the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Complex refractive index and single scattering albedo of Icelandic dust in the shortwave spectrum
Abstract. Icelandic dust can impact the radiative budget in high-latitude regions directly by affecting light absorption and scattering and indirectly by changing the surface albedo after dust deposition. This tends to produce a positive radiative forcing. However, the limited knowledge of the spectral optical properties of Icelandic dust prevents an accurate assessment of these radiative effects. Here, the spectral single scattering albedo (SSA) and the complex refractive index (m = n - ik) of Icelandic dust from five major emission hotspots were retrieved between 370–950 nm using online measurements of size distribution and spectral absorption (βabs) and scattering (βsca) coefficients of particles suspended in a large-scale atmospheric simulation chamber. The SSA(λ) estimated from the measured βabs and βsca increased from 0.90–0.94 at 370 nm to 0.94–0.96 at 950 nm in Icelandic dust from the different hotspots, which falls within the range of mineral dust from northern Africa and eastern Asian. The spectral complex refractive index was retrieved by minimizing the differences between the measured βabs and βsca and those computed using the Mie theory for spherical and internally homogeneous particles, using the size distribution data as input. The real part of the complex refractive index (n(λ)) was found to be 1.60-1.61 in the different samples and independent on wavelength. The imaginary part (k(λ)) was almost constant with wavelength and was found to be around 0.004 at 370 nm and 0.002–0.003 at 950 nm. The estimated complex refractive index was close to the initial estimates based on the mineralogical composition, also suggesting that the high magnetite content observed in Icelandic dust may contribute to its high absorption capacity in the shortwave spectrum. The k(λ) values retrieved for Icelandic dust are at the upper end of the reported range for low-latitude dust (e.g., from the Sahel). Furthermore, Icelandic dust tends to be more absorbing toward the near-infrared. In Icelandic dust, k(λ) between 660–950 nm was 2–8 times higher than most of the dust samples sourced in northern Africa and eastern Asia. This suggests that Icelandic dust may have a stronger positive direct radiative forcing on climate which has not been accounted for in climate predictions.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(2302 KB)
-
Supplement
(4183 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2302 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(4183 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-276', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Apr 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-276/egusphere-2023-276-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-276', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 Apr 2023
General
The paper deals with a systematic laboratory study on the relationship between (a) the measured microphysical properties (size distribution) and spectral scattering and absorption coefficients and (b) the spectral single scattering albedo (SSA) and complex refractive index. The laboratory work is carefully and professionally performed by experienced scientists.
I have some minor remarks, only.
Introduction:
p2, line 45: Icelandic dust can reach several kilometres in altitude. Can you provide some numbers, 2km, 4 km, 8 km height. Some kind of a small summary. And also, how was it measured, ceilometer? aircraft? balloon? If dust at, e.g., 3 km height is observed, how can you be sure that this was Icelandic dust and not dust from other continents? So, I want to know a bit more about the range the Iceland dust can reach and potential horizontal transport scales.
Results
p11, line 302: I personally find these plots in Figure S2 very important for the study. It is always the question: Could the full size range be covered? And then these nice and important plots are at all in the supplementary.
Figure 7: I was completely lost… All symbols (left column) in the legend are in black, and references are given (to each black symbol). In the figure, the symbols then have colors. In the legend, we have many colored full circles (but no references!). The k values for the volcanic ash are 3-4 orders of magnitude lower than for Icelandic dust. So, ash is totally non absorbing? Confusing?
Final point:
Figure 8: This figure shows a nice comparison with other dusts from other major sources, but all measured by the same team!
I miss a bit a comparison with other findings, by other groups, from different field campaigns (maybe from different deserts and continents). I remember, e.g., these SAMUM campaigns. There was this paper of Mueller et al, JGR 2010 (2009JD12520) with refractive index values etc. I could imagine, there are several other studies showing SSA and refractive index properties.
Is it possible to have another figure or a table with different (independent) findings from different field studies… together with your findings?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-276-RC2 - AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-276', Clarissa Baldo, 06 Jun 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-276', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Apr 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-276/egusphere-2023-276-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-276', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 Apr 2023
General
The paper deals with a systematic laboratory study on the relationship between (a) the measured microphysical properties (size distribution) and spectral scattering and absorption coefficients and (b) the spectral single scattering albedo (SSA) and complex refractive index. The laboratory work is carefully and professionally performed by experienced scientists.
I have some minor remarks, only.
Introduction:
p2, line 45: Icelandic dust can reach several kilometres in altitude. Can you provide some numbers, 2km, 4 km, 8 km height. Some kind of a small summary. And also, how was it measured, ceilometer? aircraft? balloon? If dust at, e.g., 3 km height is observed, how can you be sure that this was Icelandic dust and not dust from other continents? So, I want to know a bit more about the range the Iceland dust can reach and potential horizontal transport scales.
Results
p11, line 302: I personally find these plots in Figure S2 very important for the study. It is always the question: Could the full size range be covered? And then these nice and important plots are at all in the supplementary.
Figure 7: I was completely lost… All symbols (left column) in the legend are in black, and references are given (to each black symbol). In the figure, the symbols then have colors. In the legend, we have many colored full circles (but no references!). The k values for the volcanic ash are 3-4 orders of magnitude lower than for Icelandic dust. So, ash is totally non absorbing? Confusing?
Final point:
Figure 8: This figure shows a nice comparison with other dusts from other major sources, but all measured by the same team!
I miss a bit a comparison with other findings, by other groups, from different field campaigns (maybe from different deserts and continents). I remember, e.g., these SAMUM campaigns. There was this paper of Mueller et al, JGR 2010 (2009JD12520) with refractive index values etc. I could imagine, there are several other studies showing SSA and refractive index properties.
Is it possible to have another figure or a table with different (independent) findings from different field studies… together with your findings?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-276-RC2 - AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-276', Clarissa Baldo, 06 Jun 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
288 | 116 | 15 | 419 | 43 | 5 | 4 |
- HTML: 288
- PDF: 116
- XML: 15
- Total: 419
- Supplement: 43
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
Paola Formenti
Claudia Di Biagio
Gongda Lu
Congbo Song
Mathieu Cazaunau
Edouard Pangui
Jean-Francois Doussin
Pavla Dagsson-Waldhauserova
Olafur Arnalds
David Beddows
A. Robert MacKenzie
Zongbo Shi
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2302 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(4183 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper