the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Can we use atmospheric CO2 measurements to verify emission trends reported by cities? Lessons from a six-year atmospheric inversion over Paris
Abstract. Existing CO2 emissions reported by city inventories usually lag real-time by a year or more and are prone to large uncertainties. This study responds to the growing need for timely and precise estimation of urban CO2 emissions to support the present and future mitigation measures and policies. We focus on the Paris metropolitan area, the largest urban region in the European Union and the city with the densest atmospheric CO2 observation network in Europe. We performed long-term atmospheric inversions to quantify the citywide CO2 emissions, both fossil fuel and biogenic sources and sinks, over six years (2016–2021) using a Bayesian inverse modeling system. Our inversion framework benefits from a novel near-real-time hourly fossil fuel CO2 emission inventory (Origins.earth) at 1 km spatial resolution. In addition to the mid-afternoon observations, we attempt to assimilate morning CO2 concentrations based on the ability of the WRF-Chem transport model to simulate atmospheric boundary layer dynamics constrained by observed layer heights. Our results show a long-term decreasing trend by around 2 % per year in annual CO2 emissions over the Paris region. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic led to a 13 %±1 % reduction in annual fossil fuel CO2 emissions in 2020 with respect to 2019. Then, annual emissions increased by 5.2 % from 32.6±2.2 MtCO2 in 2020 to 34.3±2.3 MtCO2 in 2021. Based on a combination of up-to-date inventories, high-resolution atmospheric modeling, and high-precision observations, our current capacity could deliver near real-time CO2 emission estimates at city scale in less than a month, and the results agree within 10 % with independent estimates from multiple city-scale inventories.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(1144 KB)
-
Supplement
(2723 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1144 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2723 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-401', Anonymous Referee #1, 09 May 2023
General comments
The manuscript presents results of a multiyear inverse modeling study estimating fossil CO2 emissions using observations in the Paris region. The ability to estimate annual emissions with errors under 10% is a major advance presented in the paper. The paper is well-written and can be accepted after minor revision. One notable deficiency is lack of an inverse model description, suggest adding a section outlining the method.
Detailed comments
Page 1 Line 30 Suggest giving an uncertainty range to estimated 5.2% trend (seems to be in order of ±6% based on change of 32.6±2.2 MtCO2 in 2020 to 34.3±2.3 MtCO2 in 2021)
P2 L18 Need to check if the references are most recent for Boston (Northeast corridor), and also for Los Angeles. Can mention dense NIST network around Washington DC.
P5 L17 Suggest giving readers more detail about the method used in Lian et al 2022, when reporting the revisions, that would save readers effort and help them understand the full merit of both this and the previous study. Also, need to give somewhere a summary of key points of the inversion approach, like, using station-to-station concentration gradients as “observations”, control state, wind speed filters, horizontal resolution, PBL height filters, etc.
P8 L10, L15 Better give 2% and 3% per year trend numbers with uncertainties like 2±X%
Technical corrections:
P2 L10 Better write “inversion” instead of “atmospheric inversion” when citing Tarantola 2005.
P4 L4 For ODIAC, a more popular reference could be Oda et al ESSD 2018
P9 L12 Remove extra digits in text: diagnostic phenology41
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-401-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jinghui Lian, 02 Jul 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-401', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 May 2023
Summary
Lian et al. present a study investigating long-term changes in CO2 emissions in the Greater Paris Area using different emission data products in combination with atmospheric observations. The inventories provided by origin.earth, AirParif and TNO can be the basis for policy decisions and they are validated using a bayesian inversion system which relies on assimilating morning and afternoon observations from a ground-based network. This emission monitoring framework performs well, is able to detect trends and short-term changes in emissions, here due to COVID-lockdowns. Overall, the paper is well-written and clearly structured. The description of the components is concise and a lot of information and illustrations of the actual performance are given in the appendix. The scope of the paper aligns very well with ACP and I can fully recommend publication after some minor changes have been considered.
General comments
1.) Unfortunately, the description of the modelling framework and its performance is very short. A lot of instructive and convincing information (plots) are only found in the supplemental materials. It could be worthwhile considering moving at least one into the main text.
2.) The manuscript does not discuss any other greenhouse gasses. In recent years several mobile surveys have been conducted highlighting significant CH4 emissions in the region. It would be more balanced to mention CH4, N2O as other gases that need to be mitigated (or why they can be ignored for the Plan Climat de Paris).
Specific comments
P3L17: please provide a quantitative measure of the instrument performance, what does ‘high precision’ mean here?
P4L33: formatting issue with “ru le”
P4L36: consider changing “imposed” to “required to be”
P15 L10: The blue boxplots should be added to the legend or the description of the other symbols to the captions. Splitting up the information seems unnecessary.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-401-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jinghui Lian, 02 Jul 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-401', Anonymous Referee #1, 09 May 2023
General comments
The manuscript presents results of a multiyear inverse modeling study estimating fossil CO2 emissions using observations in the Paris region. The ability to estimate annual emissions with errors under 10% is a major advance presented in the paper. The paper is well-written and can be accepted after minor revision. One notable deficiency is lack of an inverse model description, suggest adding a section outlining the method.
Detailed comments
Page 1 Line 30 Suggest giving an uncertainty range to estimated 5.2% trend (seems to be in order of ±6% based on change of 32.6±2.2 MtCO2 in 2020 to 34.3±2.3 MtCO2 in 2021)
P2 L18 Need to check if the references are most recent for Boston (Northeast corridor), and also for Los Angeles. Can mention dense NIST network around Washington DC.
P5 L17 Suggest giving readers more detail about the method used in Lian et al 2022, when reporting the revisions, that would save readers effort and help them understand the full merit of both this and the previous study. Also, need to give somewhere a summary of key points of the inversion approach, like, using station-to-station concentration gradients as “observations”, control state, wind speed filters, horizontal resolution, PBL height filters, etc.
P8 L10, L15 Better give 2% and 3% per year trend numbers with uncertainties like 2±X%
Technical corrections:
P2 L10 Better write “inversion” instead of “atmospheric inversion” when citing Tarantola 2005.
P4 L4 For ODIAC, a more popular reference could be Oda et al ESSD 2018
P9 L12 Remove extra digits in text: diagnostic phenology41
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-401-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jinghui Lian, 02 Jul 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-401', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 May 2023
Summary
Lian et al. present a study investigating long-term changes in CO2 emissions in the Greater Paris Area using different emission data products in combination with atmospheric observations. The inventories provided by origin.earth, AirParif and TNO can be the basis for policy decisions and they are validated using a bayesian inversion system which relies on assimilating morning and afternoon observations from a ground-based network. This emission monitoring framework performs well, is able to detect trends and short-term changes in emissions, here due to COVID-lockdowns. Overall, the paper is well-written and clearly structured. The description of the components is concise and a lot of information and illustrations of the actual performance are given in the appendix. The scope of the paper aligns very well with ACP and I can fully recommend publication after some minor changes have been considered.
General comments
1.) Unfortunately, the description of the modelling framework and its performance is very short. A lot of instructive and convincing information (plots) are only found in the supplemental materials. It could be worthwhile considering moving at least one into the main text.
2.) The manuscript does not discuss any other greenhouse gasses. In recent years several mobile surveys have been conducted highlighting significant CH4 emissions in the region. It would be more balanced to mention CH4, N2O as other gases that need to be mitigated (or why they can be ignored for the Plan Climat de Paris).
Specific comments
P3L17: please provide a quantitative measure of the instrument performance, what does ‘high precision’ mean here?
P4L33: formatting issue with “ru le”
P4L36: consider changing “imposed” to “required to be”
P15 L10: The blue boxplots should be added to the legend or the description of the other symbols to the captions. Splitting up the information seems unnecessary.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-401-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jinghui Lian, 02 Jul 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
627 | 279 | 21 | 927 | 57 | 10 | 14 |
- HTML: 627
- PDF: 279
- XML: 21
- Total: 927
- Supplement: 57
- BibTeX: 10
- EndNote: 14
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
Thomas Lauvaux
Hervé Utard
François-Marie Bréon
Grégoire Broquet
Michel Ramonet
Olivier Laurent
Ivonne Albarus
Mali Chariot
Simone Kotthaus
Martial Haeffelin
Olivier Sanchez
Olivier Perrussel
Hugo Anne Denier van der Gon
Stijn Nicolaas Camiel Dellaert
Philippe Ciais
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1144 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2723 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper