the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Assessment of the ISBA Land Surface Model soil hydrology using four closed-form soilwater relationships and several lysimeters
Abstract. Soil water drainage is the main source of groundwater recharge and river flow. It is therefore a key process for water resource management. In this study, we evaluate the soil hydrology and the soil water drainage, simulated by the Interaction-Soil-Biosphere-Atmosphere (ISBA) land surface model currently used for hydrological applications from the watershed scale to the global scale. This evaluation is done using seven lysimeters from two long term model approach sites measuring hourly water dynamics between 2009 and 2019 in northeastern France. These 2-meter depth lysimeters are filled with different soil types and are either maintained bare soil or covered with vegetation. Four closed-form equations describing soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity functions, are tested: the commonly used equations from Brooks and Corey (1966) and van Genuchten (1980), a combination of the van Genuchten soil water retention function with the Brooks and Corey unsaturated hydraulic conductivity function, and, for the very first time in a Land Surface Model (LSM), a modified version of Van Genuchten equations, with a new hydraulic conductivity curve proposed by Iden et al. (2015). The results indicate a good performance by ISBA with the different closure equations in terms of soil volumetric water content and water mass. The drained flow at the bottom of the lysimeter is well simulated using Brooks and Corey (1966) while some weaknesses appear with van Genuchten (1980) due to the abrupt shape near saturation of its hydraulic conductivity function. The mixed form or the new van Genuchten hydraulic conductivity function from Iden et al. (2015) allows solving this problem and even improves the simulation of the drainage dynamic, especially for intense drainage events. The study also highlights the importance of the vertical heterogeneity of the soil hydrodynamic parameters to correctly simulate the drainage dynamic, as well as the primary influence of the parameters characterizing the shape of the soil water retention function.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(5285 KB)
-
Supplement
(2132 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(5285 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2132 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-248', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 Mar 2023
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', antoine sobaga, 16 May 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-248/egusphere-2023-248-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', antoine sobaga, 16 May 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-248', Anonymous Referee #2, 27 Mar 2023
The objective of the paper is to assess the ability of the ISBA_DF land surface scheme to simulate drainage at the bottom of the soil column by comparing the simulations with data from a set of lysimeters located in two places in France, and having various soil characteristics and vegetation cover. The data are also used to compare various models for the retention and hydraulic conductivity curves used in the modeling.
I had already revised an earlier version of this paper submitted to Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. The authors have addressed the comments I had on their manuscript and I have only a few additional comments to provide.
After reading comments on the earlier version of the manuscript and those already available on the present version, I have the feeling that the authors should better specify the context of their study in the introduction. Their context is the one of Land Surface Models (LSMs) that are applied regionally or at the global scale. This context explains why numerical simulations and parameter specification are generally simplified for the model to be applicable in different contexts, without specific calibration, except in the case of some validations using in situ data at specific sites.The present study aim is to assess the ability of the current model to simulate accurately groundwater recharge. For that, the model is applied at the local scale, using data from several lysimeter experiments. But this is not the general application context of the model, where soil parameters are computed from soil texture using PedoTransfer Functions (PTF) and the soil profile is assumed homogeneous.
The interest of the study is to show that:- When parameters and model configuration (in particular soil vertical heterogeneity, but also lower boundary condition) is specified using in situ data, the model performance is satisfactory
- In such configuration, some combinations of soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity models provide better simulations
- Model performance is significantly decreased when vertically homogeneous soil profiles are used or when PTFs are used
The study leads to interesting conclusions with regards to the specification of soil parameters in LSMs that could be better highlighted in the abstract and the conclusions.
Minor comments:
Line 313-314: the sentence is truncated.
Line 548: sensitivity instead of sensibilityCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-248-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', antoine sobaga, 16 May 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-248/egusphere-2023-248-AC2-supplement.pdf
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-248', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 Mar 2023
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', antoine sobaga, 16 May 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-248/egusphere-2023-248-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', antoine sobaga, 16 May 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-248', Anonymous Referee #2, 27 Mar 2023
The objective of the paper is to assess the ability of the ISBA_DF land surface scheme to simulate drainage at the bottom of the soil column by comparing the simulations with data from a set of lysimeters located in two places in France, and having various soil characteristics and vegetation cover. The data are also used to compare various models for the retention and hydraulic conductivity curves used in the modeling.
I had already revised an earlier version of this paper submitted to Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. The authors have addressed the comments I had on their manuscript and I have only a few additional comments to provide.
After reading comments on the earlier version of the manuscript and those already available on the present version, I have the feeling that the authors should better specify the context of their study in the introduction. Their context is the one of Land Surface Models (LSMs) that are applied regionally or at the global scale. This context explains why numerical simulations and parameter specification are generally simplified for the model to be applicable in different contexts, without specific calibration, except in the case of some validations using in situ data at specific sites.The present study aim is to assess the ability of the current model to simulate accurately groundwater recharge. For that, the model is applied at the local scale, using data from several lysimeter experiments. But this is not the general application context of the model, where soil parameters are computed from soil texture using PedoTransfer Functions (PTF) and the soil profile is assumed homogeneous.
The interest of the study is to show that:- When parameters and model configuration (in particular soil vertical heterogeneity, but also lower boundary condition) is specified using in situ data, the model performance is satisfactory
- In such configuration, some combinations of soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity models provide better simulations
- Model performance is significantly decreased when vertically homogeneous soil profiles are used or when PTFs are used
The study leads to interesting conclusions with regards to the specification of soil parameters in LSMs that could be better highlighted in the abstract and the conclusions.
Minor comments:
Line 313-314: the sentence is truncated.
Line 548: sensitivity instead of sensibilityCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-248-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', antoine sobaga, 16 May 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-248/egusphere-2023-248-AC2-supplement.pdf
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
272 | 118 | 21 | 411 | 49 | 7 | 5 |
- HTML: 272
- PDF: 118
- XML: 21
- Total: 411
- Supplement: 49
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Bertrand Decharme
Florence Habets
Christine Delire
Noële Enjelvin
Paul-Olivier Redon
Pierre Faure-Catteloin
Patrick Le Moigne
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(5285 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2132 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper