the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Glacier damage evolution over ice flow timescales
Abstract. The rate of mass loss from the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets is controlled in large part by the processes of ice flow and ice fracture. Studies have shown these processes to be coupled: the development of fractured zones weakens the structural integrity of the ice, reducing ice viscosity and enabling more rapid flow. This coupling may have significant implications for the stability of ice shelves and the rate of flow from grounded ice. However, there are challenges with modeling this process, in large part due to the discrepancy in timescales of fracture and flow processes as well as uncertainty in the construction of the damage evolution model. This leads to uncertainty in how fracture processes can affect ice viscosity and, therefore, projections of future ice mass loss. Here, we develop a damage evolution model that represents fracture initiation and propagation over ice flow timescales, with the goal of representing solely the effect of damage on flow behavior. We then apply this model to quantify the effect of damage on projections of glacier response to climate forcing. We use the MISMIP+ benchmark glacier configuration with Experiment Ice1r, which represents grounding line retreat due to basal melt forcing. In this model configuration, we find that damage can enhance mass loss from grounded and floating ice by ~ 13–29 % in 100 years. The enhancement of mass loss due to damage is approximately of the same order as increasing the basal melt rate by 50 %. We further show the dependence of these results on uncertain model parameters. These results emphasize the importance of further studying the multiscale processes of damage initiation and growth from an experimental and observational standpoint and of incorporating this coupling into large-scale ice sheet models.
- Preprint
(6448 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(8453 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1850', Anonymous Referee #1, 31 Oct 2024
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Meghana Ranganathan, 09 Dec 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-1850/egusphere-2024-1850-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Meghana Ranganathan, 09 Dec 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1850', Anonymous Referee #2, 10 Nov 2024
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Meghana Ranganathan, 09 Dec 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-1850/egusphere-2024-1850-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Meghana Ranganathan, 09 Dec 2024
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
338 | 141 | 19 | 498 | 33 | 8 | 7 |
- HTML: 338
- PDF: 141
- XML: 19
- Total: 498
- Supplement: 33
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1