the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Downstream rounding rate of pebbles in the Himalaya
Abstract. Sediment grains are progressively rounded during their transport down a river. For more than a century, Earth scientists have used the roundness of pebbles within modern sediment, and of clasts within conglomerates, as a key metric to constrain the sediment's transport history and source area(s). However, the current practices of assessment of pebble roundness are mainly qualitative and based on time consuming manual measurement methods. This qualitative judgement provides the transport history only in a broad sense, such as classifying distance as 'near' or 'far'. In this study, we propose a new model that quantifies the relationship between roundness and the transport distance. We demonstrate that this model can be applied to the clasts of multiple lithologies including modern sediment as well as conglomerates deposited by ancient river systems. We present field data from two Himalayan catchments in Nepal. We use the Normalized Isoperimetric Ratio (IRn) which relates a pebble's area (A) to its perimeter (P), to quantify roundness. The maximum analytical value for IRn is 1, and IRn is expected to increase with transport distance. We propose a non-linear roundness model based on our field data, whereby the difference between a grain's IRn and the maximum value of 1 decays exponentially with transport distance, mirroring Sternberg's model of mass loss or size reduction by abrasion. This roundness model predicts an asymptotic behaviour for IRn, and the distance over which IRn approaches the asymptote is controlled by a rounding coefficient. Our field data suggest that the roundness coefficient for granite pebbles is eight times that of quartzite pebbles. Using this model, we reconstruct the transport history of a Pliocene paleo-river deposit preserved at the base of the Kathmandu intermontane Basin. These results, along with other sedimentary evidence, imply that the paleo-river was much longer than the length of the Kathmandu Basin, and that it must have lost its headwaters through drainage capture. We further explore the extreme rounding of clasts from Miocene conglomerate of the Siwaliks Zone and find evidence of sediment recycling.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(17096 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(17096 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2157', Joakim Edlund, 30 Oct 2023
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Prakash Pokhrel, 06 Feb 2024
Dear Joakim Edlund,
Thank you very much for expressing interest in our work and for your appreciation, as well as for providing valuable comments and suggestions. Your insights have significantly contributed to the enhancement of our manuscript, and we sincerely appreciate the time you dedicated to this manuscript.
We have attached a response file addressing all comments and suggestions from the reviewers (CC1, RC1 and RC2).
Kind regards,
Pokhrel et al.
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Prakash Pokhrel, 06 Feb 2024
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2157', Laure Guerit, 21 Nov 2023
Please find my review in the attached pdf.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Prakash Pokhrel, 06 Feb 2024
Dear Laure Guerit,
We appreciate the valuable feedback and suggestions you have provided, greatly enhancing the quality of our manuscript. Base on your thorough review, Â we have attached a detailed response, including responses to CC1 and RC2.
Kind regards,
Pokhrel et al.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Prakash Pokhrel, 06 Feb 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2157', Anonymous Referee #2, 30 Nov 2023
Please see the attached document for comments.
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Prakash Pokhrel, 06 Feb 2024
Dear Anonymous Reviewer,
Thank you very much for your thorough review and your helpful comments and suggestions, which have significantly contributed to improving our manuscript.
We have attached a response file addressing all comments and suggestions from the reviewers (CC1, RC1 and RC2).
Kind regards,
Pokhrel et al.
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Prakash Pokhrel, 06 Feb 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2157', Joakim Edlund, 30 Oct 2023
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Prakash Pokhrel, 06 Feb 2024
Dear Joakim Edlund,
Thank you very much for expressing interest in our work and for your appreciation, as well as for providing valuable comments and suggestions. Your insights have significantly contributed to the enhancement of our manuscript, and we sincerely appreciate the time you dedicated to this manuscript.
We have attached a response file addressing all comments and suggestions from the reviewers (CC1, RC1 and RC2).
Kind regards,
Pokhrel et al.
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Prakash Pokhrel, 06 Feb 2024
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2157', Laure Guerit, 21 Nov 2023
Please find my review in the attached pdf.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Prakash Pokhrel, 06 Feb 2024
Dear Laure Guerit,
We appreciate the valuable feedback and suggestions you have provided, greatly enhancing the quality of our manuscript. Base on your thorough review, Â we have attached a detailed response, including responses to CC1 and RC2.
Kind regards,
Pokhrel et al.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Prakash Pokhrel, 06 Feb 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2157', Anonymous Referee #2, 30 Nov 2023
Please see the attached document for comments.
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Prakash Pokhrel, 06 Feb 2024
Dear Anonymous Reviewer,
Thank you very much for your thorough review and your helpful comments and suggestions, which have significantly contributed to improving our manuscript.
We have attached a response file addressing all comments and suggestions from the reviewers (CC1, RC1 and RC2).
Kind regards,
Pokhrel et al.
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Prakash Pokhrel, 06 Feb 2024
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
472 | 189 | 32 | 693 | 10 | 13 |
- HTML: 472
- PDF: 189
- XML: 32
- Total: 693
- BibTeX: 10
- EndNote: 13
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Mikael Attal
Hugh D. Sinclair
Simon M. Mudd
Mark Naylor
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(17096 KB) - Metadata XML