the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Simulating multi-hazard event sets for life cycle consequence analysis
Abstract. In the context of natural hazard risk quantification and modeling of hazard interactions, some literature separates “Level I” (or occurrence) interactions from “Level II” (or consequence) interactions. The Level I interactions occur inherently due to the nature of the hazards, independently of the presence of physical assets. In such cases, one hazard event triggers or modifies the occurrence of another (e.g., heavy rain and flooding; liquefaction and landslides triggered by an earthquake), thus creating a dependency between the features characterizing such hazard events. They differ from Level II interactions, which instead occur through impacts/consequences on physical assets/components and systems (e.g., accumulation of physical damage or social impacts due to earthquake sequences, landslides due to the earthquake-induced collapse of a retaining structure). Multi-hazard Life Cycle Consequence (LCCon) analysis aims to quantify the consequences (e.g., repair costs, downtime, casualty rates) throughout a system’s service life and should account for both Level I and II interactions. The available literature generally considers Level I interactions – the focus of this study – mainly defining relevant taxonomies, often qualitatively, without providing a computational framework to simulate a sequence of hazard events incorporating the identified interrelations among them. This paper addresses this gap, proposing modeling approaches associated with different types of Level I interactions. It describes a simulation-based method for generating multi-hazard event sets (i.e., a sequence of hazard events and associated features throughout the system’s life cycle) based on the theory of competing Poisson processes. The proposed approach incorporates the different types of interactions in a sequential Monte Carlo sampling method. The method outputs multi-hazard event sets that can be integrated into LCCon frameworks to quantify interacting hazard consequences. An application incorporating several hazard interactions is presented to illustrate the potential of the proposed method.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(3427 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(3427 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2540', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Dec 2023
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Leandro Iannacone, 22 Jan 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2540', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Jan 2024
This is an ambitious paper simulating multi-hazard event sets for life cycle consequence analysis. The methodology is transparent and is systematically presented, and should meet the general requirements of life cycle consequence analysis. However, it should be made clear that uncommon combinations of different hazards can create dangerous hazard situations. With progressive climate change, these dangerous hazard situations may arise more often. Thus the occurrence of a typhoon close to an earthquake can have a major impact on fire and landslide risk, as demonstrated in Japan in September 1923 in Tokyo, and September 2018 in Hokkaido.
Some systems may demand a very high degree of life cycle reliability. The authors should stress test their Poisson process modelling to gauge the sensitivity of the model results to anomalous rare compound event behaviour. End users should not be surprised by such phenomena.
The authors should address
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2540-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Leandro Iannacone, 22 Jan 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2540', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Dec 2023
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Leandro Iannacone, 22 Jan 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2540', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Jan 2024
This is an ambitious paper simulating multi-hazard event sets for life cycle consequence analysis. The methodology is transparent and is systematically presented, and should meet the general requirements of life cycle consequence analysis. However, it should be made clear that uncommon combinations of different hazards can create dangerous hazard situations. With progressive climate change, these dangerous hazard situations may arise more often. Thus the occurrence of a typhoon close to an earthquake can have a major impact on fire and landslide risk, as demonstrated in Japan in September 1923 in Tokyo, and September 2018 in Hokkaido.
Some systems may demand a very high degree of life cycle reliability. The authors should stress test their Poisson process modelling to gauge the sensitivity of the model results to anomalous rare compound event behaviour. End users should not be surprised by such phenomena.
The authors should address
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2540-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Leandro Iannacone, 22 Jan 2024
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
426 | 152 | 31 | 609 | 14 | 17 |
- HTML: 426
- PDF: 152
- XML: 31
- Total: 609
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 17
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Kenneth Otárola
Roberto Gentile
Carmine Galasso
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(3427 KB) - Metadata XML