Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1813
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1813
20 Jun 2024
 | 20 Jun 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

National Weather Service Alaska Sea Ice Program: Gridded ice concentration maps for the Alaskan Arctic

Astrid Pacini, Michael Steele, and Mary-Beth Schreck

Abstract. There are many challenges associated with obtaining high-fidelity sea ice concentration (SIC) information, and products that rely solely on passive microwave measurements often struggle to represent conditions at low concentration, especially within the Marginal Ice Zone and during periods of active melt. Here, we present a new SIC product for the Alaskan Arctic generated by the National Weather Service Alaska Sea Ice Program (hereafter referred to as ASIP) that synthesizes a variety of satellite SIC and in-situ observations from 2007–present. These SIC fields have been primarily used for operational purposes and have not yet been gridded or independently validated. In this study, we first grid the ASIP product into 0.05° resolution in both latitude and longitude. We then perform extensive intercomparison with an international database of ship-based in-situ SIC observations, supplemented with observations from Saildrones. Additionally, an intercomparison between three ice products is performed: (i) ASIP, (ii) a high-resolution passive microwave product (AMSR2), and (iii) an operational product available from the National Snow and Ice Data Center that originates at the National Ice Center (MASIE). This intercomparison demonstrates that all products perform similarly when compared to in-situ observations generally, but ASIP outperforms the other products during periods of active melt and in low SIC regions. Furthermore, we show that the similarity in performance among products is due to the in-situ asset distribution, as most in-situ observations are far from the ice edge in locations where all products agree. We find that the ASIP ice edge is generally farther south than both the AMSR2 and MASIE ice edges, by an average of approximately 55 km in the winter and 175 km in summer for ASIP vs. AMSR2, and 60 km in the winter and 130 km in the summer for ASIP vs. MASIE.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Astrid Pacini, Michael Steele, and Mary-Beth Schreck

Status: open (until 01 Aug 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Astrid Pacini, Michael Steele, and Mary-Beth Schreck
Astrid Pacini, Michael Steele, and Mary-Beth Schreck

Viewed

Total article views: 117 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
74 34 9 117 6 5
  • HTML: 74
  • PDF: 34
  • XML: 9
  • Total: 117
  • BibTeX: 6
  • EndNote: 5
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jun 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jun 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 117 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 117 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
While sea ice concentration data are critically important for climate research, obtaining high-resolution data remains a challenge. Here we present and validate the US National Weather Service Alaska Sea Ice Program ice maps (ASIP). These ice maps are shown to be highly accurate, and when compared against existing datasets, are shown to outperform other products in low concentration regions. Therefore, ASIP data provide an exciting new tool to study ice conditions in the Pacific Arctic.