the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A thermodynamic framework for bulk–surface partitioning in finite-volume mixed organic–inorganic aerosol particles and cloud droplets
Abstract. Atmospheric aerosol particles and their interactions with clouds are among the largest sources of uncertainty in global climate modeling. Aerosol particles in the ultrafine size range with diameters less than 100 nm have very high surface area to volume ratios, with a substantial fraction of molecules occupying the air–droplet interface. The partitioning of surface-active species between the interior bulk of a droplet and the interface with the surrounding air plays a large role in the physicochemical properties of a particle and in the activation of ultrafine particles, especially those of less than 50 nm diameter, into cloud droplets. In this work, a novel and thermodynamically rigorous treatment of bulk–surface equilibrium partitioning is developed through the use of a framework based on the Aerosol Inorganic–Organic Mixtures Functional groups Activity Coefficients (AIOMFAC) model in combination with a finite-depth Guggenheim interface region on spherical, finite-volume droplets. We outline our numerical implementation of the resulting modified Butler equation, including accounting for challenging extreme cases when certain compounds have very limited solubility in either the surface or bulk phase. This model, which uses a single, physically constrained interface thickness parameter, is capable of predicting the size-dependent surface tension of complex multicomponent solutions containing organic and inorganic species. We explore the impacts of coupled surface tension changes and changes in bulk–surface partitioning coefficients for aerosol particles ranging in diameters from several µm to as small as 10 nm and across atmospherically relevant relative humidity ranges. The treatment of bulk–surface equilibrium leads to deviations from classical cloud droplet activation behavior as modeled by simplified treatments of the Köhler equation that do not account for bulk–surface partitioning. The treatments for bulk–surface partitioning laid out in this work, when applied to the Köhler equation, are in agreement with measured critical supersaturations of a range of different systems. However, we also find that challenges remain in accurately modeling the growth behavior of certain systems containing small dicarboxylic acids, especially in a predictive manner. Furthermore, it was determined that the thickness of the interfacial phase is sensitive parameter in this treatment; however, constraining it to a meaningful range allow for predictive modeling of aerosol particle activation into cloud droplets, including cases with consideration of co-condensation of semivolatile organics.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(3261 KB)
-
Supplement
(1260 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(3261 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1260 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-336', Alison Bain, 03 Mar 2023
Really interesting paper and very nice, clear summary of partitioning models.
Could the authors please clarify for me the difference between AIOMFAC-CLLPS and AIOMFAC-Equil. I did not find either of these explicitly defined.
The authors note a couple of time the lack of sub 500 nm droplet surface tension measurements. They may want to comment on the AFM surface tension meausurements (e.g. 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b04041) which start to come close to this size range, albiet for droplets on surfaces.
I also noticed a few typos. Line 104 'sigma' is likely ment to be the greek letter. Line 515 the first word should be capitalized. Also note a couple of the figures seem to be cropped too close on the right side, Fig 5 & 7 for example.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-336-CC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Ryan Schmedding, 21 Mar 2023
Thank you for your questions and feedback on the manuscript. Detailed responses to the comments and related manuscript revisions will be addressed together with input from other comments and formal reviews.
Regarding the difference between the AIOMFAC-Equil. and AIOMFAC-CLLPS models we will provide references and a more detailed characterization in a revised version of the manuscript. Briefly, these are two thermodynamic model variants for the computation of droplet surface tension as a function of composition, size, and temperature, introduced by Ovadnevaite et al. (2017) (see their supplementary information) and also discussed and applied by Davies et al. (2019). AIOMFAC-Equil is a full “bulk” equilibrium model, including gas–particle partitioning and liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS), but without consideration of bulk–surface partitioning. In the context of surface tension predictions, a procedure for the postprocessing of model outputs has been introduced in Ovadnevaite et al. (2017), which assumes a core–shell droplet morphology in the case of LLPS. The AIOMFA-Equil model treats the droplet surface tension as the surface-area-fraction-weighted average of the surface tensions of the present liquid phases. The initial surface tensions of those phases are computed based on a volume-fraction-weighted mean of the pure component surface tensions. The “AIOMFAC-CLLPS with organic film” model variant assumes complete LLPS among organics and inorganics (except for water) at all RH levels. It further assumes that all organic species in the droplet are present in a water-free layer at the surface of the droplet while all electrolytes are present in a core phase of the droplet. The surface tension of the droplet in this model is equal to the surface tension of the organic film (phase), assuming complete coverage by the organic phase, or the surface-area-fraction-weighted average of the organic phase and the electrolyte-rich aqueous phase, should there be insufficient organic material to completely cover the droplet (Davies et al., 2019).
Regarding the second comment on the AFM measurements of sub-micrometer scale droplets, these studies are indeed promising as a source of measurement data at that size scale. In the present study, such measurements were not analyzed because placing the droplet on a glass substrate introduces a second interface, the substrate–droplet interface, which may modify the partitioning behavior of different species as well as affect the geometry of the droplet from spherical to approximately semi-spherical. At the moment, the framework laid out in this manuscript is only capable of handling spherical geometries with a single gas–droplet surface; the inclusion of interfaces between two condensed phases and the treatment of non-spherical geometries is the subject of future work.
References
Davies, J. F., Zuend, A., and Wilson, K. R.: Technical note: The role of evolving surface tension in the formation of cloud droplets, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2933-2946, 10.5194/acp-19-2933-2019, 2019.
Ovadnevaite, J., Zuend, A., Laaksonen, A., Sanchez, K. J., Roberts, G., Ceburnis, D., Decesari, S., Rinaldi, M., Hodas, N., Facchini, M. C., Seinfeld, J. H., and O’ Dowd, C.: Surface tension prevails over solute effect in organic-influenced cloud droplet activation, Nature, 546, 637-641, 10.1038/nature22806, 2017.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-336-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Ryan Schmedding, 21 Mar 2023
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-336', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Mar 2023
It is excellent work on an important topic in atmospheric chemistry.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-336-RC1 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Ryan Schmedding, 25 May 2023
We would like to thank the referee for reviewing our manuscript and for their positive feedback on our work.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-336-AC2
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Ryan Schmedding, 25 May 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-336', Anonymous Referee #2, 03 May 2023
Overall the manuscript is excellent and a well thought-out consideration of complex droplet growth processes and worthy of publication. However much of the analysis relies on assumptions at the interfaces and thus the major comment that should be considered to strengthen the analysis and discussion is as follows:
Major Comment:
Schmedding and Zuend treat the interfacial region (boundary between the liquid and vapor phase) as a separate phase following the approach of Guggenheim. This leads to a significant simplification, since the chemical potential in the interfacial region is assumed to be equal to that in the other phases.
Rowlinson and Widom point out that “we can not measure or define unambiguously and independently the thermodynamic properties of the surface phase”. They go on to say “We can evade the difficulty only by defining the properties of the surface phase as differences between those of the whole system and those of the two phases. They point out that questions about local thermodynamic functions (density, chemical potential) in the interface region are best answered by the methods of statistical mechanics.
Chapter 5 of their book includes calculations of the local thermodynamic functions based on statistical mechanics for a number of models including hard spheres, lattice gas model, and penetrable sphere model for one and two component systems.
It would greatly increase the impact of this study if the authors included a comparison with results given by Rowlinson and Widom. One possibility is a comparison of the modified chemical potential based on statistical mechanics (Eq. (4-68)) versus the value obtained using the Guggenheim approach for the two component lattice gas.
Minor Comments:
Equation 1. - multiplied by 100% is a typo. (e.g, one multiplies the value by 100, such that the value is a percentage)
Equation 23 - is sigma missing a subscript? this sigma is somewhat ambiguous.
References:
Guggenheim, E. A.: The thermodynamics of interfaces in systems of several components, Transactions of the Faraday Society, 35, 397–412, 1940.
Rowlinson, J.S. and Widom, B., Molecular Theory of Capillarity, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1982.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-336-RC2 - AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Ryan Schmedding, 25 May 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-336', Alison Bain, 03 Mar 2023
Really interesting paper and very nice, clear summary of partitioning models.
Could the authors please clarify for me the difference between AIOMFAC-CLLPS and AIOMFAC-Equil. I did not find either of these explicitly defined.
The authors note a couple of time the lack of sub 500 nm droplet surface tension measurements. They may want to comment on the AFM surface tension meausurements (e.g. 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b04041) which start to come close to this size range, albiet for droplets on surfaces.
I also noticed a few typos. Line 104 'sigma' is likely ment to be the greek letter. Line 515 the first word should be capitalized. Also note a couple of the figures seem to be cropped too close on the right side, Fig 5 & 7 for example.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-336-CC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Ryan Schmedding, 21 Mar 2023
Thank you for your questions and feedback on the manuscript. Detailed responses to the comments and related manuscript revisions will be addressed together with input from other comments and formal reviews.
Regarding the difference between the AIOMFAC-Equil. and AIOMFAC-CLLPS models we will provide references and a more detailed characterization in a revised version of the manuscript. Briefly, these are two thermodynamic model variants for the computation of droplet surface tension as a function of composition, size, and temperature, introduced by Ovadnevaite et al. (2017) (see their supplementary information) and also discussed and applied by Davies et al. (2019). AIOMFAC-Equil is a full “bulk” equilibrium model, including gas–particle partitioning and liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS), but without consideration of bulk–surface partitioning. In the context of surface tension predictions, a procedure for the postprocessing of model outputs has been introduced in Ovadnevaite et al. (2017), which assumes a core–shell droplet morphology in the case of LLPS. The AIOMFA-Equil model treats the droplet surface tension as the surface-area-fraction-weighted average of the surface tensions of the present liquid phases. The initial surface tensions of those phases are computed based on a volume-fraction-weighted mean of the pure component surface tensions. The “AIOMFAC-CLLPS with organic film” model variant assumes complete LLPS among organics and inorganics (except for water) at all RH levels. It further assumes that all organic species in the droplet are present in a water-free layer at the surface of the droplet while all electrolytes are present in a core phase of the droplet. The surface tension of the droplet in this model is equal to the surface tension of the organic film (phase), assuming complete coverage by the organic phase, or the surface-area-fraction-weighted average of the organic phase and the electrolyte-rich aqueous phase, should there be insufficient organic material to completely cover the droplet (Davies et al., 2019).
Regarding the second comment on the AFM measurements of sub-micrometer scale droplets, these studies are indeed promising as a source of measurement data at that size scale. In the present study, such measurements were not analyzed because placing the droplet on a glass substrate introduces a second interface, the substrate–droplet interface, which may modify the partitioning behavior of different species as well as affect the geometry of the droplet from spherical to approximately semi-spherical. At the moment, the framework laid out in this manuscript is only capable of handling spherical geometries with a single gas–droplet surface; the inclusion of interfaces between two condensed phases and the treatment of non-spherical geometries is the subject of future work.
References
Davies, J. F., Zuend, A., and Wilson, K. R.: Technical note: The role of evolving surface tension in the formation of cloud droplets, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2933-2946, 10.5194/acp-19-2933-2019, 2019.
Ovadnevaite, J., Zuend, A., Laaksonen, A., Sanchez, K. J., Roberts, G., Ceburnis, D., Decesari, S., Rinaldi, M., Hodas, N., Facchini, M. C., Seinfeld, J. H., and O’ Dowd, C.: Surface tension prevails over solute effect in organic-influenced cloud droplet activation, Nature, 546, 637-641, 10.1038/nature22806, 2017.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-336-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Ryan Schmedding, 21 Mar 2023
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-336', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Mar 2023
It is excellent work on an important topic in atmospheric chemistry.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-336-RC1 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Ryan Schmedding, 25 May 2023
We would like to thank the referee for reviewing our manuscript and for their positive feedback on our work.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-336-AC2
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Ryan Schmedding, 25 May 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-336', Anonymous Referee #2, 03 May 2023
Overall the manuscript is excellent and a well thought-out consideration of complex droplet growth processes and worthy of publication. However much of the analysis relies on assumptions at the interfaces and thus the major comment that should be considered to strengthen the analysis and discussion is as follows:
Major Comment:
Schmedding and Zuend treat the interfacial region (boundary between the liquid and vapor phase) as a separate phase following the approach of Guggenheim. This leads to a significant simplification, since the chemical potential in the interfacial region is assumed to be equal to that in the other phases.
Rowlinson and Widom point out that “we can not measure or define unambiguously and independently the thermodynamic properties of the surface phase”. They go on to say “We can evade the difficulty only by defining the properties of the surface phase as differences between those of the whole system and those of the two phases. They point out that questions about local thermodynamic functions (density, chemical potential) in the interface region are best answered by the methods of statistical mechanics.
Chapter 5 of their book includes calculations of the local thermodynamic functions based on statistical mechanics for a number of models including hard spheres, lattice gas model, and penetrable sphere model for one and two component systems.
It would greatly increase the impact of this study if the authors included a comparison with results given by Rowlinson and Widom. One possibility is a comparison of the modified chemical potential based on statistical mechanics (Eq. (4-68)) versus the value obtained using the Guggenheim approach for the two component lattice gas.
Minor Comments:
Equation 1. - multiplied by 100% is a typo. (e.g, one multiplies the value by 100, such that the value is a percentage)
Equation 23 - is sigma missing a subscript? this sigma is somewhat ambiguous.
References:
Guggenheim, E. A.: The thermodynamics of interfaces in systems of several components, Transactions of the Faraday Society, 35, 397–412, 1940.
Rowlinson, J.S. and Widom, B., Molecular Theory of Capillarity, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1982.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-336-RC2 - AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Ryan Schmedding, 25 May 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
295 | 95 | 19 | 409 | 29 | 6 | 4 |
- HTML: 295
- PDF: 95
- XML: 19
- Total: 409
- Supplement: 29
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Ryan Schmedding
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(3261 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1260 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper