the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The Impact of Aqueous Phase Replacement Reaction on the Phase State of Internally Mixed Organic/ammonium Aerosols
Abstract. Aerosol phase state is crucial for air quality, climate, and human health. Atmospheric secondary aerosols are often internally mixed with organic and inorganic components, particularly dicarboxylic acids, ammonium, sulfate, nitrate, and chloride. These complex compositions enable aqueous reaction between organic and inorganic species, significantly complicating aerosol phase behaviour during aging and making phase predictions challenging. We investigated carboxylate/ammonium salt mixtures using in-situ infrared spectroscopy. The di- and tri- carboxylates included sodium pyruvate (SP), sodium tartrate (ST), and sodium citrate (SC), while the ammonium salts included NH4NO3, NH4Cl, and (NH4)2SO4. Our results demonstrated that aqueous replacement reactions between carboxylates and ammonium salts was promoted by the formation and depletion of NH3 as relative humidity (RH) changed. Solid NaNO3, SP, and Na2SO4 formed in SP/ammonium aerosol at 35.7 %~12.7 %, 64 % and 65.5 %~60.1 % RH, respectively. In contrast, reactions between ST or SC and (NH4)2SO4 was incomplete due to the gel structure of SC or ST at low RH. Upon hydration, the deliquescence RH of Na2SO4 in SP/(NH4)2SO4 (88.8 %–95.2 %) and NaNO3 in SP/NH4NO3 (76.5–81.9 %) are higher than those of pure inorganic aerosols. Unexpectedly, aqueous Na2SO4 crystallized upon humidification in ST/(NH4)2SO4 particles at 43.6 % RH and then deliquesced with increasing RH. This is attributed to decreased viscosity and increased ion mobility, which overcome the kinetic inhibition of ion movement, leading to nucleation and growth of Na2SO4 crystal. Our findings highlight the intricate interplay between chemical components within organic/inorganic aerosol, the impact of replacement reactions on aerosol aging and phase state, and subsequently on atmospheric processes.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(1165 KB)
-
Supplement
(1113 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1165 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1113 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1556', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Jul 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-1556/egusphere-2024-1556-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Qishen Huang, 04 Aug 2024
Dear referee,
We are grateful for your careful review, positive feedback, and constructive suggestions. Your suggestions are of great significance in enhancing the quality of our manuscript and facilitating readers' better understanding of our work. We have incorporated your comments and suggestions into our manuscript, please find our point-to-point response in the supplement. In our response, we list each comment, followed by our detailed responses, corresponding revisions, and additional figures. We believe that the changes have resulted in a much stronger manuscript.
Sincerely,
The authors
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Qishen Huang, 24 Aug 2024
Dear referee,
This note explains the additional changes we've made to the manuscript while addressing the comments from Referee 2. Your comments and those from Referee 2 were complementary and not contradictory; therefore, in our last response, we focused on polishing our introduction, summary, and implications for better clarity according to Referee 2's suggestions. You can find details of these changes in our response to Referee2. If you need any further information about our revisions, we would be happy to provide further explanations.
Sincerely,
The authors
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1556-AC3
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Qishen Huang, 04 Aug 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1556', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Aug 2024
- The article is overly lengthy; it is suggested that the author shorten it. For example, condense the introduction to focus more on the study's specific objectives and significance. Reduce background information that isn't directly relevant to your study's aims.
- Explain the rationale for choosing specific organic salts.
- Provide more details about the relative humidity control and measurement, such as the precision and accuracy of RH measurements.
- It is suggested to add some summary tables comparing the phase transition behaviors of different organic salts and ammonium salts.
- What is the potential impact of temperature on phase transitions? What is the relationship between liquid-liquid phase separation and phase transition behaviors in this study? It is suggested to discuss them in the implication.
- Ensure all references are up-to-date and relevant. Check if any recent studies on similar topics have been published and could be included. E.g. recent field observation studies have highlighted the significant role of organic acids in modifying the phase behavior of ammonium sulfate aerosols, further complicating the prediction of aerosol phase states (Li et al., EST, 2021, 55, 16339; Yuan et al., 2023, ACP, 23, 9385; Kirpes et al., PNAS, 2022, 119, 14).
- Specific comments:
Abstract: The abstract is informative but could be improved by including a brief mention of the methodology (ATR-FTIR spectroscopy) and the key findings related to the RH ranges.
Line 14: A detailed introduction to “aqueous replacement reactions” for better understanding the mechanisms.
Line 16: 35.7%~12.7%, 64% and 65.5%~60.1% RH?
Figure 1: Enhance the figure with annotations indicating key RH ranges where phase changes occur.
Figure 7: Include a scale bar in each image to indicate the size of the observed particles. Highlight key features in the images, such as the appearance of solid entities or changes in particle morphology, with arrows or labels.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1556-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Qishen Huang, 24 Aug 2024
Dear referee,
We are grateful for your careful review, and constructive suggestions. Your suggestions are of great significance in enhancing the quality of our manuscript. We have incorporated your comments and suggestions into our manuscript, please find our point-to-point response in the supplement. In our response, we list each comment, followed by our detailed responses, corresponding revisions, and additional figures. We believe that the changes have resulted in a much stronger manuscript.
Sincerely,
The authors
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1556', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Jul 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-1556/egusphere-2024-1556-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Qishen Huang, 04 Aug 2024
Dear referee,
We are grateful for your careful review, positive feedback, and constructive suggestions. Your suggestions are of great significance in enhancing the quality of our manuscript and facilitating readers' better understanding of our work. We have incorporated your comments and suggestions into our manuscript, please find our point-to-point response in the supplement. In our response, we list each comment, followed by our detailed responses, corresponding revisions, and additional figures. We believe that the changes have resulted in a much stronger manuscript.
Sincerely,
The authors
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Qishen Huang, 24 Aug 2024
Dear referee,
This note explains the additional changes we've made to the manuscript while addressing the comments from Referee 2. Your comments and those from Referee 2 were complementary and not contradictory; therefore, in our last response, we focused on polishing our introduction, summary, and implications for better clarity according to Referee 2's suggestions. You can find details of these changes in our response to Referee2. If you need any further information about our revisions, we would be happy to provide further explanations.
Sincerely,
The authors
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1556-AC3
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Qishen Huang, 04 Aug 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1556', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Aug 2024
- The article is overly lengthy; it is suggested that the author shorten it. For example, condense the introduction to focus more on the study's specific objectives and significance. Reduce background information that isn't directly relevant to your study's aims.
- Explain the rationale for choosing specific organic salts.
- Provide more details about the relative humidity control and measurement, such as the precision and accuracy of RH measurements.
- It is suggested to add some summary tables comparing the phase transition behaviors of different organic salts and ammonium salts.
- What is the potential impact of temperature on phase transitions? What is the relationship between liquid-liquid phase separation and phase transition behaviors in this study? It is suggested to discuss them in the implication.
- Ensure all references are up-to-date and relevant. Check if any recent studies on similar topics have been published and could be included. E.g. recent field observation studies have highlighted the significant role of organic acids in modifying the phase behavior of ammonium sulfate aerosols, further complicating the prediction of aerosol phase states (Li et al., EST, 2021, 55, 16339; Yuan et al., 2023, ACP, 23, 9385; Kirpes et al., PNAS, 2022, 119, 14).
- Specific comments:
Abstract: The abstract is informative but could be improved by including a brief mention of the methodology (ATR-FTIR spectroscopy) and the key findings related to the RH ranges.
Line 14: A detailed introduction to “aqueous replacement reactions” for better understanding the mechanisms.
Line 16: 35.7%~12.7%, 64% and 65.5%~60.1% RH?
Figure 1: Enhance the figure with annotations indicating key RH ranges where phase changes occur.
Figure 7: Include a scale bar in each image to indicate the size of the observed particles. Highlight key features in the images, such as the appearance of solid entities or changes in particle morphology, with arrows or labels.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1556-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Qishen Huang, 24 Aug 2024
Dear referee,
We are grateful for your careful review, and constructive suggestions. Your suggestions are of great significance in enhancing the quality of our manuscript. We have incorporated your comments and suggestions into our manuscript, please find our point-to-point response in the supplement. In our response, we list each comment, followed by our detailed responses, corresponding revisions, and additional figures. We believe that the changes have resulted in a much stronger manuscript.
Sincerely,
The authors
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
348 | 114 | 154 | 616 | 33 | 11 | 14 |
- HTML: 348
- PDF: 114
- XML: 154
- Total: 616
- Supplement: 33
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 14
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Hui Yang
Fengfeng Dong
Li Xia
Yunhong Zhang
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1165 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1113 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper