the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Response of PM2.5 chemical composition to variations in anthropogenic emissions and meteorological conditions during COVID-19 lockdown
Yitian Gong
Haijun Zhou
Xi Chun
Zhiqiang Wan
Jingwen Wang
Chun Liu
Abstract. PM2.5 is a primary atmospheric pollutant with various sources and complicated chemical compositions that are influenced by various factors, such as anthropogenic emissions (AE) and meteorological conditions (MC). MC have significant impacts on variations of the atmospheric pollutant; therefore, emission reduction policies and ambient air quality are non-linearly correlated, which hinders accurate assessments of the effectiveness of control measures. The online observations of PM2.5 and its chemical composition were conducted in Hohhot, China, from December 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020, to investigate PM2.5 chemical compositions respond to the variation of AE and MC. Moreover, the random forest (RF) model was used to quantify the AE and MC contributions of PM2.5 and its chemical composition during severe hazes and the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown period. During the clean period, MC contributed -124 % to PM2.5 concentrations, indicating that MC promoted PM2.5 dispersion. During severe pollution episodes, MC contributed 49 % to PM2.5 concentrations, indicating that MC promoted PM2.5 accumulation. The inorganic aerosols (SO42-, NO3-, and NH4+) showed the strongest response to MC. MC had significant contributions to the PM2.5 (36 %), SO42- (32 %), NO3- (29 %), NH4+ (28 %), OC (22 %), and SOC (17 %). From the pre-lockdown to lockdown period, AE (MC) contributed 52 % (48 %), 81 % (19 %), 48 % (52 %), 68 % (32 %), 59 % (41 %), and 288 % (-188 %) to the PM2.5, SO42-, NO3-, NH4+, OC, and SOC variations, respectively. The variations of MC (especially the increase in relative humidity) rapidly generated meteorologically sensitive species (SO42-, NO3-, and NH4+), which led to severe winter pollution. This study provides reference for assessing the net benefits of emission reduction measures for PM2.5 and its chemical compositions.
- Preprint
(1933 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1069 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Yitian Gong et al.
Status: open (until 16 Oct 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1851', Anonymous Referee #1, 27 Sep 2023
reply
The paper presents a study examining the relationship between PM2.5 chemical composition, anthropogenic emissions, and meteorological conditions during the COVID-19 lockdown. This research offers valuable insights into the effectiveness of emission reduction and its impact on PM2.5 and its chemical composition. The topic is highly relevant to Atmos. Chem. Phys.. However, it is crucial to address more technical details and incorporate more scientific discussion. I recommend the publication of this work after the following concerns are addressed.
- Please justify the use of 1.6 in the conversion of OC to OM.
- Please double-check the correctness of the equations of SOR and NOR.
- Please provide a detailed explanation of the model training process and the hyperparameters.
- Please provide details on how the Cdeweathered is calculated.
- Please provide the scatter plots of the model prediction v.s. observation in the test set.
- Regarding the relative importance of meteorological variables in Figure 5, it would be helpful to clarify whether the values are derived from a single simulation or multiple simulations. Additionally, it would be informative to determine if the results remain consistent when employing a different random state in the train-test split.
- In Figure 5, the importance of meteorological variables is relatively small, whereas in Figure 6, their contribution seems significant. Please clarify this difference. Additionally, could you provide the relative importance of meteorological variables at different pollution levels?
- It would be helpful to have a more in-depth scientific discussion regarding Figure 6 and Figure 7 instead of just reporting the number.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1851-RC1
Yitian Gong et al.
Yitian Gong et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
236 | 67 | 9 | 312 | 22 | 3 | 6 |
- HTML: 236
- PDF: 67
- XML: 9
- Total: 312
- Supplement: 22
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1