añel, 29 Oct 2024
Dear authors,
We have checked your manuscript for compliance with our code policy. I would like to ask you to publish Ever v1.1 openly. Currently, it is deposited in a Zenodo repository, but with restricted access. It is my interpretation that newly developed submodels do not suffer of the problems of code inheritance, and therefore licensing, that prevent you of sharing the full MESSy model. Therefore, please, publish Ever v1.1 without restrictions, or reply to this comment with the reasoning that prevents you of doing it, to assess if we can grant you an exception to our code policy.
Please, answer this request as soon as possible. To clarify if your submitted manuscript is in compliance or not with our policy in its current form is a matter of some urgency.
Regards,
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2200-CEC1 -
CC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Patrick Jöckel, 31 Oct 2024
Dear Juan,
first of all, thank you very much for your initiative to push us making our code available.
To avoid any misunderstanding: The zip file that we deposited at ZENODO (with the cited doi) contains the complete source code of the model system, as it has been used to obtain the results presented in the manuscript. This is, as far as I understand, the most important prerequisite for publishing in GMD(D), since it guarantees the reproducibility of the results, and the possibility to inspect the code at any time later. The results described in the manuscript could not be obtained with the EVER submodel alone, but the source code of the ECHAM model (which is still under a non-open-source licence) is also required. Therefore, we do not see any point in providing parts of our source code, which can neither be compiled nor run. And opening the deposited zip-file on ZENODO is not an option, since the legacy code, which is subject to a restricted licence is also contained.
But there is another, maybe even more important reason, why we do not see us in a position to open parts of our code immediately now: we are currently working very hard on preparing a release of our source code under an open source licence, we even try to find ways to include the "restricted" legacy code. This activity requires a lot of negotiations and finding solutions for a lot of legal issues. With more than 15 institutions involved (of which affiliated co-workers contributed over time to the code base) this is a huge effort which takes time. At the moment, we could not even decide which licence we do want to give the code, which one is appropriate and possible. This also depends on what the legacy code licenser will potentially allow. Thus, if we would release EVER just now, we would need to decide immediately on an open source licence for it, and such a decision might have severe consequences on the further process of an open source release of MESSy. And that is why we are more than hesitating to "just provide the code" now. With any hasty action on this, we could endanger our entire open source release process.
Yours,
Patrick Jöckel (in my role as speaker of the MESSy consortium)
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2200-CC1 -
CEC2: 'Reply on CC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 11 Dec 2024
Dear Patrick,
Thanks for providing this clarification, and for the willingness to comply with our policy. We can accept your explanations and consider the manuscript in compliance with the policy of the journal.
Juan A. Añel
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2200-CEC2
-
CEC2: 'Reply on CC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 11 Dec 2024
-
CC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Patrick Jöckel, 31 Oct 2024
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2200', Sandro Vattioni, 02 Dec 2024
Dear authors,
Please find my review in the pdf attached.
Best,
Sandro Vattioni-
AC1: 'Initial reply on RC1', Matthias Kohl, 10 Dec 2024
Dear Sandro Vattioni,
we thank you for your detailed and constructive feedback. As we do not agree on the overall evaluation, we provide an answer to the general comments attached, and will provide a complete reply including the detailed comments after the discussion phase has concluded.
Best regards,
Matthias Kohl (on behalf of all authors)
-
AC1: 'Initial reply on RC1', Matthias Kohl, 10 Dec 2024
- RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2200', Anonymous Referee #2, 12 Dec 2024
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
324 | 111 | 91 | 526 | 35 | 5 | 6 |
- HTML: 324
- PDF: 111
- XML: 91
- Total: 526
- Supplement: 35
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1