Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2060
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2060
31 Jul 2024
 | 31 Jul 2024

Assessing the sensitivity of the Vanderford Glacier, East Antarctica, to basal melt and calving

Lawrence A. Bird, Felicity S. McCormack, Johanna Beckmann, Richard S. Jones, and Andrew N. Mackintosh

Abstract. Vanderford Glacier is the fastest retreating glacier in East Antarctica; however, the dominant driver of the observed grounding line retreat remains largely unknown. The presence of warm modified Circumpolar Deep Water offshore Vanderford Glacier suggests that grounding line retreat may be driven by ice shelf basal melt, similar to the neighbouring Totten Glacier. Here, we use an ice sheet model to assess the relative contributions of basal melt and calving to mass loss and grounding line retreat at Vanderford Glacier. We compare simulations forced both by satellite-derived estimates of basal melt and calving, and varying magnitude idealised basal melt and ice-front retreat. Observed basal melt rates are too low to drive grounding line migration; instead, basal melt rates in excess of 50 m yr−1 at the grounding line are required to generate grounding line retreat similar to observations. By contrast, calving experiments suggest that > 80 % ice-front retreat – well in excess of the observed ice-front retreat since 1996 – needs to occur to generate grounding line retreat similar to observations. Our results suggest that grounding line retreat and dynamic mass loss at Vanderford Glacier is likely to be dominated by basal melt, with an almost negligible contribution from calving. However, basal melt rates that generate grounding line retreat in our idealised experiments are twice the current estimates, highlighting the need for improved constraints on basal melting in the Vincennes Bay region.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of The Cryosphere.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

03 Mar 2025
Assessing the sensitivity of the Vanderford Glacier, East Antarctica, to basal melt and calving
Lawrence A. Bird, Felicity S. McCormack, Johanna Beckmann, Richard S. Jones, and Andrew N. Mackintosh
The Cryosphere, 19, 955–973, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-955-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-955-2025, 2025
Short summary
Lawrence A. Bird, Felicity S. McCormack, Johanna Beckmann, Richard S. Jones, and Andrew N. Mackintosh

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2060', Benjamin Getraer, 21 Sep 2024
    • RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Benjamin Getraer, 21 Sep 2024
      • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Lawrence Bird, 05 Nov 2024
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Lawrence Bird, 05 Nov 2024
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2060', Tyler Pelle, 09 Oct 2024
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC3', Lawrence Bird, 05 Nov 2024

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2060', Benjamin Getraer, 21 Sep 2024
    • RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Benjamin Getraer, 21 Sep 2024
      • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Lawrence Bird, 05 Nov 2024
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Lawrence Bird, 05 Nov 2024
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2060', Tyler Pelle, 09 Oct 2024
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC3', Lawrence Bird, 05 Nov 2024

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (10 Nov 2024) by Gong Cheng
AR by Lawrence Bird on behalf of the Authors (15 Nov 2024)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (15 Nov 2024) by Gong Cheng
RR by Tyler Pelle (04 Dec 2024)
RR by Benjamin Getraer (23 Dec 2024)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (31 Dec 2024) by Gong Cheng
AR by Lawrence Bird on behalf of the Authors (07 Jan 2025)  Author's response   Manuscript 

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

03 Mar 2025
Assessing the sensitivity of the Vanderford Glacier, East Antarctica, to basal melt and calving
Lawrence A. Bird, Felicity S. McCormack, Johanna Beckmann, Richard S. Jones, and Andrew N. Mackintosh
The Cryosphere, 19, 955–973, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-955-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-955-2025, 2025
Short summary
Lawrence A. Bird, Felicity S. McCormack, Johanna Beckmann, Richard S. Jones, and Andrew N. Mackintosh

Data sets

Supporting Data - Assessing the sensitivity of the Vanderford Glacier, East Antarctica, to basal melt and calving. Lawrence Bird https://doi.org/10.26180/26170102

Lawrence A. Bird, Felicity S. McCormack, Johanna Beckmann, Richard S. Jones, and Andrew N. Mackintosh

Viewed

Total article views: 860 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
347 165 348 860 56 14 12
  • HTML: 347
  • PDF: 165
  • XML: 348
  • Total: 860
  • Supplement: 56
  • BibTeX: 14
  • EndNote: 12
Views and downloads (calculated since 31 Jul 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 31 Jul 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 897 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 897 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 03 Mar 2025
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Vanderford Glacier is the fastest retreating glacier in East Antarctica and may have important implications for future ice loss from the Aurora Subglacial Basin. Our ice sheet model simulations suggest that grounding line retreat is driven by sub-ice shelf basal melting, where warm ocean waters melt ice close the grounding line. We show that current estimates of basal melt are likely too low, highlighting the need for improved estimates and direct measurements of basal melt in the region.
Share