the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The Risk of Synoptic-Scale Arctic Cyclones to Shipping
Abstract. The risk posed by Arctic cyclones to ships has seldom been quantified due to the lack of publicly available historical Arctic ship track data. This study investigates Automated Identification System (AIS) transponder derived Arctic ship tracks from September 2009 to December 2016. These are analysed with historical synoptic-scale cyclone tracks derived from ERA-5 and reports of past Arctic shipping incidents, to determine the number of ships intersected by the passage of intense Arctic cyclones, and how many resulted in shipping incidents.
The number of ships operating in the Arctic has increased year-on-year from 2010 to 2016. The highest density of ships occurs year-round in the Barents Sea. Trans-Arctic shipping transits via the Northern Sea Route and the North-West Passage are limited to summer and autumn months, when sea ice extent has sufficiently retreated from the coastlines. But, ship traffic along these trans-Arctic routes is far less than the thousands of ships travelling in the Barents Sea year-round. Between 2010 and 2016, 248 Arctic shipping incidents were reported, but only 2 % of these occurred following the passage of an intense Arctic cyclone. So, shipping incidents do occur in the Arctic, but the vast majority appear unrelated to the passage of intense Arctic cyclones, despite ship tracks being frequently intersected by such hazards. Less than 0.0001 % of these intersections resulted in a reported shipping incident. This suggests that Arctic cyclones have not been hazardous to ships, and that ships are resilient to the rough sea conditions caused by intense Arctic cyclones.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(178372 KB)
-
Supplement
(5868 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(178372 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(5868 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2222', Paul Arthur Berkman, 29 Nov 2023
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alexander Vessey, 21 Feb 2024
Thank you very much for reading our manuscript and posting your reviewer comment. The authors of this manuscript have read through your comments and written a response (please see attached). Some of your comments were also raised by Reviewer #2. So in the attached document, we have also included our response to Reviewer #2, so that you can view our response to your comment.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alexander Vessey, 21 Feb 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2222', Anonymous Referee #2, 26 Dec 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2222/egusphere-2023-2222-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Alexander Vessey, 21 Feb 2024
Thank you very much for reading our manuscript and posting your reviewer comment. The authors of this manuscript have read through your comments and written a response (please see attached document). The respone to Reviewer #1 is also included in this document, as some of the comments were similar between the reviews.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Alexander Vessey, 21 Feb 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2222', Paul Arthur Berkman, 29 Nov 2023
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alexander Vessey, 21 Feb 2024
Thank you very much for reading our manuscript and posting your reviewer comment. The authors of this manuscript have read through your comments and written a response (please see attached). Some of your comments were also raised by Reviewer #2. So in the attached document, we have also included our response to Reviewer #2, so that you can view our response to your comment.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alexander Vessey, 21 Feb 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2222', Anonymous Referee #2, 26 Dec 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2222/egusphere-2023-2222-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Alexander Vessey, 21 Feb 2024
Thank you very much for reading our manuscript and posting your reviewer comment. The authors of this manuscript have read through your comments and written a response (please see attached document). The respone to Reviewer #1 is also included in this document, as some of the comments were similar between the reviews.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Alexander Vessey, 21 Feb 2024
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
270 | 95 | 25 | 390 | 82 | 21 | 21 |
- HTML: 270
- PDF: 95
- XML: 25
- Total: 390
- Supplement: 82
- BibTeX: 21
- EndNote: 21
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Alexander Frank Vessey
Kevin I. Hodges
Len C. Shaffrey
Jonathan J. Day
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(178372 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(5868 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper