Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1748
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1748
08 Sep 2023
 | 08 Sep 2023

Consistent but more intense atmospheric circulation response to Arctic sea ice loss in CMIP6 experiments compared to PAMIP experiments

Steve Delhaye, Rym Msadek, Thierry Fichefet, François Massonnet, and Laurent Terray

Abstract. The atmospheric circulation response to Arctic sea ice loss may differ depending on the region of sea ice loss but also on the methodology used to study this impact. Examining the different possible atmospheric circulation responses to sea ice loss is essential, as the Arctic sea ice is not melting uniformly. In this study, we examine the atmospheric response in winter to regional sea ice loss using two different approaches across seven climate models. The sea ice anomaly areas are the pan-Arctic, the Barents-Kara Seas only, and the Sea of Okhotsk only. The first approach involves sensitivity experiments performed within the Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP), while the second approach entails a composite analysis in long pre-industrial control simulations from CMIP6. Our results reveal that both approaches lead to consistent atmospheric circulation responses to pan-Arctic sea ice loss, characterized by a negative phase in the North Atlantic Oscillation and a weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex. Similar responses to BK sea ice loss are simulated, albeit with more spread in the PAMIP experiments. The responses to Okhotsk sea ice loss differ and are uncertain in both approaches. Furthermore, larger changes are detected in the composite analysis than in the sensitivity experiments, likely due to a different background state and the presence of confounding factors in the composite analysis. We also find that the atmosphere-ocean coupling does not imply larger circulation changes or a better representation of the eddy momentum feedback in the climate response. These results highlight that sea ice loss in sensitivity experiments yields a weaker atmospheric circulation response compared to the pre-industrial simulations in CMIP6 where the sea ice loss is governed by internal climate variability. A quantification of the role played by factors related to sea ice loss that amplifies the response should be further investigated.

Steve Delhaye, Rym Msadek, Thierry Fichefet, François Massonnet, and Laurent Terray

Status: closed (peer review stopped)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1748', Anonymous Referee #1, 04 Oct 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1748', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Oct 2023

Status: closed (peer review stopped)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1748', Anonymous Referee #1, 04 Oct 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1748', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Oct 2023
Steve Delhaye, Rym Msadek, Thierry Fichefet, François Massonnet, and Laurent Terray
Steve Delhaye, Rym Msadek, Thierry Fichefet, François Massonnet, and Laurent Terray

Viewed

Total article views: 467 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
352 95 20 467 14 17
  • HTML: 352
  • PDF: 95
  • XML: 20
  • Total: 467
  • BibTeX: 14
  • EndNote: 17
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Sep 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Sep 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 447 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 447 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 Feb 2024
Download
Short summary
The climate impact of Arctic sea ice loss may depend on the region of sea ice loss and the methodology used to study this impact. This study uses two approaches across seven climate models to investigate the winter atmospheric circulation response to regional sea ice loss. Our findings indicate a consistent atmospheric circulation response to pan-Arctic sea ice loss in most models and across both approaches. In contrast, more uncertainty emerges in the responses linked to regional sea ice loss.