the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
New Developments in Incremental Heating Detrital 40Ar/39Ar Lithic (DARL) Geochronology using Icelandic River Sand
Abstract. Iceland records over fifteen million years of complex volcanism resulting from the intersection of mid-ocean ridge and mantle plume upwelling. The Iceland mantle plume has been active for at least 70 Ma, with surface expressions in Greenland, the North Atlantic, and Iceland. The Iceland hotspot may exhibit periods of increased volcanic output linked to pulses of upwelling within the plume. Understanding Iceland’s magmatic history and potential pulsation could provide key insights into dynamic topography driving changes in deep-water oceanic circulation, late Cenozoic climate change and mantle plume – mid-ocean ridge interaction. Detrital geochronology is a powerful tool for capturing the magmatic history of a region. However, Iceland's fine-grained extrusive volcanic lithologies lack the typical detrital mineral phases such as zircon, sanidine, hornblende, and rutile that current geochronology methods utilize. Here we present a new methodology for capturing the magmatic history of fine grained extrusive volcanic rocks using single grain detrital 40Ar/39Ar incremental heating geochronology. The DARL (or Detrital Argon Lithics) method thus far has consisted of 40Ar/39Ar total fusion analyses, which pose a problem in the case of Iceland, due to the nature of its young glassy lava flows commonly displaying subatmospheric 40Ar/36Ar isochron intercepts and low 40Ar*. This work represents a 40Ar/39Ar incremental heating pilot study on 19 single grains of Icelandic river sand (1–3 mm), collected from five different catchments. Fifteen of the 19 basaltic grains produced concordant age experiments that ranged from 0.2 to 13.5 Ma and uncertainties (2σ) from 1 % to 86 % with the grains under 1 Ma having the largest uncertainties. Preliminary results show that basaltic grains with less alteration (and corresponding lower atmospheric argon concentration) yield more accurate age determinations, though altered basaltic grains can still produce statistically valid age determinations. Results presented here show the validity of the incremental heating DARL methodology for capturing the magmatic history of mafic terrains. The long analysis time required for incremental heating experiments makes it infeasible to produce the large number of ages required for a detrital study. For this reason, we propose combining the aspects of the total fusion and incremental heating DARL methodologies to acquire age data for the large N values needed for detrital studies while improving the accuracy of total fusion DARL analysis.
- Preprint
(5169 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1299 - From Matt Brueseke, Jeff Benowitz, and Jeff Trop', Matthew Brueseke, 03 Jun 2024
See attached PDF for the review- we (M. Brueseke, Jeff Benowitz, Jeff Trop) have submitted a collective group review, re: approval from Editor Clare Warren. We outline the major issues that need to be addressed in the manuscript and study, in our review.
-Thank you,
Matt Brueseke
- AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Kevin Konrad, 29 Oct 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1299', Dan Barfod, 29 Jul 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-1299/egusphere-2024-1299-RC2-supplement.pdf
- AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Kevin Konrad, 29 Oct 2024
-
EC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1299', Klaus Mezger, 07 Aug 2024
Dear Dr. Okwueze
your paper has now been reviewed by four experts who provided two review comments (one review has three contributors!). These reviews are overall very positive, but some modification of the paper is requested. In particular expansion of discussion and a completer reporting of the data set are requested. The literature on the topic seems quite extensive and it suggested you place your new findings in the context or previous publications, more than it is now.
Please have a look at these reviews/comments and let me know how you will respond to them. A brief statement suffices. If you think you can modify the paper in such a way that others will not come up with the same concerns/queries/questions, you can proceed with the revision. However, first I would like to know if you can take the comments into account when revising the manuscript.
(Clare Warren originally handled the manuscript. She stepped down as an Associate Editor due to other commitments. This is why I am handling your paper now.)
With kind regards
Klaus Mezger
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1299-EC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on EC1', Kevin Konrad, 08 Aug 2024
Hello Klaus,
Thank you for taking over the handling of the manuscript. I am currently at sea leading an expedition until September 7th. I will work with Odinaka on getting the manuscript revised but a few items (e.g. additional raw data) may not be completed until I get back in the lab. Is it possible to extend the due date to September 20th or so? From my first reading of the comments, we will likely not have any significant push-back on the reviewer comments and they will improve the manuscript.
Thanks again!
Kevin
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1299-AC1 -
EC2: 'Reply on AC1', Klaus Mezger, 08 Aug 2024
Dear Kevin
we can extend the deadline. No problem. Just ignore the reminders you will get from the journal. This is all automatic.
It is mostly in your own interest to move the paper forward as fast as possible. Thus the rate limiting step is in your hand.
Greetings
Klaus
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1299-EC2 -
AC4: 'Reply on EC2', Kevin Konrad, 29 Oct 2024
Dear Klaus,
Thank you so much for your patience in my response to the reviewer comments. I have had a lot of change and flux in my professional and personal life and I haven't had a moment to sit down and finalize the responses for months. Things have settled a bit and the reviews were fairly straightforward to handle. I'm embarrassed for myself but please don't let me tardiness reflect poorly on Odinaka or Tomas.
Best,
Kevin
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1299-AC4
-
AC4: 'Reply on EC2', Kevin Konrad, 29 Oct 2024
-
EC2: 'Reply on AC1', Klaus Mezger, 08 Aug 2024
-
AC1: 'Reply on EC1', Kevin Konrad, 08 Aug 2024
-
EC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1299', Klaus Mezger, 30 Oct 2024
Dear authors
Thank your for your response to the review comments. I think the suggestions you make take into considerations all the comments provided by the reviewer and will lead to a clearer and improved manuscript.
I have a few technical comments you might consider when making the revisions.
The reply is largely written in the I-form, although the paper has three authors. This indicates that the other authors will not take part in the revisions. However, our journal requires that ALL authors have approved the submission of a manuscript and to do so they must have read it.
I think the word "believe" has no place in a scientific paper. Scientists do not "believe", they consider, interpret, suggest, conclude.....
Please report data properly The decimal places of the errors should match the decimal places of data.
Please make the modifications suggested and submit a revised and improved paper soon
With kind regards
Klaus Mezger
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1299-EC3
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1299 - From Matt Brueseke, Jeff Benowitz, and Jeff Trop', Matthew Brueseke, 03 Jun 2024
See attached PDF for the review- we (M. Brueseke, Jeff Benowitz, Jeff Trop) have submitted a collective group review, re: approval from Editor Clare Warren. We outline the major issues that need to be addressed in the manuscript and study, in our review.
-Thank you,
Matt Brueseke
- AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Kevin Konrad, 29 Oct 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1299', Dan Barfod, 29 Jul 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-1299/egusphere-2024-1299-RC2-supplement.pdf
- AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Kevin Konrad, 29 Oct 2024
-
EC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1299', Klaus Mezger, 07 Aug 2024
Dear Dr. Okwueze
your paper has now been reviewed by four experts who provided two review comments (one review has three contributors!). These reviews are overall very positive, but some modification of the paper is requested. In particular expansion of discussion and a completer reporting of the data set are requested. The literature on the topic seems quite extensive and it suggested you place your new findings in the context or previous publications, more than it is now.
Please have a look at these reviews/comments and let me know how you will respond to them. A brief statement suffices. If you think you can modify the paper in such a way that others will not come up with the same concerns/queries/questions, you can proceed with the revision. However, first I would like to know if you can take the comments into account when revising the manuscript.
(Clare Warren originally handled the manuscript. She stepped down as an Associate Editor due to other commitments. This is why I am handling your paper now.)
With kind regards
Klaus Mezger
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1299-EC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on EC1', Kevin Konrad, 08 Aug 2024
Hello Klaus,
Thank you for taking over the handling of the manuscript. I am currently at sea leading an expedition until September 7th. I will work with Odinaka on getting the manuscript revised but a few items (e.g. additional raw data) may not be completed until I get back in the lab. Is it possible to extend the due date to September 20th or so? From my first reading of the comments, we will likely not have any significant push-back on the reviewer comments and they will improve the manuscript.
Thanks again!
Kevin
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1299-AC1 -
EC2: 'Reply on AC1', Klaus Mezger, 08 Aug 2024
Dear Kevin
we can extend the deadline. No problem. Just ignore the reminders you will get from the journal. This is all automatic.
It is mostly in your own interest to move the paper forward as fast as possible. Thus the rate limiting step is in your hand.
Greetings
Klaus
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1299-EC2 -
AC4: 'Reply on EC2', Kevin Konrad, 29 Oct 2024
Dear Klaus,
Thank you so much for your patience in my response to the reviewer comments. I have had a lot of change and flux in my professional and personal life and I haven't had a moment to sit down and finalize the responses for months. Things have settled a bit and the reviews were fairly straightforward to handle. I'm embarrassed for myself but please don't let me tardiness reflect poorly on Odinaka or Tomas.
Best,
Kevin
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1299-AC4
-
AC4: 'Reply on EC2', Kevin Konrad, 29 Oct 2024
-
EC2: 'Reply on AC1', Klaus Mezger, 08 Aug 2024
-
AC1: 'Reply on EC1', Kevin Konrad, 08 Aug 2024
-
EC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1299', Klaus Mezger, 30 Oct 2024
Dear authors
Thank your for your response to the review comments. I think the suggestions you make take into considerations all the comments provided by the reviewer and will lead to a clearer and improved manuscript.
I have a few technical comments you might consider when making the revisions.
The reply is largely written in the I-form, although the paper has three authors. This indicates that the other authors will not take part in the revisions. However, our journal requires that ALL authors have approved the submission of a manuscript and to do so they must have read it.
I think the word "believe" has no place in a scientific paper. Scientists do not "believe", they consider, interpret, suggest, conclude.....
Please report data properly The decimal places of the errors should match the decimal places of data.
Please make the modifications suggested and submit a revised and improved paper soon
With kind regards
Klaus Mezger
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1299-EC3
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
342 | 125 | 34 | 501 | 42 | 18 |
- HTML: 342
- PDF: 125
- XML: 34
- Total: 501
- BibTeX: 42
- EndNote: 18
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1