the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Improving relative humidity measurements on Mars: New laboratory calibration measurements
Abstract. In this paper we present new calibration measurements that have been performed with the ground reference models of the relative humidity instruments of the MSL, Mars 2020 and ExoMars missions. All instruments are based on capacitive sensor head technology, and they are developed, manufactured and tested by The Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI). Calibration of capacitive humidity sensors for the Martian environment has been a challenging task and special facilities are needed in order to create Martian conditions including all relevant environmental parameters: low pressure, low temperature, carbon dioxide environment, and especially humidity that can be accurately controlled and measured. A measurement campaign was performed at DLR PASLAB (Planetary Analog Simulation Laboratory) determining relative humidity calibration data sets for REMS-H, MEDA HS and METEO-H instruments in temperatures from -30 °C down to -70 °C in low pressure CO2. In addition to the stable point humidity calibration measurements in CO2, the instrument performance was tested with the actual Martian atmosphere composition, and during long continuous measurements. The new calibration data set has already been used in the flight calibration of the MEDA HS instrument resulting in successful calibration and excellent accuracy. The results from this campaign will further improve relative humidity measurements on Mars by providing the means to reanalyse the current calibration of the REMS-H flight model, and by allowing more accurate comparison between the two instruments currently on the Martian surface.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(3203 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(3203 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1823', Andrew Ball, 04 Apr 2024
The paper is a welcome contribution to the understanding of humidity measurements on Mars.
Only minor comments:
1) Perhaps add a global plot of predicted vs. measured RH values for the new overall calibration approach, showing the remaining residuals.
2) Comment on whether or not any hysteresis effect is observed.
3) Does the work suggest any recommendations for accommodation, calibration or operation of such sensors on future missions?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1823-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Maria Hieta, 16 Sep 2024
Thank you for reviewing our manuscript and for the comments and suggestions. Responses to the comments are provided below:1) Residual plots have been left out from this manuscript since they are provided in related calibration papers in preparation by Tabandeh and Hieta.2) In general, the calibration measurements were performed both in increasing and decreasing humidity. It can be seen in the capacitance plots that there are some differences between the measurements at the same humidity, but differences are not consistent and might be due to changing test environment (temperature or pressure drifting). If hysteresis were present, it would be smaller than the other uncertainties involved in the measurements.3) Calibrating the sensors in a representative operating environment, accounting for all factors affecting their performance, is crucial and has now been demonstrated to be feasible. A ground reference model can be used to transfer calibration information to the flight model, provided the test campaign is carefully planned and the models are sufficiently identical, and it has also been demonstrated that this approach is effective.Citation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2023-1823-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Maria Hieta, 16 Sep 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1823', Anonymous Referee #2, 11 Sep 2024
This paper describes a detailed calibration and characterisation campaign under proper Marian environmental conditions, of representative ground reference models of three humidity sensors landed on Mars. Two of these are still in operation on Mars (on Curiosity and on Perseverance). These sensors had not been subjected to a thorough calibration campaign before their launches, partly due to the complexity and difficulties to realise such calibrations. This paper provides a detailed description of the calibration campaign and the related results. The paper is well written, well referenced, the figures are clear and representative. The paper is recommended for publication as is.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1823-RC2
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1823', Andrew Ball, 04 Apr 2024
The paper is a welcome contribution to the understanding of humidity measurements on Mars.
Only minor comments:
1) Perhaps add a global plot of predicted vs. measured RH values for the new overall calibration approach, showing the remaining residuals.
2) Comment on whether or not any hysteresis effect is observed.
3) Does the work suggest any recommendations for accommodation, calibration or operation of such sensors on future missions?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1823-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Maria Hieta, 16 Sep 2024
Thank you for reviewing our manuscript and for the comments and suggestions. Responses to the comments are provided below:1) Residual plots have been left out from this manuscript since they are provided in related calibration papers in preparation by Tabandeh and Hieta.2) In general, the calibration measurements were performed both in increasing and decreasing humidity. It can be seen in the capacitance plots that there are some differences between the measurements at the same humidity, but differences are not consistent and might be due to changing test environment (temperature or pressure drifting). If hysteresis were present, it would be smaller than the other uncertainties involved in the measurements.3) Calibrating the sensors in a representative operating environment, accounting for all factors affecting their performance, is crucial and has now been demonstrated to be feasible. A ground reference model can be used to transfer calibration information to the flight model, provided the test campaign is carefully planned and the models are sufficiently identical, and it has also been demonstrated that this approach is effective.Citation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2023-1823-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Maria Hieta, 16 Sep 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1823', Anonymous Referee #2, 11 Sep 2024
This paper describes a detailed calibration and characterisation campaign under proper Marian environmental conditions, of representative ground reference models of three humidity sensors landed on Mars. Two of these are still in operation on Mars (on Curiosity and on Perseverance). These sensors had not been subjected to a thorough calibration campaign before their launches, partly due to the complexity and difficulties to realise such calibrations. This paper provides a detailed description of the calibration campaign and the related results. The paper is well written, well referenced, the figures are clear and representative. The paper is recommended for publication as is.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1823-RC2
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
277 | 131 | 89 | 497 | 32 | 36 |
- HTML: 277
- PDF: 131
- XML: 89
- Total: 497
- BibTeX: 32
- EndNote: 36
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Iina Jaakonaho
Jouni Polkko
Andreas Lorek
Stephen Garland
Jean-Pierre de Vera
Maria Genzer
Ari-Matti Harri
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(3203 KB) - Metadata XML