the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Uptake Behavior of Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds during Field Calibrations of the XAD-Based Passive Air Sampler Across Seasons and Locations
Abstract. Polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) continue to demand attention due to their widespread presence and well-established health implications. Given that incomplete combustion is a major contributor to PACs and inhalation constitutes a crucial human exposure pathway, a comprehensive understanding of the concentrations, spatial distributions, and fates of a broad range of PACs in the atmosphere is important. Passive air samplers (PASs) are a commonly utilized technique for PAC sampling and monitoring. In this study, we present the results from two one-year calibration experiments, one starting in summer and the other in winter, using a passive air sampler equipped with XAD resin as the sorbent (XAD-PAS). Throughout both experiments, PACs were consistently sorbed during the initial six-month period. However, the sorbed amounts for many PACs exhibited a decrease after half a year of deployment. Three hypotheses to explain this phenomenon were explored, including the uptake of atmospheric particles, evaporation from the sorbent, and reactions with photooxidants. All had to be rejected based on the obtained data, additional laboratory experiments and model results. Model simulations were further used to (i) confirm that a loss process must be invoked to explain the observed uptake behaviour and (ii) estimate the kinetics of that loss process for different PACs. Sampling rates (SRs) for 28 PACs derived from the linearized uptake curves during the first six months of deployment were comparable to those of other semi-volatile organic compounds obtained during the same calibration experiment, and they also demonstrate a consistent negative correlation with volatility.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(1067 KB)
-
Supplement
(2578 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1067 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2578 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2202', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Nov 2023
General comments:
This manuscript makes a strong contribution to advancing our understanding of passive air sampling by critically evaluating the existing paradigms of sampler deployment and, importantly, identifying a strong source of uncertainty that is being introduced into the data. The overview of the state of passive air sampling is accurate and correctly captures the uncertainties in passive sampling sorbents, configurations, and uptakes that impact PAC quantification by PAS.
The authors take a step-by-step approach in testing a series of hypotheses - this structure is very clear, and very comprehensively integrates the results from the different methods that were combined in the study. The scientific methods and interpretation are very good, and only a few points require further clarification.
Specific points for the authors to clarify:
- Please clarify hypothesis 1 "Can Uptake of Particle-bound Compounds Explain Decreasing Trends in the Amounts Accumulated in PASs?" While I fully agree with the methodology used to test the hypothesis and the conclusions the authors have made with respect to this hypothesis, I question how this phenomenon could lead to decreases in chemicals in the samplers over time. I rather think this would be lead to irregular/non-linear uptake. Does this hypothesis assume that particles can be "blown-off" the sorbents in over time?
- Please consider adding more specificity to the naming of the hypothesis related to degradation (hypothesis 3) to make it clear that this is related to photooxidants, largely ozone. In fact, the outcome of the study seems to be that some other unknown degradation pathway is contributing to the observed patterns, but that aspect is not tested under the 3rd hypothesis.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2202-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Frank Wania, 27 Nov 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2202/egusphere-2023-2202-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2202', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Nov 2023
Review of Title: Uptake Behavior of Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds during Field Calibrations of the XAD-Based Passive Air Sampler Across Seasons and Locations
Author(s): Yuening Li et al.
MS No.: egusphere-2023-2202General comments
The manuscript discusses the uptake of polycyclic aromatic compounds by a specific passive air sampler for deployments lasting up to 1 year. Contrary to expectations, several compounds did not remain in the linear uptake phase; several PAHs either plateaued, or decreased after about 6 months deployment. The behaviour observed for PAHs was in contrast to results for other semi-volatile organic compounds. Three possible reasons were explored (i) impact of particle-bound PACs; (ii) degradation of PAC by ozone and (iii) equilibration of certain PACs.
None of these were concluded to be responsible for the observed observations.
Overall, the manuscript is well written, and includes good data, figures and tables. There is a lack of additional creativity beyond the 3 reasons investigated by the authors.
Let’s try a few:
- What amount of XAD is oxidized, and thus losing sorption capacity during the year?
- The curves depicted in Figure 1 might indicate competition for sorptive sites. And the PACs might simply be replaced by stronger sorbing compounds.
Â
Specific comments
Â
L66 – very detailed list what is the difference between urban and regions with high traffic density?
L 149 – give better reason why ozone was chosen (NOx or OH)
L193 – reference for chosen air boundary later?
Figure 3 – This is supposed to simulate an equilibration experiment, right? Make that explicit in the caption
Figure 5 would benefit from some descriptive statistics – presumably all compounds but PACs, and PACs on their own
Â
Technical corrections
Â
L145 – sandwich
L335 – Thus it should?
Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2202-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Frank Wania, 27 Nov 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2202/egusphere-2023-2202-AC2-supplement.pdf
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2202', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Nov 2023
General comments:
This manuscript makes a strong contribution to advancing our understanding of passive air sampling by critically evaluating the existing paradigms of sampler deployment and, importantly, identifying a strong source of uncertainty that is being introduced into the data. The overview of the state of passive air sampling is accurate and correctly captures the uncertainties in passive sampling sorbents, configurations, and uptakes that impact PAC quantification by PAS.
The authors take a step-by-step approach in testing a series of hypotheses - this structure is very clear, and very comprehensively integrates the results from the different methods that were combined in the study. The scientific methods and interpretation are very good, and only a few points require further clarification.
Specific points for the authors to clarify:
- Please clarify hypothesis 1 "Can Uptake of Particle-bound Compounds Explain Decreasing Trends in the Amounts Accumulated in PASs?" While I fully agree with the methodology used to test the hypothesis and the conclusions the authors have made with respect to this hypothesis, I question how this phenomenon could lead to decreases in chemicals in the samplers over time. I rather think this would be lead to irregular/non-linear uptake. Does this hypothesis assume that particles can be "blown-off" the sorbents in over time?
- Please consider adding more specificity to the naming of the hypothesis related to degradation (hypothesis 3) to make it clear that this is related to photooxidants, largely ozone. In fact, the outcome of the study seems to be that some other unknown degradation pathway is contributing to the observed patterns, but that aspect is not tested under the 3rd hypothesis.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2202-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Frank Wania, 27 Nov 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2202/egusphere-2023-2202-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2202', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Nov 2023
Review of Title: Uptake Behavior of Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds during Field Calibrations of the XAD-Based Passive Air Sampler Across Seasons and Locations
Author(s): Yuening Li et al.
MS No.: egusphere-2023-2202General comments
The manuscript discusses the uptake of polycyclic aromatic compounds by a specific passive air sampler for deployments lasting up to 1 year. Contrary to expectations, several compounds did not remain in the linear uptake phase; several PAHs either plateaued, or decreased after about 6 months deployment. The behaviour observed for PAHs was in contrast to results for other semi-volatile organic compounds. Three possible reasons were explored (i) impact of particle-bound PACs; (ii) degradation of PAC by ozone and (iii) equilibration of certain PACs.
None of these were concluded to be responsible for the observed observations.
Overall, the manuscript is well written, and includes good data, figures and tables. There is a lack of additional creativity beyond the 3 reasons investigated by the authors.
Let’s try a few:
- What amount of XAD is oxidized, and thus losing sorption capacity during the year?
- The curves depicted in Figure 1 might indicate competition for sorptive sites. And the PACs might simply be replaced by stronger sorbing compounds.
Â
Specific comments
Â
L66 – very detailed list what is the difference between urban and regions with high traffic density?
L 149 – give better reason why ozone was chosen (NOx or OH)
L193 – reference for chosen air boundary later?
Figure 3 – This is supposed to simulate an equilibration experiment, right? Make that explicit in the caption
Figure 5 would benefit from some descriptive statistics – presumably all compounds but PACs, and PACs on their own
Â
Technical corrections
Â
L145 – sandwich
L335 – Thus it should?
Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2202-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Frank Wania, 27 Nov 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2202/egusphere-2023-2202-AC2-supplement.pdf
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
202 | 66 | 18 | 286 | 29 | 6 | 9 |
- HTML: 202
- PDF: 66
- XML: 18
- Total: 286
- Supplement: 29
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 9
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Yuening Li
Faqiang Zhan
Yushan Su
Ying Duan Lei
Chubashini Shunthirasingham
Zilin Zhou
Jonathan P. D. Abbatt
Hayley Hung
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1067 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2578 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper