the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Solubility characteristics of soil humic substances as a function of pH
Abstract. This study investigated the solubility features, environmental consequences, and mechanisms of humic substances (HS), including humic acids (HA), fulvic acids (FA), and protein-like substances (PLS), in two soils in the pH range of 1–12. The pH-dependent presence or absence of fluorescence peaks in the individual HS components reflected their functional group proton/electron exchange features at both low and high pH values, which were related to their solubility or insolubility. In particular, alkaline pH (≥ pH 9) yielded the anionic forms (‒O‒ and ‒COO‒) of phenolic OH and carboxyl groups of HACS resulted in decreased electron/proton transfer from HS functionalities, as indicated by the decline of fluorescence peak maxima, whereas the protonic functionalities (e.g., −COOH, −OH) of HS at lower pH resulted in the formation of highly available and remains uncomplexed HS forms. The solubility of HA fractions increases with increasing pH, whereas their insolubility increases with decreasing pH, which determines their initial precipitation at pH 6 and final precipitation at pH 1, amounting approximately to 39.1–49.2 % and 3.1–24.1 % of the total DOM, respectively, in the two soils. HS insolubility arises via organo-metal and organo-mineral interactions at alkaline pH, along with HApH6 insolubility via rainwater/water discharge, whereas HApH2+FA+PLS appears to be soluble at acidic pH, thereby being transported in ambient waters via rainwater/water discharge and groundwater infiltration. These results were supported by the corresponding elemental compositions and FTIR data. Therefore, the pH-dependent behaviour of soil HS greatly contributes to a better understanding of the progressive transformation, mobility/transportation, and immobility/accumulation of HS components under various environmental conditions, with relevant implications for sustainable soil management practices and soil DOM dynamics.
- Preprint
(2029 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(687 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2994', Mohammad Mahbub Kabir, 26 Jul 2024
-This paper presents some excellent views on the solubility of soil humic substances depending on pH
variations and their solubility mechanisms, together with important biogeochemical perspectives.
Considering this issue, I suggest adding “: mechanisms and biogeochemical perspectives” to the
end of the current title.-Another important issue is that the author should shortly describe the important information
regarding the results of elemental compositions and FTIR data” by replacing “These results were
supported by the corresponding elemental compositions and FTIR data” from the abstract.-In the manuscript, type settings need to be corrected by adding a gap between the ending sentence and
the reference in many cases.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2994-CC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Khan M. G. Mostofa, 29 Jul 2024
Interactive review comments
Based on the interactive review comments, we are submitting the manuscript revised duly using the blue color for all revisions made.
-This paper presents some excellent views on the solubility of soil humic substances depending on pH variations and their solubility mechanisms, together with important biogeochemical perspectives. Considering this issue, I suggest adding “: mechanisms and biogeochemical perspectives” to the end of the current title.
Response: Thank you for reviewer thoughtful suggestion. We agreed with reviewer suggestion. As suggested new title “Solubility characteristics of soil humic substances as a function of pH: mechanisms and biogeochemical perspectives” are added in the revised manuscript.
-Another important issue is that the author should shortly describe the important information regarding the results of elemental compositions and FTIR data” by replacing “These results were supported by the corresponding elemental compositions and FTIR data” from the abstract.
Response: Thank you for reviewer thoughtful comment. Based on this comment, we have replaced “These results were supported by the corresponding elemental compositions and FTIR data” by adding ‘Elemental anlysis results demonstrated that the C and N contents of HALS-pH6 were lower and those of O, S and H higher than those of HACS-pH6, suggesting the preservation of C and N without S acquisition in HACS-pH6 possibly because of their complexed with minerals, which, in turn, would determine the insolubility of the HACS-pH6 fraction. FACS+PLSCS showed relatively higher C and S contents, and lower O% with respect to FALS+PLSLS, impling that FACS+PLSCS would remain under mineral protection. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) results show significantly reduced infrared absorptions (e.g. 3300‒3600 and 800-1200 cm−1) of HACS-pH6 with respect to HALS-pH6, suggesting the existence of strong intermolecular interactions among HA functional groups, possibly due to insoluble forms originally complexed with minerals. But FALS+PLSLS exhibited stronger bands at 3414-3429 cm−1 and 1008-1018 cm−1 than FACS+PLSCS, implying a strong interaction among functional groups possibly derived from various organo-mineral complexes in FACS+PLSCS. These results would indicate that’
-In the manuscript, type settings need to be corrected by adding a gap between the ending sentence and the reference in many cases.
Response: Revised accordingly in the manuscript.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2994-AC1 -
CC2: 'Reply on AC1', Mohammad Mahbub Kabir, 29 Jul 2024
The authors addressed all my recommendations very effectively. I recommend to accept this paper in its current form.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2994-CC2
-
CC2: 'Reply on AC1', Mohammad Mahbub Kabir, 29 Jul 2024
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Khan M. G. Mostofa, 29 Jul 2024
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2994', Anonymous Referee #3, 19 Dec 2024
I have only a few comments below.
1, please add background in the abstract;
2, please separate the introduction
3, why there are some data not provided (nd) in the Fig 1 and 2?
4, the authors may put some of the data to the SI, but remain the main findings in the main text.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2994-RC1 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Khan M.G. Mostofa, 22 Dec 2024
Comment from Referee#3
I have only a few comments below.
Reply: We are grateful for the referee’s thoughtful comments. We have revised them accordingly. Our reply for each comment are mentioned below:
1, please add background in the abstract;
Reply: Reply: As suggested, we have replaced the sentence in lines 50: “This study investigated the solubility features, environmental consequences, and mechanisms of humic substances (HS), including humic acids (HA), fulvic acids (FA), and protein-like substances (PLS), in two soils in the pH range of 1–12.” with the following text: ‘Soil humic substances (HS) typically alter their electrochemical behaviors in the pH range of 1–12, which simultaneously regulates the stability of organo-minerals by modifying the HS functionalities. This process facilitates both biotic and abiotic transformations, which consequently leads to the export of degradative byproducts (e.g. HS components, nutrients) from soils into surrounding aquatic environments through water and/or rainwater discharges. However, the solubility features, environmental consequences, and mechanisms of HS, including humic acids (HA), fulvic acids (FA), and protein-like substances (PLS), under different pHs remain unclear. To respond to these issues, we used two soil extracts which were fractionated in the pH range from 12 to 1.” In lines 50
2, please separate the introduction
Reply: Reply: As suggested, we have separate the text in line 100.
3, why there are some data not provided (nd) in the Fig 1 and 2?
In Figure 1: Water-extractable humic acid (HA) is completely precipitated in both paddy and maize soils, as evidenced by a substantial decrease in dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations of 48.3% and 49.2% at pH 6, respectively. Consequently, it results not detected (nd) by the EEM-PARAFAC model. Similarly, ‘not detected’ for protein-like substances (PLS) in paddy soil may be due to its highly degradative nature, as its minor peaks are detected in the original solution at pH 8.13, whereas the correspondingly functionalities disappear at highly acidic pH 1-2.’ Based on this comment, we have added this explanation in the Figure caption, in ‘line 500’.
In Figure 2: Alkali-extractable HA is completely precipitated at pH 1 in both paddy and maize soils, which is a well-known phenomenon in soil, also evidenced by a corresponding decrease of 48.1% and 53.8% of DOC concentration at pH 1, with respect to their extracted original solutions (pH ~13). Consequently, HA at pH 1-2 results ‘not detected’ by the EEM-PARAFAC model. Noteworthy, the detection of alkali-extractable HA at pH levels 3-6, in contrast to its absence in water-extractable HA, may result from a significantly higher release of HA from organo-minerals, which is evidenced by the DOC in alkali-extractable HA that is 2.6 to 3.2 times greater than that in water-extractable HA. In particular, water-extractable HA is highly degradative in nature and shows relatively low concentrations, which correspondingly result in its precipitation at pH 6.” We have clarified this issue in Figure 2 caption in lines 510-520.
4, the authors may put some of the data to the SI, but remain the main findings in the main text.
Reply: As suggested, we have included the Figure related to DOC in the main text as it is very important, and have revised all Figure numbers in the manuscript accordingly.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2994-AC2
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Khan M.G. Mostofa, 22 Dec 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2994', Anonymous Referee #4, 24 Dec 2024
The manuscript provides an insightful and methodologically robust exploration of the pH-dependent behaviors of humic substances (HS), including humic acids, fulvic acids, and protein-like substances in soils. By employing a combination of fluorescence excitation-emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy and FTIR analysis, the study elucidates the solubility mechanisms of HS, revealing their dynamic interactions with environmental pH. These findings have important implications for understanding soil organic matter dynamics, sustainable soil management, and the global carbon cycle. Overall, the manuscript represents a valuable contribution to soil science and environmental studies.
Major comments:
Clarify whether adjustments in pH mimic natural soil conditions accurately. In general, soil pH range from 4-8, why you chose pH 1 to 12.
Discuss how the findings may inform strategies for mitigating soil carbon loss.
Specific comments
Introduction:
Consider elaborating on the novelty of this study compared to previous research to better establish its unique contributions.
Please explain the practical importance of understanding the solubility of humic substances in relation to soil management or soil carbon dynamics.
Methods: The extraction protocols are clearly described, but providing a brief rationale for selecting the specific soil types (paddy and maize soils).
Discussion: Expand on why understanding the molecular-level solubility is critical for agricultural practices.
Conclusion: Conclusion is repetitive. Please consider addressing any future research directions.
Line 60: Define "FTIR" in the first instance it appears for readers who may not be familiar with the term.
Line 110-115: Expand on the significance of fluorescence excitation-emission matrix (EEM) and its advantages over other methods.
Line 130-135: Include a brief justification for selecting maize and paddy soils as the study sites.
More references for major FTIR absorption bands and assignments.
Use consistent formatting for citations throughout the text.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2994-RC2 -
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Khan M.G. Mostofa, 02 Jan 2025
Referee comment#4
The manuscript provides an insightful and methodologically robust exploration of the pH-dependent behaviors of humic substances (HS), including humic acids, fulvic acids, and protein-like substances in soils. By employing a combination of fluorescence excitation-emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy and FTIR analysis, the study elucidates the solubility mechanisms of HS, revealing their dynamic interactions with environmental pH. These findings have important implications for understanding soil organic matter dynamics, sustainable soil management, and the global carbon cycle. Overall, the manuscript represents a valuable contribution to soil science and environmental studies.
Response: We are very grateful to the Reviewer for valuable and constructive comments on the manuscript. Thank you.
Itemized responses (R) to Reviewer’s point by point comments are provided below.
Major comments:
Clarify whether adjustments in pH mimic natural soil conditions accurately. In general, soil pH range from 4-8, why you chose pH 1 to 12.
R: Based on the soil data summarized in Table S1, the pH of world soils vary from 2.80 to 9.39. As suggested, we have revised the text in lines 138-143 as follows: ‘Although the soil pH varies from 2.80 to 9.39 (Table S1), we fractionated the extracted solution in the pH range from 12 to 1 for several key reasons: Firstly, HS-bound as organo-minerals primarily liberate HS components and other constituents (e.g., various metals) in the liquid phase under alkaline extraction (0.1 M NaOH ≈ pH 13.0). Thus, it is crucial to understand how these HS components change their properties from pH 12 to 1. Secondly, it is essential to investigate how HS, in particular HA-DOC, due to its insoluble nature behave within the pH range from 12 to 1.’
Discuss how the findings may inform strategies for mitigating soil carbon loss.
R: We have revised the text in lines 500-504 as follows: “7. The strategies for addressing pH-affected soil carbon loss primarily involve the significant loss of dissolved HS, particularly fulvic acids and protein-like fractions, from acidic soils due to water and rainwater runoff. Therefore, it is crucial to implement an efficient, rapid and sustainable drainage system that operates on a relatively short time scale, so that HS components may become less likely to dissolve in water and rainwater. Effective and timely drainage from the soil surface can help prevent carbon loss from acidic soils.”
Specific comments
Introduction:
Consider elaborating on the novelty of this study compared to previous research to better establish its unique contributions.
R: We think that a short explanation regarding “the novelty of our study compared to previous research” is enough because reviewer’s itself has been provided three more comments to add. Considering ‘Introduction’ in reasonably in good shape, we did not add in a more detailed explanation in that regards. Besides, new additions from reviewer’s three individual comments (1st major comment, and next two specific comments) are adequately added in the ‘Introduction’.
The previous studies explanation are mentioned below:
“Earlier studies (Hemingway et al., 2019; Lützow et al., 2006; Marschner et al., 2008; Sollins et al., 1996; Vogel et al., 2014) have not paid much attention to these issues when assessing the solubility and insolubility of SOM/HS. For example, pH effects were studied to assess the interaction mechanisms of Fe(II) ions with soil HA at pH values of 5 and 7 (Boguta et al., 2019), the binding of Cu and Pb to HA and FA at pH 4-8 (Christl et al., 2005), Cu(II) binding properties of soil FA at pH 7.0 (dos Santos et al., 2020), coagulation mechanisms of HA in metal ion solutions at pH 4.6-7.0 (Ai et al., 2020), coagulation behaviours of HA in Na+ and Mg2+solutions at pH 3.6, 7.1, and 10.0 (Wang et al., 2013), and the disaggregation kinetics of peat HA at pH 3.65-5.56 (Avena and Wilkinson, 2002), but not directly in water and alkali-extracted soil HA, FA and PLS fractions. The acidic and alkaline pH conditions in the soil liquid phase alter the electronic configuration of the functional groups of HS components, which in turn affect their complexation capacity (Christl et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2023; Avena and Wilkinson, 2002). The solubility and insolubility mechanisms of the HS components under different pH conditions remain unknown. In particular, two key fundamental questions regarding the effects of pH on HS are still unclear, that is, how the electrochemical behaviour of soil HS components changes in the pH range of 1–12, and how these changes affect the solubility/insolubility features of HS components and their mobilization/immobilization during rainwater runoff and groundwater infiltration in soil.”
Please explain the practical importance of understanding the solubility of humic substances in relation to soil management or soil carbon dynamics.
R: As suggested by the Reviewer, we have added the following paragraph in lines 144-153 of the revised Introduction: “Most importantly, the solubility of HS components and their subsequent mineralization are very relevant factor for the availability of soil nutrients and trace elements and the activity of soil microorganisms, while their stability in organo-minerals affects negatively these processes (Malik et al., 2018; Varghese et al., 2024; Lange et al., 1998; Gao et al., 2025; Soti et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2024; Gilbert et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2023). These issues are concurrently associated with the corresponding biological fixation/sequestration of C, N and S by soil photosynthetic microorganisms (Green et al., 2019; Varghese et al., 2024; Heckman et al., 2001; Levicán et al., 2008; Ma et al., 2021; Kelly et al., 2021; Gao et al., 2025), and the subsequent release of extracellular polymeric substances and/or HS components in the neoformation of fresh organo-minerals in soil (Whalen et al., 2024; Yu et al., 2020; Paul, 2016; Kallenbach et al., 2016). Therefore, the solubility or insolubility of soil HS components is crucial for a better understanding of both soil management and soil carbon dynamics.”
References
Gao, X., Zhang, J., Mostofa, K. M. G., Zheng, W., Liu, C. Q., Senesi, N., Senesi, G. S., Vione, D.,Yuan, J, Liu, Y., Mohinuzzaman, M., Li, L., and Li, S. L.: Sulfur-mediated transformation, export and mineral complexation of organic and inorganic C, N, P and Si in dryland soils. Sci. Rep. under review (revising based on positive review comments), 2025.
Gilbert, B., Lu, G., and Kim, C. S.: Stable cluster formation in aqueous suspensions of iron oxyhydroxide nanoparticles, J. Colloid Interface Sci, 313, 152–159, 2007.
Green, J. K., Seneviratne, S. I., Berg, A. M. et al.: Large influence of soil moisture on long-term terrestrial carbon uptake, Nature, 565, 476–479, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0848-x, 2019.
Heckman, D. S. et al.: Molecular Evidence for the Early Colonization of Land by Fungi and Plants. Science 293, 1129, 2001.
Kallenbach, C., Frey, S., and Grandy, A.: Direct evidence for microbial-derived soil organic matter formation and its ecophysiological controls, Nat Commun 7, 13630, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13630, 2016.
Lange, O. L., Belnap, J., and Reichenberger, H.: Photosynthesis of the cyanobacterial soil-crust lichen Collema tenax from arid lands in southern Utah, USA: Role of water content on light and temperature responses of CO2 exchange. Funct. Ecol., 12, 195-202, 1998.
Levicán, G. et al.: Comparative genomic analysis of carbon and nitrogen assimilation mechanisms in three indigenous bioleaching bacteria: predictions and validations, BMC Genomics, 2008, 9, 581, 2008.
Ma, H. et al.: Rice Planting Increases Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Acidic Soil and the Influence of Light and Flood Layer Thickness, J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 21, 341–348, 2021.
Malik, A. A., Puissant, J., Buckeridge, K. M., Goodall, T., Jehmlich, N., Chowdhury, S., et al.: Land use driven change in soil pH affects microbial carbon cycling processes, Nat. Commun. 9, 3591, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05980-1, 2018.
Paul, E. A.: The nature and dynamics of soil organic matter: Plant inputs, microbial transformations, and organic matter stabilization, Soil Biol. Biochem., 98, 109-126, 2016.
Soti, P. G., Jayachandran K., Koptur, S., and Volin J.C.: Effect of soil pH on growth, nutrient uptake, and mycorrhizal colonization in exotic invasive Lygodium microphyllum, Plant Ecolog., 216, 989-998, 2015.
Varghese, E.M., et al.: Rice in acid sulphate soils: Role of microbial interactions in crop and soil health management. Appl. Soil Ecol., 196, 105309, 2024.
Whalen, E. D. et al.: Microbial trait multifunctionality drives soil organic matter formation potential. Nature Commun., 15, 10209, 2024.
Yang, X., Gao, X., Mostofa, K. M. G., Zheng, W., Senesi, N., Senesi, G. S., Vione, D., Yuan, J., Li, S. L., Li, L., Liu, C. Q.: Mineral states and sequestration processes involving soil biogenic components in various soils and desert sands of Inner Mongolia, Sci. Rep. 14, 28530, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80004-1, 2024.
Methods: The extraction protocols are clearly described, but providing a brief rationale for selecting the specific soil types (paddy and maize soils).
R: As suggested by the Reviewer, we have added the following text in lines 173-178: “Importantly, the rationale for selecting paddy and maize soils is based on their distinct characteristics, i.e., paddy soils are submerged for extended periods, while maize soils are relatively less influenced by the presence of water. Therefore, HS components of these two soil types are expected to be altered very differently in their organo-mineral lability and stability in the pH range from 1 to 12. This study is expected to provide useful information on soil carbon dynamics and contribute to minimize soil carbon loss during agricultural practices.”
Discussion: Expand on why understanding the molecular-level solubility is critical for agricultural practices.
R: As suggested by the Reviewer, we have added the following text in lines 482-499: “6. The knowledge of the molecular-level solubility of the three HS components is essential for a better understanding and management of agricultural practices, as affected by their individual solubility, tendency to precipitate, and variable capability to form organo-minerals, which can occur more or less rapidly/slowly (Underwood et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2023). For instance, the HA fractions of acidic soils may either partially precipitate or remain in suspension due to an increase in IFN from increasing intramolecular interactions among various functional groups via hydrogen bonding, influenced by acidic conditions as discussed earlier. As a result, precipitated HA fractions would enhance C stability, while suspended HA fractions are highly prone to leaching by rainwater runoff. Furthermore, the high solubility of FA and PLS under acidic conditions would result from prolonged water saturation occurring in paddy fields, which will lead to soil C loss by their transport due to rainwater runoff. Simultaneously, these conditions of HS are expected to contribute to increase the salinity levels in such type of soils (Varghese et al., 2024; Ma et al., 2021). Therefore, high-water-demand crops such as rice may not be suitable for maintaining C stability in acidic soils. In contrast, low-water-demanding crops like maize and wheat would be more effective in minimizing C loss from acidic soils. On the other hand, alkaline soils can support the cultivation of a wide variety of crops while minimizing C loss, along with the presence of relatively high levels of HS-bound to organo-minerals. In particular, the pH levels of the paddy and maize soils object of this study are slightly alkaline (8.13 and 7.92, respectively), making them reasonably suitable for diverse types of crops. Furthermore, both soils exhibit relatively high levels of HS-bound organo-minerals, with significant increases in DOCCS stability (2.6 and 3.2 times higher, respectively) compared to DOCLS lability.”
New references
Underwood, T. R. et al.: Mineral-associated organic matter is heterogeneous and structured by hydrophobic, charged, and polar interactions. PNAS 121, e2413216121 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2413216121, 2024.
Conclusion: Conclusion is repetitive. Please consider addressing any future research directions.
R: As suggested, we have revised the repetition in lines 516-525 as follows (blue color new addition):
“In particular, an alkaline or elevated pH level would result in anionic forms (‒O‒ and ‒COO‒) of phenolic OH and carboxyl groups of HA, FA and PLS, which ultimately contributes to the insolubilisation and stability of HS through the formation of organo-mineral complexes in soils. In contrast, at acidic pH, the electron and proton transfer processes would be facilitated by the availability of uncomplexed metal ions, with subsequent insolubility of HALS+CS-pH6 which would remain insoluble in soils during rainwater events or water runoff at pH 6, whereas HALS+CS-pH1 would remain soluble and thus mobile and would be transported in ambient surface waters via rainwater, leaching, and groundwater infiltration (Ronchi et al., 2013; Stolpe et al., 2013; Mostofa et al., 2019).
The highly soluble FA and PLS at acidic conditions would facilitate to the easy transport to ambient surface waters via rainwater and groundwater discharge (Ronchi et al., 2013; Stolpe et al., 2013; Mostofa et al., 2019).”
We have added the future research direction the following text in lines 531-533: “Future research directions should focus on investigating acidic soils, which are beyond the scope of this study. These soils are expected to be significantly affected by the individual conditions of HA, FA, and PLS in acidic environments.”
Line 60: Define "FTIR" in the first instance it appears for readers who may not be familiar with the term.
R: As suggested, revised in line 68, 240 and 391.
Line 110-115: Expand on the significance of fluorescence excitation-emission matrix (EEM) and its advantages over other methods.
R: As suggested, we have added the following text of the revised Introduction in lines 99-105: ‘Three-dimensional (3D) fluorescence excitation-emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy (3D EEMS) is a precise, rapid and relatively simple technique for measuring filtered environmental surface waters and samples extracted from soils and sediments (Senesi, 1990b; Coble, 1990, 1996; Stedmon et al., 2003; Mostofa et al., 2013; Mohinuzzman et al., 2020). In particular, this technique allows the characterization of fluorescent components, including soil HS, autochthonous humic-like substances, PLS, detergent-like substances, and others, without the need for further pretreatment of the samples (Senesi, 1990b; Coble 1990, 1996; Stedmon et al., 2003; Mostofa et al., 2013).
New references
Coble, P. G., Green, S. A., Blough, N. V., and Gagosian, R. B.: Characterization of dissolved organic matter in the
Black Sea by fluorescence spectroscopy, Nature, 348, 432–435, 1990.
Coble, P. G.: Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in sea water using excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy, Mar. Chem., 52, 325–346, 1996.
Mostofa, K. M. G., Yoshioka, T., Mottaleb, M. A., Vione, D.: Photobiogeochemistry of Organic Matter: Principles and Practices in Water Environments. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2013.
Senesi, N.: Molecular and quantitative aspects of the chemistry of fulvic acid and its interactions with metal ions and organic chemicals. Part II. The fluorescence spectroscopy approach, Anal. Chim. Acta, 232, 77–106, 1990a.
Stedmon, C. A., Markager, S. and Bro, R. (2003) Tracing dissolved organic matter in aquatic environments using a new approach to fluorescence spectroscopy. Mar. Chem. 82, 239–254
Line 130-135: Include a brief justification for selecting maize and paddy soils as the study sites.
More references for major FTIR absorption bands and assignments.
Use consistent formatting for citations throughout the text.
R: As suggested, for the first issue (and also referee’s same previous comment), we have already added this in lines 173-178.
For the second issue, we have added more relevant references regarding FTIR band peaks in lines 403-416
For the third issue, we have carefully checked the consistent formatting for citations throughout the text.
New references:
Demyan, M. S. et al.: Use of specific peaks obtained by diffuse reflectance Fourier transform mid-infrared spectroscopy to study the composition of organic matter in a Haplic Chernozem, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 63, 189–199, 2012.
Kunlanit, B., Vityakon, P., Puttaso, A., Cadisch, G., and Rasche, F.: Mechanisms controlling soil organic carbon composition pertaining to microbial decomposition of biochemically contrasting organic residues: Evidence from midDRIFTS peak area analysis, Soil Bio. Biochem. 76, 100–108, 2014.
Shammi, M., Pan, X., Mostofa, K. M. G., Zhang, D., Liu, C. Q.: Photo-flocculation of algal biofilm extracellular polymeric substances and its transformation into transparent exopolymer particles. Chemical and spectroscopic evidences. Sci. Rep. 7, 9074, 2017.
Singh, R. P. et al. Isolation and characterization of exopolysaccharides from seaweed associated bacteria Bacillus licheniformis. Carbohyd. Polym. 84, 1019–1026 (2011).
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2994-AC3
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Khan M.G. Mostofa, 02 Jan 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
477 | 156 | 32 | 665 | 76 | 18 | 20 |
- HTML: 477
- PDF: 156
- XML: 32
- Total: 665
- Supplement: 76
- BibTeX: 18
- EndNote: 20
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1