the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Cover crops improve soil structure and change organic carbon distribution in macroaggregate fractions
Abstract. Soil structure is sensitive to intensive soil management. It can be ameliorated by a reduction in soil cultivation and stimulation of plant and microbial mediators for aggregate formation, latter a prerequisite and measure for soil quality. Cover crops (CC) are part of an integrated approach to stabilize or improve soil quality. Thereby, the incorporation of diverse CC mixtures is hypothesized to increase the positive effects of CC applications. This study entailed an investigation of the legacy effect of CC on soil aggregates after three crop rotations in the second main crop (winter wheat) after the last CC treatment. Four CCs (mustard, phacelia, clover, and oat) cultivated in pure stands and a fallow treatment were compared to a mixture of the four CC species (Mix4) and a highly diverse 12 plant species mixture (Mix12) in a long-term field experiment in Germany. The organic carbon (OC) distribution within macroaggregate fractions (16–8, 8–4, 4–2, 2–1 and < 1 mm) and their aggregate stability were measured by dry and wet sieving methods, and the mean weight diameter (MWD) was calculated from water-stable aggregates.
The results showed that compared to the fallow, all CCs increased the MWD between 10 and 19 % in soil under the following main crop. The average MWD increase over the fallow was slightly higher for CC mixtures (16 %) than for single CCs (12 %). Higher MWD improvement at the 20–30 cm depth also indicates additional benefits from a reduction in the cultivation depth. Structural equation modelling (SEM) suggests that single CCs were more likely to increase OC storage in small macroaggregates < 1 mm, while CC mixtures were more likely to increase OC in the largest fraction (8–16 mm). Different individual CC species or mixtures exhibited a varying involvement in the formation of different aggregate fractions. We provide evidence that litter quality, root morphology and rhizosphere input, which affect microbial mediators of aggregate formation, might be the main reasons for the observed differences between CC treatments. Cover crops are valuable multifunctional tools for sustainable soil management. Here, we showed that they contribute to structure amelioration in arable soils. Increasing the functional diversity of plant species in CC mixtures could be a strategy to further enhance the positive effects of CC in agroecosystems.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(939 KB)
-
Supplement
(1372 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(939 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1372 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1885', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Oct 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1885/egusphere-2023-1885-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Anonymous Referee #2, 17 Oct 2023
The manuscript explores the changes in soil structure and carbon content through different cover crops, it is important for further increasing soil carbon content and improving soil structure. However, this manuscript needs be further revised and improved as shown the following issues:
- Although different CCs were selected in this manuscript, what is the basis for selecting these CCs?
- The role of different CCs was involved in the discussion, but this article does not provide the data of CC. Please supplement these data (such as root morphology, CC carbon type, root density, etc.) to support the discussion;
- Please provide field management in the material method;
- Added P values after the significant results, and delete the non-significant results to further refine the results
- The manuscript mentions the contribution of fungi to soil structure, such as L73, L281, etc. However, the number of fungi decreases and the number of bacteria increases due to fertilization in farmland. Moreover, there is no relevant fungal data in this manuscript. Please further revise and improve;
- The figures in the manuscript provide the replicates data, such as Figure 2, and the figures in the supporting information. It is enough to the mean with standard error in the figures. Please further modify and add statistical analysis in the figures;
- L252-255 is the result, please move to the results parts; Further refine the discussion section;
- L292 nuclear magnetic resonance data, not included in the manuscript, please delete it;
- L294 mentions cellulose hemicellulose, please provide relevant data for CC;
- Is “the strongest direct effect” in L311 significant?
- L320 not clear;
- Two largest fractions, which fractions?
- Rhizosphere products and hyphae, providing data support
- Please change the conclusion to a paragraph
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1885-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Norman Gentsch, 02 Nov 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1885/egusphere-2023-1885-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Norman Gentsch, 02 Nov 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1885/egusphere-2023-1885-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Anonymous Referee #2, 17 Oct 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1885', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Oct 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1885/egusphere-2023-1885-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Anonymous Referee #2, 17 Oct 2023
The manuscript explores the changes in soil structure and carbon content through different cover crops, it is important for further increasing soil carbon content and improving soil structure. However, this manuscript needs be further revised and improved as shown the following issues:
- Although different CCs were selected in this manuscript, what is the basis for selecting these CCs?
- The role of different CCs was involved in the discussion, but this article does not provide the data of CC. Please supplement these data (such as root morphology, CC carbon type, root density, etc.) to support the discussion;
- Please provide field management in the material method;
- Added P values after the significant results, and delete the non-significant results to further refine the results
- The manuscript mentions the contribution of fungi to soil structure, such as L73, L281, etc. However, the number of fungi decreases and the number of bacteria increases due to fertilization in farmland. Moreover, there is no relevant fungal data in this manuscript. Please further revise and improve;
- The figures in the manuscript provide the replicates data, such as Figure 2, and the figures in the supporting information. It is enough to the mean with standard error in the figures. Please further modify and add statistical analysis in the figures;
- L252-255 is the result, please move to the results parts; Further refine the discussion section;
- L292 nuclear magnetic resonance data, not included in the manuscript, please delete it;
- L294 mentions cellulose hemicellulose, please provide relevant data for CC;
- Is “the strongest direct effect” in L311 significant?
- L320 not clear;
- Two largest fractions, which fractions?
- Rhizosphere products and hyphae, providing data support
- Please change the conclusion to a paragraph
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1885-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Norman Gentsch, 02 Nov 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1885/egusphere-2023-1885-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Norman Gentsch, 02 Nov 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1885/egusphere-2023-1885-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Anonymous Referee #2, 17 Oct 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
382 | 148 | 28 | 558 | 49 | 12 | 11 |
- HTML: 382
- PDF: 148
- XML: 28
- Total: 558
- Supplement: 49
- BibTeX: 12
- EndNote: 11
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Norman Gentsch
Florin Laura Riechers
Jens Boy
Dörte Schwenecker
Ulf Feuerstein
Diana Heuermann
Georg Guggenberger
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(939 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1372 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper