Particulate-bound alkyl nitrate pollution and formation mechanisms in Beijing, China

Yang, Jiyuan; Lei, Guoyang; Zhu, Jinfeng; Wu, Yutong; Liu, Chang; Hu, Kai; Bao, Junsong; Zhang, Zitong; Lin, Weili; Jin, Jun

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-700

Preprints

https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-700

Preprints

02 May 2023

| 02 May 2023

Particulate-bound alkyl nitrate pollution and formation mechanisms in Beijing, China

Jiyuan Yang, Guoyang Lei, Jinfeng Zhu, Yutong Wu, Chang Liu, Kai Hu, Junsong Bao, Zitong Zhang, Weili Lin, and Jun Jin

Abstract. Fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) samples were collected between November 2020 and October 2021 at the Minzu University of China in Beijing and the n-alkyl nitrate concentrations in the PM_2.5 samples were determined to investigate n-alkyl nitrate pollution and formation mechanisms. C₉–C₁₆n-alkyl nitrate standards were synthesized and the n-alkyl nitrate concentrations in PM_2.5 were determined by gas chromatography triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. Temporal trends in and correlations between particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrate, ozone, PM_2.5, and nitrogen dioxide concentrations were investigated to assess the relationships between particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrate concentrations and photochemical reactions and identify the n-alkyl nitrate formation mechanisms. The n-alkyl nitrate concentrations in the PM_2.5 samples were 9.67–2730 pg/m³, and the mean was 578 pg/m³. The n-alkyl nitrate homologue group concentrations increased as the carbon chain length increased, i.e, long-chain n-alkyl nitrates contributed more than short-chain n-alkyl nitrates to the total n-alkyl nitrate concentrations in PM_2.5. The n-alkyl nitrate concentrations clearly varied seasonally and diurnally, the concentrations decreasing in the order winter > spring > autumn > summer and the mean concentrations being higher at night than in the day. The particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrate and ozone concentrations significantly negatively correlated despite gas-phase alkyl nitrate and ozone concentrations previously being found to positively correlate. This indicated that long-chain alkyl nitrates may not be produced during photochemical reactions. The particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrate concentrations followed the same trends as and significantly positively correlated with the PM_2.5 and nitrogen dioxide concentrations. Nitrogen dioxide is an important contributor of nitrates in particulate matter. This indicated that particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates may form through reactions between alkanes and nitrates on particulate matter surfaces. Particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates are important components of PM_2.5 during haze events and strongly affect atmospheric visibility. Particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates are secondary pollutants that strongly influence haze pollution.

Received: 09 Apr 2023 – Discussion started: 02 May 2023

Download & links

Preprint (PDF, 3318 KB)

Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
Preprint (3318 KB)

Download & links

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

05 Jan 2024

Particulate-bound alkyl nitrate pollution and formation mechanisms in Beijing, China

Jiyuan Yang, Guoyang Lei, Jinfeng Zhu, Yutong Wu, Chang Liu, Kai Hu, Junsong Bao, Zitong Zhang, Weili Lin, and Jun Jin

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 123–136, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-123-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-123-2024, 2024

Short summary

Jiyuan Yang et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

RC1:
'Comment on egusphere-2023-700', yongjie wei, 18 Jun 2023
This manuscript describes the n-alkyl nitrate pollution in Beijing, China. The authors detected n-alkyl nitrates from PM2.5 samples and evaluated the relationship between the formation of n-alkyl nitrate and photochemical reactions in PM2.5 by analyzing the temporal trends and correlations of n-alkyl nitrates with related pollutants, and inferred the formation mechanism of n-alkyl nitrates in particulate matter. This article presents the first qualitative and quantitative analysis of n-alkyl nitrates in PM2.5 using a new method. The manuscript is suitable for publication after the following concerns are responded.
The authors need to further justify the interest in studying n-alkyl nitrates in PM2.5 because it appears that the environmental impact of n-alkyl nitrates is limited.

Line 37-42. Please include citations in the background.

Line 103-105. Please provide the references of the n-alkanes emission.

Line 112. What is the basis for the day and night division of the sampling time?

Section 2.3. How to determine the quality and purity of synthetic standards of n-alkyl nitrates? Please provide more methodological details.

Line 181-183. How to define the long-chain and short-chain n-alkyl nitrates?

Line 186. Change “highest” to “largest”.

Section 3.1.2. Insufficient explanation of the influencing factors on seasonal differences in n-alkyl nitrate concentrations in PM2.5, more discussion is needed on the impact of meteorological factors.

Line 246-248. For the temporal trend of particulate long-chain n-alkyl nitrate concentrations and the variability of gas-phase short-chain alkyl nitrate concentrations found in previous studies with both gas particle state and chain length variables, why are they compared together?

Line 267-269. The results of trend and correlation analysis of n-alkyl nitrate in PM2.5 with O3 concentration levels are not sufficient to indicate that their formation are not related to photochemical reactions.

Section 3.2.2. The result on the formation mechanism are speculative and not sufficiently supported by evidences.

Line 583-585. Change “Table” to “Figure”.

Figure 4-8. What is the definition of the dotted line, please explain.

Figure 2-8. What is the definition of horizontal coordinate numbering, please explain or modify.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-700-RC1
- AC1:
  'Reply on RC1', Jun Jin, 24 Aug 2023
  Author's Response
  Particulate-bound alkyl nitrate pollution and formation mechanisms in Beijing, China
  Jiyuan Yang^1*, Guoyang Lei^1*, Jinfeng Zhu¹,Yutong Wu¹, Chang Liu¹, Kai Hu¹, Junsong Bao², Zitong Zhang¹, Weili Lin¹ and Jun Jin^1,3.
  ¹College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China
  ²State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
  ³Beijing Engineering Research Center of Food Environment and Public Health, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China
  *These authors contributed equally to this work
  Referee Comment
  This manuscript describes the n-alkyl nitrate pollution in Beijing, China. The authors detected n-alkyl nitrates from PM2.5 samples and evaluated the relationship between the formation of n-alkyl nitrate and photochemical reactions in PM2.5 by analyzing the temporal trends and correlations of n-alkyl nitrates with related pollutants, and inferred the formation mechanism of n-alkyl nitrates in particulate matter. This article presents the first qualitative and quantitative analysis of n-alkyl nitrates in PM2.5 using a new method. The manuscript is suitable for publication after the following concerns are responded.
  The authors need to further justify the interest in studying n-alkyl nitrates in PM2.5 because it appears that the environmental impact of n-alkyl nitrates is limited.
  
  Line 37-42. Please include citations in the background.
  
  Line 103-105. Please provide the references of the n-alkanes emission.
  
  Line 112. What is the basis for the day and night division of the sampling time?
  
  Section 2.3. How to determine the quality and purity of synthetic standards of n-alkyl nitrates? Please provide more methodological details.
  
  Line 181-183. How to define the long-chain and short-chain n-alkyl nitrates?
  
  Line 186. Change “highest” to “largest”.
  
  Section 3.1.2. Insufficient explanation of the influencing factors on seasonal differences in n-alkyl nitrate concentrations in PM2.5, more discussion is needed on the impact of meteorological factors.
  
  Line 246-248. For the temporal trend of particulate long-chain n-alkyl nitrate concentrations and the variability of gas-phase short-chain alkyl nitrate concentrations found in previous studies with both gas particle state and chain length variables, why are they compared together?
  
  Line 267-269. The results of trend and correlation analysis of n-alkyl nitrate in PM2.5 with O3 concentration levels are not sufficient to indicate that their formation are not related to photochemical reactions.
  
  Section 3.2.2. The result on the formation mechanism are speculative and not sufficiently supported by evidences.
  
  Line 583-585. Change “Table” to “Figure”.
  
  Figure 4-8. What is the definition of the dotted line, please explain.
  
  Figure 2-8. What is the definition of horizontal coordinate numbering, please explain or modify.
  
  Author's response：
  Dear referee:
  Thank you for your constructive comments and detailed revisions on our manuscript. We have carefully considered the suggestions and made some changes on the details of the manuscript accordingly. We supplemented the analysis in the conclusion and provided additional evidence to support the speculative ideas we presented. We have tried our best to improve this manuscript in order to it can be published successfully, please find our itemized responses and our revisions/corrections in below.
  
  The authors need to further justify the interest in studying n-alkyl nitratesin PM2.5 because it appears that the environmental impact of n-alkyl nitrates is limited.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestions. Atmospheric particulate matter and aerosol particles directly or indirectly affect climate and regional air quality. The atmosphere is a huge oxidizing chemical reactor, and the oxidizing capacity of the atmosphere is closely related to the chemical evolution of aerosol particles (Gen et al., 2022). Alkyl nitrates in particulate matter have not received attention in the past, as a kind of semi-permanent reservoir species, the formation of alkyl nitrates consumes nitrogen oxides and thus become an important sink for atmospheric nitrogen oxides (Perring et al., 2010). In addition, alkyl nitrates may release nitrogen dioxide by photolysis, affecting the balance of nitrogen oxides (Barnes et al., 1993). The photolysis of particulate nitrate can contribute to atmospheric oxidation capacity by producing strong oxidants such as hydroxyl radicals (Gen et al., 2022). Particulate-bound alkyl nitrates as a kind of secondary pollutants affected by anthropogenic emissions have an important influence on the oxidation of the atmospheric environment and the formation of regional haze (Browne et al., 2012). Therefore, we studied the sources and pollution characteristics of particulate-bound alkyl nitrates to explore their effects on the atmospheric environment and air quality.
  
  Modification: We have further explained our interest in studying particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates in the manuscript (L56-67: As a kind of semi-permanent reservoir species, ONs are important participants in the atmospheric nitrogen cycle, which involves various atmospheric sources and sinks of nitrogen oxides. The formation of ONs consumes nitrogen oxides and atmospheric oxidants, thus becomes an important sink for atmospheric nitrogen oxides (Perring et al., 2010) and affects the atmospheric lifetimes of free radicals, the ozone concentration, and photochemical reactions (Calvert et al., 1987). In addition, ONs may release nitrogen dioxide and produce strong oxidants such as hydroxyl radicals by photolysis, affecting the balance of nitrogen oxides in regional NOx cycles (Barnes et al., 1993; Chen et al., 1998) and contribute to atmospheric oxidation capacity (Gen et al., 2022), respectively. Semi-volatile ONs are an important kind of sources and component of secondary organic aerosols (SOAs) and contribute to fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) (Rollins et al., 2012). As important secondary air pollutants, ONs affect the oxidation in the atmosphere and the formation of haze (Browne et al., 2012), controlling particulate-bound ONs may therefore be key to controlling both PM_2.5 and ozone in the atmosphere. L97-99: Particulate-bound alkyl nitrates as a kind of secondary pollutants affected by anthropogenic emissions have an important influence on the oxidation of the atmospheric environment and the formation of regional haze pollution (Browne et al., 2012).).
  
  Line 37-42. Please include citations in the background.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out, we will add the citations.
  
  Modification: We have added the citations for the background (L38: Li et al., 2017; L41: Bai et al., 2018)
  
  Line 103-105. Please provide the references of the n-alkanes emission.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out, we will provide the references of n-alkanes emission in the manuscript.
  
  Modification: We have provided the references (L114: Kang et al., 2018; Cui et al., 2021).
  
  Line 112. What is the basis for the day and night division of the sampling time?
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question. We wanted to explore the differences of the concentrations of n-alkyl nitrates in PM_2.5 between day and night, and in order to take into account to the influences of vehicle emissions to the concentration levels of particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates, the day and night sampling times are divided based on the morning and evening rush hours in Beijing.
  
  Modification: We have added the timing of rush hours in Beijing in Section 2.1 (L122-123: according to the morning and evening rush hours in Beijing tend to be 7-9 am and 5-8 pm, respectively. ).
  
  Section 2.3. How to determine the quality and purity of synthetic standards of n-alkyl nitrates? Please provide more methodological details.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. In this study, we characterized and quantified the synthesized standards by GC-MS/MS to determine their purity. The synthesized standard and toluene were used as solute and solvent respectively to prepare the standard solution, and then detected the standard solution by GC-MS/MS full scan detection. According to the total ion flow diagram and mass spectrogram obtained by GC-MS/MS, we qualitatively analyzed the synthesized standards. In the case of n-nonyl nitrate, for example, as shown in the total ion flow diagram, only one compound showed high instrumental response, indicating the high purity. The characteristic ions of n-alkyl group and organic nitrates appeared in the mass spectrogram, and these characteristic ions all have high relative abundance. Therefore, we identified that the synthesized standard substance is n-nonyl nitrate. We will add more methodological details in Section 2.3.
  Total ion flow diagram
  Mass spectrogram
  
  Modification: We have added more methodological details in this section (L142-147: The standards were examined and analyzed by GC-MS/MS and detected by full scan detection. According to the total ion flow diagrams and mass spectrograms obtained by GC-MS/MS, only one compound showed high instrumental response in the total ion flow diagrams, indicating the high purity of synthesized standards. The characteristic irons of n-alkyl nitrates, [CH₂ONO₂]⁺ ion (m/z 76.07) and [NO₂]⁺ ion (m/z 46.07) appeared in the mass spectrograms and have high relative abundance, indicating the synthesized standards are n-alkyl nitrates.).
  
  Line 181-183. How to define the long-chain and short-chain n-alkyl nitrates?
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question. In this study, we defined C₉-C₁₁ n-alkyl nitrates as short-chain and C₁₂-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates as long-chain based on the carbon chain length, the detection rates in PM_2.5 samples and their pollution characteristics. We will modify the statement in this part to make it clearer.
  
  Modification: We have revised the statement in this part (L202-204: For n-alkyl nitrates with a single function group, relatively long chain n-alkyl nitrates (C₁₂-C₁₆) are more abundant than relatively short chain n-alkyl nitrates (C₉-C₁₁).).
  
  Line 186. Change “highest” to “largest”.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestion, we will change the description.
  
  Modification: We have changed “highest” to “largest” (L207).
  
  Section 3.1.2. Insufficient explanation of the influencing factors on seasonal differences in n-alkyl nitrate concentrations in PM2.5, more discussion is needed on the impact of meteorological factors.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. Differences in concentrations of semi-volatile organic pollutants such as n-alkyl nitrate in PM_2.5 may be affected by meteorological factors such as temperature. We will add the discussion of the effect of meteorological factors on the differences in particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrate concentrations in Section 3.1.2.
  
  Modification: We have added relevant discussion in the Section 3.1.2 (L248-260: We inferred that the diurnal and seasonal differences and changes in the particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrate concentrations may be influenced by the meteorological factors and the changes in particulate-bound alkyl nitrates formation process. Temperature affects the partitioning of the semi-volatile organic compounds between the gas and particle phases, the fraction of ONs in the particle phase increase with decreasing temperature (Kenagy et al., 2021), and the precursor n-alkanes are more likely to partition into particles with the high partition coefficient of gas-particle partitioning when the temperature is lower (Wick et al., 2002; Lyu et al., 2016). Other meteorological factors such as the mixing-layer height and atmospheric dispersion conditions can also affect the concentration level of particulate-bound alkyl nitrates by influencing the concentrations of PM_2.5 and precursor n-alkanes (Wagner and Schäfer, 2017). More abundant particulate matter and n-alkanes, influenced by meteorological factors, may further provide the reaction conditions for the formation of particulate-bound alkyl nitrates. L264-266: Long-chain particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates (C₉-C₁₆) and gaseous short-chain alkyl nitrates (C₁-C₅) in the same season such as summer showed different characteristics, which maybe due to their different formation mechanisms. However, it needs to be further analyzed.).
  
  Line 246-248. For the temporal trend of particulate long-chain n-alkyl nitrate concentrations and the variability of gas-phase short-chain alkyl nitrate concentrations found in previous studies with both gas particle state and chain length variables, why are they compared together?
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question. We think that during the gas-particle partitioning process of alkyl nitrate, short-chain alkyl nitrates (C≤8) have higher vapor pressure and usually in the gas phase, while long-chain alkyl nitrates (C>8) can easily enter the particle phase or form directly on the particulate phase due to their lower vapor pressure. We aimed to compare the different distributions of long-chain and short-chain alkyl nitrates in the gas and particulate phases suggesting that long-chain alkyl nitrates may have a different environmental behavior than short chains.
  
  Line 267-269. The results of trend and correlation analysis of n-alkyl nitrate in PM2.5 with O3 concentration levels are not sufficient to indicate that their formation are not related to photochemical reactions.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. According to previous studies of alkyl nitrates in gas phase, we found that the formation of alkyl nitrates in gas-phase environments as a branching reaction of photochemical processes (Perring et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2018), and these short-chain alkyl nitrates (C₁-C₅) showed a significant positive correlation with ozone and their peak concentration occur in summer (Wang et al., 2013; Ling et al., 2016). However, we found that long-chain n-alkyl nitrates in PM_2.5showed different pollution characteristics and environmental behaviors from short-chain alkyl nitrates. Therefore, we inferred that the formation of long-chain alkyl nitrates is different from that of short-chain and may not come from the gas-phase formation reactions of photochemical process but may be formed directly in the particulate phase through the non-homogeneous reaction. This conclusion is speculative due to the limitations of experimental conditions and need further research, so we will make some modifications in the manuscript.
  
  Modification: We have modified some statements in this part (L295-303: C₉-C₁₆ particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates showed diametrically opposite characteristics and different environmental behaviors from gaseous alkyl nitrates, which suggest that particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates are not the indicators of photochemical pollution and maybe form through different mechanisms from gas-phase short-chain (C₁-C₅) alkyl nitrates. Research have shown that there may be other reaction pathways for the formation of particulate organic nitrates, particulate-bound organic nitrates are able to form via non-homogeneous reactions (Li et al., 2022). Therefore, we inferred that particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates may not be formed through the gas-phase reactions in photochemical process involving ozone and that long-chain (C₁₂-C₁₆) n-alkyl nitrates are not the secondary products of gas-phase homogeneous reactions in photochemical process.).
  
  Section 3.2.2. The result on the formation mechanism are speculative and not sufficiently supported by evidences.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. Due to the limitations of the experimental conditions, we only studied the C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates in PM_2.5 but lacked the concentration levels of these pollutants in the gas phase. However, previous studies have not reported these n-alkyl nitrates (C₉-C₁₆) in the gas phase. The conclusions in this section are speculative, we will try to find more literature to support the conclusions as evidence.
  
  Modification: We have revised this part and added some references as evidence to support our points (L315-332: According to previous study about particulate-bound n-alkanes in Beijing (Yang et al., 2023), we found that particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates showed the same temporal trends and pollution characteristics as n-alkanes, the particulate-bound n-alkanes and PM_2.5 concentrations significantly correlated (p<0.01, r=0.618). From this we hypothesize that C₁₂-C₁₆ particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrate and particulate matter concentrations probably correlated because of reactions involving precursors of n-alkyl nitrates on the particulate matter, meaning the particulate matter acted as a medium on which particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates formed or n-alkyl nitrates are involved in the formation of particulate matter; L329-330: studies have shown that ONs are able to form through non-homogeneous reactions (Zhen et al., 2022; Li et al., 2022); L353-358: The similar temporal trends in the particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrate, n-alkanes, PM_2.5, and NO₂ concentrations and the significant positive correlations between the n-alkyl nitrate, PM_2.5, and NO₂ concentrations indicate that particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates maybe form through non-homogeneous reactions between precursor alkanes and particulate-bound nitrate on particulate matter surfaces. However, the formation mechanisms still needs to be further study.).
  
  Line 583-585. Change “Table” to “Figure”.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out, we will correct this mistake.
  
  Modification: We have corrected the mistake and changed “Table” to “Figure”.
  
  Figure 4-8. What is the definition of the dotted line, please explain.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question. The dotted lines are the dividing lines and delineate the four seasons, from left to right, winter, spring, summer, and fall. We will add the definition of the dotted line in the figures.
  
  Modification: We have added the relevant definition (L675; L680; L685; L690).
  
  Figure 2-8. What is the definition of horizontal coordinate numbering, please explain or modify.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question. The horizontal coordinate number in Figure 2-8 indicate the sampling time of the samples. We will add the explanation of the definition of horizontal coordinate number in the figures.
  
  Modification: We have added the relevant explanation in the figures (L664-665; L669-670; L673-674; L678-679; L683-684; L688-689).
  
  We would like to thank you again for taking the time to review our manuscript.
  
  Reference:
  Bai, J. H., de Leeuw, G., De Smedt, I., Theys, N., Van Roozendael, M., Sogacheva, L., and Chai, W.: Variations and photochemical transformations of atmospheric constituents in North China, Atmospheric Environ., 189, 213-226, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.004, 2018.
  Barnes, I,, Becker, K. H., and Zhu, T.: Near UV absorption spectra and photolysis products of difunctional organic nitrates: Possible importance as NOx reservoirs, J. Atmos. Chem., 17, 353-373, doi: 10.1007/BF00696854, 1993.
  Browne, E. C., and Cohen, R. C.: Effects of biogenic nitrate chemistry on the NOx lifetime in remote continental regions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 20673-20716, doi: 10.5194/acp-12-11917-2012, 2012.
  Calvert, J. G., and Madronich, S.: Theoretical study of the initial products of the atmospheric oxidation of hydrocarbons, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 92, 2211-2220, doi: 10.1029/JD092iD02p02211, 1987.
  Chen, X. H., Hulbert, D., and Shepson, P. B.: Measurement of the organic nitrate yield from OH reaction with isoprene, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 103, 25563-25568, doi: 10.1029/98JD01483, 1998.
  Cui, M., Chen, Y. J., Li, C., Yin, J., Li, J., and Zheng, J.: Parent and methyl polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and n-alkanes emitted by construction machinery in China, Sci. Total Environ., 775, 144759, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144759, 2021.
  Gen, M. S., Liang, Z. C, Zhang, R.F., Mabato, B. R. G., and Chan, C. K.: Particulate nitrate photolysis in the atmosphere, Environ. Sci.: Atmos., 2, 111-127, doi: 10.1039/D1EA00087J, 2022.
  Kang, M. J., Ren, L., Ren, H., Zhao, Y., Kawamura, K., Zhang, H., Wei, L., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., and Fu, P.: Primary biogenic and anthropogenic sources of organic aerosols in Beijing, China: Insights from saccharides and n-alkanes, Environ. Pollut., 243, 1579-1587, doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.118, 2018.
  Kenagy, H. S., Romer Present, P. S., Wooldridge, P. J., Nault, B. A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Jimenez, J. L., Zare, A., Pye, H. O., and Yu, J.: Contribution of Organic Nitrates to Organic Aerosol over South Korea during KORUS-AQ, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 16326-16338, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c05521, 2021.
  Li, G.B., Cai, S.H., and Long, B.: New reactions for the formation of organic nitrate in the atmosphere, ACS omega, 7, 39671-39679, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03321, 2022.
  Li, Q., Wang, E. R., Zhang, T. T., and Hu, H.: Spatial and temporal patterns of air pollution in Chinese cities, Water Air Soil Pollut., 228, 1-22, doi: 10.1007/s11270-017-3268-x, 2017.
  Ling, Z., Guo, H., Simpson, I. J., Saunders, S. M., Lam, S. H. M., Lyu, X., and Blake, D. R.: New insight into the spatiotemporal variability and source apportionments of C1-C4 alkyl nitrates in Hong Kong, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8141–8156, doi: 10.5194/acp-16-8141-2016, 2016.
  Lyu, Y., Xu, T. T., Yang, X., Chen, J. M., Cheng, T. T., and Li, X.: Seasonal contributions to size-resolved n-alkanes (C8-C40) in the Shanghai atmosphere from regional anthropogenic activities and terrestrial plant waxes, Sci. Total Environ., 579, 1918-1928, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.201, 2016.
  Perring, A. E., Bertram, T. H., Farmer, D. K., Wooldridge, P. J., Dibb, J., Blake, N. J., Blake, D. R., Singh, H. B., Fuelberg, H., Diskin, G., Sachse, G., and Cohen, R. C.: The production and persistence of ΣRONO2 in the Mexico City plume, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7215-7229, doi: 10.5194/acp-10-7215-2010, 2010.
  Perring, A. E., Pusede, S. E., and Cohen, R. C.: An observational perspective on the atmospheric impacts of alkyl and multifunctional nitrates on ozone and secondary organic aerosol, Chem. Rev., 113, 5848-5870, doi: 10.1021/cr300520x, 2013.
  Rollins, A. W., Browne, E. C., Min, K. E., Pusede, S. E., Wooldridge, P. J., Gentner, D. R., Goldstein, A. H., Liu, S., Day, D. A., Russell, L. M.: Evidence for NOx Control over Nighttime SOA Formation, Science, 337, 1210-1212, doi: 10.1126/science.1221520, 2012.
  Sun, J., Li, Z., Xue, L., Wang, T., Wang, X., Gao, J., Nie, W., Simpson, I. J., Gao, R., and Blake, D. R.: Summertime C1-C5 alkyl nitrates over Beijing, northern China: Spatial distribution, regional transport, and formation mechanisms, Atmos. Res., 204, 102-109, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.01.014, 2018.
  Wagner, P., and Schäfer, K.: Influence of mixing layer height on air pollutant concentrations in an urban street canyon, Urban Clim., 22, 64-79, doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.11.001, 2017.
  Wang, M., Shao, M., Chen, W., Lu, S., Wang, C., Huang, D., Yuan, B., Zeng, L., and Zhao, Y.: Measurements of C1-C4 alkyl nitrates and their relationships with carbonyl compounds and O3 in Chinese cities, Atmos. Environ., 81, 389-398, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.065, 2013.
  Wick, C. D, Siepmann, J., Klotz, W. L, and Schure, M. R.: Temperature effects on the retention of n-alkanes and arenes in helium-squalane gas-liquid chromatography: experiment and molecular simulation, J. Chromatogr. A, 957, 181-190, doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)00171-1, 2002.
  Yang, J., Lei, G., Liu, C., Wu, Y., Hu, K., Zhu, J., Bao, J., Lin, W., and Jin, J.: Characteristics of particulate-bound n-alkanes indicating sources of PM2.5 in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3015-3029, doi: 10.5194/acp-23-3015-2023, 2023.
  Zhen, S. S., Luo, M., Shao, Y., Xu, D. D., and Ma, L. L.: Application of Stable Isotope Techniques in Tracing the Sources of Atmospheric NOX and Nitrate, Processes, 10, 2549, doi: 10.3390/pr10122549, 2022.
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-700-AC1
RC2:
'Comment on egusphere-2023-700', Anonymous Referee #2, 21 Jun 2023

This is a paper describing measurement of long-chain alkyl nitrates in particulate matter in China. The measurements seem well done and I think there is probably interesting material here, however, as presented, the analysis is not mature enough to make compelling conclusions and it's hard to tell, from what is presented, whether it is merely an issue of presentation or whether additional correlative measurements would be needed. I include specific comments below but it seems like it should be possible to do more extensive calculations of the expected distributions of these compounds between the gas and particle phases which might explain the observed diurnal and seasonal trends. Until those calculations (based on a wealth of previously published work regarding gas-particle partitioning of VOC) I don;t belive that the main conclusion (formation of organic nitrates in the particle phase) can be supported.
Smaller comments include:
Line 47 – I don’t think it’s true that more oxidation occurs as NOx concentrations increase. Probably under most conditions? But under NOx saturated conditions that’s not true anymore. I recommend rephrasing.
End of the same paragraph – the last sentence doesn’t really wrap these things together the way I think you want to. Maybe try to make the point that particulate-bound organic nitrates reflect both ozone production and SOA formation chemistry?
I recommend re-writing paragraph that starts on line 55. ONs are not mostly esters and they’re not such a reactive nitrogen oxide, they’re more like semi-permanent reservoir species. They’re an interesting component of PM but only a large fraction under very special circumstances. If the main idea of this paragraph is to describe how ONs behave as part of the coupled Hox-NOx cycles that lead to ozone production and then how they can partition to aerosol then this should be rearranged and refocused.
Then, beginning of the next paragraph, in this case you mean nitrates including nitrate salts and organic nitrates? I would rephrase because, as written, that is going to be confusing to some readers since you’ve been only talking about organic nitrates. And then later be specific about the fraction of particulate nitrate that are observed to be ONs. Finally, the fraction of PM2.5 that’s SOA seems a bit disconnected from the rest of this discussion since ONs are a minor component of both SOA and PM.
And then in the discussion of the different VOC that can contribute to ONs, I think it’s odd not to mention the relative abundances of those precursors. Do you have measurements of any of the hydrocarbon precursors?
In 2.1 it might be good to mention the timing of rush hour as it relates to your sample times.
Section 2.3 – Have you checked the quantitative yields of the alkyl nitrate that you're using to make your standards? I think you should say more about how sure you are that they can be used as calibration standards.
Why is NO2+ used for confirmation and CH2ONO2 quantitatively? Can you comment on the relative detection efficiencies of the quantitative fragment for different ONs? Or I guess that is taken care of with the calibration but it's probably worth mentioning why you choose to use these ions the way you do.
Line 168 – 63% recovery isn’t great. Was it systematically low for certain compounds? Which ones? Any idea why? The small standard deviation makes it seem like it must have been systematic.
Line 188 – more longer chain compounds doesn’t mean that they are more abundant overall, it might just be that they’re more likely to partition. Are the vapor pressures known or estimated? Can you evaluate the implied overall concentration (gas+particle) based on your observations in the particle phase using known vapor pressures and the calculated partition coefficients?
Lines 193 and after – Are there number-of-carbon effects to vapor pressure? I wonder if part of this trend is because c9-c11 includes only one even C number while 12-16 includes only two odds? See for example this reference: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es0201810
Lines 210-213 – has anyone measured a speciated VOC distribution here? Can you see if your contributions to particulate phase match up? (I mentioned this earlier too) I’m not sure we need to call for more investigation unless we have evidence that the known chemistry fails to explain what you’re seeing.
3.1.2 – How much of this can be explained by colder temperatures at night?
Paragraph that starts on line 223 – Please be a bit more specific on which statistical tests have been used to determine significance for different things.
Line 234 – different chain lengths of nitrates don’t have different formation mechanisms. But particulate nitrate formation is really temperature sensitive so it makes total sense that overall nitrate production might be highest in the summer even though particulate nitrate peaks in the winter. Or perhaps the winter has different VOC sources? Is this an area with isoprene emissions? Because those are very volatile products so that could drive a big summer to winter difference.
Figure 1 – what is the x-axis? Are the different points individual samples smushed into the same little region? Is it a function of time?
Figure 4 – You don't need both Figure 4 and 6. I recommend just keeping figure 6. Also why put day and night together? Maybe make them different traces? But the mass fraction of ONs are insanely small. Does current figure 6 imply that it's ~0.001% of PM? If so I think it's hard to argue, as you do at the end of the paper, that these n-alkyl nitrates are an imporatant contributor to PM and haze formation.
Also figures 4, 5 and 6 – would help to label or color-code with seasons since it’s hard to look at numerical dates, especially since there are gaps.

Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-700-RC2
- AC2:
  'Reply on RC2', Jun Jin, 24 Aug 2023
  Author's Response
  Particulate-bound alkyl nitrate pollution and formation mechanisms in Beijing, China
  Jiyuan Yang^1*, Guoyang Lei^1*, Jinfeng Zhu¹,Yutong Wu¹, Chang Liu¹, Kai Hu¹, Junsong Bao², Zitong Zhang¹, Weili Lin¹ and Jun Jin^1,3.
  ¹College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China
  ²State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
  ³Beijing Engineering Research Center of Food Environment and Public Health, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China
  *These authors contributed equally to this work
  Referee Comment
  This is a paper describing measurement of long-chain alkyl nitrates in particulate matter in China. The measurements seem well done and I think there is probably interesting material here, however, as presented, the analysis is not mature enough to make compelling conclusions and it's hard to tell, from what is presented, whether it is merely an issue of presentation or whether additional correlative measurements would be needed. I include specific comments below but it seems like it should be possible to do more extensive calculations of the expected distributions of these compounds between the gas and particle phases which might explain the observed diurnal and seasonal trends. Until those calculations (based on a wealth of previously published work regarding gas-particle partitioning of VOC) I don’t belive that the main conclusion (formation of organic nitrates in the particle phase) can be supported.
  Smaller comments include:
  Line 47 – I don’t think it’s true that more oxidation occurs as NOx concentrations increase. Probably under most conditions? But under NOx saturated conditions that’s not true anymore. I recommend rephrasing.
  
  End of the same paragraph – the last sentence doesn’t really wrap these things together the way I think you want to. Maybe try to make the point that particulate-bound organic nitrates reflect both ozone production and SOA formation chemistry?
  
  I recommend re-writing paragraph that starts on line 55. ONs are not mostly esters and they’re not such a reactive nitrogen oxide, they’re more like semi-permanent reservoir species. They’re an interesting component of PM but only a large fraction under very special circumstances. If the main idea of this paragraph is to describe how ONs behave as part of the coupled Hox-NOx cycles that lead to ozone production and then how they can partition to aerosol then this should be rearranged and refocused.
  
  Then, beginning of the next paragraph, in this case you mean nitrates including nitrate salts and organic nitrates? I would rephrase because, as written, that is going to be confusing to some readers since you’ve been only talking about organic nitrates. And then later be specific about the fraction of particulate nitrate that are observed to be ONs. Finally, the fraction of PM2.5 that’s SOA seems a bit disconnected from the rest of this discussion since ONs are a minor component of both SOA and PM.
  
  And then in the discussion of the different VOC that can contribute to ONs, I think it’s odd not to mention the relative abundances of those precursors. Do you have measurements of any of the hydrocarbon precursors?
  
  In 2.1 it might be good to mention the timing of rush hour as it relates to your sample times.
  
  Section 2.3 – Have you checked the quantitative yields of the alkyl nitrate that you're using to make your standards? I think you should say more about how sure you are that they can be used as calibration standards.
  
  Why is NO2+ used for confirmation and CH2ONO2 quantitatively? Can you comment on the relative detection efficiencies of the quantitative fragment for different ONs? Or I guess that is taken care of with the calibration but it's probably worth mentioning why you choose to use these ions the way you do.
  
  Line 168 – 63% recovery isn’t great. Was it systematically low for certain compounds? Which ones? Any idea why? The small standard deviation makes it seem like it must have been systematic.
  
  Line 188 – more longer chain compounds doesn’t mean that they are more abundant overall, it might just be that they’re more likely to partition. Are the vapor pressures known or estimated? Can you evaluate the implied overall concentration (gas+particle) based on your observations in the particle phase using known vapor pressures and the calculated partition coefficients?
  
  Lines 193 and after – Are there number-of-carbon effects to vapor pressure? I wonder if part of this trend is because c9-c11 includes only one even C number while 12-16 includes only two odds? See for example this reference: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es0201810
  
  Lines 210-213 – has anyone measured a speciated VOC distribution here? Can you see if your contributions to particulate phase match up? (I mentioned this earlier too) I’m not sure we need to call for more investigation unless we have evidence that the known chemistry fails to explain what you’re seeing.
  
  1.2 – How much of this can be explained by colder temperatures at night?
  
  Paragraph that starts on line 223 – Please be a bit more specific on which statistical tests have been used to determine significance for different things.
  
  Line 234 – different chain lengths of nitrates don’t have different formation mechanisms. But particulate nitrate formation is really temperature sensitive so it makes total sense that overall nitrate production might be highest in the summer even though particulate nitrate peaks in the winter. Or perhaps the winter has different VOC sources? Is this an area with isoprene emissions? Because those are very volatile products so that could drive a big summer to winter difference.
  
  Figure 1 – what is the x-axis? Are the different points individual samples smushed into the same little region? Is it a function of time?
  
  Figure 4 – You don't need both Figure 4 and 6. I recommend just keeping figure 6. Also why put day and night together? Maybe make them different traces? But the mass fraction of ONs are insanely small. Does current figure 6 imply that it's ~0.001% of PM? If so I think it's hard to argue, as you do at the end of the paper, that these n-alkyl nitrates are an imporatant contributor to PM and haze formation.
  
  Also figures 4, 5 and 6 – would help to label or color-code with seasons since it’s hard to look at numerical dates, especially since there are gaps.
  
  Author's response：
  Dear referee:
  Thank you for your constructive comments on our manuscript. We have carefully considered the suggestions and revised the manuscript accordingly. We have added to the analysis of our conclusion based on your suggestions and provided more additional evidence to support our points. However, we could not add more additional measurements especially of alkyl nitrates in the gas phase due to the experimental constraints, so it is difficult to calculate the expected distributions of these compounds between the gas and particle phases without being able to obtain their concentration levels in the gas phase. We have tried our best to improve this manuscript, please find our itemized responses and revisions/corrections in below.
  
  Line 47 – I don’t think it’s true that more oxidations occurs as NOx concentrations increase. Probably under most conditions? But under NOx saturated conditions that’s not true anymore. I recommend rephrasing.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestions, we previously thought that atmospheric oxidizability may increase as NOx concentrations in the atmosphere increase, with enhanced photochemical reactions and increased ozone production, did not take into account the situation that NOx reaches saturation. We will rephrase this sentence.
  
  Modification: We have rephrased this sentence and changed it to “Before the NOx reach saturation, more oxidations may occurs in the atmosphere as NOx concentrations increase” (L47-48).
  
  End of the same paragraph – the last sentence doesn’t really wrap these things together the way I think you want to. Maybe try to make the point that particulate-bound organic nitrates reflect both ozone production and SOA formation chemistry?
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. We will add a summary at the end of this paragraph and improve this part according to your suggestion.
  
  Modification: We have added a concluding sentence at the end of this paragraph (L54-55: they reflect both photochemical processes of ozone production and SOA formation.).
  
  I recommend re-writing paragraph that starts on line 55. ONs are not mostly esters and they’re not such a reactive nitrogen oxide, they’re more like semi-permanent reservoir species. They’re an interesting component of PM but only a large fraction under very special circumstances. If the main idea of this paragraph is to describe how ONs behave as part of the coupled Hox-NOx cycles that lead to ozone production and then how they can partition to aerosol, then this should be rearranged and refocused.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestions. We will rewrite this paragraph according to your advice and emphasize the impacts of particulate-bound organic nitrates as a kind of semi-permanent reservoir species on the nitrogen cycle and the atmosphere.
  Modification: We have rewritten this paragraph (L56-67: As a kind of semi-permanent reservoir species, ONs are important participants in the atmospheric nitrogen cycle, which involves various atmospheric sources and sinks of nitrogen oxides. The formation of ONs consumes nitrogen oxides and atmospheric oxidants, thus becomes an important sink for atmospheric nitrogen oxides (Perring et al., 2010) and affects the atmospheric lifetimes of free radicals, the ozone concentration, and photochemical reactions (Calvert et al., 1987). In addition, ONs may release nitrogen dioxide and produce strong oxidants such as hydroxyl radicals by photolysis, affecting the balance of nitrogen oxides in regional NOx cycles (Barnes et al., 1993; Chen et al., 1998) and contribute to atmospheric oxidation capacity (Gen et al., 2022), respectively. Semi-volatile ONs are an important kind of sources and component of secondary organic aerosols (SOAs) and contribute to fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) (Rollins et al., 2012). As important secondary air pollutants, ONs affect the oxidation in the atmosphere and the formation of haze (Browne et al., 2012), controlling particulate-bound ONs may therefore be key to controlling both PM_2.5 and ozone in the atmosphere.).
  
  Then, beginning of the next paragraph, in this case you mean nitrates including nitrate salts and organic nitrates? I would rephrase because, as written, that is going to be confusing to some readers since you’ve been only talking about organic nitrates. And then later be specific about the fraction of particulate nitrate that are observed to be ONs. Finally, the fraction of PM2.5 that’s SOA seems a bit disconnected from the rest of this discussion since ONs are a minor component of both SOA and PM.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out, the “nitrates” in this part means organic nitrates, we will revise this paragraph to make it more logical.
  
  Modification: We have modified this paragraph (L70-74: The formation of particulate-bound ONs associated with non-homogeneous reactions (Zhen et al., 2022; Li et al., 2022), especially at night was highly correlated with nitrogen oxide levels. During strong air pollution events, SOAs can contribute up to 30%-77% of PM_2.5, with particulate organic nitrates accounting for 5%-40% of the organic matter (Rollins et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2012). L76-77: The strong correlation between ONs and SOAs and the diurnal trend of ONs particle size distribution indicate the key role of particulate-bound ONs (Yu et al., 2019).)
  
  And then in the discussion of the different VOC that can contribute to ONs, I think it’s odd not to mention the relative abundances of those precursors. Do you have measurements of any of the hydrocarbon precursors?
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. According to previous research, we found that alkanes, as the precursors of alkyl nitrates, have been found to be the most abundant species and contributing 54.1-64.7% of the total VOC concentration (Li et al., 2020). We will add the measurement results of n-alkanes to this part of the manuscript.
  
  Modification: We have added the the measurement results of alkanes to this part (L83-84: Alkanes, as the precursors of alkyl nitrates, have been found to be the most abundant species and contributing 54.1-64.7% of the total VOC concentration (Li et al., 2020)).
  
  In 2.1 it might be good to mention the timing of rush hour as it relates to your sample times.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestion. The morning and evening rush hours in Beijing tend to be 7-9 am and 5-8 pm, respectively. We will add this to Section 2.1.
  
  Modification: We have added the timing of rush hours in Beijing in Section 2.1 (L122-123).
  
  Section 2.3 – Have you checked the quantitative yields of the alkyl nitrate that you're using to make your standards? I think you should say more about how sure you are that they can be used as calibration standards.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question and suggestion. In this study, we characterized and quantified the synthesized standards by GC-MS/MS to determine their purity. The synthesized standards were detected by the GC-MS/MS full scan detection. We qualitatively analyzed the synthesized standards, according to the total ion flow diagram and mass spectrogram obtained by GC-MS/MS. In the case of n-nonyl nitrate, for example, as shown in the total ion flow diagram, only one compound showed high instrumental response, indicating the high purity. The characteristic ions of n-alkyl group and organic nitrate appeared in the mass spectrogram, and these characteristic ions all have high relative abundance. Therefore, we identified that the synthesized standard substance is n-nonyl nitrate. We will add more methodological details in Section 2.3.
  Total ion flow diagram
  Mass spectrogram
  
  Modification: We have added more methodological details in this section (L142-147: The standards were examined and analyzed by GC-MS/MS and detected by full scan detection. According to the total ion flow diagrams and mass spectrograms obtained by GC-MS/MS, only one compound showed high instrumental response in the total ion flow diagrams, indicating the high purity of synthesized standards. The characteristic irons of n-alkyl nitrates, [CH₂ONO₂]⁺ ion (m/z 76.07) and [NO₂]⁺ ion (m/z 46.07) appeared in the mass spectrograms and have high relative abundance, indicating the synthesized standards are n-alkyl nitrates.).
  
  Why is NO2+ used for confirmation and CH2ONO2 quantitatively? Can you comment on the relative detection efficiencies of the quantitative fragment for different ONs? Or I guess that is taken care of with the calibration but it's probably worth mentioning why you choose to use these ions the way you do.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. In this study, we used GC-MS/MS for the detection of alkyl nitrates and chose both [CH₂ONO₂]⁺ and [NO₂]⁺ as qualitative and quantitative ions, where [CH₂ONO₂]⁺ was used as the parent ion and [NO₂]⁺ as the daughter ion. In mass spectrometry, organic nitrates formed from saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons were able to cleave to produce [CH₂ONO₂]⁺ ion, and [CH₂ONO₂]⁺ ion were able to further cleave to produce [NO₂]⁺ ion, both ions have high abundance. According to previous studies, the [NO₂]⁺ ion is widely used in the detection of alkyl nitrates as a characteristic ion of alkyl nitrates (Luxenhofer et al., 1994; Luxenhofer et al., 1996). The use of these two ions as qualitative and quantitative ions for the detection of alkyl nitrates has been studied and proven (Yang et al., 2019).
  
  Line 168 – 63% recovery isn’t great. Was it systematically low for certain compounds? Which ones? Any idea why? The small standard deviation makes it seem like it must have been systematic.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your questions. In blank spiked recovery experiments, we found that the recovery of C₉-C₁₁ n-alkyl nitrates was lower than that of other n-alkyl nitrates, probably due to the effect of higher volatility. We will improve the pretreatment method to improve the recovery in the follow-up study.
  
  Line 188 – more longer chain compounds doesn’t mean that they are more abundant overall, it might just be that they’re more likely to partition. Are the vapor pressures known or estimated? Can you evaluate the implied overall concentration (gas+particle) based on your observations in the particle phase using known vapor pressures and the calculated partition coefficients?
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. In this study, we found that C₁₂-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates with longer carbon chains have higher detection rates and concentrations than C₉-C₁₁ n-alkyl nitrates in PM_2.5. Therefore, we thought that long-chain n-alkyl nitrates are more abundant in particulate matter, this is the conclusion based on the observations. Through our investigations, we have found that the vapor pressure of each homologue of C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates is approximately 0.0 ± 0.7 mmHg at 25℃, and decreases with the growth of the carbon chain length. However, due to the limitations of the experimental conditions, we were unable to measure the concentration levels of C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates in the gas-phase environment, so we were unable to calculate the relevant partition coefficients for further study. The total concentration and partitioning of alkyl nitrate in both phases needs to be explored by more research.
  
  Modification: We have revised the statement in this part (L202-204: For n-alkyl nitrates with a single function group, relatively long chain n-alkyl nitrates (C₁₂-C₁₆) are more abundant than relatively short chain n-alkyl nitrates (C₉-C₁₁).).
  
  Lines 193 and after – Are there number-of-carbon effects to vapor pressure? I wonder if part of this trend is because c9-c11 includes only one even C number while 12-16 includes only two odds? See for example this reference: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es0201810
  
  Reply: Thank you for your questions. We found that the vapor pressure of C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates varies only with increasing carbon chain length, independent of the number of odd or even carbons.
  
  Lines 210-213 – has anyone measured a speciated VOC distribution here? Can you see if your contributions to particulate phase match up? (I mentioned this earlier too) I’m not sure we need to call for more investigation unless we have evidence that the known chemistry fails to explain what you’re seeing.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. Previously, no studies have focused on the partitioning and distribution of C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates between gas and particle phases. Research on alkyl nitrates has mainly focused on C₁-C₅ alkyl nitrates in the gas phase (Ling et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2018), and longer n-alkyl nitrates have not received enough attention and research. Therefore, we did not find any direct validation of our conclusions by the results of studies on the air particle distribution of long-chain alkyl nitrates.
  
  1.2 – How much of this can be explained by colder temperatures at night?
  
  Reply: Thank you for your questions. Temperature influence the partition of semivolatile organic compounds between the gas and particle phases. As semivolatile organic compounds, ONs enter the particle phase more easily when the temperature is lower, the fraction of ONs in the particle phase increase with decreasing temperature (Kenagy et al., 2021). However, the extent of the direct effect of temperature is hard to be quantified. According to previous study, variations in the concentration of particulate-bound alkyl nitrates are more related to their formation (Rollins et al., 2013). We prefer to think that temperature affects the formation of alkyl nitrates on PM by influencing the partitioning of precursor n-alkanes between the gas and particle phases.
  
  Paragraph that starts on line 223 – Please be a bit more specific on which statistical tests have been used to determine significance for different things.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestion. The differences between samples were characterized by independent samples t-test, paired samples t-test and one-way ANOVA. We'll add to the manuscript accordingly
  
  Modification: We have added the details in the manuscript (L242: According to the analysis of variation; L247: based on the independent samples t-test.).
  
  Line 234 – different chain lengths of nitrates don’t have different formation mechanisms. But particulate nitrate formation is really temperature sensitive so it makes total sense that overall nitrate production might be highest in the summer even though particulate nitrate peaks in the winter. Or perhaps the winter has different VOC sources? Is this an area with isoprene emissions? Because those are very volatile products so that could drive a big summer to winter difference.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. C₁-C₅ alkyl nitrates have been shown to be formed from daytime gas-phase reactions of alkanes and radicals during photochemical processes (Perring et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2018). However, it has been demonstrated that organic nitrates can be formed by non-homogeneous reactions occurring on the surface of particulate matter (Li et al., 2022), NO₂ can form the particulate phase NO₃^- via a non-homogeneous reaction (Goodman et al., 1998), and n-alkanes can be reacted with nitric acid to form alkyl nitrates catalyzed by copper at room temperature (Luxenhofer et al., 1994; Luxenhofer et al., 1996). In addition, it has been found that non-homogeneous reactions affect the partitioning of alkyl nitrates between the gas and particle phases, the concentration of particulate-bound alkyl nitrates increases with the organic aerosol. Since the direct relationship between particulate-bound alkyl nitrates and temperature could not be observed, the differences in the concentration of particulate-bound alkyl nitrates are mainly due to chemical factors and related to their formation (Rollins et al., 2013). Therefore, we made the speculation that particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates may be formed by non-homogeneous reactions. We were unable to directly quantify the extent of the effect of temperature on particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates, But the seasonal differences and trends in the concentrations of particulate-bound were the same as those of the precursor n-alkanes, so we thought that the seasonal differences in particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates come more from precursor-related formation than the temperature effects.
  
  Figure 1 – what is the x-axis? Are the different points individual samples smushed into the same little region? Is it a function of time?
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question, The x-axis of Figure 1 shows the structural expression of each homologue of C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates, from left to right. Figure 1 represents the concentrations range of each homologue of C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrate in all samples, not as a function of time. The concentrations of each homologue in the samples is represented by different colors and concentrated in the corresponding area, and we hope to represent the abundance of each homologue in the PM_2.5 in this way.
  
  Modification: We have modified the x-axis label of Figure 1 and added the explanation to make it can be better understood (L658-660).
  
  Figure 4 – You don't need both Figure 4 and 6. I recommend just keeping figure 6. Also why put day and night together? Maybe make them different traces? But the mass fraction of ONs are insanely small. Does current figure 6 imply that it's ~0.001% of PM? If so I think it's hard to argue, as you do at the end of the paper, that these n-alkyl nitrates are an imporatant contributor to PM and haze formation.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestions. We would like to show the time trend of n-alkyl nitrates concentrations in Figure 4 and the comparison of n-alkyl nitrates and PM_2.5 in Figure 6. In fact, Figure 4 and Figure 6 are duplicated in the function, so we will modify according to your suggestion and only retain Figure 6. We put the day and night samples together in order to ensure the temporal continuity. C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates are only a part of particulate-bound alkyl nitrates, considering the different carbon chain lengths, carbon frame structures and functional group substitution positions, etc., as well as isomers, we believe that the effect of particulate-bound alkyl nitrate on PM and haze formation should not be neglected.
  
  Modification: We have modified the figures that only kept Figure 6 and adjusted the order of the figures, we also revised the corresponding part of the manuscript.
  
  Also figures 4, 5 and 6 – would help to label or color-code with seasons since it’s hard to look at numerical dates, especially since there are gaps.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestions, we will modify these figures to better distinguish the different seasons.
  
  Modification: We have modified the figures (L671; L676; L681; L686).
  
  We would like to thank you again for taking the time to review our manuscript.
  
  Reference:
  Barnes, I,, Becker, K. H., and Zhu, T.: Near UV absorption spectra and photolysis products of difunctional organic nitrates: Possible importance as NOx reservoirs, J. Atmos. Chem., 17, 353-373,doi: 10.1007/BF00696854, 1993.
  Browne, E. C., and Cohen, R. C.: Effects of biogenic nitrate chemistry on the NOx lifetime in remote continental regions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 20673-20716, doi: 10.5194/acp-12-11917-2012, 2012.
  Calvert, J. G., and Madronich, S.: Theoretical study of the initial products of the atmospheric oxidation of hydrocarbons, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 92, 2211-2220, doi: 10.1029/JD092iD02p02211, 1987.
  Chen, X. H., Hulbert, D., and Shepson, P. B.: Measurement of the organic nitrate yield from OH reaction with isoprene, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 103, 25563-25568, doi: 10.1029/98JD01483, 1998.
  Gen, M. S., Liang, Z. C, Zhang, R.F., Mabato, B. R. G., and Chan, C. K.: Particulate nitrate photolysis in the atmosphere, Environ. Sci.: Atmos., 2, 111-127, doi: 10.1039/D1EA00087J, 2022.
  Goodman, A. L., Miller, T. M., and Grassian, V. H.: Heterogeneous reactions of NO 2 on NaCl and Al 2 O 3 particles, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films, 16, 2585–2590, doi: 10.1116/1.581386, 1998.
  Kenagy, H. S., Romer Present, P. S., Wooldridge, P. J., Nault, B. A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Jimenez, J. L., Zare, A., Pye, H. O., and Yu, J.: Contribution of Organic Nitrates to Organic Aerosol over South Korea during KORUS-AQ, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 16326-16338, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c05521, 2021.
  Li, G.B., Cai, S.H., and Long, B.: New reactions for the formation of organic nitrate in the atmosphere, ACS omega, 7, 39671-39679, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03321, 2022.
  Li, Q. Q., Su, G. J., Li, C. Q., Liu, P. F., Zhao, X. X., Zhang, C. L., Sun, X., Mu, Y. J., Wu, M. G., and Wang, Q. L.: An investigation into the role of VOCs in SOA and ozone production in Beijing, China, Sci. Total Environ., 720, 137536, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137536, 2020.
  Ling, Z., Guo, H., Simpson, I. J., Saunders, S. M., Lam, S. H. M., Lyu, X., and Blake, D. R.: New insight into the spatiotemporal variability and source apportionments of C1–C4 alkyl nitrates in Hong Kong, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8141–8156, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8141-2016, 2016.
  Luxenhofer, O., Schneider, E., and Ballschmiter, K.: Separation, detection and occurrence of (C2-C8)-alkyl- and phenyl-alkyl nitrates as trace compounds in clean and polluted air, Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 350, 384-394, doi: 10.1007/BF00325611, 1994.
  Luxenhofer, O., Schneider, M., Dambach, M. and Ballschmiter, K.: Semivolatile long chain C6-C17 alkyl nitrates as trace compounds in air, Chemosphere, 33, 393-404, doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(96)00205-6, 1996.
  Perring, A. E., Bertram, T. H., Farmer, D. K., Wooldridge, P. J., Dibb, J., Blake, N. J., Blake, D. R., Singh, H. B., Fuelberg, H., Diskin, G., Sachse, G., and Cohen, R. C.: The production and persistence of ΣRONO2 in the Mexico City plume, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7215-7229, doi: 10.5194/acp-10-7215-2010, 2010.
  Perring, A. E., Pusede, S. E., and Cohen, R. C.: An observational perspective on the atmospheric impacts of alkyl and multifunctional nitrates on ozone and secondary organic aerosol, Chem. Rev., 113, 5848-5870, doi: 10.1021/cr300520x, 2013.
  Rollins, A. W., Browne, E. C., Min, K. E., Pusede, S. E., Wooldridge, P. J., Gentner, D. R., Goldstein, A. H., Liu, S., Day, D. A., Russell, L. M.: Evidence for NOx Control over Nighttime SOA Formation, Science, 337, 1210-1212, doi: 10.1126/science.1221520, 2012.
  Rollins, A. W., Pusede, S., Wooldridge, P., Min, K.-E., Gentner, D. R., Goldstein, A. H., Liu, S., Day, D. A., Russell, L. M., and Rubitschun, C. L.: Gas/particle partitioning of total alkyl nitrates observed with TD-LIF in Bakersfield, J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 118, 6651-6662, doi: 10.1002/jgrd.50522, 2013.
  Sun, Y. L., Zhang, Q., Schwab, J. J., Yang, T., Ng, N. L., and Demerjian, K. L.: Factor analysis of combined organic and inorganic aerosol mass spectra from high resolution aerosol mass spectrometer measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8537-8551, doi:10.5194/acp-12-8537-2012, 2012.
  Sun, J., Li, Z., Xue, L., Wang, T., Wang, X., Gao, J., Nie, W., Simpson, I. J., Gao, R., and Blake, D. R.: Summertime C1-C5 alkyl nitrates over Beijing, northern China: Spatial distribution, regional transport, and formation mechanisms, Atmos. Res., 204, 102-109, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.01.014, 2018.
  Xu, L., Suresh, S., Guo, H., Weber, R. J., and Ng, N. L.: Aerosol characterization over the southeastern United States using high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry: spatial and seasonal variation of aerosol composition and sources with a focus on organic nitrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7307-7336, doi: 10.5194/acp-15-7307-2015, 2015.
  Yang, X. H., Luo, F. X., Li, J. Q., Chen, D. Y., E, Y., Lin, W. L., and Jun, J.: Alkyl and aromatic nitrates in atmospheric particles determined by gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom., 30, 2762-2770, doi: 10.1007/s13361-019-02347-8, 2019.
  Yu, K. Y., Zhu, Q., Du, K., and Huang, X.-F.: Characterization of nighttime formation of particulate organic nitrates based on high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry in an urban atmosphere in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5235-5249, doi: 10.5194/acp-19-5235-2019, 2019.
  Zhen, S. S., Luo, M., Shao, Y., Xu, D. D., and Ma, L. L.: Application of Stable Isotope Techniques in Tracing the Sources of Atmospheric NOX and Nitrate, Processes, 10, 2549, doi: 10.3390/pr10122549, 2022.
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-700-AC2
RC3:
'Comment on egusphere-2023-700', Anonymous Referee #3, 06 Jul 2023
The manuscript describes the concentration of 8 different long-chain alkyl nitrates species from aerosol filter samples collected from Beijing between 2020 to 2021 and presents their temporal variation and correlation with O₃, NO₂ and PM concentration, from which the author inferred particle phase formation of those compounds. While the measurement seems to be of high quality, especially since the authors take effects to synthesize alkyl nitrates standards to make this work quantitative, the quality of their interpretation and presentation is not sufficient to support their conclusion (“particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates may form through reactions between alkanes and nitrates on PM surface”).
The authors need to justify why choosing the compounds presented in the manuscript. Are they major compositions of particle-bound alkyl nitrates? The work focused on 8 n-alkyl nitrates ranging from C₉H₁₉ONO₂ to C₁₆H₃₃ONO₂, which make up only less than 0.1% of PM_2.5 based on the measurements (around 2.7 ng/m³ to 160 ug/m³) compare to 2~12% of PM_2.5 by organic nitrate in literature (Line 338). Those compounds are probably too volatile (LogC^* around 2 ~5 estimated from SIMPOL model¹) to be found in high concentration in PM_2.5 compared to other alkyl nitrates with multiple functional groups and as a result of their volatility, their gas-particle partitioning behavior would be highly affected by PM_2.5 loading and temperature. Thus gas-particle partitioning needs to be addressed in a more quantitative way.
Detailed comments:
Line 120: How long are those samples stored before being analyzed? Is there any degradation of organic nitrates during sample collection and storage?
Line 184: Please specify how the instrument DL ( 1 to 10 pg ) differs for different carbon numbers and if how it affects detection rates.
Line 188: “long chain n-alkyl nitrates are more abundant than short chain n-alkyl nitrates”, for alkyl nitrates with multiple functional groups, this may be different.
Line 202~Line204: But long-chain n-alkyl nitrates concentrations in your study is not high here. For “high concentrations of precursor n-alkanes”, please add references here to specify the concentration of precursor n-alkanes or precursor measurements if available.
Line 206: “alkyl nitrate yield”, please clarify you mean total alkyl nitrate (gas+particle) or alkyl nitrate in SOA?
Line 215~235: Seasonal variations could also be driven by temperature, PM concentrations, and precursor concentrations. The analysis here is not sufficient to lead to the conclusion “long-chain particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates and short-chain alkyl nitrates have different formation mechanisms”.
Line 232: Here you have “long-chain” vs “short-chain (C1–C5)” but in line 199, you have “longer carbon chains (C12–C16)” and “shorter carbon chains (C9–C11)”.
3.2.1 Many other reasons temperature and precursors emission intensity could cause the temporal trend to be anti-correlated with ozone. “This and the particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrate concentration being higher at night than in the day” is not sufficient to conclude those compounds “are not secondary products of 269 photochemical reactions.”
3.2.2 What about formation mechanisms from NO₃ radical chemistry at night?
Line 552: Yang, J. et al. appeared twice here.
Figure. 1. Are measurements below DL also present in figure.1 or only measurements above DL is present? If so, please also note the ND measurements (for example, using open markers). For me, most of the markers in the plots read zero. As your DL is 0.1~1 pg/m³ and your concentration range is 0.009~2.7 ng/m³, please consider having the concentrations plotted in the log-scale.
Figures.2~8. Make the labels on the x-axis more readable or plot them against sample dates.
Reference:
Pankow, J. F. & Asher, W. E. SIMPOL.1: A simple group contribution method for predicting vapor pressures and enthalpies of vaporization of multifunctional organic compounds. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 2773–2796 (2008).
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-700-RC3
- AC3:
  'Reply on RC3', Jun Jin, 24 Aug 2023
  Author's Response
  Particulate-bound alkyl nitrate pollution and formation mechanisms in Beijing, China
  Jiyuan Yang^1*, Guoyang Lei^1*, Jinfeng Zhu¹,Yutong Wu¹, Chang Liu¹, Kai Hu¹, Junsong Bao², Zitong Zhang¹, Weili Lin¹ and Jun Jin^1,3.
  ¹College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China
  ²State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
  ³Beijing Engineering Research Center of Food Environment and Public Health, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China
  *These authors contributed equally to this work
  Referee Comment
  The manuscript describes the concentration of 8 different long-chain alkyl nitrates species from aerosol filter samples collected from Beijing between 2020 to 2021 and presents their temporal variation and correlation with O3, NO2 and PM concentration, from which the author inferred particle phase formation of those compounds. While the measurement seems to be of high quality, especially since the authors take effects to synthesize alkyl nitrates standards to make this work quantitative, the quality of their interpretation and presentation is not sufficient to support their conclusion (“particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates may form through reactions between alkanes and nitrates on PM surface”).
  The authors need to justify why choosing the compounds presented in the manuscript. Are they major compositions of particle-bound alkyl nitrates? The work focused on 8 n-alkyl nitrates ranging from C9H19ONO2 to C16H33ONO2, which make up only less than 0.1% of PM2.5 based on the measurements (around 2.7 ng/m3 to 160 ug/m3) compare to 2~12% of PM2.5 by organic nitrate in literature (Line 338). Those compounds are probably too volatile (LogC* around 2 ~5 estimated from SIMPOL model1) to be found in high concentration in PM2.5 compared to other alkyl nitrates with multiple functional groups and as a result of their volatility, their gas-particle partitioning behavior would be highly affected by PM2.5 loading and temperature. Thus gas-particle partitioning needs to be addressed in a more quantitative way.
  Detailed comments:
  Line 120: How long are those samples stored before being analyzed? Is there any degradation of organic nitrates during sample collection and storage?
  
  Line 184: Please specify how the instrument DL ( 1 to 10 pg) differs for different carbon numbers and if how it affects detection rates.
  
  Line 188: “long chain n-alkyl nitrates are more abundant than short chain n-alkyl nitrates”, for alkyl nitrates with multiple functional groups, this may be different.
  
  Line 202~Line204: But long-chain n-alkyl nitrates concentrations in your study is not high here. For “high concentrations of precursor n-alkanes”, please add references here to specify the concentration of precursor n-alkanes or precursor measurements if available.
  
  Line 206: “alkyl nitrate yield”, please clarify you mean total alkyl nitrate (gas+particle) or alkyl nitrate in SOA?
  
  Line 215~235: Seasonal variations could also be driven by temperature, PM concentrations, and precursor concentrations. The analysis here is not sufficient to lead to the conclusion “long-chain particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates and short-chain alkyl nitrates have different formation mechanisms”.
  
  Line 232: Here you have “long-chain” vs “short-chain (C1–C5)” but in line 199, you have “longer carbon chains (C12–C16)” and “shorter carbon chains (C9–C11)”.
  
  2.1 Many other reasons temperature and precursors emission intensity could cause the temporal trend to be anti-correlated with ozone. “This and the particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrate concentration being higher at night than in the day” is not sufficient to conclude those compounds “are not secondary products of 269 photochemical reactions.”
  
  2.2 What about formation mechanisms from NO3 radical chemistry at night?
  
  Line 552: Yang, J. et al. appeared twice here.
  
  1. Are measurements below DL also present in figure.1 or only measurements above DL is present? If so, please also note the ND measurements (for example, using open markers). For me, most of the markers in the plots read zero. As your DL is 0.1~1 pg/m3 and your concentration range is 0.009~2.7 ng/m3, please consider having the concentrations plotted in the log-scale.
  
  2~8. Make the labels on the x-axis more readable or plot them against sample dates.
  
  Reference:
  Pankow, J. F. & Asher, W. E. SIMPOL.1: A simple group contribution method for predicting vapor pressures and enthalpies of vaporization of multifunctional organic compounds. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 2773–2796 (2008).
  
  Author's response：
  Dear referee:
  Thank you for pointing out the problems and providing suggestions on our manuscripts. We have carefully considered the suggestions and tried our best to revise the manuscript accordingly. We further explain the reason for studying C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates and added more references as evidence to support our conclusions. However, due to experimental limitations, we did not measure the concentration levels of C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates in the gas-phase environment, and therefore could not quantify the gas-particle partitioning. We have tried our best to improve this manuscript and modify the problems, please find our itemized responses and revisions/corrections in below.
  
  Line 120: How long are those samples stored before being analyzed? Is there any degradation of organic nitrates during sample collection and storage?
  
  Reply: Thank you for your questions, PM_2.5 samples were usually analyzed within one month of sampling. Previous studies found that photolysis is the main pathway for alkyl nitrates degradation (Clemitshaw et al., 1997). In order to avoid the degradation of n-alkyl nitrate in PM_2.5 during the process of sampling to analysis, we kept the samples away from light during the whole process and stored them at -20 ℃. Therefore, we think that the n-alkyl nitrates did not degrade under these collection and storage conditions.
  
  Line 184: Please specify how the instrument DL ( 1 to 10 pg) differs for different carbon numbers and if how it affects detection rates.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. The instrumental detection limits for C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates were in the range of 1-10 pg, and the DL for each homologue increased with the increasing carbon number. However, we found that the detection rates of C₁₂-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates were higher than C₉-C₁₁ n-alkyl nitrates, so we think that the DL has no direct effects on the detection rates.
  
  Line 188: “long chain n-alkyl nitrates are more abundant than short chain n-alkyl nitrates”, for alkyl nitrates with multiple functional groups, this may be different.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out, the statement in this part is not clear enough. The point we have tried to express was that “For n-alkyl nitrates with a single function group, long chain n-alkyl nitrates are more abundant than short chain n-alkyl nitrates” in our study, we will modify the statement in this part.
  
  Modification: We have revised the statement in this part to make it more clear (L202-204: For n-alkyl nitrates with a single function group, relatively long chain n-alkyl nitrates (C₁₂-C₁₆) are more abundant than relatively short chain n-alkyl nitrates (C₉-C₁₁).).
  
  Line 202~Line204: But long-chain n-alkyl nitrates concentrations in your study is not high here. For “high concentrations of precursor n-alkanes”, please add references here to specify the concentration of precursor n-alkanes or precursor measurements if available.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestions. According to our previous study, the concentration of precursor n-alkanes in PM_2.5 in Beijing range from 4.51 ng/m³ to 153 ng/m³ (mean 32.7 ng/m³) and have rich anthropogenic emissions sources in the environment (Yang et al., 2023). The concentration level of precursor n-alkanes in particulate matter increases with carbon chain length, and the yield of alkyl nitrates from n-alkanes increases with the growth of carbon chain length (Lim et al., 2009). Therefore, we think that the higher abundance of long-chain n-alkyl nitrates (C₁₂-C₁₆) compared to short-chain n-alkanes (C₉-C₁₁) in PM_2.5 may be influenced by this factor.
  
  Modification: We have revised this part and added the references (L222-224: Our previous study found that the concentration of precursor n-alkanes in PM_2.5 in Beijing range from 4.51 ng/m³ to 153 ng/m³ (mean 32.7 ng/m³) and have rich anthropogenic emissions sources in the environment (Yang et al., 2023).).
  
  Line 206: “alkyl nitrate yield”, please clarify you mean total alkyl nitrate (gas+particle) or alkyl nitrate in SOA?
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. According to the references, the “alkyl nitrate yield” in this part means that the yield of alkyl nitrate in SOA.
  
  Line 215~235: Seasonal variations could also be driven by temperature, PM concentrations, and precursor concentrations. The analysis here is not sufficient to lead to the conclusion “long-chain particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates and short-chain alkyl nitrates have different formation mechanisms”.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. Seasonal variations in the concentration levels of particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates are influenced by many factors, the conclusion in this part of the discussion is not rigorous and it will be modified.
  
  Modification: We have changed the conclusion to “long-chain particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates (C₉-C₁₆) and gaseous short-chain alkyl nitrates (C₁-C₅) in the same season such as summer showed different characteristics, which maybe due to their different formation mechanisms. However, it needs to be further analyzed” (L264-266).
  
  Line 232: Here you have “long-chain” vs “short-chain (C1–C5)” but in line 199, you have “longer carbon chains (C12–C16)” and “shorter carbon chains (C9–C11)”.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question. The comparison of these two parts is relative. In here, “long-chain” means C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates in the PM_2.5 and “short-chain” means C₁-C₅ alkyl nitrates in the gas-phase environment. In line 199, due to the different characteristics between C₉-C₁₁ and C₁₂-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates in our study, we used “longer carbon chains” and “shorter carbon chains” to distinguish.
  
  2.1 Many other reasons temperature and precursors emission intensity could cause the temporal trend to be anti-correlated with ozone. “This and the particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrate concentration being higher at night than in the day” is not sufficient to conclude those compounds “are not secondary products of 269 photochemical reactions.”
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question. For alkyl nitrates, this kind of air pollutants have extensively studied that C₁-C₅ alkyl nitrates are formed from photochemical reactions, they showed a positive correlated with ozone and have the same temporal trend (Wang et al., 2013; Ling et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2018). However, we found diametrically opposite characteristics for C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrate with longer carbon chains in particulate matter. Combined with the fact that particulate-bound C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates exhibit diurnal differences from C₁-C₅ alkyl nitrates, we hypothesize that particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates may not be formed from gas-phase reactions via photochemical process. The temporal trend of particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates can indeed be influenced by many factors, so the exact mechanism of formation needs to be proven by more studies. We will modify the discussion and conclusion in this part to make it more reasonable.
  
  Modification: We have revised the discussion and conclusion in this part (L295-303: C₉-C₁₆ particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates showed diametrically opposite characteristics and different environmental behaviors from gaseous alkyl nitrates, which suggest that particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates are not the indicators of photochemical pollution and maybe form through different mechanisms from gas-phase short-chain (C₁-C₅) alkyl nitrates. Research have shown that there may be other reaction pathways for the formation of particulate organic nitrates, particulate-bound organic nitrates are able to form via non-homogeneous reactions (Li et al., 2022). Therefore, we inferred that particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates may not be formed through the gas-phase reactions in photochemical process involving ozone and that long-chain (C₁₂-C₁₆) n-alkyl nitrates are not the secondary products of gas-phase homogeneous reactions in photochemical process.).
  
  2.2 What about formation mechanisms from NO3 radical chemistry at night?
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question. In fact, the formation mechanisms from NO₃ radical chemistry at night to form organic nitrates are participate mainly by olefins and aromatic hydrocarbons but do not form n-alkyl nitrates (Perring et al., 2013). Therefore, we did not consider this formation pathway.
  
  Line 552: Yang, J. et al. appeared twice here.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out, we will correct it.
  
  Modification: We have removed the duplicate references.
  
  1. Are measurements below DL also present in figure.1 or only measurements above DL is present? If so, please also note the ND measurements (for example, using open markers). For me, most of the markers in the plots read zero. As your DL is 0.1~1 pg/m3 and your concentration range is 0.009~2.7 ng/m3, please consider having the concentrations plotted in the log-scale.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out, the measurements below the detection limit are donated by “0” in the Figure 1, we think that it is more intuitive to represent the abundance of C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates in this way.
  
  Modification: We have modified the x-axis label of Figure 1 and added the explanation to make it can be better understood (L658-660).
  
  2~8. Make the labels on the x-axis more readable or plot them against sample dates.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestion, we will modify the labels on these x-axis.
  
  Modification: We have modified the labels on x-axis in the figures.
  
  We would like to thank you again for taking the time to review our manuscript.
  
  Reference:
  Clemitshaw, K. C., Williams, J., Rattigan, O. V., Shallcross, D. E., Law, K. S., and Cox, R. A.: Gas-phase ultraviolet absorption cross-sections and atmospheric lifetimes of several C2-C5 alkyl nitrates, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 102, 117-126, doi: 10.1016/S1010-6030(96)04458-9, 1997.
  Li, G.B., Cai, S.H., and Long, B.: New reactions for the formation of organic nitrate in the atmosphere, ACS omega, 7, 39671-39679, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03321, 2022.
  Lim, Y. B., and Ziemann, P. J.: Chemistry of Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from OH Radical-Initiated Reactions of Linear, Branched, and Cyclic Alkanes in the Presence of NOx. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 43, 604-619, doi: 10.1080/02786820902802567, 2009.
  Ling, Z., Guo, H., Simpson, I. J., Saunders, S. M., Lam, S. H. M., Lyu, X., and Blake, D. R.: New insight into the spatiotemporal variability and source apportionments of C1–C4 alkyl nitrates in Hong Kong, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8141–8156, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8141-2016, 2016.
  Perring, A. E., Pusede, S. E., and Cohen, R. C.: An observational perspective on the atmospheric impacts of alkyl and multifunctional nitrates on ozone and secondary organic aerosol, Chem. Rev., 113, 5848-5870, doi: 10.1021/cr300520x, 2013.
  Sun, J., Li, Z., Xue, L., Wang, T., Wang, X., Gao, J., Nie, W., Simpson, I. J., Gao, R., and Blake, D. R.: Summertime C1-C5 alkyl nitrates over Beijing, northern China: Spatial distribution, regional transport, and formation mechanisms, Atmos. Res., 204, 102-109, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.01.014, 2018.
  Wang, M., Shao, M., Chen, W., Lu, S., Wang, C., Huang, D., Yuan, B., Zeng, L., and Zhao, Y.: Measurements of C1-C4 alkyl nitrates and their relationships with carbonyl compounds and O3 in Chinese cities, Atmos. Environ., 81, 389-398, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.065, 2013.
  Yang, J., Lei, G., Liu, C., Wu, Y., Hu, K., Zhu, J., Bao, J., Lin, W., and Jin, J.: Characteristics of particulate-bound n-alkanes indicating sources of PM2.5 in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3015-3029, doi: 10.5194/acp-23-3015-2023, 2023.
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-700-AC3

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

RC1:
'Comment on egusphere-2023-700', yongjie wei, 18 Jun 2023
This manuscript describes the n-alkyl nitrate pollution in Beijing, China. The authors detected n-alkyl nitrates from PM2.5 samples and evaluated the relationship between the formation of n-alkyl nitrate and photochemical reactions in PM2.5 by analyzing the temporal trends and correlations of n-alkyl nitrates with related pollutants, and inferred the formation mechanism of n-alkyl nitrates in particulate matter. This article presents the first qualitative and quantitative analysis of n-alkyl nitrates in PM2.5 using a new method. The manuscript is suitable for publication after the following concerns are responded.
The authors need to further justify the interest in studying n-alkyl nitrates in PM2.5 because it appears that the environmental impact of n-alkyl nitrates is limited.

Line 37-42. Please include citations in the background.

Line 103-105. Please provide the references of the n-alkanes emission.

Line 112. What is the basis for the day and night division of the sampling time?

Section 2.3. How to determine the quality and purity of synthetic standards of n-alkyl nitrates? Please provide more methodological details.

Line 181-183. How to define the long-chain and short-chain n-alkyl nitrates?

Line 186. Change “highest” to “largest”.

Section 3.1.2. Insufficient explanation of the influencing factors on seasonal differences in n-alkyl nitrate concentrations in PM2.5, more discussion is needed on the impact of meteorological factors.

Line 246-248. For the temporal trend of particulate long-chain n-alkyl nitrate concentrations and the variability of gas-phase short-chain alkyl nitrate concentrations found in previous studies with both gas particle state and chain length variables, why are they compared together?

Line 267-269. The results of trend and correlation analysis of n-alkyl nitrate in PM2.5 with O3 concentration levels are not sufficient to indicate that their formation are not related to photochemical reactions.

Section 3.2.2. The result on the formation mechanism are speculative and not sufficiently supported by evidences.

Line 583-585. Change “Table” to “Figure”.

Figure 4-8. What is the definition of the dotted line, please explain.

Figure 2-8. What is the definition of horizontal coordinate numbering, please explain or modify.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-700-RC1
- AC1:
  'Reply on RC1', Jun Jin, 24 Aug 2023
  Author's Response
  Particulate-bound alkyl nitrate pollution and formation mechanisms in Beijing, China
  Jiyuan Yang^1*, Guoyang Lei^1*, Jinfeng Zhu¹,Yutong Wu¹, Chang Liu¹, Kai Hu¹, Junsong Bao², Zitong Zhang¹, Weili Lin¹ and Jun Jin^1,3.
  ¹College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China
  ²State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
  ³Beijing Engineering Research Center of Food Environment and Public Health, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China
  *These authors contributed equally to this work
  Referee Comment
  This manuscript describes the n-alkyl nitrate pollution in Beijing, China. The authors detected n-alkyl nitrates from PM2.5 samples and evaluated the relationship between the formation of n-alkyl nitrate and photochemical reactions in PM2.5 by analyzing the temporal trends and correlations of n-alkyl nitrates with related pollutants, and inferred the formation mechanism of n-alkyl nitrates in particulate matter. This article presents the first qualitative and quantitative analysis of n-alkyl nitrates in PM2.5 using a new method. The manuscript is suitable for publication after the following concerns are responded.
  The authors need to further justify the interest in studying n-alkyl nitrates in PM2.5 because it appears that the environmental impact of n-alkyl nitrates is limited.
  
  Line 37-42. Please include citations in the background.
  
  Line 103-105. Please provide the references of the n-alkanes emission.
  
  Line 112. What is the basis for the day and night division of the sampling time?
  
  Section 2.3. How to determine the quality and purity of synthetic standards of n-alkyl nitrates? Please provide more methodological details.
  
  Line 181-183. How to define the long-chain and short-chain n-alkyl nitrates?
  
  Line 186. Change “highest” to “largest”.
  
  Section 3.1.2. Insufficient explanation of the influencing factors on seasonal differences in n-alkyl nitrate concentrations in PM2.5, more discussion is needed on the impact of meteorological factors.
  
  Line 246-248. For the temporal trend of particulate long-chain n-alkyl nitrate concentrations and the variability of gas-phase short-chain alkyl nitrate concentrations found in previous studies with both gas particle state and chain length variables, why are they compared together?
  
  Line 267-269. The results of trend and correlation analysis of n-alkyl nitrate in PM2.5 with O3 concentration levels are not sufficient to indicate that their formation are not related to photochemical reactions.
  
  Section 3.2.2. The result on the formation mechanism are speculative and not sufficiently supported by evidences.
  
  Line 583-585. Change “Table” to “Figure”.
  
  Figure 4-8. What is the definition of the dotted line, please explain.
  
  Figure 2-8. What is the definition of horizontal coordinate numbering, please explain or modify.
  
  Author's response：
  Dear referee:
  Thank you for your constructive comments and detailed revisions on our manuscript. We have carefully considered the suggestions and made some changes on the details of the manuscript accordingly. We supplemented the analysis in the conclusion and provided additional evidence to support the speculative ideas we presented. We have tried our best to improve this manuscript in order to it can be published successfully, please find our itemized responses and our revisions/corrections in below.
  
  The authors need to further justify the interest in studying n-alkyl nitratesin PM2.5 because it appears that the environmental impact of n-alkyl nitrates is limited.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestions. Atmospheric particulate matter and aerosol particles directly or indirectly affect climate and regional air quality. The atmosphere is a huge oxidizing chemical reactor, and the oxidizing capacity of the atmosphere is closely related to the chemical evolution of aerosol particles (Gen et al., 2022). Alkyl nitrates in particulate matter have not received attention in the past, as a kind of semi-permanent reservoir species, the formation of alkyl nitrates consumes nitrogen oxides and thus become an important sink for atmospheric nitrogen oxides (Perring et al., 2010). In addition, alkyl nitrates may release nitrogen dioxide by photolysis, affecting the balance of nitrogen oxides (Barnes et al., 1993). The photolysis of particulate nitrate can contribute to atmospheric oxidation capacity by producing strong oxidants such as hydroxyl radicals (Gen et al., 2022). Particulate-bound alkyl nitrates as a kind of secondary pollutants affected by anthropogenic emissions have an important influence on the oxidation of the atmospheric environment and the formation of regional haze (Browne et al., 2012). Therefore, we studied the sources and pollution characteristics of particulate-bound alkyl nitrates to explore their effects on the atmospheric environment and air quality.
  
  Modification: We have further explained our interest in studying particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates in the manuscript (L56-67: As a kind of semi-permanent reservoir species, ONs are important participants in the atmospheric nitrogen cycle, which involves various atmospheric sources and sinks of nitrogen oxides. The formation of ONs consumes nitrogen oxides and atmospheric oxidants, thus becomes an important sink for atmospheric nitrogen oxides (Perring et al., 2010) and affects the atmospheric lifetimes of free radicals, the ozone concentration, and photochemical reactions (Calvert et al., 1987). In addition, ONs may release nitrogen dioxide and produce strong oxidants such as hydroxyl radicals by photolysis, affecting the balance of nitrogen oxides in regional NOx cycles (Barnes et al., 1993; Chen et al., 1998) and contribute to atmospheric oxidation capacity (Gen et al., 2022), respectively. Semi-volatile ONs are an important kind of sources and component of secondary organic aerosols (SOAs) and contribute to fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) (Rollins et al., 2012). As important secondary air pollutants, ONs affect the oxidation in the atmosphere and the formation of haze (Browne et al., 2012), controlling particulate-bound ONs may therefore be key to controlling both PM_2.5 and ozone in the atmosphere. L97-99: Particulate-bound alkyl nitrates as a kind of secondary pollutants affected by anthropogenic emissions have an important influence on the oxidation of the atmospheric environment and the formation of regional haze pollution (Browne et al., 2012).).
  
  Line 37-42. Please include citations in the background.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out, we will add the citations.
  
  Modification: We have added the citations for the background (L38: Li et al., 2017; L41: Bai et al., 2018)
  
  Line 103-105. Please provide the references of the n-alkanes emission.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out, we will provide the references of n-alkanes emission in the manuscript.
  
  Modification: We have provided the references (L114: Kang et al., 2018; Cui et al., 2021).
  
  Line 112. What is the basis for the day and night division of the sampling time?
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question. We wanted to explore the differences of the concentrations of n-alkyl nitrates in PM_2.5 between day and night, and in order to take into account to the influences of vehicle emissions to the concentration levels of particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates, the day and night sampling times are divided based on the morning and evening rush hours in Beijing.
  
  Modification: We have added the timing of rush hours in Beijing in Section 2.1 (L122-123: according to the morning and evening rush hours in Beijing tend to be 7-9 am and 5-8 pm, respectively. ).
  
  Section 2.3. How to determine the quality and purity of synthetic standards of n-alkyl nitrates? Please provide more methodological details.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. In this study, we characterized and quantified the synthesized standards by GC-MS/MS to determine their purity. The synthesized standard and toluene were used as solute and solvent respectively to prepare the standard solution, and then detected the standard solution by GC-MS/MS full scan detection. According to the total ion flow diagram and mass spectrogram obtained by GC-MS/MS, we qualitatively analyzed the synthesized standards. In the case of n-nonyl nitrate, for example, as shown in the total ion flow diagram, only one compound showed high instrumental response, indicating the high purity. The characteristic ions of n-alkyl group and organic nitrates appeared in the mass spectrogram, and these characteristic ions all have high relative abundance. Therefore, we identified that the synthesized standard substance is n-nonyl nitrate. We will add more methodological details in Section 2.3.
  Total ion flow diagram
  Mass spectrogram
  
  Modification: We have added more methodological details in this section (L142-147: The standards were examined and analyzed by GC-MS/MS and detected by full scan detection. According to the total ion flow diagrams and mass spectrograms obtained by GC-MS/MS, only one compound showed high instrumental response in the total ion flow diagrams, indicating the high purity of synthesized standards. The characteristic irons of n-alkyl nitrates, [CH₂ONO₂]⁺ ion (m/z 76.07) and [NO₂]⁺ ion (m/z 46.07) appeared in the mass spectrograms and have high relative abundance, indicating the synthesized standards are n-alkyl nitrates.).
  
  Line 181-183. How to define the long-chain and short-chain n-alkyl nitrates?
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question. In this study, we defined C₉-C₁₁ n-alkyl nitrates as short-chain and C₁₂-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates as long-chain based on the carbon chain length, the detection rates in PM_2.5 samples and their pollution characteristics. We will modify the statement in this part to make it clearer.
  
  Modification: We have revised the statement in this part (L202-204: For n-alkyl nitrates with a single function group, relatively long chain n-alkyl nitrates (C₁₂-C₁₆) are more abundant than relatively short chain n-alkyl nitrates (C₉-C₁₁).).
  
  Line 186. Change “highest” to “largest”.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestion, we will change the description.
  
  Modification: We have changed “highest” to “largest” (L207).
  
  Section 3.1.2. Insufficient explanation of the influencing factors on seasonal differences in n-alkyl nitrate concentrations in PM2.5, more discussion is needed on the impact of meteorological factors.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. Differences in concentrations of semi-volatile organic pollutants such as n-alkyl nitrate in PM_2.5 may be affected by meteorological factors such as temperature. We will add the discussion of the effect of meteorological factors on the differences in particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrate concentrations in Section 3.1.2.
  
  Modification: We have added relevant discussion in the Section 3.1.2 (L248-260: We inferred that the diurnal and seasonal differences and changes in the particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrate concentrations may be influenced by the meteorological factors and the changes in particulate-bound alkyl nitrates formation process. Temperature affects the partitioning of the semi-volatile organic compounds between the gas and particle phases, the fraction of ONs in the particle phase increase with decreasing temperature (Kenagy et al., 2021), and the precursor n-alkanes are more likely to partition into particles with the high partition coefficient of gas-particle partitioning when the temperature is lower (Wick et al., 2002; Lyu et al., 2016). Other meteorological factors such as the mixing-layer height and atmospheric dispersion conditions can also affect the concentration level of particulate-bound alkyl nitrates by influencing the concentrations of PM_2.5 and precursor n-alkanes (Wagner and Schäfer, 2017). More abundant particulate matter and n-alkanes, influenced by meteorological factors, may further provide the reaction conditions for the formation of particulate-bound alkyl nitrates. L264-266: Long-chain particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates (C₉-C₁₆) and gaseous short-chain alkyl nitrates (C₁-C₅) in the same season such as summer showed different characteristics, which maybe due to their different formation mechanisms. However, it needs to be further analyzed.).
  
  Line 246-248. For the temporal trend of particulate long-chain n-alkyl nitrate concentrations and the variability of gas-phase short-chain alkyl nitrate concentrations found in previous studies with both gas particle state and chain length variables, why are they compared together?
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question. We think that during the gas-particle partitioning process of alkyl nitrate, short-chain alkyl nitrates (C≤8) have higher vapor pressure and usually in the gas phase, while long-chain alkyl nitrates (C>8) can easily enter the particle phase or form directly on the particulate phase due to their lower vapor pressure. We aimed to compare the different distributions of long-chain and short-chain alkyl nitrates in the gas and particulate phases suggesting that long-chain alkyl nitrates may have a different environmental behavior than short chains.
  
  Line 267-269. The results of trend and correlation analysis of n-alkyl nitrate in PM2.5 with O3 concentration levels are not sufficient to indicate that their formation are not related to photochemical reactions.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. According to previous studies of alkyl nitrates in gas phase, we found that the formation of alkyl nitrates in gas-phase environments as a branching reaction of photochemical processes (Perring et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2018), and these short-chain alkyl nitrates (C₁-C₅) showed a significant positive correlation with ozone and their peak concentration occur in summer (Wang et al., 2013; Ling et al., 2016). However, we found that long-chain n-alkyl nitrates in PM_2.5showed different pollution characteristics and environmental behaviors from short-chain alkyl nitrates. Therefore, we inferred that the formation of long-chain alkyl nitrates is different from that of short-chain and may not come from the gas-phase formation reactions of photochemical process but may be formed directly in the particulate phase through the non-homogeneous reaction. This conclusion is speculative due to the limitations of experimental conditions and need further research, so we will make some modifications in the manuscript.
  
  Modification: We have modified some statements in this part (L295-303: C₉-C₁₆ particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates showed diametrically opposite characteristics and different environmental behaviors from gaseous alkyl nitrates, which suggest that particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates are not the indicators of photochemical pollution and maybe form through different mechanisms from gas-phase short-chain (C₁-C₅) alkyl nitrates. Research have shown that there may be other reaction pathways for the formation of particulate organic nitrates, particulate-bound organic nitrates are able to form via non-homogeneous reactions (Li et al., 2022). Therefore, we inferred that particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates may not be formed through the gas-phase reactions in photochemical process involving ozone and that long-chain (C₁₂-C₁₆) n-alkyl nitrates are not the secondary products of gas-phase homogeneous reactions in photochemical process.).
  
  Section 3.2.2. The result on the formation mechanism are speculative and not sufficiently supported by evidences.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. Due to the limitations of the experimental conditions, we only studied the C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates in PM_2.5 but lacked the concentration levels of these pollutants in the gas phase. However, previous studies have not reported these n-alkyl nitrates (C₉-C₁₆) in the gas phase. The conclusions in this section are speculative, we will try to find more literature to support the conclusions as evidence.
  
  Modification: We have revised this part and added some references as evidence to support our points (L315-332: According to previous study about particulate-bound n-alkanes in Beijing (Yang et al., 2023), we found that particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates showed the same temporal trends and pollution characteristics as n-alkanes, the particulate-bound n-alkanes and PM_2.5 concentrations significantly correlated (p<0.01, r=0.618). From this we hypothesize that C₁₂-C₁₆ particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrate and particulate matter concentrations probably correlated because of reactions involving precursors of n-alkyl nitrates on the particulate matter, meaning the particulate matter acted as a medium on which particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates formed or n-alkyl nitrates are involved in the formation of particulate matter; L329-330: studies have shown that ONs are able to form through non-homogeneous reactions (Zhen et al., 2022; Li et al., 2022); L353-358: The similar temporal trends in the particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrate, n-alkanes, PM_2.5, and NO₂ concentrations and the significant positive correlations between the n-alkyl nitrate, PM_2.5, and NO₂ concentrations indicate that particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates maybe form through non-homogeneous reactions between precursor alkanes and particulate-bound nitrate on particulate matter surfaces. However, the formation mechanisms still needs to be further study.).
  
  Line 583-585. Change “Table” to “Figure”.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out, we will correct this mistake.
  
  Modification: We have corrected the mistake and changed “Table” to “Figure”.
  
  Figure 4-8. What is the definition of the dotted line, please explain.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question. The dotted lines are the dividing lines and delineate the four seasons, from left to right, winter, spring, summer, and fall. We will add the definition of the dotted line in the figures.
  
  Modification: We have added the relevant definition (L675; L680; L685; L690).
  
  Figure 2-8. What is the definition of horizontal coordinate numbering, please explain or modify.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question. The horizontal coordinate number in Figure 2-8 indicate the sampling time of the samples. We will add the explanation of the definition of horizontal coordinate number in the figures.
  
  Modification: We have added the relevant explanation in the figures (L664-665; L669-670; L673-674; L678-679; L683-684; L688-689).
  
  We would like to thank you again for taking the time to review our manuscript.
  
  Reference:
  Bai, J. H., de Leeuw, G., De Smedt, I., Theys, N., Van Roozendael, M., Sogacheva, L., and Chai, W.: Variations and photochemical transformations of atmospheric constituents in North China, Atmospheric Environ., 189, 213-226, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.004, 2018.
  Barnes, I,, Becker, K. H., and Zhu, T.: Near UV absorption spectra and photolysis products of difunctional organic nitrates: Possible importance as NOx reservoirs, J. Atmos. Chem., 17, 353-373, doi: 10.1007/BF00696854, 1993.
  Browne, E. C., and Cohen, R. C.: Effects of biogenic nitrate chemistry on the NOx lifetime in remote continental regions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 20673-20716, doi: 10.5194/acp-12-11917-2012, 2012.
  Calvert, J. G., and Madronich, S.: Theoretical study of the initial products of the atmospheric oxidation of hydrocarbons, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 92, 2211-2220, doi: 10.1029/JD092iD02p02211, 1987.
  Chen, X. H., Hulbert, D., and Shepson, P. B.: Measurement of the organic nitrate yield from OH reaction with isoprene, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 103, 25563-25568, doi: 10.1029/98JD01483, 1998.
  Cui, M., Chen, Y. J., Li, C., Yin, J., Li, J., and Zheng, J.: Parent and methyl polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and n-alkanes emitted by construction machinery in China, Sci. Total Environ., 775, 144759, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144759, 2021.
  Gen, M. S., Liang, Z. C, Zhang, R.F., Mabato, B. R. G., and Chan, C. K.: Particulate nitrate photolysis in the atmosphere, Environ. Sci.: Atmos., 2, 111-127, doi: 10.1039/D1EA00087J, 2022.
  Kang, M. J., Ren, L., Ren, H., Zhao, Y., Kawamura, K., Zhang, H., Wei, L., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., and Fu, P.: Primary biogenic and anthropogenic sources of organic aerosols in Beijing, China: Insights from saccharides and n-alkanes, Environ. Pollut., 243, 1579-1587, doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.118, 2018.
  Kenagy, H. S., Romer Present, P. S., Wooldridge, P. J., Nault, B. A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Jimenez, J. L., Zare, A., Pye, H. O., and Yu, J.: Contribution of Organic Nitrates to Organic Aerosol over South Korea during KORUS-AQ, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 16326-16338, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c05521, 2021.
  Li, G.B., Cai, S.H., and Long, B.: New reactions for the formation of organic nitrate in the atmosphere, ACS omega, 7, 39671-39679, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03321, 2022.
  Li, Q., Wang, E. R., Zhang, T. T., and Hu, H.: Spatial and temporal patterns of air pollution in Chinese cities, Water Air Soil Pollut., 228, 1-22, doi: 10.1007/s11270-017-3268-x, 2017.
  Ling, Z., Guo, H., Simpson, I. J., Saunders, S. M., Lam, S. H. M., Lyu, X., and Blake, D. R.: New insight into the spatiotemporal variability and source apportionments of C1-C4 alkyl nitrates in Hong Kong, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8141–8156, doi: 10.5194/acp-16-8141-2016, 2016.
  Lyu, Y., Xu, T. T., Yang, X., Chen, J. M., Cheng, T. T., and Li, X.: Seasonal contributions to size-resolved n-alkanes (C8-C40) in the Shanghai atmosphere from regional anthropogenic activities and terrestrial plant waxes, Sci. Total Environ., 579, 1918-1928, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.201, 2016.
  Perring, A. E., Bertram, T. H., Farmer, D. K., Wooldridge, P. J., Dibb, J., Blake, N. J., Blake, D. R., Singh, H. B., Fuelberg, H., Diskin, G., Sachse, G., and Cohen, R. C.: The production and persistence of ΣRONO2 in the Mexico City plume, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7215-7229, doi: 10.5194/acp-10-7215-2010, 2010.
  Perring, A. E., Pusede, S. E., and Cohen, R. C.: An observational perspective on the atmospheric impacts of alkyl and multifunctional nitrates on ozone and secondary organic aerosol, Chem. Rev., 113, 5848-5870, doi: 10.1021/cr300520x, 2013.
  Rollins, A. W., Browne, E. C., Min, K. E., Pusede, S. E., Wooldridge, P. J., Gentner, D. R., Goldstein, A. H., Liu, S., Day, D. A., Russell, L. M.: Evidence for NOx Control over Nighttime SOA Formation, Science, 337, 1210-1212, doi: 10.1126/science.1221520, 2012.
  Sun, J., Li, Z., Xue, L., Wang, T., Wang, X., Gao, J., Nie, W., Simpson, I. J., Gao, R., and Blake, D. R.: Summertime C1-C5 alkyl nitrates over Beijing, northern China: Spatial distribution, regional transport, and formation mechanisms, Atmos. Res., 204, 102-109, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.01.014, 2018.
  Wagner, P., and Schäfer, K.: Influence of mixing layer height on air pollutant concentrations in an urban street canyon, Urban Clim., 22, 64-79, doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.11.001, 2017.
  Wang, M., Shao, M., Chen, W., Lu, S., Wang, C., Huang, D., Yuan, B., Zeng, L., and Zhao, Y.: Measurements of C1-C4 alkyl nitrates and their relationships with carbonyl compounds and O3 in Chinese cities, Atmos. Environ., 81, 389-398, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.065, 2013.
  Wick, C. D, Siepmann, J., Klotz, W. L, and Schure, M. R.: Temperature effects on the retention of n-alkanes and arenes in helium-squalane gas-liquid chromatography: experiment and molecular simulation, J. Chromatogr. A, 957, 181-190, doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)00171-1, 2002.
  Yang, J., Lei, G., Liu, C., Wu, Y., Hu, K., Zhu, J., Bao, J., Lin, W., and Jin, J.: Characteristics of particulate-bound n-alkanes indicating sources of PM2.5 in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3015-3029, doi: 10.5194/acp-23-3015-2023, 2023.
  Zhen, S. S., Luo, M., Shao, Y., Xu, D. D., and Ma, L. L.: Application of Stable Isotope Techniques in Tracing the Sources of Atmospheric NOX and Nitrate, Processes, 10, 2549, doi: 10.3390/pr10122549, 2022.
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-700-AC1
RC2:
'Comment on egusphere-2023-700', Anonymous Referee #2, 21 Jun 2023

This is a paper describing measurement of long-chain alkyl nitrates in particulate matter in China. The measurements seem well done and I think there is probably interesting material here, however, as presented, the analysis is not mature enough to make compelling conclusions and it's hard to tell, from what is presented, whether it is merely an issue of presentation or whether additional correlative measurements would be needed. I include specific comments below but it seems like it should be possible to do more extensive calculations of the expected distributions of these compounds between the gas and particle phases which might explain the observed diurnal and seasonal trends. Until those calculations (based on a wealth of previously published work regarding gas-particle partitioning of VOC) I don;t belive that the main conclusion (formation of organic nitrates in the particle phase) can be supported.
Smaller comments include:
Line 47 – I don’t think it’s true that more oxidation occurs as NOx concentrations increase. Probably under most conditions? But under NOx saturated conditions that’s not true anymore. I recommend rephrasing.
End of the same paragraph – the last sentence doesn’t really wrap these things together the way I think you want to. Maybe try to make the point that particulate-bound organic nitrates reflect both ozone production and SOA formation chemistry?
I recommend re-writing paragraph that starts on line 55. ONs are not mostly esters and they’re not such a reactive nitrogen oxide, they’re more like semi-permanent reservoir species. They’re an interesting component of PM but only a large fraction under very special circumstances. If the main idea of this paragraph is to describe how ONs behave as part of the coupled Hox-NOx cycles that lead to ozone production and then how they can partition to aerosol then this should be rearranged and refocused.
Then, beginning of the next paragraph, in this case you mean nitrates including nitrate salts and organic nitrates? I would rephrase because, as written, that is going to be confusing to some readers since you’ve been only talking about organic nitrates. And then later be specific about the fraction of particulate nitrate that are observed to be ONs. Finally, the fraction of PM2.5 that’s SOA seems a bit disconnected from the rest of this discussion since ONs are a minor component of both SOA and PM.
And then in the discussion of the different VOC that can contribute to ONs, I think it’s odd not to mention the relative abundances of those precursors. Do you have measurements of any of the hydrocarbon precursors?
In 2.1 it might be good to mention the timing of rush hour as it relates to your sample times.
Section 2.3 – Have you checked the quantitative yields of the alkyl nitrate that you're using to make your standards? I think you should say more about how sure you are that they can be used as calibration standards.
Why is NO2+ used for confirmation and CH2ONO2 quantitatively? Can you comment on the relative detection efficiencies of the quantitative fragment for different ONs? Or I guess that is taken care of with the calibration but it's probably worth mentioning why you choose to use these ions the way you do.
Line 168 – 63% recovery isn’t great. Was it systematically low for certain compounds? Which ones? Any idea why? The small standard deviation makes it seem like it must have been systematic.
Line 188 – more longer chain compounds doesn’t mean that they are more abundant overall, it might just be that they’re more likely to partition. Are the vapor pressures known or estimated? Can you evaluate the implied overall concentration (gas+particle) based on your observations in the particle phase using known vapor pressures and the calculated partition coefficients?
Lines 193 and after – Are there number-of-carbon effects to vapor pressure? I wonder if part of this trend is because c9-c11 includes only one even C number while 12-16 includes only two odds? See for example this reference: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es0201810
Lines 210-213 – has anyone measured a speciated VOC distribution here? Can you see if your contributions to particulate phase match up? (I mentioned this earlier too) I’m not sure we need to call for more investigation unless we have evidence that the known chemistry fails to explain what you’re seeing.
3.1.2 – How much of this can be explained by colder temperatures at night?
Paragraph that starts on line 223 – Please be a bit more specific on which statistical tests have been used to determine significance for different things.
Line 234 – different chain lengths of nitrates don’t have different formation mechanisms. But particulate nitrate formation is really temperature sensitive so it makes total sense that overall nitrate production might be highest in the summer even though particulate nitrate peaks in the winter. Or perhaps the winter has different VOC sources? Is this an area with isoprene emissions? Because those are very volatile products so that could drive a big summer to winter difference.
Figure 1 – what is the x-axis? Are the different points individual samples smushed into the same little region? Is it a function of time?
Figure 4 – You don't need both Figure 4 and 6. I recommend just keeping figure 6. Also why put day and night together? Maybe make them different traces? But the mass fraction of ONs are insanely small. Does current figure 6 imply that it's ~0.001% of PM? If so I think it's hard to argue, as you do at the end of the paper, that these n-alkyl nitrates are an imporatant contributor to PM and haze formation.
Also figures 4, 5 and 6 – would help to label or color-code with seasons since it’s hard to look at numerical dates, especially since there are gaps.

Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-700-RC2
- AC2:
  'Reply on RC2', Jun Jin, 24 Aug 2023
  Author's Response
  Particulate-bound alkyl nitrate pollution and formation mechanisms in Beijing, China
  Jiyuan Yang^1*, Guoyang Lei^1*, Jinfeng Zhu¹,Yutong Wu¹, Chang Liu¹, Kai Hu¹, Junsong Bao², Zitong Zhang¹, Weili Lin¹ and Jun Jin^1,3.
  ¹College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China
  ²State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
  ³Beijing Engineering Research Center of Food Environment and Public Health, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China
  *These authors contributed equally to this work
  Referee Comment
  This is a paper describing measurement of long-chain alkyl nitrates in particulate matter in China. The measurements seem well done and I think there is probably interesting material here, however, as presented, the analysis is not mature enough to make compelling conclusions and it's hard to tell, from what is presented, whether it is merely an issue of presentation or whether additional correlative measurements would be needed. I include specific comments below but it seems like it should be possible to do more extensive calculations of the expected distributions of these compounds between the gas and particle phases which might explain the observed diurnal and seasonal trends. Until those calculations (based on a wealth of previously published work regarding gas-particle partitioning of VOC) I don’t belive that the main conclusion (formation of organic nitrates in the particle phase) can be supported.
  Smaller comments include:
  Line 47 – I don’t think it’s true that more oxidation occurs as NOx concentrations increase. Probably under most conditions? But under NOx saturated conditions that’s not true anymore. I recommend rephrasing.
  
  End of the same paragraph – the last sentence doesn’t really wrap these things together the way I think you want to. Maybe try to make the point that particulate-bound organic nitrates reflect both ozone production and SOA formation chemistry?
  
  I recommend re-writing paragraph that starts on line 55. ONs are not mostly esters and they’re not such a reactive nitrogen oxide, they’re more like semi-permanent reservoir species. They’re an interesting component of PM but only a large fraction under very special circumstances. If the main idea of this paragraph is to describe how ONs behave as part of the coupled Hox-NOx cycles that lead to ozone production and then how they can partition to aerosol then this should be rearranged and refocused.
  
  Then, beginning of the next paragraph, in this case you mean nitrates including nitrate salts and organic nitrates? I would rephrase because, as written, that is going to be confusing to some readers since you’ve been only talking about organic nitrates. And then later be specific about the fraction of particulate nitrate that are observed to be ONs. Finally, the fraction of PM2.5 that’s SOA seems a bit disconnected from the rest of this discussion since ONs are a minor component of both SOA and PM.
  
  And then in the discussion of the different VOC that can contribute to ONs, I think it’s odd not to mention the relative abundances of those precursors. Do you have measurements of any of the hydrocarbon precursors?
  
  In 2.1 it might be good to mention the timing of rush hour as it relates to your sample times.
  
  Section 2.3 – Have you checked the quantitative yields of the alkyl nitrate that you're using to make your standards? I think you should say more about how sure you are that they can be used as calibration standards.
  
  Why is NO2+ used for confirmation and CH2ONO2 quantitatively? Can you comment on the relative detection efficiencies of the quantitative fragment for different ONs? Or I guess that is taken care of with the calibration but it's probably worth mentioning why you choose to use these ions the way you do.
  
  Line 168 – 63% recovery isn’t great. Was it systematically low for certain compounds? Which ones? Any idea why? The small standard deviation makes it seem like it must have been systematic.
  
  Line 188 – more longer chain compounds doesn’t mean that they are more abundant overall, it might just be that they’re more likely to partition. Are the vapor pressures known or estimated? Can you evaluate the implied overall concentration (gas+particle) based on your observations in the particle phase using known vapor pressures and the calculated partition coefficients?
  
  Lines 193 and after – Are there number-of-carbon effects to vapor pressure? I wonder if part of this trend is because c9-c11 includes only one even C number while 12-16 includes only two odds? See for example this reference: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es0201810
  
  Lines 210-213 – has anyone measured a speciated VOC distribution here? Can you see if your contributions to particulate phase match up? (I mentioned this earlier too) I’m not sure we need to call for more investigation unless we have evidence that the known chemistry fails to explain what you’re seeing.
  
  1.2 – How much of this can be explained by colder temperatures at night?
  
  Paragraph that starts on line 223 – Please be a bit more specific on which statistical tests have been used to determine significance for different things.
  
  Line 234 – different chain lengths of nitrates don’t have different formation mechanisms. But particulate nitrate formation is really temperature sensitive so it makes total sense that overall nitrate production might be highest in the summer even though particulate nitrate peaks in the winter. Or perhaps the winter has different VOC sources? Is this an area with isoprene emissions? Because those are very volatile products so that could drive a big summer to winter difference.
  
  Figure 1 – what is the x-axis? Are the different points individual samples smushed into the same little region? Is it a function of time?
  
  Figure 4 – You don't need both Figure 4 and 6. I recommend just keeping figure 6. Also why put day and night together? Maybe make them different traces? But the mass fraction of ONs are insanely small. Does current figure 6 imply that it's ~0.001% of PM? If so I think it's hard to argue, as you do at the end of the paper, that these n-alkyl nitrates are an imporatant contributor to PM and haze formation.
  
  Also figures 4, 5 and 6 – would help to label or color-code with seasons since it’s hard to look at numerical dates, especially since there are gaps.
  
  Author's response：
  Dear referee:
  Thank you for your constructive comments on our manuscript. We have carefully considered the suggestions and revised the manuscript accordingly. We have added to the analysis of our conclusion based on your suggestions and provided more additional evidence to support our points. However, we could not add more additional measurements especially of alkyl nitrates in the gas phase due to the experimental constraints, so it is difficult to calculate the expected distributions of these compounds between the gas and particle phases without being able to obtain their concentration levels in the gas phase. We have tried our best to improve this manuscript, please find our itemized responses and revisions/corrections in below.
  
  Line 47 – I don’t think it’s true that more oxidations occurs as NOx concentrations increase. Probably under most conditions? But under NOx saturated conditions that’s not true anymore. I recommend rephrasing.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestions, we previously thought that atmospheric oxidizability may increase as NOx concentrations in the atmosphere increase, with enhanced photochemical reactions and increased ozone production, did not take into account the situation that NOx reaches saturation. We will rephrase this sentence.
  
  Modification: We have rephrased this sentence and changed it to “Before the NOx reach saturation, more oxidations may occurs in the atmosphere as NOx concentrations increase” (L47-48).
  
  End of the same paragraph – the last sentence doesn’t really wrap these things together the way I think you want to. Maybe try to make the point that particulate-bound organic nitrates reflect both ozone production and SOA formation chemistry?
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. We will add a summary at the end of this paragraph and improve this part according to your suggestion.
  
  Modification: We have added a concluding sentence at the end of this paragraph (L54-55: they reflect both photochemical processes of ozone production and SOA formation.).
  
  I recommend re-writing paragraph that starts on line 55. ONs are not mostly esters and they’re not such a reactive nitrogen oxide, they’re more like semi-permanent reservoir species. They’re an interesting component of PM but only a large fraction under very special circumstances. If the main idea of this paragraph is to describe how ONs behave as part of the coupled Hox-NOx cycles that lead to ozone production and then how they can partition to aerosol, then this should be rearranged and refocused.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestions. We will rewrite this paragraph according to your advice and emphasize the impacts of particulate-bound organic nitrates as a kind of semi-permanent reservoir species on the nitrogen cycle and the atmosphere.
  Modification: We have rewritten this paragraph (L56-67: As a kind of semi-permanent reservoir species, ONs are important participants in the atmospheric nitrogen cycle, which involves various atmospheric sources and sinks of nitrogen oxides. The formation of ONs consumes nitrogen oxides and atmospheric oxidants, thus becomes an important sink for atmospheric nitrogen oxides (Perring et al., 2010) and affects the atmospheric lifetimes of free radicals, the ozone concentration, and photochemical reactions (Calvert et al., 1987). In addition, ONs may release nitrogen dioxide and produce strong oxidants such as hydroxyl radicals by photolysis, affecting the balance of nitrogen oxides in regional NOx cycles (Barnes et al., 1993; Chen et al., 1998) and contribute to atmospheric oxidation capacity (Gen et al., 2022), respectively. Semi-volatile ONs are an important kind of sources and component of secondary organic aerosols (SOAs) and contribute to fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) (Rollins et al., 2012). As important secondary air pollutants, ONs affect the oxidation in the atmosphere and the formation of haze (Browne et al., 2012), controlling particulate-bound ONs may therefore be key to controlling both PM_2.5 and ozone in the atmosphere.).
  
  Then, beginning of the next paragraph, in this case you mean nitrates including nitrate salts and organic nitrates? I would rephrase because, as written, that is going to be confusing to some readers since you’ve been only talking about organic nitrates. And then later be specific about the fraction of particulate nitrate that are observed to be ONs. Finally, the fraction of PM2.5 that’s SOA seems a bit disconnected from the rest of this discussion since ONs are a minor component of both SOA and PM.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out, the “nitrates” in this part means organic nitrates, we will revise this paragraph to make it more logical.
  
  Modification: We have modified this paragraph (L70-74: The formation of particulate-bound ONs associated with non-homogeneous reactions (Zhen et al., 2022; Li et al., 2022), especially at night was highly correlated with nitrogen oxide levels. During strong air pollution events, SOAs can contribute up to 30%-77% of PM_2.5, with particulate organic nitrates accounting for 5%-40% of the organic matter (Rollins et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2012). L76-77: The strong correlation between ONs and SOAs and the diurnal trend of ONs particle size distribution indicate the key role of particulate-bound ONs (Yu et al., 2019).)
  
  And then in the discussion of the different VOC that can contribute to ONs, I think it’s odd not to mention the relative abundances of those precursors. Do you have measurements of any of the hydrocarbon precursors?
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. According to previous research, we found that alkanes, as the precursors of alkyl nitrates, have been found to be the most abundant species and contributing 54.1-64.7% of the total VOC concentration (Li et al., 2020). We will add the measurement results of n-alkanes to this part of the manuscript.
  
  Modification: We have added the the measurement results of alkanes to this part (L83-84: Alkanes, as the precursors of alkyl nitrates, have been found to be the most abundant species and contributing 54.1-64.7% of the total VOC concentration (Li et al., 2020)).
  
  In 2.1 it might be good to mention the timing of rush hour as it relates to your sample times.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestion. The morning and evening rush hours in Beijing tend to be 7-9 am and 5-8 pm, respectively. We will add this to Section 2.1.
  
  Modification: We have added the timing of rush hours in Beijing in Section 2.1 (L122-123).
  
  Section 2.3 – Have you checked the quantitative yields of the alkyl nitrate that you're using to make your standards? I think you should say more about how sure you are that they can be used as calibration standards.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question and suggestion. In this study, we characterized and quantified the synthesized standards by GC-MS/MS to determine their purity. The synthesized standards were detected by the GC-MS/MS full scan detection. We qualitatively analyzed the synthesized standards, according to the total ion flow diagram and mass spectrogram obtained by GC-MS/MS. In the case of n-nonyl nitrate, for example, as shown in the total ion flow diagram, only one compound showed high instrumental response, indicating the high purity. The characteristic ions of n-alkyl group and organic nitrate appeared in the mass spectrogram, and these characteristic ions all have high relative abundance. Therefore, we identified that the synthesized standard substance is n-nonyl nitrate. We will add more methodological details in Section 2.3.
  Total ion flow diagram
  Mass spectrogram
  
  Modification: We have added more methodological details in this section (L142-147: The standards were examined and analyzed by GC-MS/MS and detected by full scan detection. According to the total ion flow diagrams and mass spectrograms obtained by GC-MS/MS, only one compound showed high instrumental response in the total ion flow diagrams, indicating the high purity of synthesized standards. The characteristic irons of n-alkyl nitrates, [CH₂ONO₂]⁺ ion (m/z 76.07) and [NO₂]⁺ ion (m/z 46.07) appeared in the mass spectrograms and have high relative abundance, indicating the synthesized standards are n-alkyl nitrates.).
  
  Why is NO2+ used for confirmation and CH2ONO2 quantitatively? Can you comment on the relative detection efficiencies of the quantitative fragment for different ONs? Or I guess that is taken care of with the calibration but it's probably worth mentioning why you choose to use these ions the way you do.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. In this study, we used GC-MS/MS for the detection of alkyl nitrates and chose both [CH₂ONO₂]⁺ and [NO₂]⁺ as qualitative and quantitative ions, where [CH₂ONO₂]⁺ was used as the parent ion and [NO₂]⁺ as the daughter ion. In mass spectrometry, organic nitrates formed from saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons were able to cleave to produce [CH₂ONO₂]⁺ ion, and [CH₂ONO₂]⁺ ion were able to further cleave to produce [NO₂]⁺ ion, both ions have high abundance. According to previous studies, the [NO₂]⁺ ion is widely used in the detection of alkyl nitrates as a characteristic ion of alkyl nitrates (Luxenhofer et al., 1994; Luxenhofer et al., 1996). The use of these two ions as qualitative and quantitative ions for the detection of alkyl nitrates has been studied and proven (Yang et al., 2019).
  
  Line 168 – 63% recovery isn’t great. Was it systematically low for certain compounds? Which ones? Any idea why? The small standard deviation makes it seem like it must have been systematic.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your questions. In blank spiked recovery experiments, we found that the recovery of C₉-C₁₁ n-alkyl nitrates was lower than that of other n-alkyl nitrates, probably due to the effect of higher volatility. We will improve the pretreatment method to improve the recovery in the follow-up study.
  
  Line 188 – more longer chain compounds doesn’t mean that they are more abundant overall, it might just be that they’re more likely to partition. Are the vapor pressures known or estimated? Can you evaluate the implied overall concentration (gas+particle) based on your observations in the particle phase using known vapor pressures and the calculated partition coefficients?
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. In this study, we found that C₁₂-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates with longer carbon chains have higher detection rates and concentrations than C₉-C₁₁ n-alkyl nitrates in PM_2.5. Therefore, we thought that long-chain n-alkyl nitrates are more abundant in particulate matter, this is the conclusion based on the observations. Through our investigations, we have found that the vapor pressure of each homologue of C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates is approximately 0.0 ± 0.7 mmHg at 25℃, and decreases with the growth of the carbon chain length. However, due to the limitations of the experimental conditions, we were unable to measure the concentration levels of C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates in the gas-phase environment, so we were unable to calculate the relevant partition coefficients for further study. The total concentration and partitioning of alkyl nitrate in both phases needs to be explored by more research.
  
  Modification: We have revised the statement in this part (L202-204: For n-alkyl nitrates with a single function group, relatively long chain n-alkyl nitrates (C₁₂-C₁₆) are more abundant than relatively short chain n-alkyl nitrates (C₉-C₁₁).).
  
  Lines 193 and after – Are there number-of-carbon effects to vapor pressure? I wonder if part of this trend is because c9-c11 includes only one even C number while 12-16 includes only two odds? See for example this reference: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es0201810
  
  Reply: Thank you for your questions. We found that the vapor pressure of C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates varies only with increasing carbon chain length, independent of the number of odd or even carbons.
  
  Lines 210-213 – has anyone measured a speciated VOC distribution here? Can you see if your contributions to particulate phase match up? (I mentioned this earlier too) I’m not sure we need to call for more investigation unless we have evidence that the known chemistry fails to explain what you’re seeing.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. Previously, no studies have focused on the partitioning and distribution of C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates between gas and particle phases. Research on alkyl nitrates has mainly focused on C₁-C₅ alkyl nitrates in the gas phase (Ling et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2018), and longer n-alkyl nitrates have not received enough attention and research. Therefore, we did not find any direct validation of our conclusions by the results of studies on the air particle distribution of long-chain alkyl nitrates.
  
  1.2 – How much of this can be explained by colder temperatures at night?
  
  Reply: Thank you for your questions. Temperature influence the partition of semivolatile organic compounds between the gas and particle phases. As semivolatile organic compounds, ONs enter the particle phase more easily when the temperature is lower, the fraction of ONs in the particle phase increase with decreasing temperature (Kenagy et al., 2021). However, the extent of the direct effect of temperature is hard to be quantified. According to previous study, variations in the concentration of particulate-bound alkyl nitrates are more related to their formation (Rollins et al., 2013). We prefer to think that temperature affects the formation of alkyl nitrates on PM by influencing the partitioning of precursor n-alkanes between the gas and particle phases.
  
  Paragraph that starts on line 223 – Please be a bit more specific on which statistical tests have been used to determine significance for different things.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestion. The differences between samples were characterized by independent samples t-test, paired samples t-test and one-way ANOVA. We'll add to the manuscript accordingly
  
  Modification: We have added the details in the manuscript (L242: According to the analysis of variation; L247: based on the independent samples t-test.).
  
  Line 234 – different chain lengths of nitrates don’t have different formation mechanisms. But particulate nitrate formation is really temperature sensitive so it makes total sense that overall nitrate production might be highest in the summer even though particulate nitrate peaks in the winter. Or perhaps the winter has different VOC sources? Is this an area with isoprene emissions? Because those are very volatile products so that could drive a big summer to winter difference.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. C₁-C₅ alkyl nitrates have been shown to be formed from daytime gas-phase reactions of alkanes and radicals during photochemical processes (Perring et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2018). However, it has been demonstrated that organic nitrates can be formed by non-homogeneous reactions occurring on the surface of particulate matter (Li et al., 2022), NO₂ can form the particulate phase NO₃^- via a non-homogeneous reaction (Goodman et al., 1998), and n-alkanes can be reacted with nitric acid to form alkyl nitrates catalyzed by copper at room temperature (Luxenhofer et al., 1994; Luxenhofer et al., 1996). In addition, it has been found that non-homogeneous reactions affect the partitioning of alkyl nitrates between the gas and particle phases, the concentration of particulate-bound alkyl nitrates increases with the organic aerosol. Since the direct relationship between particulate-bound alkyl nitrates and temperature could not be observed, the differences in the concentration of particulate-bound alkyl nitrates are mainly due to chemical factors and related to their formation (Rollins et al., 2013). Therefore, we made the speculation that particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates may be formed by non-homogeneous reactions. We were unable to directly quantify the extent of the effect of temperature on particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates, But the seasonal differences and trends in the concentrations of particulate-bound were the same as those of the precursor n-alkanes, so we thought that the seasonal differences in particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates come more from precursor-related formation than the temperature effects.
  
  Figure 1 – what is the x-axis? Are the different points individual samples smushed into the same little region? Is it a function of time?
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question, The x-axis of Figure 1 shows the structural expression of each homologue of C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates, from left to right. Figure 1 represents the concentrations range of each homologue of C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrate in all samples, not as a function of time. The concentrations of each homologue in the samples is represented by different colors and concentrated in the corresponding area, and we hope to represent the abundance of each homologue in the PM_2.5 in this way.
  
  Modification: We have modified the x-axis label of Figure 1 and added the explanation to make it can be better understood (L658-660).
  
  Figure 4 – You don't need both Figure 4 and 6. I recommend just keeping figure 6. Also why put day and night together? Maybe make them different traces? But the mass fraction of ONs are insanely small. Does current figure 6 imply that it's ~0.001% of PM? If so I think it's hard to argue, as you do at the end of the paper, that these n-alkyl nitrates are an imporatant contributor to PM and haze formation.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestions. We would like to show the time trend of n-alkyl nitrates concentrations in Figure 4 and the comparison of n-alkyl nitrates and PM_2.5 in Figure 6. In fact, Figure 4 and Figure 6 are duplicated in the function, so we will modify according to your suggestion and only retain Figure 6. We put the day and night samples together in order to ensure the temporal continuity. C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates are only a part of particulate-bound alkyl nitrates, considering the different carbon chain lengths, carbon frame structures and functional group substitution positions, etc., as well as isomers, we believe that the effect of particulate-bound alkyl nitrate on PM and haze formation should not be neglected.
  
  Modification: We have modified the figures that only kept Figure 6 and adjusted the order of the figures, we also revised the corresponding part of the manuscript.
  
  Also figures 4, 5 and 6 – would help to label or color-code with seasons since it’s hard to look at numerical dates, especially since there are gaps.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestions, we will modify these figures to better distinguish the different seasons.
  
  Modification: We have modified the figures (L671; L676; L681; L686).
  
  We would like to thank you again for taking the time to review our manuscript.
  
  Reference:
  Barnes, I,, Becker, K. H., and Zhu, T.: Near UV absorption spectra and photolysis products of difunctional organic nitrates: Possible importance as NOx reservoirs, J. Atmos. Chem., 17, 353-373,doi: 10.1007/BF00696854, 1993.
  Browne, E. C., and Cohen, R. C.: Effects of biogenic nitrate chemistry on the NOx lifetime in remote continental regions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 20673-20716, doi: 10.5194/acp-12-11917-2012, 2012.
  Calvert, J. G., and Madronich, S.: Theoretical study of the initial products of the atmospheric oxidation of hydrocarbons, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 92, 2211-2220, doi: 10.1029/JD092iD02p02211, 1987.
  Chen, X. H., Hulbert, D., and Shepson, P. B.: Measurement of the organic nitrate yield from OH reaction with isoprene, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 103, 25563-25568, doi: 10.1029/98JD01483, 1998.
  Gen, M. S., Liang, Z. C, Zhang, R.F., Mabato, B. R. G., and Chan, C. K.: Particulate nitrate photolysis in the atmosphere, Environ. Sci.: Atmos., 2, 111-127, doi: 10.1039/D1EA00087J, 2022.
  Goodman, A. L., Miller, T. M., and Grassian, V. H.: Heterogeneous reactions of NO 2 on NaCl and Al 2 O 3 particles, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films, 16, 2585–2590, doi: 10.1116/1.581386, 1998.
  Kenagy, H. S., Romer Present, P. S., Wooldridge, P. J., Nault, B. A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Jimenez, J. L., Zare, A., Pye, H. O., and Yu, J.: Contribution of Organic Nitrates to Organic Aerosol over South Korea during KORUS-AQ, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 16326-16338, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c05521, 2021.
  Li, G.B., Cai, S.H., and Long, B.: New reactions for the formation of organic nitrate in the atmosphere, ACS omega, 7, 39671-39679, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03321, 2022.
  Li, Q. Q., Su, G. J., Li, C. Q., Liu, P. F., Zhao, X. X., Zhang, C. L., Sun, X., Mu, Y. J., Wu, M. G., and Wang, Q. L.: An investigation into the role of VOCs in SOA and ozone production in Beijing, China, Sci. Total Environ., 720, 137536, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137536, 2020.
  Ling, Z., Guo, H., Simpson, I. J., Saunders, S. M., Lam, S. H. M., Lyu, X., and Blake, D. R.: New insight into the spatiotemporal variability and source apportionments of C1–C4 alkyl nitrates in Hong Kong, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8141–8156, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8141-2016, 2016.
  Luxenhofer, O., Schneider, E., and Ballschmiter, K.: Separation, detection and occurrence of (C2-C8)-alkyl- and phenyl-alkyl nitrates as trace compounds in clean and polluted air, Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 350, 384-394, doi: 10.1007/BF00325611, 1994.
  Luxenhofer, O., Schneider, M., Dambach, M. and Ballschmiter, K.: Semivolatile long chain C6-C17 alkyl nitrates as trace compounds in air, Chemosphere, 33, 393-404, doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(96)00205-6, 1996.
  Perring, A. E., Bertram, T. H., Farmer, D. K., Wooldridge, P. J., Dibb, J., Blake, N. J., Blake, D. R., Singh, H. B., Fuelberg, H., Diskin, G., Sachse, G., and Cohen, R. C.: The production and persistence of ΣRONO2 in the Mexico City plume, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7215-7229, doi: 10.5194/acp-10-7215-2010, 2010.
  Perring, A. E., Pusede, S. E., and Cohen, R. C.: An observational perspective on the atmospheric impacts of alkyl and multifunctional nitrates on ozone and secondary organic aerosol, Chem. Rev., 113, 5848-5870, doi: 10.1021/cr300520x, 2013.
  Rollins, A. W., Browne, E. C., Min, K. E., Pusede, S. E., Wooldridge, P. J., Gentner, D. R., Goldstein, A. H., Liu, S., Day, D. A., Russell, L. M.: Evidence for NOx Control over Nighttime SOA Formation, Science, 337, 1210-1212, doi: 10.1126/science.1221520, 2012.
  Rollins, A. W., Pusede, S., Wooldridge, P., Min, K.-E., Gentner, D. R., Goldstein, A. H., Liu, S., Day, D. A., Russell, L. M., and Rubitschun, C. L.: Gas/particle partitioning of total alkyl nitrates observed with TD-LIF in Bakersfield, J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 118, 6651-6662, doi: 10.1002/jgrd.50522, 2013.
  Sun, Y. L., Zhang, Q., Schwab, J. J., Yang, T., Ng, N. L., and Demerjian, K. L.: Factor analysis of combined organic and inorganic aerosol mass spectra from high resolution aerosol mass spectrometer measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8537-8551, doi:10.5194/acp-12-8537-2012, 2012.
  Sun, J., Li, Z., Xue, L., Wang, T., Wang, X., Gao, J., Nie, W., Simpson, I. J., Gao, R., and Blake, D. R.: Summertime C1-C5 alkyl nitrates over Beijing, northern China: Spatial distribution, regional transport, and formation mechanisms, Atmos. Res., 204, 102-109, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.01.014, 2018.
  Xu, L., Suresh, S., Guo, H., Weber, R. J., and Ng, N. L.: Aerosol characterization over the southeastern United States using high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry: spatial and seasonal variation of aerosol composition and sources with a focus on organic nitrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7307-7336, doi: 10.5194/acp-15-7307-2015, 2015.
  Yang, X. H., Luo, F. X., Li, J. Q., Chen, D. Y., E, Y., Lin, W. L., and Jun, J.: Alkyl and aromatic nitrates in atmospheric particles determined by gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom., 30, 2762-2770, doi: 10.1007/s13361-019-02347-8, 2019.
  Yu, K. Y., Zhu, Q., Du, K., and Huang, X.-F.: Characterization of nighttime formation of particulate organic nitrates based on high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry in an urban atmosphere in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5235-5249, doi: 10.5194/acp-19-5235-2019, 2019.
  Zhen, S. S., Luo, M., Shao, Y., Xu, D. D., and Ma, L. L.: Application of Stable Isotope Techniques in Tracing the Sources of Atmospheric NOX and Nitrate, Processes, 10, 2549, doi: 10.3390/pr10122549, 2022.
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-700-AC2
RC3:
'Comment on egusphere-2023-700', Anonymous Referee #3, 06 Jul 2023
The manuscript describes the concentration of 8 different long-chain alkyl nitrates species from aerosol filter samples collected from Beijing between 2020 to 2021 and presents their temporal variation and correlation with O₃, NO₂ and PM concentration, from which the author inferred particle phase formation of those compounds. While the measurement seems to be of high quality, especially since the authors take effects to synthesize alkyl nitrates standards to make this work quantitative, the quality of their interpretation and presentation is not sufficient to support their conclusion (“particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates may form through reactions between alkanes and nitrates on PM surface”).
The authors need to justify why choosing the compounds presented in the manuscript. Are they major compositions of particle-bound alkyl nitrates? The work focused on 8 n-alkyl nitrates ranging from C₉H₁₉ONO₂ to C₁₆H₃₃ONO₂, which make up only less than 0.1% of PM_2.5 based on the measurements (around 2.7 ng/m³ to 160 ug/m³) compare to 2~12% of PM_2.5 by organic nitrate in literature (Line 338). Those compounds are probably too volatile (LogC^* around 2 ~5 estimated from SIMPOL model¹) to be found in high concentration in PM_2.5 compared to other alkyl nitrates with multiple functional groups and as a result of their volatility, their gas-particle partitioning behavior would be highly affected by PM_2.5 loading and temperature. Thus gas-particle partitioning needs to be addressed in a more quantitative way.
Detailed comments:
Line 120: How long are those samples stored before being analyzed? Is there any degradation of organic nitrates during sample collection and storage?
Line 184: Please specify how the instrument DL ( 1 to 10 pg ) differs for different carbon numbers and if how it affects detection rates.
Line 188: “long chain n-alkyl nitrates are more abundant than short chain n-alkyl nitrates”, for alkyl nitrates with multiple functional groups, this may be different.
Line 202~Line204: But long-chain n-alkyl nitrates concentrations in your study is not high here. For “high concentrations of precursor n-alkanes”, please add references here to specify the concentration of precursor n-alkanes or precursor measurements if available.
Line 206: “alkyl nitrate yield”, please clarify you mean total alkyl nitrate (gas+particle) or alkyl nitrate in SOA?
Line 215~235: Seasonal variations could also be driven by temperature, PM concentrations, and precursor concentrations. The analysis here is not sufficient to lead to the conclusion “long-chain particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates and short-chain alkyl nitrates have different formation mechanisms”.
Line 232: Here you have “long-chain” vs “short-chain (C1–C5)” but in line 199, you have “longer carbon chains (C12–C16)” and “shorter carbon chains (C9–C11)”.
3.2.1 Many other reasons temperature and precursors emission intensity could cause the temporal trend to be anti-correlated with ozone. “This and the particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrate concentration being higher at night than in the day” is not sufficient to conclude those compounds “are not secondary products of 269 photochemical reactions.”
3.2.2 What about formation mechanisms from NO₃ radical chemistry at night?
Line 552: Yang, J. et al. appeared twice here.
Figure. 1. Are measurements below DL also present in figure.1 or only measurements above DL is present? If so, please also note the ND measurements (for example, using open markers). For me, most of the markers in the plots read zero. As your DL is 0.1~1 pg/m³ and your concentration range is 0.009~2.7 ng/m³, please consider having the concentrations plotted in the log-scale.
Figures.2~8. Make the labels on the x-axis more readable or plot them against sample dates.
Reference:
Pankow, J. F. & Asher, W. E. SIMPOL.1: A simple group contribution method for predicting vapor pressures and enthalpies of vaporization of multifunctional organic compounds. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 2773–2796 (2008).
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-700-RC3
- AC3:
  'Reply on RC3', Jun Jin, 24 Aug 2023
  Author's Response
  Particulate-bound alkyl nitrate pollution and formation mechanisms in Beijing, China
  Jiyuan Yang^1*, Guoyang Lei^1*, Jinfeng Zhu¹,Yutong Wu¹, Chang Liu¹, Kai Hu¹, Junsong Bao², Zitong Zhang¹, Weili Lin¹ and Jun Jin^1,3.
  ¹College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China
  ²State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
  ³Beijing Engineering Research Center of Food Environment and Public Health, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China
  *These authors contributed equally to this work
  Referee Comment
  The manuscript describes the concentration of 8 different long-chain alkyl nitrates species from aerosol filter samples collected from Beijing between 2020 to 2021 and presents their temporal variation and correlation with O3, NO2 and PM concentration, from which the author inferred particle phase formation of those compounds. While the measurement seems to be of high quality, especially since the authors take effects to synthesize alkyl nitrates standards to make this work quantitative, the quality of their interpretation and presentation is not sufficient to support their conclusion (“particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates may form through reactions between alkanes and nitrates on PM surface”).
  The authors need to justify why choosing the compounds presented in the manuscript. Are they major compositions of particle-bound alkyl nitrates? The work focused on 8 n-alkyl nitrates ranging from C9H19ONO2 to C16H33ONO2, which make up only less than 0.1% of PM2.5 based on the measurements (around 2.7 ng/m3 to 160 ug/m3) compare to 2~12% of PM2.5 by organic nitrate in literature (Line 338). Those compounds are probably too volatile (LogC* around 2 ~5 estimated from SIMPOL model1) to be found in high concentration in PM2.5 compared to other alkyl nitrates with multiple functional groups and as a result of their volatility, their gas-particle partitioning behavior would be highly affected by PM2.5 loading and temperature. Thus gas-particle partitioning needs to be addressed in a more quantitative way.
  Detailed comments:
  Line 120: How long are those samples stored before being analyzed? Is there any degradation of organic nitrates during sample collection and storage?
  
  Line 184: Please specify how the instrument DL ( 1 to 10 pg) differs for different carbon numbers and if how it affects detection rates.
  
  Line 188: “long chain n-alkyl nitrates are more abundant than short chain n-alkyl nitrates”, for alkyl nitrates with multiple functional groups, this may be different.
  
  Line 202~Line204: But long-chain n-alkyl nitrates concentrations in your study is not high here. For “high concentrations of precursor n-alkanes”, please add references here to specify the concentration of precursor n-alkanes or precursor measurements if available.
  
  Line 206: “alkyl nitrate yield”, please clarify you mean total alkyl nitrate (gas+particle) or alkyl nitrate in SOA?
  
  Line 215~235: Seasonal variations could also be driven by temperature, PM concentrations, and precursor concentrations. The analysis here is not sufficient to lead to the conclusion “long-chain particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates and short-chain alkyl nitrates have different formation mechanisms”.
  
  Line 232: Here you have “long-chain” vs “short-chain (C1–C5)” but in line 199, you have “longer carbon chains (C12–C16)” and “shorter carbon chains (C9–C11)”.
  
  2.1 Many other reasons temperature and precursors emission intensity could cause the temporal trend to be anti-correlated with ozone. “This and the particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrate concentration being higher at night than in the day” is not sufficient to conclude those compounds “are not secondary products of 269 photochemical reactions.”
  
  2.2 What about formation mechanisms from NO3 radical chemistry at night?
  
  Line 552: Yang, J. et al. appeared twice here.
  
  1. Are measurements below DL also present in figure.1 or only measurements above DL is present? If so, please also note the ND measurements (for example, using open markers). For me, most of the markers in the plots read zero. As your DL is 0.1~1 pg/m3 and your concentration range is 0.009~2.7 ng/m3, please consider having the concentrations plotted in the log-scale.
  
  2~8. Make the labels on the x-axis more readable or plot them against sample dates.
  
  Reference:
  Pankow, J. F. & Asher, W. E. SIMPOL.1: A simple group contribution method for predicting vapor pressures and enthalpies of vaporization of multifunctional organic compounds. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 2773–2796 (2008).
  
  Author's response：
  Dear referee:
  Thank you for pointing out the problems and providing suggestions on our manuscripts. We have carefully considered the suggestions and tried our best to revise the manuscript accordingly. We further explain the reason for studying C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates and added more references as evidence to support our conclusions. However, due to experimental limitations, we did not measure the concentration levels of C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates in the gas-phase environment, and therefore could not quantify the gas-particle partitioning. We have tried our best to improve this manuscript and modify the problems, please find our itemized responses and revisions/corrections in below.
  
  Line 120: How long are those samples stored before being analyzed? Is there any degradation of organic nitrates during sample collection and storage?
  
  Reply: Thank you for your questions, PM_2.5 samples were usually analyzed within one month of sampling. Previous studies found that photolysis is the main pathway for alkyl nitrates degradation (Clemitshaw et al., 1997). In order to avoid the degradation of n-alkyl nitrate in PM_2.5 during the process of sampling to analysis, we kept the samples away from light during the whole process and stored them at -20 ℃. Therefore, we think that the n-alkyl nitrates did not degrade under these collection and storage conditions.
  
  Line 184: Please specify how the instrument DL ( 1 to 10 pg) differs for different carbon numbers and if how it affects detection rates.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. The instrumental detection limits for C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates were in the range of 1-10 pg, and the DL for each homologue increased with the increasing carbon number. However, we found that the detection rates of C₁₂-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates were higher than C₉-C₁₁ n-alkyl nitrates, so we think that the DL has no direct effects on the detection rates.
  
  Line 188: “long chain n-alkyl nitrates are more abundant than short chain n-alkyl nitrates”, for alkyl nitrates with multiple functional groups, this may be different.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out, the statement in this part is not clear enough. The point we have tried to express was that “For n-alkyl nitrates with a single function group, long chain n-alkyl nitrates are more abundant than short chain n-alkyl nitrates” in our study, we will modify the statement in this part.
  
  Modification: We have revised the statement in this part to make it more clear (L202-204: For n-alkyl nitrates with a single function group, relatively long chain n-alkyl nitrates (C₁₂-C₁₆) are more abundant than relatively short chain n-alkyl nitrates (C₉-C₁₁).).
  
  Line 202~Line204: But long-chain n-alkyl nitrates concentrations in your study is not high here. For “high concentrations of precursor n-alkanes”, please add references here to specify the concentration of precursor n-alkanes or precursor measurements if available.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestions. According to our previous study, the concentration of precursor n-alkanes in PM_2.5 in Beijing range from 4.51 ng/m³ to 153 ng/m³ (mean 32.7 ng/m³) and have rich anthropogenic emissions sources in the environment (Yang et al., 2023). The concentration level of precursor n-alkanes in particulate matter increases with carbon chain length, and the yield of alkyl nitrates from n-alkanes increases with the growth of carbon chain length (Lim et al., 2009). Therefore, we think that the higher abundance of long-chain n-alkyl nitrates (C₁₂-C₁₆) compared to short-chain n-alkanes (C₉-C₁₁) in PM_2.5 may be influenced by this factor.
  
  Modification: We have revised this part and added the references (L222-224: Our previous study found that the concentration of precursor n-alkanes in PM_2.5 in Beijing range from 4.51 ng/m³ to 153 ng/m³ (mean 32.7 ng/m³) and have rich anthropogenic emissions sources in the environment (Yang et al., 2023).).
  
  Line 206: “alkyl nitrate yield”, please clarify you mean total alkyl nitrate (gas+particle) or alkyl nitrate in SOA?
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. According to the references, the “alkyl nitrate yield” in this part means that the yield of alkyl nitrate in SOA.
  
  Line 215~235: Seasonal variations could also be driven by temperature, PM concentrations, and precursor concentrations. The analysis here is not sufficient to lead to the conclusion “long-chain particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates and short-chain alkyl nitrates have different formation mechanisms”.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out. Seasonal variations in the concentration levels of particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates are influenced by many factors, the conclusion in this part of the discussion is not rigorous and it will be modified.
  
  Modification: We have changed the conclusion to “long-chain particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates (C₉-C₁₆) and gaseous short-chain alkyl nitrates (C₁-C₅) in the same season such as summer showed different characteristics, which maybe due to their different formation mechanisms. However, it needs to be further analyzed” (L264-266).
  
  Line 232: Here you have “long-chain” vs “short-chain (C1–C5)” but in line 199, you have “longer carbon chains (C12–C16)” and “shorter carbon chains (C9–C11)”.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question. The comparison of these two parts is relative. In here, “long-chain” means C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates in the PM_2.5 and “short-chain” means C₁-C₅ alkyl nitrates in the gas-phase environment. In line 199, due to the different characteristics between C₉-C₁₁ and C₁₂-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates in our study, we used “longer carbon chains” and “shorter carbon chains” to distinguish.
  
  2.1 Many other reasons temperature and precursors emission intensity could cause the temporal trend to be anti-correlated with ozone. “This and the particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrate concentration being higher at night than in the day” is not sufficient to conclude those compounds “are not secondary products of 269 photochemical reactions.”
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question. For alkyl nitrates, this kind of air pollutants have extensively studied that C₁-C₅ alkyl nitrates are formed from photochemical reactions, they showed a positive correlated with ozone and have the same temporal trend (Wang et al., 2013; Ling et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2018). However, we found diametrically opposite characteristics for C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrate with longer carbon chains in particulate matter. Combined with the fact that particulate-bound C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates exhibit diurnal differences from C₁-C₅ alkyl nitrates, we hypothesize that particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates may not be formed from gas-phase reactions via photochemical process. The temporal trend of particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates can indeed be influenced by many factors, so the exact mechanism of formation needs to be proven by more studies. We will modify the discussion and conclusion in this part to make it more reasonable.
  
  Modification: We have revised the discussion and conclusion in this part (L295-303: C₉-C₁₆ particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates showed diametrically opposite characteristics and different environmental behaviors from gaseous alkyl nitrates, which suggest that particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates are not the indicators of photochemical pollution and maybe form through different mechanisms from gas-phase short-chain (C₁-C₅) alkyl nitrates. Research have shown that there may be other reaction pathways for the formation of particulate organic nitrates, particulate-bound organic nitrates are able to form via non-homogeneous reactions (Li et al., 2022). Therefore, we inferred that particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates may not be formed through the gas-phase reactions in photochemical process involving ozone and that long-chain (C₁₂-C₁₆) n-alkyl nitrates are not the secondary products of gas-phase homogeneous reactions in photochemical process.).
  
  2.2 What about formation mechanisms from NO3 radical chemistry at night?
  
  Reply: Thank you for your question. In fact, the formation mechanisms from NO₃ radical chemistry at night to form organic nitrates are participate mainly by olefins and aromatic hydrocarbons but do not form n-alkyl nitrates (Perring et al., 2013). Therefore, we did not consider this formation pathway.
  
  Line 552: Yang, J. et al. appeared twice here.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out, we will correct it.
  
  Modification: We have removed the duplicate references.
  
  1. Are measurements below DL also present in figure.1 or only measurements above DL is present? If so, please also note the ND measurements (for example, using open markers). For me, most of the markers in the plots read zero. As your DL is 0.1~1 pg/m3 and your concentration range is 0.009~2.7 ng/m3, please consider having the concentrations plotted in the log-scale.
  
  Reply: Thank you for pointing this out, the measurements below the detection limit are donated by “0” in the Figure 1, we think that it is more intuitive to represent the abundance of C₉-C₁₆ n-alkyl nitrates in this way.
  
  Modification: We have modified the x-axis label of Figure 1 and added the explanation to make it can be better understood (L658-660).
  
  2~8. Make the labels on the x-axis more readable or plot them against sample dates.
  
  Reply: Thank you for your suggestion, we will modify the labels on these x-axis.
  
  Modification: We have modified the labels on x-axis in the figures.
  
  We would like to thank you again for taking the time to review our manuscript.
  
  Reference:
  Clemitshaw, K. C., Williams, J., Rattigan, O. V., Shallcross, D. E., Law, K. S., and Cox, R. A.: Gas-phase ultraviolet absorption cross-sections and atmospheric lifetimes of several C2-C5 alkyl nitrates, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 102, 117-126, doi: 10.1016/S1010-6030(96)04458-9, 1997.
  Li, G.B., Cai, S.H., and Long, B.: New reactions for the formation of organic nitrate in the atmosphere, ACS omega, 7, 39671-39679, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03321, 2022.
  Lim, Y. B., and Ziemann, P. J.: Chemistry of Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from OH Radical-Initiated Reactions of Linear, Branched, and Cyclic Alkanes in the Presence of NOx. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 43, 604-619, doi: 10.1080/02786820902802567, 2009.
  Ling, Z., Guo, H., Simpson, I. J., Saunders, S. M., Lam, S. H. M., Lyu, X., and Blake, D. R.: New insight into the spatiotemporal variability and source apportionments of C1–C4 alkyl nitrates in Hong Kong, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8141–8156, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8141-2016, 2016.
  Perring, A. E., Pusede, S. E., and Cohen, R. C.: An observational perspective on the atmospheric impacts of alkyl and multifunctional nitrates on ozone and secondary organic aerosol, Chem. Rev., 113, 5848-5870, doi: 10.1021/cr300520x, 2013.
  Sun, J., Li, Z., Xue, L., Wang, T., Wang, X., Gao, J., Nie, W., Simpson, I. J., Gao, R., and Blake, D. R.: Summertime C1-C5 alkyl nitrates over Beijing, northern China: Spatial distribution, regional transport, and formation mechanisms, Atmos. Res., 204, 102-109, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.01.014, 2018.
  Wang, M., Shao, M., Chen, W., Lu, S., Wang, C., Huang, D., Yuan, B., Zeng, L., and Zhao, Y.: Measurements of C1-C4 alkyl nitrates and their relationships with carbonyl compounds and O3 in Chinese cities, Atmos. Environ., 81, 389-398, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.065, 2013.
  Yang, J., Lei, G., Liu, C., Wu, Y., Hu, K., Zhu, J., Bao, J., Lin, W., and Jin, J.: Characteristics of particulate-bound n-alkanes indicating sources of PM2.5 in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3015-3029, doi: 10.5194/acp-23-3015-2023, 2023.
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-700-AC3

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload

AR by Jun Jin on behalf of the Authors (24 Aug 2023) Author's response Author's tracked changes Manuscript

ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (04 Sep 2023) by Joachim Curtius

RR by yongjie wei (05 Oct 2023)

ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (03 Nov 2023) by Joachim Curtius

Dear authors,

there are still a few points by reviewers 2 and 3 which I would like you to take into account and coment on in more detail before the manuscript is suitable for publication.

1.) Please comment on the fact that the alkyl nitrates range in the 1 ng/m3 range while the total aerosol accounts for >100 ug/m3. Please state clearly that these compounds do only account for 0.001% of the total PM. Please discuss the relevance of this minute contribution to PM as well as this very small contribution with respect to the statement in line 73 that ON typically make up 5 to 43% of the organic matter and the statement of a "key role of particulate-bound ONs" (line 79).

2.) Please reconsider item 11) of referee #3. Plotting the concentrations in log-scale would be very interesting if the DL is indeed 1 pg/m3.

Technical comments:
l. 48: change to "more oxidation potentially occurs"
l. 123: change to "in Beijing, which tend to be..."
l. 143 and other occasions: change "mass spectorgraphs" to "mass spectra"
l. 145 change "irons" to "ions"
l. 171 change "Method and spiked..." to "Measured and spiked ..."
l. 203 "single functional group"
l. 231 "the influencing factors and the mechanisms..."
l. 253 "high partitioning coefficient"
l. 297 "and may form..."
l. 298 "Research has shown...
l. 306 Please check numbering of Figures in the text: PM 2.5 is shown in Fig 4 not Fig 6
l. 331 "we hypothesize"
l. 339 check numbering: NO2 is shown in Fig 6.
l. 348 "mean that particulate-phase..."
l. 356 "may form"
the formation
l. 357-358: "However, the formation mechanism needs further study."
l. 369 check numbering of Figure.
l. 376 check numbering of Figure.
l. 391 "we conclude ..."
l. 394 this is a Summary not Conclusions
Table 1: does it make sense to show the data with two significant digits?

Best regards,
J. Curtius

Hide

AR by Jun Jin on behalf of the Authors (12 Nov 2023) Author's response Author's tracked changes Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (15 Nov 2023) by Joachim Curtius

AR by Jun Jin on behalf of the Authors (19 Nov 2023) Author's response Manuscript

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

05 Jan 2024

Particulate-bound alkyl nitrate pollution and formation mechanisms in Beijing, China

Jiyuan Yang, Guoyang Lei, Jinfeng Zhu, Yutong Wu, Chang Liu, Kai Hu, Junsong Bao, Zitong Zhang, Weili Lin, and Jun Jin

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 123–136, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-123-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-123-2024, 2024

Short summary

Jiyuan Yang et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 407 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML	PDF	XML	Total	BibTeX	EndNote
282	97	28	407	14	17

HTML: 282
PDF: 97
XML: 28
Total: 407
BibTeX: 14
EndNote: 17

Views and downloads (calculated since 02 May 2023)

Month	HTML	PDF	XML	Total
May 2023	99	27	5	131
Jun 2023	50	17	4	71
Jul 2023	31	4	3	38
Aug 2023	38	10	6	54
Sep 2023	24	9	2	35
Oct 2023	20	16	4	40
Nov 2023	5	4	2	11
Dec 2023	15	10	2	27
Jan 2024	0

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 May 2023)

Month	HTML	PDF	XML	Total
May 2023	99	27	5	131
Jun 2023	50	17	4	71
Jul 2023	31	4	3	38
Aug 2023	38	10	6	54
Sep 2023	24	9	2	35
Oct 2023	20	16	4	40
Nov 2023	5	4	2	11
Dec 2023	15	10	2	27
Jan 2024	0

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 427 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 427 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.

Country	#	Views	%

Latest update: 05 Jan 2024

Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Preprint (3318 KB)
Metadata XML

Short summary

The atmospheric pollution and formation mechanisms of particulate-bound alkyl nitrate in Beijing were studied. Long-chain n-alkyl nitrates contributed more to the total n-alkyl nitrate in PM_2.5. Long-chain n-alkyl nitrates negatively correlated with O₃ but positively correlated with PM_2.5 and NO₂, so they may not be produced during photochemical reactions but form through reactions between alkanes and nitrates on PM surfaces. Particulate-bound n-alkyl nitrates strongly influence haze pollution.


Total:	0
HTML:	0
PDF:	0
XML:	0

Particulate-bound alkyl nitrate pollution and formation mechanisms in Beijing, China

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

Interactive discussion

Interactive discussion

Peer review completion

Suggestions for revision or reasons for rejection

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

Viewed

Viewed (geographical distribution)