the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Stream water sourcing from high elevation snowpack inferred from stable isotopes of water: A novel application of d-excess values
Rosemary Carroll
David Marchetti
Carleton Bern
Harsh Beria
Wendy Brown
Alexander Newman
Curtis Beutler
Kenneth Williams
Abstract. About 80 % of the precipitation in the Colorado River’s headwaters is snow, and the resulting snowmelt-driven hydrograph is a crucial water source for about 40 million people. Snowmelt from alpine and subalpine snowpack contributes substantially to groundwater recharge and river flow. However, the dynamics of snowmelt progression are not well understood because observations of the high elevation snowpack are difficult due to challenging access in complex mountainous terrain as well as the cost- and labor-intensity of methods. We present a novel approach to infer the processes and dynamics of high elevation snowmelt contributions predicated upon stable hydrogen and oxygen isotope ratios observed in stream discharge. We show that d-excess values of stream water can serve as a comparatively cost-effective proxy for a catchment integrated signal of high elevation snow melt contributions to catchment runoff.
We sampled stable hydrogen and oxygen isotope ratios of the precipitation, snowpack, and stream water in the East River, a headwater catchment of the Colorado River and the stream water of larger catchments at sites on the Gunnison River and Colorado River.
The d-excess of snowpack increased with elevation; the upper subalpine and alpine snowpack (>3200 m) and had a substantially higher d-excess compared to lower elevations (<3200 m) in the study area. The d-excess values of stream water reflected this because d-excess values increased as the higher elevation snowpack contributed more to stream water generation later in the snowmelt/runoff season. Endmember mixing analyses based on the d-excess data showed that the share of high elevation snowmelt contributions within the snowmelt hydrograph was on average 44 % and generally increased during melt period progression, up to 70 %. The observed pattern was consistent during six years for the East River, and a similar relation was found for the larger catchments on the Gunnison and Colorado Rivers. High elevation snowpack contributions were found to be higher for years with lower snowpack and warmer spring temperatures. Thus, we conclude that the d-excess of stream water is a viable proxy to observe changes in high elevation snowmelt contributions in catchments at various scales. Inter-catchment comparisons and temporal trends of the d-excess of stream water could therefore serve as a catchment-integrated measure to monitor if mountain systems increasingly rely on high elevation water inputs during snow drought.
- Preprint
(2353 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1528 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Matthias Sprenger et al.
Status: open (until 01 Nov 2023)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1934', Ryan Webb, 08 Sep 2023
reply
This is a really cool study. The data being collected and publications coming out of the East River have been providing some great insights towards hydrologic processes. This study also reminds me of a number of studies on Niwot Ridge that actually find similar results across an elevational gradient that further support the idea of this method being broadly applicable. The studies use slightly different tracers, but also deuterium, and generally look at storage and/or flow paths. However, I think that since Niwot Ridge is also in the CO Rockies they provides further evidence for the processes being discussed and tracers being applied to be used for the CO River Basin. I wonder if the East River is showing similar storage and release mechanisms as what has been observed on Niwot to give insights towards CO River Basin Models. Any thoughts on that given all the data in the East River and comparisons with the studies below?
Sorry to provide so many references below, but I thought the similarities were quite surprising and shows the broad applicability of your study.
Cowie et al., 2017 showed a similar elevational gradient: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169417301907
Recently, Webb et al., 2022 and 2018 has also discussed specific flow paths and hydrologic connectivity with elevation that may be of interest.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/hyp.14541
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/hyp.13686
Lastly (but certainly not least) Liu et al, 2004 and Williams et al., 2015 discuss the specific storage mechanisms in high alpine environments.
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2004WR003076
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17550874.2015.1123318
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1934-CC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CC1, comment by Ryan Webb', Matthias Sprenger, 12 Sep 2023
reply
We thank Ryan Webb for the interest in the work coming out of the East River in general and we appreciate the feedback provided for this particular manuscript in currently review for HESS. The studies on Niwot Ridge that he refers to are of general relevance for the hydrological work conducted at the East River.
We discuss below each of the manuscript that Ryan Webb referred to and briefly outline its relevance for and potential changes of a revised manuscript.
Cowie et al. (2017) showed based on EMMA how groundwater contributions to stream flow decreases with decreasing elevation at Niwot Ridge. Our mixing analyses based on d-excess values cannot identify groundwater as an explicit end-member, because groundwater, rainfall, and lower elevation snowmelt all have very similar d-excess values (about 10 per mill). Carroll et al. (2018) did not find that the fraction of groundwater increased with lower elevation of the catchments, because they reported that fraction of groundwater correlated with snow water equivalent, which correlates with elevation. Catchments with lower snow water equivalent were at lower elevation and had lower groundwater contributions compared to catchments with higher snow water equivalent at higher elevation.
If the comment that “Cowie showed a similar elevational gradient” refers to the change of groundwater contributions to stream flow with elevation, there is very limited connection to our current study.
The comment refers to Webb 2018 and 2020, but the links provided lead to a paper from 2020 and 2022, respectively. Webb et al. (2020) showed that at higher elevation there was intra-snowpack water flow, whereas at lower elevation such a process decreased and ceased at the lowest observed elevation. Webb et al. (2022) outlines a more comprehensive conceptual model of the runoff generation processes in snow covered slopes. We will consider including these processes in the discussion as they are likely to contribute to the relatively fast flow paths that are needed for the increase of d-excess in the stream water during the snowmelt that we observed.
Liu et al. (2004) and Williams et al. (2015) are as well focusing on runoff mechanism highlighting that at high elevations much of the snowmelt is flowing through the relatively shallow subsurface (talus in their catchments). We will include the findings from the Niwot Ridge in our discussion to provide potential explanations how a relatively large share of the high elevation snowmelt is ending up in the streamflow within several weeks during the snowmelt peak.
References:
Carroll, R. W. H., Bearup, L. A., Brown, W., Dong, W., Bill, M., and Willlams, K. H.: Factors controlling seasonal groundwater and solute flux from snow-dominated basins, Hydrol. Process., 32, 2187–2202, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13151, 2018.
Cowie, R. M., Knowles, J. F., Dailey, K. R., Williams, M. W., Mills, T. J., and Molotch, N. P.: Sources of streamflow along a headwater catchment elevational gradient, J. Hydrol., 549, 163–178, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.044, 2017.
Liu, F., Williams, M. W., and Caine, N.: Source waters and flow paths in an alpine catchment, Colorado Front Range, United States, Water Resour. Res., 40, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003076, 2004.
Webb, R. W., Wigmore, O., Jennings, K., Fend, M., and Molotch, N. P.: Hydrologic connectivity at the hillslope scale through intra-snowpack flow paths during snowmelt, Hydrol. Process., 34, 1616–1629, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13686, 2020.
Webb, R. W., Musselman, K. N., Ciafone, S., Hale, K. E., and Molotch, N. P.: Extending the vadose zone: Characterizing the role of snow for liquid water storage and transmission in streamflow generation, Hydrol. Process., 36, e14541, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14541, 2022.
Williams, M. W., Hood, E., Molotch, N. P., Caine, N., Cowie, R., and Liu, F.: The ‘teflon basin’ myth: hydrology and hydrochemistry of a seasonally snow-covered catchment, Plant Ecol. Divers., 8, 639–661, https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2015.1123318, 2015.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1934-AC1 -
AC2: 'Reply on CC1, comment by Ryan Webb', Matthias Sprenger, 12 Sep 2023
reply
Publisher’s note: this comment is a copy of AC1 and its content was therefore removed.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1934-AC2
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1, comment by Ryan Webb', Matthias Sprenger, 12 Sep 2023
reply
Matthias Sprenger et al.
Matthias Sprenger et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
236 | 75 | 12 | 323 | 17 | 5 | 7 |
- HTML: 236
- PDF: 75
- XML: 12
- Total: 323
- Supplement: 17
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1