Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2921
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2921
06 Dec 2023
 | 06 Dec 2023

How hard do we tap during snow stability tests?

Håvard Boutera Toft, Samuel V. Verplanck, and Markus Landrø

Abstract. This study examines the impact force applied from hand taps during Extended Column Tests (ECT), a common method of assessing snow stability. The hand-tap loading method has inconsistencies across the United States, Canadian, and Norwegian written standards, as well as inherent subjectivity. We developed a device, the “tap-o-meter”, to measure the force-time curves during these taps and collected data from 286 practitioners, including avalanche forecasters and mountain guides in Scandinavia, Central Europe, and North America. Peak forces and loading rates are the metrics chosen to quantitatively compare the data. The mean, median, and inner quartile peak forces are distinctly different for each loading step (wrist, elbow and shoulder), as are the loading rates. However, there is significant overlap across the range of measurements and examples of participants with higher force wrist taps than other participants' shoulder taps. This overlap challenges the reliability and reproducibility of ECT results, potentially leading to dangerous interpretations in avalanche decision-making, forecasting and risk assessments. Therefore, we recommend updating the standards for the ECT. We propose two viable paths for future action: (1) define a target impact force-time curve for each tap level and develop tools and training to minimize variability in tapping force (2) assess the significance of the information derived from the number of taps. If deemed not highly valuable, we should consider reverting to a simpler binary interpretation that focuses exclusively on crack propagation.

Håvard Boutera Toft, Samuel V. Verplanck, and Markus Landrø

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2921', Frank Techel, 14 Dec 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2921', Ron Simenhois, 19 Jan 2024
Håvard Boutera Toft, Samuel V. Verplanck, and Markus Landrø
Håvard Boutera Toft, Samuel V. Verplanck, and Markus Landrø

Viewed

Total article views: 249 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
183 50 16 249 5 9
  • HTML: 183
  • PDF: 50
  • XML: 16
  • Total: 249
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 9
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Dec 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Dec 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 247 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 247 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 26 Feb 2024
Download
Short summary
This study investigates inconsistencies in impact force during the Extended Column Tests (ECT). We measured force-time curves from 286 practitioners in Scandinavia, Central Europe and North America. The results show a large variability in peak forces and loading rates across wrist, elbow, and shoulder taps, challenging the ECT's reliability. We recommend standardizing ECT tapping force or simplifying interpretation to focus on crack propagation.