the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
High-resolution numerical modelling of seasonal volume, freshwater, and heat transport along the Indian coast
Abstract. Seasonal reversal of winds and equatorial remote forcing influences the circulation of the Arabian Sea (AS) and Bay of Bengal (BoB) basins in the North Indian Ocean. In this study, we numerically modelled the physical characteristics of AS and BoB, using the MITgcm model at a high spatial resolution of 1/20° forced with climatological initial and boundary conditions. The simulated temperature, salinity, and flow fields were validated with satellite and in situ datasets. We then studied the exchange of coastal waters by evaluating transports computed from the model simulations. The alongshore volume transport on the eastern coast is stronger with high seasonal variability due to the poleward-flowing western boundary current and equatorward-flowing East Indian Coastal Current. West coast transport is influenced by large intraseasonal oscillations. The alongshore freshwater transport is two orders less than the alongshore volume transport. Out of the net volume transport, freshwater accounts for a maximum of 6.03 % during the southwest monsoon season followed by 4.85 % in the post-monsoon season. We observe an inverse relationship between alongshore freshwater and volume transport on the western coast and a direct relationship on the eastern coast. Seasonal variations between the cross-shore volume transport and its alongshore component also present such a contradiction along the western coast while displaying in-phase behaviour on the eastern coast. We also observed that meridional heat transport over AS is stronger than BoB. Both basins act as a heat source during the summer monsoon and heat sink during the winter. This high-resolution model set-up simulates all the important physical climatological patterns making it a useful tool in various physical as well as biogeochemical studies in this region.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(7826 KB)
-
Supplement
(923 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(7826 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(923 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-3011', Anonymous Referee #1, 09 Feb 2024
The comments to the MS by Madkaiker et al are presented in the attached PDF file.
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Kunal Madkaiker, 22 May 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-3011', Anonymous Referee #2, 31 May 2024
This is a very well-documented and very well-written paper. It concerns the application of a high-resolution model in the Northern Indian Ocean (NIO) with the view of revealing important patterns of the volume, salt, and heat transport under the prevailing climatological conditions. Apart from the direct outcome of this application, it also provides a quite interesting comparison with the findings of other numerical models in the region and available real-life datasets which is important and an asset of the paper. As a result, a pragmatic picture and features of the existing circulation and local physical phenomena are produced, most of which agree at a considerable degree with those described and analyzed by other researchers as well.
A general comment though is that the paper omits a discussion section but incorporates it instead in the results. Given that the authors devote little space on the affiliation and contribution of their results to the environmental problems of the NIO region (e.g., ecological, and biological processes, nutrient and carbon transport, fisheries etc.), I would recommend adding a separate section and elaborate more on the matter, so that the scientific contribution of this paper’s findings to real life problems can be better stressed.
Other than that, only some minor comments follow:
Line 59 ‘augmenting its physical model to extend to various biogeochemical processes’ This doesn’t read very well because this is a numerical model that implements the laws of physics but does not involve any physical modelling. Please rephrase.
Line 72 INC-HYC is only explained in section 2.1.2 and line 124 but the acronym needs to be determined here.
Line 85 Please rephrase to ‘this study aims further to help’
Line 88 This sentence sounds like a phrasal error. Please rewrite it.
Line 94 Refer to “Fig. 1 ” inside the parentheses
Line 123 what do you mean by simulated? The model is run, built or setup at INCOIS?
Line 131 ETOPO-1 acronym is not explained.
Line 139 NRL-HYCOM, INCOIS-GODAS. Please explain acronyms NRL and GODAS.
Line 515 similar comment to that for line 59 regarding the use of the term ‘physical model’
Figure 1. The purple color does not work well in contrast to the red symbols. Change the color for the ADCP locations so that they can be better distinguished. There is a purple symbol missing from the Sri Lanka transect. Remove the brackets (in color scale). Please indicate where is AS and where BoB on the map.
Figure 5 Add units in the stick plots.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3011-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Kunal Madkaiker, 09 Jun 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-3011', Anonymous Referee #1, 09 Feb 2024
The comments to the MS by Madkaiker et al are presented in the attached PDF file.
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Kunal Madkaiker, 22 May 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-3011', Anonymous Referee #2, 31 May 2024
This is a very well-documented and very well-written paper. It concerns the application of a high-resolution model in the Northern Indian Ocean (NIO) with the view of revealing important patterns of the volume, salt, and heat transport under the prevailing climatological conditions. Apart from the direct outcome of this application, it also provides a quite interesting comparison with the findings of other numerical models in the region and available real-life datasets which is important and an asset of the paper. As a result, a pragmatic picture and features of the existing circulation and local physical phenomena are produced, most of which agree at a considerable degree with those described and analyzed by other researchers as well.
A general comment though is that the paper omits a discussion section but incorporates it instead in the results. Given that the authors devote little space on the affiliation and contribution of their results to the environmental problems of the NIO region (e.g., ecological, and biological processes, nutrient and carbon transport, fisheries etc.), I would recommend adding a separate section and elaborate more on the matter, so that the scientific contribution of this paper’s findings to real life problems can be better stressed.
Other than that, only some minor comments follow:
Line 59 ‘augmenting its physical model to extend to various biogeochemical processes’ This doesn’t read very well because this is a numerical model that implements the laws of physics but does not involve any physical modelling. Please rephrase.
Line 72 INC-HYC is only explained in section 2.1.2 and line 124 but the acronym needs to be determined here.
Line 85 Please rephrase to ‘this study aims further to help’
Line 88 This sentence sounds like a phrasal error. Please rewrite it.
Line 94 Refer to “Fig. 1 ” inside the parentheses
Line 123 what do you mean by simulated? The model is run, built or setup at INCOIS?
Line 131 ETOPO-1 acronym is not explained.
Line 139 NRL-HYCOM, INCOIS-GODAS. Please explain acronyms NRL and GODAS.
Line 515 similar comment to that for line 59 regarding the use of the term ‘physical model’
Figure 1. The purple color does not work well in contrast to the red symbols. Change the color for the ADCP locations so that they can be better distinguished. There is a purple symbol missing from the Sri Lanka transect. Remove the brackets (in color scale). Please indicate where is AS and where BoB on the map.
Figure 5 Add units in the stick plots.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3011-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Kunal Madkaiker, 09 Jun 2024
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
402 | 106 | 27 | 535 | 51 | 18 | 19 |
- HTML: 402
- PDF: 106
- XML: 27
- Total: 535
- Supplement: 51
- BibTeX: 18
- EndNote: 19
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Kunal Madkaiker
Ambarukhana D. Rao
Sudheer Joseph
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(7826 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(923 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper