the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The roles of surface processes on porphyry copper deposits preservation
Abstract. Porphyry copper deposits typically originate within subduction zones at 2 to 5 km depths. These deposits are exhumed due to the influence of tectonic forces and climate-driven erosion. Porphyry copper deposits are currently only mineable at relatively shallow depths, and their prospectivity relies on a balance between the rate of exhumation and preservation. In this study, we evaluate the impact of surface processes on the preservation or exhumation of porphyry copper deposits. To do so, we rely on a global-scale numerical model (goSPL), which simulates landscape dynamics and associated erosion and deposition patterns over geological time scales. High-resolution Cenozoic simulations incorporate published open-source global paleo-climate and paleo-elevation datasets, and have been fine-tuned using contemporary data. We then calculate exhumation rates by comparing the ages of known porphyry copper deposits and their simulated emplacement depths based on modelled erosion-deposition values. Obtained average exhumation rates vary from 10−2 to 10−1 km/Myr, with an overall difference of 0.04 mm/yr when compared to independent erosion rate estimates available from published studies. The predicted global mean emplacement depths range from 1 to 3 km. To highlight the influence of paleo-reconstructions on exhumation rate estimates, we analyse simulated erosion rates across the Andean region using two distinct paleo-climate models and find significant spatial and temporal differences across the Central Andes. While our landscape evolution model successfully predicts the known emplacement depths for the North and South Andean deposits younger than 20 Myr, it also predicts depths exceeding 6 km for Central Andean deposits older than 60 Myr. We attribute these mismatches to a combination of limitations related to model assumptions and input resolutions. Our results show the intricate connection between deposit preservation and surface processes. Our method offers an addition to the traditional porphyry copper exploration toolkit that links geological observations to plate tectonics dynamics and paleo-climatic reconstructions.
- Preprint
(62063 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1868', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Sep 2024
This is a unique study in which a very special geologic feature (porphyry copper deposit) has been used to test model approaches to quantifying exhumation rates. The results provide insights both to estimates of exhumation rates in different climate regimes and to factors that might control the depth of emplacement of porphyry copper deposits. The authors have provided excellent background informationl on porphyry copper deposits, including factors that control estimates of their depth of emplacement. I cannot comment on the modeling methods used here, but can say that the results of are of considerable interest from the perspective of mineral deposit geology.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1868-RC1 -
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1868', Victor Sacek, 11 Apr 2025
The manuscript presents the use of a sophisticated numerical code of high-resolution global-scale landscape evolution model applied to quantify the preservation or exhumation of porphyry copper deposits (PCDs). With the input from published palo-climate and paleo-elevation data, the authors predicted the exhumation rate by comparing the age of known PCDs and the simulated emplacement depth.
I recommend this article for publication after minor revisions.
I have a few points to discuss about the numerical approach:
i) In equation (1), the term related to the fluvial processes considers the local precipitation P and the upstream total area A. In line 84, the authors define the water flow as the product P times A. However this is only true if the precipitation P is spatially constant.The correct flow discharge should be calculated as the integration of the precipitation in each upstream numerical cell. Therefore, the water flux in one point of the mesh depends on the upstream precipitation and not on the local precipitation.
This is specifically important in the eastern side of the Andean Cordillera where orographic precipitation can create significant lateral variations in precipitation rate. Therefore, I think it is important to discuss more about this in the manuscript, and how the adopted simplification can affect the results.
ii) Please, give some description of how the tectonic forcing was added in the model. Give details of how the U term is calculated to simulate the tectonic correction to reach the dynamic equilibrium. The authors referred to Salles et al. (2023), but I think a short description in the paper can contribute to the understanding of the mathematical procedure adopted in this work.
iii) The paper does not mention any isostatic compensation. Therefore, I assume that the model does not take into account isostasy (local or regional). My question is: how does the vertical displacement of the plate, caused by the load of the cordillera and sedimentary layers in the foreland basins, affect the present results of exhumation rates? The authors briefly commented on this on line 385, discussing about the effect of re-burial, but I think that flexural effects can significant impact the exhumation rate, aspect not explored in the text.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1868-CC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1868', Victor Sacek, 14 Apr 2025
The manuscript presents the use of a sophisticated numerical code of high-resolution global-scale landscape evolution model applied to quantify the preservation or exhumation of porphyry copper deposits (PCDs). With the input from published palo-climate and paleo-elevation data, the authors predicted the exhumation rate by comparing the age of known PCDs and the simulated emplacement depth.
I recommend this article for publication after minor revisions.
I have a few points to discuss about the numerical approach:
i) In equation (1), the term related to the fluvial processes considers the local precipitation P and the upstream total area A. In line 84, the authors define the water flow as the product P times A. However this is only true if the precipitation P is spatially constant.The correct flow discharge should be calculated as the integration of the precipitation in each upstream numerical cell. Therefore, the water flux in one point of the mesh depends on the upstream precipitation and not on the local precipitation.
This is specifically important in the eastern side of the Andean Cordillera where orographic precipitation can create significant lateral variations in precipitation rate. Therefore, I think it is important to discuss more about this in the manuscript, and how the adopted simplification can affect the results.
ii) Please, give some description of how the tectonic forcing was added in the model. Give details of how the U term is calculated to simulate the tectonic correction to reach the dynamic equilibrium. The authors referred to Salles et al. (2023), but I think a short description in the paper can contribute to the understanding of the mathematical procedure adopted in this work.
iii) The paper does not mention any isostatic compensation. Therefore, I assume that the model does not take into account isostasy (local or regional). My question is: how does the vertical displacement of the plate, caused by the load of the cordillera and sedimentary layers in the foreland basins, affect the present results of exhumation rates? The authors briefly commented on this on line 385, discussing about the effect of re-burial, but I think that flexural effects can significant impact the exhumation rate, aspect not explored in the text.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1868-RC2
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
304 | 464 | 29 | 797 | 16 | 17 |
- HTML: 304
- PDF: 464
- XML: 29
- Total: 797
- BibTeX: 16
- EndNote: 17
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1