Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1962
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1962
30 Oct 2024
 | 30 Oct 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

Moana Ocean Future Climate V1.0: High Resolution Marine Climate Futures For The New Zealand Region

Christopher J. Roach, Joao Marcos A. C. de Souza, Erik Behrens, and Stephen J. Stuart

Abstract. We have produced a series of 5 km resolution future climate dynamic downscalings for the ocean surrounding New Zealand covering CMIP6 reference conditions; SSP2-4.5 and SSP3-7.0 emissions trajectories. These downscalings combine the Moana Backbone 5 km resolution ROMS configuration with lateral boundary forcing from the 15 km resolution New Zealand Earth System Model (NZESM) and atmospheric forcing from the New Zealand Regional Climate Model 12 km atmospheric model.

We validated our reference period downscaling against the Moana Ocean Hindcast and find reasonable agreement to the west and north of New Zealand, but significant disagreement in the region of the Sub-Tropical Front to the east and southeast of the domain. This disagreement is consistent with known issues with the version of NZESM used as forcing in this study.

We see similar relative rates of increase in Ocean Heat Content in the upper ocean and mode waters all around New Zealand, but in the deeper ocean the rate of warming is stronger in the Tasman Sea and Antarctic Circumpolar Current than in the Sub Tropical Front East of New Zealand. We examine the occurrence of Marine Heat Waves (MHWs) and find that the use of a “fixed" baseline or one that takes into consideration a long-term warming based on the historical period results in important differences in the estimated number of days under MHWs for mid and end-of-the-century scenarios.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Christopher J. Roach, Joao Marcos A. C. de Souza, Erik Behrens, and Stephen J. Stuart

Status: open (until 29 Dec 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1962 - No compliance with the policy of the journal', Juan Antonio Añel, 04 Dec 2024 reply
    • AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Christopher Roach, 06 Dec 2024 reply
Christopher J. Roach, Joao Marcos A. C. de Souza, Erik Behrens, and Stephen J. Stuart
Christopher J. Roach, Joao Marcos A. C. de Souza, Erik Behrens, and Stephen J. Stuart

Viewed

Total article views: 245 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
185 51 9 245 2 3
  • HTML: 185
  • PDF: 51
  • XML: 9
  • Total: 245
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 Oct 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 Oct 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 233 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 233 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
We have used a 5 km regional ocean model for New Zealand forced with a coarser resolution global model to project changes in under medium and high emissions scenarios. This is necessary since the global model is unable to resolve the small scale processes on the continental shelf which determine climate change may influence fisheries and aquaculture. We see the upper ocean warms at similar rates all around New Zealand, but that the deep ocean shows more rapid warming in the west and south.