the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Modelling the vulnerability of urban settings to WUI fires in Chile
Abstract. Wildland-urban interface (WUI) regions are particularly vulnerable to wildfires due to their proximity to both nature and urban developments, posing significant risks to lives and property. To enhance our understanding of the risk profiles in WUI areas, we analysed seven fire case studies in central Chile. We developed a mixed-methods approach for conducting local-scale analyses which involved field surveys, remote-sensing through satellite and drone imagery, and GIS-based analysis of the collected data. The methodology led to the generation of a georeferenced dataset of damaged and undamaged dwellings, including 16 variables representing their physical characteristics, spatial arrangement, and the availability of fire suppression resources. A binary classification model was then used to assess the relative importance of these attributes as indicators of vulnerability. The analysis revealed that spatial arrangement factors have a greater impact on damage prediction than the structural conditions and fire preparedness of individual units. Specifically, factors such as dwelling proximity to neighbours, distance to vegetation, proximity to the border of dwelling groups, and distance from the origin of the fire substantially contribute to the prediction of fire damage. Other structural attributes associated with less affluent homes may also increase the likelihood of damage, although further data is required for confirmation. This study provides insights for the design, planning, and governance of WUI areas in Chile, aiding the development of risk mitigation strategies for both built structures and the broader territorial area.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(2143 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2143 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2130', Michael Nolde, 12 Oct 2023
The authors identified attributes which determine the probability of build units to be damaged when exposed to WUI fires. The study is comprehensive and conducted thoroughly. The utilized methodology is sound and the conclusions are robust. The work also satisfactorily refrences other works in the field.
Some minor issues need to be addresses before the work can finally be published. This refers mostly to specific terms requiring further explanation. All comments are included directly in the PDF file.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Paula Aguirre, 26 Jan 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2130/egusphere-2023-2130-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Paula Aguirre, 26 Jan 2024
Dear Dr. Nolde,
We thank you for you taking the time to review or work, and for you helpful comments and suggestions for improving our manuscript. Please find our detailed responses in the attached file.
Sincerely,
Paula Aguirre, Jorge León, Constanza González-Mathiesen, Randy Román, Manuela Penas, and Alonso Ogueda.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Paula Aguirre, 26 Jan 2024
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2130', Stergios Tampekis, 26 Oct 2023
Dear authors,
The manuscript lacks novelty and originality. Novelty is the primary criterion that a manuscript should have in order to be published to a scientific journal. The specific manuscript is not presenting anything new except for conventional methods.
The introduction should be more updated in the probabilistic assessment of vulnerability (see the references below). Also, there is little or no scientific added value in the presenting study, when more recent methods are already available.
Major revisions
The manuscript needs improvements
-
CC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2130', Stergios Tampekis, 26 Oct 2023
Dear authors,
The introduction should be more updated in the probabilistic assessment of vulnerability (see the references below). Also, there is little or no scientific added value in the presenting study, when more recent methods are already available.
Major revisions
The manuscript needs improvements
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2130', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Nov 2023
Dear authors,
The manuscript lacks novelty and originality. Novelty is the primary criterion that a manuscript should have in order to be published to a scientific journal. The specific manuscript is not presenting anything new except for conventional methods.
The introduction should be more updated in the probabilistic assessment of vulnerability (see the references below). Also, there is little or no scientific added value in the presenting study, when more recent methods are already available.
Major revisions
The manuscript needs improvements
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2130-RC2 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Paula Aguirre, 03 Jan 2024
Dear Referee,
We appreciate your revision of the manuscript. However, the PDF files uploaded in your previous posts as Community Comments show some paragraphs highlighted in yellow, but with no visible notes or comments. Could you please resend you comments so that we can fully address them.
Thanks in advance,
Authors.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2130-AC1 -
AC4: 'Reply on RC2', Paula Aguirre, 26 Jan 2024
Dear Dr. Tampekis,
We thank you for taking the time to review or work and for your suggestions for improvement. Please find the reponses to your comments in the attached file.
Sincerely,
Paula Aguirre, Jorge León, Constanza González-Mathiesen, Randy Román, Manuela Penas, and Alonso Ogueda
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Paula Aguirre, 03 Jan 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2130', Michael Nolde, 12 Oct 2023
The authors identified attributes which determine the probability of build units to be damaged when exposed to WUI fires. The study is comprehensive and conducted thoroughly. The utilized methodology is sound and the conclusions are robust. The work also satisfactorily refrences other works in the field.
Some minor issues need to be addresses before the work can finally be published. This refers mostly to specific terms requiring further explanation. All comments are included directly in the PDF file.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Paula Aguirre, 26 Jan 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-2130/egusphere-2023-2130-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Paula Aguirre, 26 Jan 2024
Dear Dr. Nolde,
We thank you for you taking the time to review or work, and for you helpful comments and suggestions for improving our manuscript. Please find our detailed responses in the attached file.
Sincerely,
Paula Aguirre, Jorge León, Constanza González-Mathiesen, Randy Román, Manuela Penas, and Alonso Ogueda.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Paula Aguirre, 26 Jan 2024
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2130', Stergios Tampekis, 26 Oct 2023
Dear authors,
The manuscript lacks novelty and originality. Novelty is the primary criterion that a manuscript should have in order to be published to a scientific journal. The specific manuscript is not presenting anything new except for conventional methods.
The introduction should be more updated in the probabilistic assessment of vulnerability (see the references below). Also, there is little or no scientific added value in the presenting study, when more recent methods are already available.
Major revisions
The manuscript needs improvements
-
CC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2130', Stergios Tampekis, 26 Oct 2023
Dear authors,
The introduction should be more updated in the probabilistic assessment of vulnerability (see the references below). Also, there is little or no scientific added value in the presenting study, when more recent methods are already available.
Major revisions
The manuscript needs improvements
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2130', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Nov 2023
Dear authors,
The manuscript lacks novelty and originality. Novelty is the primary criterion that a manuscript should have in order to be published to a scientific journal. The specific manuscript is not presenting anything new except for conventional methods.
The introduction should be more updated in the probabilistic assessment of vulnerability (see the references below). Also, there is little or no scientific added value in the presenting study, when more recent methods are already available.
Major revisions
The manuscript needs improvements
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2130-RC2 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Paula Aguirre, 03 Jan 2024
Dear Referee,
We appreciate your revision of the manuscript. However, the PDF files uploaded in your previous posts as Community Comments show some paragraphs highlighted in yellow, but with no visible notes or comments. Could you please resend you comments so that we can fully address them.
Thanks in advance,
Authors.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2130-AC1 -
AC4: 'Reply on RC2', Paula Aguirre, 26 Jan 2024
Dear Dr. Tampekis,
We thank you for taking the time to review or work and for your suggestions for improvement. Please find the reponses to your comments in the attached file.
Sincerely,
Paula Aguirre, Jorge León, Constanza González-Mathiesen, Randy Román, Manuela Penas, and Alonso Ogueda
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Paula Aguirre, 03 Jan 2024
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
324 | 146 | 29 | 499 | 14 | 16 |
- HTML: 324
- PDF: 146
- XML: 29
- Total: 499
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 16
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Jorge León
Constanza González-Mathiesen
Randy Román
Manuela Penas
Alonso Ogueda
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2143 KB) - Metadata XML