the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Insights into the sources of ultrafine particle numbers at six European urban sites obtained by investigating COVID–19 lockdowns
Abstract. Lockdown restrictions in response to the COVID–19 pandemic led to the curtailment of many activities and reduced emissions of primary air pollutants. Here, we applied Positive Matrix Factorization to particle size distribution (PSD) data from six monitoring sites (three urban background and three roadside) between four European cities (Helsinki, Leipzig, Budapest, and London) to evaluate how particle number concentrations (PNCs) and their sources changed during the respective 2020 lockdown periods compared to the reference years 2014–2019. A number of common factors were resolved between sites, including nucleation, road traffic semi–volatile fraction (road trafficsvf), road traffic solid fraction (road trafficsf), diffuse urban (woodsmoke + aged traffic), ozone–associated secondary aerosol (O3–associated SA), and secondary inorganic aerosol (SIA). Nucleation, road traffic, and diffuse urban factors were the largest contributors to mean PNCs during the reference years and respective lockdown periods. However, SIA factors were the largest contributors to particle mass concentrations, irrespective of environment type. Total mean PNCs were lower at two of the urban background and all roadside sites during lockdown. Nucleation and road trafficsvf factors response to lockdown restrictions were highly variable, although road trafficsf factors were consistently lower at roadside sites. The responses of diffuse urban factors were largely consistent and were mostly lower at urban background sites. Secondary aerosols (O3-associated SA and SIA) exhibited extensive reductions to their mean PNCs at all sites. These variegated responses to lockdowns across Europe point to a complex network of sources and aerosol sinks contributing to PSDs.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(1022 KB)
-
Supplement
(1444 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1022 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1444 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-3053', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Apr 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-3053', Anonymous Referee #2, 20 Apr 2024
The authors applied PMF to elucidate how particle number concentrations evolve during spring 2020 lockdown period relative to the reference years of 2014-2019. While the topic is overall interesting, I feel the novelty is very weak in the current version, and a substantial revision is needed to satisfy the standard of the journal.
- This study heavily relies on PMF method. Is there any uncertainty? The authors seem to consider the source apportionment based on PMF as a fact, while I think there might be large uncertainties associated with this method.
- The overall comparison between lockdown and reference period seems to be very general and not surprising. It looks like many statements has been known already.
- In many sections, there are only a couple of sentences, briefly describing the difference between lockdown and reference period. These short paragraphs are not acceptable in my opinion, and they do not raise any scientific finding in depth.
- There are no mechanisms at all besides of the general descriptions. I feel the authors should at least try to add some mechanism discussion, not just describe things based on PMF, and cite a few papers without any deeper understanding of the changes in PNCs.
- Figure quality is very poor. Most figures are not easy to read and should be redrawn to be legible.
Minor comments
- Line 417
The insolation was markedly higher in London during the lockdown period than in previous years, but the other cities show only a small increase.
Any reasons why London has much higher downward solar radiation over this period? Why not in other cities?
- O3–associated SA and SIA
What is ozone associated SIA? It is very vague, and the readers would not know what it is. Is it secondary organic or inorganic aerosols? Is SIA also O3 associated?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3053-RC2 - AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-3053', Roy M. Harrison, 16 May 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-3053', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Apr 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-3053', Anonymous Referee #2, 20 Apr 2024
The authors applied PMF to elucidate how particle number concentrations evolve during spring 2020 lockdown period relative to the reference years of 2014-2019. While the topic is overall interesting, I feel the novelty is very weak in the current version, and a substantial revision is needed to satisfy the standard of the journal.
- This study heavily relies on PMF method. Is there any uncertainty? The authors seem to consider the source apportionment based on PMF as a fact, while I think there might be large uncertainties associated with this method.
- The overall comparison between lockdown and reference period seems to be very general and not surprising. It looks like many statements has been known already.
- In many sections, there are only a couple of sentences, briefly describing the difference between lockdown and reference period. These short paragraphs are not acceptable in my opinion, and they do not raise any scientific finding in depth.
- There are no mechanisms at all besides of the general descriptions. I feel the authors should at least try to add some mechanism discussion, not just describe things based on PMF, and cite a few papers without any deeper understanding of the changes in PNCs.
- Figure quality is very poor. Most figures are not easy to read and should be redrawn to be legible.
Minor comments
- Line 417
The insolation was markedly higher in London during the lockdown period than in previous years, but the other cities show only a small increase.
Any reasons why London has much higher downward solar radiation over this period? Why not in other cities?
- O3–associated SA and SIA
What is ozone associated SIA? It is very vague, and the readers would not know what it is. Is it secondary organic or inorganic aerosols? Is SIA also O3 associated?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3053-RC2 - AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-3053', Roy M. Harrison, 16 May 2024
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Data sets
PMF European COVID–19 lockdowns PSD analysis Roy M. Harrison, Alex Rowell, and James Brean https://doi.org/10.25500/edata.bham.00001040
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
400 | 108 | 24 | 532 | 48 | 17 | 30 |
- HTML: 400
- PDF: 108
- XML: 24
- Total: 532
- Supplement: 48
- BibTeX: 17
- EndNote: 30
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Alex Rowell
James Brean
David C. S. Beddows
Zongbo Shi
Tuukka Petäjä
Máté Vörösmarty
Imre Salma
Jarkko V. Niemi
Hanna E. Manninen
Dominik van Pinxteren
Thomas Tuch
Kay Weinhold
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1022 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1444 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper