the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Ground-based noontime D-region electron density climatology over northern Norway
Mani Sivakandan
Juliana Jaen
Werner Singer
Abstract. The bottom part of the earth’s ionosphere is the so-called D-region, which is typically less intense than the upper regions. Despite the comparably lower electron number density, the ionization state of the D-region has a significant influence on signal absorption for propagating lower to medium radio frequencies. We present local noon climatologies of electron number density in the middle atmosphere at high latitudes as observed by an active radar experiment. The radar measurements cover nine years from the solar maximum of cycle 24 to the beginning of cycle 25. Reliable electron densities are derived by employing signal processing, applying interferometry methods, and the Faraday International Reference Ionosphere (FIRI) model. For all years a consistent spring-autumn asymmetry of the electron number density pattern as well as a sharp decrease at the beginning of October was found. These findings are consistent with VLF studies showing equivalent signatures for nearby propagation paths. It has been suggested that the meridional circulation associated with downwelling in winter could cause enhanced electron densities through NO transport. However, this mechanism lacks to explain the reduction in electron density in early October.
Toralf Renkwitz et al.
Status: open (until 18 Jun 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-815', Martin Friedrich, 08 May 2023
reply
The manuscript “Ground-based noontime ...“ by Renkwitz et al. presents an interesting new source of continuous D-region measurements. After an overview of the processes active in the D-region, a description of the updated Saura radar is given. Data taken at local noon at Andøya of nine years of observations are presented. Since at high latitudes (69°) additional ionisation by energetic particles is very common, the quiet data were filtered out using the (non-auroral) FIRI model as a coarse reference to identify disturbed conditions. One aspect of the analysis was to find the so-called Fall Effect, an electron density enhancement typically ocurring in October, which could indeed be found at this relatively high latitude. The paper is clearly arranged, but in some places I took the liberty to suggest other wordings. Beyond these “peanuts“ I have the following comments:
lines 123/124: I am surprised that the neutral atmosphere was taken from CIRA (which year?), notably since the authors are from the same institution as F.J. Lübken and U. v. Zahn, the pioneers in establishing a local atmospheric model based on met-rocket soundings from Andøya.
lines 244/245: “Enhancements around the equinoxes are visible and especially during the winter period“. Equinox occurs when day and night have the same length; hence equinox occurs typically near March 20 and September 29 (but not in winter)
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-815-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Toralf Renkwitz, 25 May 2023
reply
We appreciate the helpful comments from Reviewer #1, Martin Friedrich.
1)
As a reference for the neutral atmosphere we used CIRA version 1986, which we unfortunately missed to quote precisely and did not reason it.
Indeed, there is a climatology by Lübken, JGR, 1999 followed by Lübken and Müllemann, JGR, 2002, derived from falling spheres at Andenes.
One limitation of this climatology for our purpose is, it only covers the summer period, namely DOY 113 to 266. There also have been a few flights during winter, but for our study we require a consistent reference throughout the year.There are indeed some noticeable differences between CIRA-1986 and Lübken-1999, which are rather intense above 85 km altitude thoughout the year and comparably small below 60km for DOY 170-200 and 70 to 80km towards the winter.
Lübken 1999 summarized the deviations to CIRA-1986 to be within about +/-5% for altitudes below 80 km.As sketched in the outlook we're also working on applying the same technique to the widely comparable Juliusruh radar (54°N) where no rocketborne climatology exists.
As we only show electron densities below 85 km and generally handle measurements with the Saura radar above this altitude with care, we tend to accept the mentioned uncertainties to be tolerable in the advantage of a homogeneous and consistent reference.
We'll add a corresponding comment to the manuscript, which is certainly needed.
2)
We realize the formulation of this rather short sentence is misleading.
We wanted to express that enhancements are visible around the equinoxes to which EPP (Russel-McPherron-cycle) are typically attributed, but enhanced electron densities are also seen for the winter period.
We'll rephrase this statement accordingly.We'll also go over the other suggestions given and incorporate them.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-815-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Toralf Renkwitz, 25 May 2023
reply
Toralf Renkwitz et al.
Toralf Renkwitz et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
98 | 30 | 11 | 139 | 3 | 2 |
- HTML: 98
- PDF: 30
- XML: 11
- Total: 139
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1