the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Quantitative analysis of actors' mention in press coverage of a seismo-volcanic activity in the French overseas
Abstract. Media, especially the press, play a crucial role in shaping public understanding and representations during risk and crisis management, acting as intermediaries between various actors and the public. However, their framing of sources can introduce biases into representations. Limited analysis exists regarding how press coverage portrays relationships between crisis and risk management actors. Using Social Network Analysis, we map quotation networks in press coverage of a seismo-volcanic crisis in Mayotte, a French overseas department allowing us to: i) have an overview of the relationships between actors; ii) highlight unique aspects related to the context and media portrayal; iii) display underlying representations and levels of trust among interviewed actors and iv) visualises networks’ dynamics over time. Analysis revealed variations in narrative approaches among newspapers, with some focusing on specific aspects. General results show that national authorities received more attention than local elected representatives, and scientific figures dominated reported speeches, while the population's perspective remained relatively passive despite their centrality to the quotation network. Identified individuals held significant positions, emphasising the importance of personal connection in communication and revealing a potential distrust toward political and scientific institutions. This underscores the need for proximity between sources and the community.
- Preprint
(2993 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(297 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 03 Jan 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1358', Anonymous Referee #1, 19 Dec 2024
reply
The manuscript presents a social network / graph analysis of actors mentioned in the press during the 2019 seismo-volcanic crisis in Mayotte, France. It discusses the amount of attention received by local authorities, national authorities, and scientists, and highlights the effect of the actors’ degree of connection to the society on the results.
The manuscript is well written, the results are discussed in a fair way and to a good length. The only downside of this manuscript is its editorial quality. I have found several instances of incorrect English throughout the manuscript; perhaps there are more. Please the manuscript thoroughly checked. Also, the Figures 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 have a low resolution, text hard to read, and too small font sizes. There is overlapping text in some of the figures.
Line 114, “eruptive activity at sea”: please consider revising to “submarine eruptive activity”
Line 114, “a newly born”: Please use a reference to confirm that it is indeed new and that it is not a preexisting that was simply discovered in 2019.
Line 115, “uncertainties were really high”: uncertainties with respect to what? The location of the volcano? The origin of the felt earthquakes? The duration of the crisis? Please specify if there is a size or a magnitude (and units of measurement or magnitude units) used to describe the uncertainty.
Line 117, “poor instrumental network”: Poor in what sense? Not dense enough? Bad resolution in time, bad bit rate, something else?
Line 117, “instrumental network”: revise to “network of sensors”
Line 119, “to appraise the situation”: Please consider revising to “to have situational awareness”.
Line 126, “seisms”: replace with “earthquakes”.Line 127, “km from the coast”: replace with “off the coast”.
Lines 128-129, “on Petite Terre island”: replace with “on the Peite Terre island, Mayotte's second-largest island, east of the largest island and closer to the Fani Maore volcano”.
Line 192, Figure 1: The image resolution is too low, which makes the text hard to read, which is already hard to read because of the small font size. Please consider improving the figure while taking into account any editorial requirements.
Line 207, “a double-reading method”: Please give a short description of this method, perhaps a reference too.
Line 214, “20190507_JDM_001”: It seems that this needs to be deleted.
Line 216, “its exact denomination(s)”: Incorrect English; replace with “their exact denominations”.
Line 225, Table 1; Line 438, Figure 5: “sismo-volcanic”: typos; replace with “seismo-volcanic”
Line 258, “Louvain clustering method”; Line 260, “network diagrams plotting citation links”
: cite any code or software used to apply this method and to plot the diagrams or declare that you used an in-house code (specify the programming language you used in this case, and cite it).Lines 253; 309, : replace “vs” with “versus” throughout the manuscript, e.g.: “speech vs simple” revise to “speech versus simple”; “mention vs indirect mention” to “mention versus indirect mention”, etc..
Line 367, “achieving a PhD in geography at Paul Valéry Montpellier 3 University”: Incorrect English, revise to “holding a PhD in geography from the Paul Valéry Montpellier 3 University”.
Line 374, “BRGM (French geological survey BRGM)”: revise to “BRGM (French geological survey)”.
Line 378, “representatives, ect)”: replace with “representatives, etc.)”.
Lines 395-396, “oceanographic campaigns (MayObs 1 and 2)”: please add a reference.
Line 398, Figure 3: Please consider using colorblind friendly colors.
Lines 402-403, “presented in green”, “presented in orange”: revise to “annotated with green/orange labels”.
Line 417, “Groupe d’Intervention Macrosismique”: please give a short description of what this is, and a reference as well.
Line 436, Figure 5: Not very helpful, too dense network, hard to see the connections.
Line 454, “mainland France and”: add a serial comma “mainland France, and”.
Line 456, “Macroseismic Intervention Group”: Here it is mentioned in English; elsewhere the manuscript used its French name. Please use the same names consistently through the text.
Line 489, “VLP earthquake”: Please write it out in full: “very-long-period earthquake”.
Line 491, “Twitter netwo rk”: Delete the space: “Twitter network”.
Line 586, “several limitations in our study”: Please consider briefly discussing all the limitations of this study that you are aware of.
Line 628, “relatively minimal material and human damage (only three lightly injured and cracked buildings in Mayotte)”: Please revise to “the light building damage (cracks), and the small number of people affected (three lightly injured).”
Line 636, “However, here despite”: please revise to “However, here, despite”
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1358-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
151 | 116 | 19 | 286 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
- HTML: 151
- PDF: 116
- XML: 19
- Total: 286
- Supplement: 17
- BibTeX: 18
- EndNote: 19
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1