the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Microwave radiometer observations of the ozone diurnal cycle and its short-term variability over Switzerland
Abstract. In Switzerland, two ground-based ozone microwave radiometers are operated in the vicinity of each other (ca. 40 km): GROMOS in Bern (Institute of Applied Physics) and SOMORA in Payerne (MeteoSwiss). Recently, their calibration and retrieval algorithms have been fully harmonized and updated time series are now available since 2009. Using these harmonized ozone time series, we investigate and cross-validate the strato-mesospheric ozone diurnal cycle derived from the two instruments and compare it with various model-based datasets: a dedicated GDOC ozone diurnal cycle climatology based on the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS-5) general circulation model, the Belgian Assimilation System for Chemical ObsErvations (BASCOE) a chemical transport model driven by ERA5 dynamics, and a set of free-running simulations from the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM). Overall, the two instruments show very similar ozone diurnal cycles at all seasons and pressure levels and the models compare well with each other. There is a good agreement between the models and the measurements at most seasons and pressure levels and the largest discrepancies can be explained by the limited vertical resolution of the microwave radiometers. However, as in a similar study over Mauna Loa, some discrepancies remain near the stratopause, at the transition region between ozone daytime accumulation and depletion. We report similar delays in the onset of the modelled ozone diurnal depletion in the lower mesosphere.
Using the newly harmonized time series of GROMOS and SOMORA radiometers, we present the first observations of short-term (sub-monthly) ozone diurnal cycle variability at mid-latitudes. The short-term variability is observed in the upper stratosphere during wintertime, when the mean monthly cycle has a small amplitude and when the dynamics is more important. It is shown in the form of strong enhancements of the diurnal cycle, reaching up to 4–5 times the amplitude of the mean monthly cycle. We show that BASCOE is able to capture some of these events and present a case study of one such event following the minor sudden stratospheric warming of January 2015. Our analysis of this event supports the conclusions of a previous modelling study, attributing regional variability of the ozone diurnal cycle to regional anomalies in nitrogen oxide (NOx) concentrations. However, we also find period with enhanced diurnal cycle that do not show much change in NOx and where other processes might be dominant (e.g. atmospheric tides). Given its importance, we believe that the short-term variability of the ozone diurnal cycle should be further investigated over the globe, for instance using the BASCOE model.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(8799 KB)
-
Supplement
(1481 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(8799 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1481 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-436', Adrian Tuck, 31 Mar 2023
Thank you for citing Pallister & Tuck (1983). My suggestion is to look closely ay the temperatures in the upper stratosphere.
See reference [60] in Meteorology 2022, 1, 4-28, https://doi.org/10.3390/meteorology1010003  and the associated discussion.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-436-CC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Eric Sauvageat, 31 Mar 2023
Thanks a lot for your interest in our manuscript and for the interesting reference, I will definitely check it out in more details.Â
Indeed, we are currently investigating in more details the impact of temperature variations on ozone in this region, notably using additonal microwave radiometry measurements. With regards to the presented case study though, the temperature alone seems not sufficient to explain the short-term variability of the ozone diurnal cycle.
Best,
Eric SauvageatCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-436-AC1 -
CC2: 'Reply on AC1', Adrian Tuck, 31 Mar 2023
Dear Eric,
You are right about temperature as it is normally defined in extant models. However, particularly in the upper stratosphere but even as observed in the lower stratosphere, the intermittency of T will be correlated with the ozone photodissociation rate, and even with T itself. See Figure 16 in the Meteorology 2022 1, 4-28 paper and the related text and references. The recoiling photofragments will have up to an order of magnitude more energy than thermal and therefore have the potential to affect the odd oxygen abundance - and the oxygen isotope distribution.
Regards, Adrian
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-436-CC2
-
CC2: 'Reply on AC1', Adrian Tuck, 31 Mar 2023
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Eric Sauvageat, 31 Mar 2023
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-436', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Apr 2023
General comment:
This study provides new results on the diurnal variability of ozone; the data figures are very good based on the two nearly co-located ground-based microwave radiometer instruments. The authors emphasize monthly and seasonal diurnal ozone scaling factors, but they also report finding significant sub-monthly diurnal ozone variations during northern hemisphere winter. Even so, the original stated goal of the study is to generate a refined diurnal model for the purpose of merging multiple datasets for analyses of long-term ozone time series and for comparisons with model ozone time series. Thus, I would argue that they are showing that it is best to avoid winter hemisphere data for that purpose. Winter anomalies in temperature may be more important than those of NOx, but it is not easy to assess that prospect because of the low vertical resolution of the MW ozone profiles.
Â
Specific comments:
Line 73—It would be helpful to learn at this point why there was an overestimate of the ozone diurnal cycle previously. Also define GROMOS here.
Line 134—Here the authors give two specific overpass times for the MLS measurements, while on line 179 they indicate a more general range of time. Which is correct?
Line 213—What is the source of the noisy appearance? Gravity waves, perhaps?
Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-436-RC1 - AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Eric Sauvageat, 12 Apr 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-436', Anonymous Referee #2, 26 Apr 2023
This paper uses the harmonized timeseries from two ground-based microwave radiometers along with output from several models to investigate the diurnal cycle of ozone in the stratosphere and mesosphere over Switzerland. An interesting finding of this paper is that the amplitude of the ozone diurnal cycle has short-term variability. The paper is well-organized and provides useful data on the diurnal cycle of ozone. I list some general and specific comments below.
General comments: Â
Section 3.3: Tides are mentioned in the abstract and conclusion but could be discussed here as well to more strongly tie this section to the abstract and conclusions. It might also be helpful to show the timeseries for one of the observations (similar to Fig. 8a) but with the daily mean overplotted, to help distinguish changes in the diurnal cycle from changes in daily mean ozone, since both seem to be happening in the time series.Â
Specific comments:
Line 125: Are the day and night averaging kernels very different, and if so, how does this affect the results?
Line 151: Is it because the profile is normalized that you cannot apply the kernel, or because it is a monthly average?
Line 168: Why was a free-running perpetual year simulation used for this study instead of nudging?
Section 2.2.2: Please provide some information on the chemical mechanism in BASCOE
Line 261: This might be easier to see if there was a plot of just the magnitude of the diurnal cycles.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-436-RC2 - AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Eric Sauvageat, 05 May 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-436', Adrian Tuck, 31 Mar 2023
Thank you for citing Pallister & Tuck (1983). My suggestion is to look closely ay the temperatures in the upper stratosphere.
See reference [60] in Meteorology 2022, 1, 4-28, https://doi.org/10.3390/meteorology1010003  and the associated discussion.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-436-CC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Eric Sauvageat, 31 Mar 2023
Thanks a lot for your interest in our manuscript and for the interesting reference, I will definitely check it out in more details.Â
Indeed, we are currently investigating in more details the impact of temperature variations on ozone in this region, notably using additonal microwave radiometry measurements. With regards to the presented case study though, the temperature alone seems not sufficient to explain the short-term variability of the ozone diurnal cycle.
Best,
Eric SauvageatCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-436-AC1 -
CC2: 'Reply on AC1', Adrian Tuck, 31 Mar 2023
Dear Eric,
You are right about temperature as it is normally defined in extant models. However, particularly in the upper stratosphere but even as observed in the lower stratosphere, the intermittency of T will be correlated with the ozone photodissociation rate, and even with T itself. See Figure 16 in the Meteorology 2022 1, 4-28 paper and the related text and references. The recoiling photofragments will have up to an order of magnitude more energy than thermal and therefore have the potential to affect the odd oxygen abundance - and the oxygen isotope distribution.
Regards, Adrian
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-436-CC2
-
CC2: 'Reply on AC1', Adrian Tuck, 31 Mar 2023
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Eric Sauvageat, 31 Mar 2023
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-436', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Apr 2023
General comment:
This study provides new results on the diurnal variability of ozone; the data figures are very good based on the two nearly co-located ground-based microwave radiometer instruments. The authors emphasize monthly and seasonal diurnal ozone scaling factors, but they also report finding significant sub-monthly diurnal ozone variations during northern hemisphere winter. Even so, the original stated goal of the study is to generate a refined diurnal model for the purpose of merging multiple datasets for analyses of long-term ozone time series and for comparisons with model ozone time series. Thus, I would argue that they are showing that it is best to avoid winter hemisphere data for that purpose. Winter anomalies in temperature may be more important than those of NOx, but it is not easy to assess that prospect because of the low vertical resolution of the MW ozone profiles.
Â
Specific comments:
Line 73—It would be helpful to learn at this point why there was an overestimate of the ozone diurnal cycle previously. Also define GROMOS here.
Line 134—Here the authors give two specific overpass times for the MLS measurements, while on line 179 they indicate a more general range of time. Which is correct?
Line 213—What is the source of the noisy appearance? Gravity waves, perhaps?
Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-436-RC1 - AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Eric Sauvageat, 12 Apr 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-436', Anonymous Referee #2, 26 Apr 2023
This paper uses the harmonized timeseries from two ground-based microwave radiometers along with output from several models to investigate the diurnal cycle of ozone in the stratosphere and mesosphere over Switzerland. An interesting finding of this paper is that the amplitude of the ozone diurnal cycle has short-term variability. The paper is well-organized and provides useful data on the diurnal cycle of ozone. I list some general and specific comments below.
General comments: Â
Section 3.3: Tides are mentioned in the abstract and conclusion but could be discussed here as well to more strongly tie this section to the abstract and conclusions. It might also be helpful to show the timeseries for one of the observations (similar to Fig. 8a) but with the daily mean overplotted, to help distinguish changes in the diurnal cycle from changes in daily mean ozone, since both seem to be happening in the time series.Â
Specific comments:
Line 125: Are the day and night averaging kernels very different, and if so, how does this affect the results?
Line 151: Is it because the profile is normalized that you cannot apply the kernel, or because it is a monthly average?
Line 168: Why was a free-running perpetual year simulation used for this study instead of nudging?
Section 2.2.2: Please provide some information on the chemical mechanism in BASCOE
Line 261: This might be easier to see if there was a plot of just the magnitude of the diurnal cycles.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-436-RC2 - AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Eric Sauvageat, 05 May 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
321 | 98 | 26 | 445 | 38 | 10 | 6 |
- HTML: 321
- PDF: 98
- XML: 26
- Total: 445
- Supplement: 38
- BibTeX: 10
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Klemens Hocke
Eliane Maillard Barras
Shengyi Hou
Quentin Errera
Alexander Haefele
Axel Murk
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(8799 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1481 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper