the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Modeling of terrain effect in magnetotelluric data from Garhwal Himalaya Region
Abstract. The magnetotelluric method (MT) is one of the most effective geophysical techniques for studying the deep structure of the Earth's crust, particularly in steep terrain like the Garhwal Himalaya region. The MT responses are distorted as a result of the undulated/rugged terrain. Such responses, if not corrected, can lead to a misinterpretation of MT data for the geoelectrical structures. In this research paper, two different correction procedures were used to compute the topography distortion for the synthetic model of Garhwal Himalaya region from Roorkee to Gangotri section. A finite difference algorithm was used to compute MT responses (apparent resistivity and phase) for the irregular terrain. The accuracy of the terrain correction procedures was checked on results published in the literature on different topography models at various periods. The relative errors between flat earth response (FER) and two terrain correction procedures (TCR1 and TCR2) were calculated and were very less or almost zero for most of the sites along the Roorkee to Gangotri profile except at the foothill where the error was high at lower periods. The similar topography response, terrain corrected responses TCR1 and TCR2 responses concluded that there is no need for topography correction along Roorkee-Gangotri Profile because the slope angle is less than one degree.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(1197 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1197 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2166', Anonymous Referee #1, 19 Oct 2023
Dear Editor and Authors,
the manuscript "Modeling of terrain effect in magnetotelluric data from Garhwal Himalaya Region" is an interesting piece of research about possible techniques to correct the distorted magnetotelluric signals produced by topography with application to the Himalayan region.
The paper is essentially well written with good literature coverage and clear introduction, methods and conclusions.
The quality of some figures must be improved because the selection of vertical axes is not always appropriate: some of them contain several subplots; therefore, it is essential that the available space is homogeneously filled with graphs, points, lines and so on.
I checked the calculations reported in the methods. I got the same results, so, they seem to be ok.
A section devoted to "Data availability" is lacking, in which authors should list explicitly the sources where data can be accessed free or after reasonable request. I could not assess the quality
Some periods reported in the manuscript are featured by a suspiciously high number of "significant" digits. Are they correct? Please, check.
I also suggest improving the abstract by providing some additional initial information about magnetotelluric methods and I have also listed a series of really minor mistakes throughout the manuscript.
My detailed comments and requests are highlighted in the attached pdf file.
In summary, I think that the manuscript has one significant weakness concerning quality and accessibility of data, which justifies, overall, in my view, the request of major revision. However, the decision must go to the editor. I also kindly ask the editor to require an additional review to an expert in magnetotelluric data in order to assess their suitability in the contest of the present research.
I thank the editor for allowing me to review this article. My best wishes to the authors.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Suman Saini, 06 Dec 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2166/egusphere-2023-2166-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Suman Saini, 06 Dec 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2166', linjiang QIN, 27 Nov 2023
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Suman Saini, 06 Dec 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2166/egusphere-2023-2166-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Suman Saini, 06 Dec 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2166', Anonymous Referee #1, 19 Oct 2023
Dear Editor and Authors,
the manuscript "Modeling of terrain effect in magnetotelluric data from Garhwal Himalaya Region" is an interesting piece of research about possible techniques to correct the distorted magnetotelluric signals produced by topography with application to the Himalayan region.
The paper is essentially well written with good literature coverage and clear introduction, methods and conclusions.
The quality of some figures must be improved because the selection of vertical axes is not always appropriate: some of them contain several subplots; therefore, it is essential that the available space is homogeneously filled with graphs, points, lines and so on.
I checked the calculations reported in the methods. I got the same results, so, they seem to be ok.
A section devoted to "Data availability" is lacking, in which authors should list explicitly the sources where data can be accessed free or after reasonable request. I could not assess the quality
Some periods reported in the manuscript are featured by a suspiciously high number of "significant" digits. Are they correct? Please, check.
I also suggest improving the abstract by providing some additional initial information about magnetotelluric methods and I have also listed a series of really minor mistakes throughout the manuscript.
My detailed comments and requests are highlighted in the attached pdf file.
In summary, I think that the manuscript has one significant weakness concerning quality and accessibility of data, which justifies, overall, in my view, the request of major revision. However, the decision must go to the editor. I also kindly ask the editor to require an additional review to an expert in magnetotelluric data in order to assess their suitability in the contest of the present research.
I thank the editor for allowing me to review this article. My best wishes to the authors.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Suman Saini, 06 Dec 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2166/egusphere-2023-2166-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Suman Saini, 06 Dec 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2166', linjiang QIN, 27 Nov 2023
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Suman Saini, 06 Dec 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2166/egusphere-2023-2166-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Suman Saini, 06 Dec 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
187 | 60 | 17 | 264 | 10 | 12 |
- HTML: 187
- PDF: 60
- XML: 17
- Total: 264
- BibTeX: 10
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Suman Saini
Deepak Kumar Tyagi
Sushil Kumar
Rajeev Sehrawat
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1197 KB) - Metadata XML