the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Identifying atmospheric processes favouring the formation of bubble free layers in Law Dome ice core, East Antarctica
Abstract. Physical features preserved in ice cores may provide unique records about past atmospheric variability. Linking the formation and preservation of these features and the atmospheric processes causing them is key to their interpretation as paleoclimate proxies. We imaged ice cores from Law Dome, East Antarctica using an Intermediate Layer Ice Core Scanner (ILCS) which shows that thin bubble-free layers (BFLs) occur multiple times per year at this site. The origin of these features is unknown. We used a previously developed age-depth scale in conjunction with regional accumulation estimated from atmospheric reanalysis data (ERA5) to estimate the year and month that the BFLs occurred, and then performed seasonal and annual analysis to reduce the overall dating errors. We then investigated measurements of snow surface height from a co-located automatic weather station to determine snow surface features co-occurring with BFLs, as well as their estimated occurrence date. We also used ERA5 to investigate potentially relevant local/regional atmospheric processes (temperature inversions, wind scour, accumulation hiatuses and extreme precipitation) associated with BFL occurrence. Finally, we used a synoptic typing dataset of the southern Indian and southwest Pacific Oceans to investigate the relationship between large scale atmospheric patterns and BFL occurrence. Our results show that BFLs occur (1) primarily in autumn and winter, (2) in conjunction with accumulation hiatuses >4 days, and (3) during synoptic patterns characterised by meridional atmospheric flow related to the episodic blocking and channeling of maritime moisture to the ice core site. Thus, BFLs may act as a seasonal marker (autumn/winter), and may indicate episodic changes in accumulation (such as hiatuses) associated with large-scale circulation. This study provides a pathway to the development of a new proxy for past climate in the Law Dome ice cores; specifically past snowfall conditions relating to synoptic variability over the southern Indian Ocean.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(2479 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2479 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-611', D.A. Winski, 22 May 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-611/egusphere-2023-611-CC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Lingwei Zhang, 02 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-611/egusphere-2023-611-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Lingwei Zhang, 02 Aug 2023
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-611', Dominic Winski, 24 May 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-611/egusphere-2023-611-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Lingwei Zhang, 02 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-611/egusphere-2023-611-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Lingwei Zhang, 02 Aug 2023
-
RC2: 'Review of egusphere-2023-611', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Jul 2023
This paper takes a very detailed look at bubble free layers in the Law Dome ice cores and their potential drivers. A particular care is given to the identification of the timing of tthe occurence of these layers, with respect to the season, which is essential for the correlation with climate variables like temperature, accumulation (or hiatus), and atmospheric circulation.
I am impressed with the level of details and care given in the paper. Not much more could have been done.
In the reading, I still struggle a bit with how things are presented, and in the section describing the exploration of mechanisms, some extra care could be put on describing hypotheses more clearly, and then, what data can be brought to support them or not.
A diagram/drawing showing the potential formation mechanisms would greatly help the reading of the paper.These are mostly cosmetic comments, on what is an excellent, thorough paper.
I sugest minor revisions.line 35: bubble number density and paleoclimate: cite Fegyveresi 2016:
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2015PA002851
also potentially:
Spencer, M. K., R. B. Alley, and J. J. Fitzpatrick (2006), Developing a bubble number-density paleoclimatic indicator for glacier ice, J. Glaciol., 52(178), 358– 364, doi:10.3189/172756506781828638.Â
Fegyveresi, J. M., R. B. Alley, M. K. Spencer, J. J. Fitzpatrick, E. J. Steig, J. W. C. White, J. R. McConnell, and K. C. Taylor (2011), Late-Holocene climate evolution at the WAIS Divide site, West Antarctica: Bubble number-density estimates, J. Glaciol., 57(204), 629– 638, doi:10.3189/002214311797409677.ÂMelt layers: consider citing Keegan 2014: www.the-cryosphere.net/8/1801/2014/
doi:10.5194/tc-8-1801-2014line 97: missing space before citation.
line 225: When you introduce the synoptic types, in section 2.5, you can include here the description of the two important types that you will use later, with a figure (potentially in the supplement if you feel you have too many figures) of the synoptic types, and their relationship with accumulation.Â
In general, I think that a description of the relationship between synoptic type and accumulation (or hiatus) is missing in a quantitative sense.Â
As I understand we could make a schematic:
synoptic type --causes --> accumulation or hiatus --causes--> bubble free layer.
In this causal chain, you would find a causal relationship between synoptic type and BFL, but you would not be learning anything more about their formation than when you were looking at accumulation/hiatus.ÂFigure 5: I can't see the grey for layer 2
Figure 7: the aws data is too tiny, Can you make it a bit thicker?
parenthesis issue in captionsection 3.4
line 330 : you mean table 4
worth adding that som1 is asociated with high precip, or describing te significant modes a bit betterline 340+:trend: once you have analyzed the drivers, can you say something about the trends in the drivers themselves? Â Would we be expecting any trend?
line 390: you have here a great comment about formation vs preservation of BFL.
I suggest that you restructure section 4 with the investigations of mechanisms, spelling them one by one, and detailing the supporting data/correlation, and the complicating factors: For instance, make a section on vapor flux upward condensing on the surface, as a formation mechanism, then show evidence for formation during snow-warmer-than-air times, during times of long surface exposure (your hiatus), seasonality, radiation, etc. And discuss evidence where it doesn't quite work.Â
Repeat this effort for other mechanisms of formation and preservation, aided by a schematics, so that we can more clearly see where your thinking is.
line 419 to 435: not sure it belongs in the paper.start of 4.4 to line 450: should go into the result section.
Section 4.4: Give more info on the relationship between SOMs and accumulation/hiatus, temperature inversions, wind scours, etc..
Appendix A1: ERA is overstimating snowfall by a factor of 2. Did you consider scaling ERA, and plotting on figure A1 the scaled ERA to highlight the temporal accuracy of hiatuses, or perhaps even plot the derivative.Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-611-RC2 -
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Lingwei Zhang, 02 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-611/egusphere-2023-611-AC3-supplement.pdf
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Lingwei Zhang, 02 Aug 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-611', D.A. Winski, 22 May 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-611/egusphere-2023-611-CC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Lingwei Zhang, 02 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-611/egusphere-2023-611-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Lingwei Zhang, 02 Aug 2023
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-611', Dominic Winski, 24 May 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-611/egusphere-2023-611-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Lingwei Zhang, 02 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-611/egusphere-2023-611-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Lingwei Zhang, 02 Aug 2023
-
RC2: 'Review of egusphere-2023-611', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Jul 2023
This paper takes a very detailed look at bubble free layers in the Law Dome ice cores and their potential drivers. A particular care is given to the identification of the timing of tthe occurence of these layers, with respect to the season, which is essential for the correlation with climate variables like temperature, accumulation (or hiatus), and atmospheric circulation.
I am impressed with the level of details and care given in the paper. Not much more could have been done.
In the reading, I still struggle a bit with how things are presented, and in the section describing the exploration of mechanisms, some extra care could be put on describing hypotheses more clearly, and then, what data can be brought to support them or not.
A diagram/drawing showing the potential formation mechanisms would greatly help the reading of the paper.These are mostly cosmetic comments, on what is an excellent, thorough paper.
I sugest minor revisions.line 35: bubble number density and paleoclimate: cite Fegyveresi 2016:
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2015PA002851
also potentially:
Spencer, M. K., R. B. Alley, and J. J. Fitzpatrick (2006), Developing a bubble number-density paleoclimatic indicator for glacier ice, J. Glaciol., 52(178), 358– 364, doi:10.3189/172756506781828638.Â
Fegyveresi, J. M., R. B. Alley, M. K. Spencer, J. J. Fitzpatrick, E. J. Steig, J. W. C. White, J. R. McConnell, and K. C. Taylor (2011), Late-Holocene climate evolution at the WAIS Divide site, West Antarctica: Bubble number-density estimates, J. Glaciol., 57(204), 629– 638, doi:10.3189/002214311797409677.ÂMelt layers: consider citing Keegan 2014: www.the-cryosphere.net/8/1801/2014/
doi:10.5194/tc-8-1801-2014line 97: missing space before citation.
line 225: When you introduce the synoptic types, in section 2.5, you can include here the description of the two important types that you will use later, with a figure (potentially in the supplement if you feel you have too many figures) of the synoptic types, and their relationship with accumulation.Â
In general, I think that a description of the relationship between synoptic type and accumulation (or hiatus) is missing in a quantitative sense.Â
As I understand we could make a schematic:
synoptic type --causes --> accumulation or hiatus --causes--> bubble free layer.
In this causal chain, you would find a causal relationship between synoptic type and BFL, but you would not be learning anything more about their formation than when you were looking at accumulation/hiatus.ÂFigure 5: I can't see the grey for layer 2
Figure 7: the aws data is too tiny, Can you make it a bit thicker?
parenthesis issue in captionsection 3.4
line 330 : you mean table 4
worth adding that som1 is asociated with high precip, or describing te significant modes a bit betterline 340+:trend: once you have analyzed the drivers, can you say something about the trends in the drivers themselves? Â Would we be expecting any trend?
line 390: you have here a great comment about formation vs preservation of BFL.
I suggest that you restructure section 4 with the investigations of mechanisms, spelling them one by one, and detailing the supporting data/correlation, and the complicating factors: For instance, make a section on vapor flux upward condensing on the surface, as a formation mechanism, then show evidence for formation during snow-warmer-than-air times, during times of long surface exposure (your hiatus), seasonality, radiation, etc. And discuss evidence where it doesn't quite work.Â
Repeat this effort for other mechanisms of formation and preservation, aided by a schematics, so that we can more clearly see where your thinking is.
line 419 to 435: not sure it belongs in the paper.start of 4.4 to line 450: should go into the result section.
Section 4.4: Give more info on the relationship between SOMs and accumulation/hiatus, temperature inversions, wind scours, etc..
Appendix A1: ERA is overstimating snowfall by a factor of 2. Did you consider scaling ERA, and plotting on figure A1 the scaled ERA to highlight the temporal accuracy of hiatuses, or perhaps even plot the derivative.Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-611-RC2 -
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Lingwei Zhang, 02 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-611/egusphere-2023-611-AC3-supplement.pdf
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Lingwei Zhang, 02 Aug 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
383 | 154 | 34 | 571 | 15 | 18 |
- HTML: 383
- PDF: 154
- XML: 34
- Total: 571
- BibTeX: 15
- EndNote: 18
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Tessa R. Vance
Alexander D. Fraser
Lenneke M. Jong
Sarah S. Thompson
Alison S. Criscitiello
Nerilie J. Abram
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2479 KB) - Metadata XML