the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A quality control method based on physical constraints and data-driven collaborative for wind observations along high-speed railway lines
Abstract. This study proposed a new quality control method via physical constraints and data-driven collaborative artificial intelligence (PD-BX) to reduce wind speed measurement errors caused by the complex environment along high-speed railway lines, achieving enhanced accuracy and reliability. On the one hand, based on the special structure in railway assembly, the physical constraint model of the railway electrical catenary supports and anemometers were experimentally established. The performance of the physical model in the wind field was simulated based on FLUENT software and the environmental change characteristics of the anemometer in the railway area were analyzed. On the other hand, to solve the constrained error mapping expression under different wind conditions, a data-driven model of hyperparameter optimization (BO-XGBoost) is introduced to perform error compensation on physical relationships. Through the PD-BX method, the RMSE of the railway anemometer was reduced by 2.497 from 2.790 to 0.293, achieving quality control of wind observations along the high-speed railway lines and providing reliable results for improving the accuracy of the high-speed railway early warning system.
- Preprint
(1978 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (extended)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1006', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 Jun 2024
reply
The manuscript presents a PD-BX method to address the shadow effects of catenary pillar and improve the wind speed measurements along the high-speed railway lines. The RMSE of railway anemometer was reduced, providing enhanced accuracy and reliability of wind measurement. The manuscript is well written, and all figures are clear. Please see my comments and suggestions for minor edits below.
General comments:
The CFD model was performed under a standard state at 25 C, and I assume the dry condition. However, under extreme wind conditions, e.g. strong thunderstorms, relative humidity would be high, and heavy rain is also expected. How does authors’ model perform under such extreme conditions? Also, in real world, it requires quick response of wind speed under such extreme conditions. How long does it take for authors’ model from data processing to wind speed results?
Based on the PD-BX method, authors reduced the uncertainty of wind velocities caused by catenary pillar. Beside velocities, anemometer can also detect wind directions. Do catenary pillars lead to uncertainties of wind directions, e.g. shadow effects. If so, can we also use this PD-BX method to correct the wind directions?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1006-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', jiajun Chen, 01 Sep 2024
reply
Thank you for your valuable comments. The response results are presented in PDF format.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', jiajun Chen, 01 Sep 2024
reply
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
185 | 51 | 37 | 273 | 13 | 18 |
- HTML: 185
- PDF: 51
- XML: 37
- Total: 273
- BibTeX: 13
- EndNote: 18
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1