the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Understanding the vertical temperature structure of recent record-shattering heatwaves
Abstract. Extreme heatwaves are one of the most impactful natural hazards, posing risks to human health, infrastructure and ecosystems. Recent theoretical as well as observational studies suggested that the vertical temperature structure during heatwaves limits the magnitude of near-surface heat through convective instability. In this study, we thus examine in detail the vertical temperature structure during three recent record-shattering heatwaves, the Pacific Northwest (PNW) heatwave in 2021, the Western Russia (RU) heatwave in 2010, and the West European and UK (UK) heatwave in 2022 by decomposing temperature anomalies (T') in the entire tropospheric column above the surface into contributions from advection, adiabatic warming and cooling, and diabatic processes.
All three heatwaves exhibited bottom-heavy yet vertically deep positive T' extending throughout the troposphere. Importantly, though, the T' magnitude and the underlying physical processes vary greatly in the vertical within each heatwave, as well as across distinct heatwaves, reflecting the diverse synoptic storylines of these events. The PNW heatwave was strongly influenced by an upstream cyclone and an associated warm conveyor belt, which amplified an extreme quasi-stationary ridge and generated substantial mid- to upper-tropospheric positive T' through advection and diabatic heating. In some contrast, positive upper-tropospheric T' during the RU heatwave was caused by advection, while during the UK heatwave, it exhibited modest positive diabatic contributions from upstream latent heating only during the early phase of the respective ridge. Adiabatic warming notably contributed positively to lower tropospheric T' in all three heatwaves, but only in the lowermost 200–300 hPa. Near the surface, all three processes contributed positively to T' in the PNW and RU heatwave, while near-surface diabatic T' was negligible during the UK heatwave. Moreover, there is clear evidence for an amplification and downward propagation of adiabatic T' during the PNW and UK heatwaves, whereby the maximum near-surface T' coincided with the arrival of maximum adiabatic T' in the boundary layer. Additionally, the widespread "ageing" of near-surface T' over the course of these events now quantitatively supports the notion of heat domes, within which air recirculates and accumulates heat.
Our results for the first time document the four-dimensional functioning of anticyclone-heatwave couplets in terms of advection, adiabatic and diabatic cooling or warming, and shed light on the complex interplay between large-scale dynamics, moist convection and boundary layer processes that ultimately determines near-surface temperatures during heatwaves.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(4742 KB)
-
Supplement
(551 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(4742 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(551 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1703', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Sep 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1703', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Sep 2023
Drawing inspiration from recent advancements in understanding atmospheric stability and stratification in heatwaves, and leveraging the Lagrangian framework developed by Roethlisberger and Papritz (2023), this paper delivers the first meticulous Lagrangian analysis of the 3-D atmosphere during three extreme heatwaves. This study is technically robust and discusses properly the existing body of literature. It provides a fresh perspective on heatwaves and holds the potential to expand its findings to analyze more events in future research. I believe this manuscript is deserving of publication following some minor revisions.
Line 174: The negative values are likely due to strong entrainment, which dilutes the specific humidity of air parcels as they ascend through the dry boundary layer, as noted by Zhang and Boos.
Line 215: I’m not entirely convinced that the conclusion of the PNW heatwave was primarily due to convective damping rather than changes in advection. Utilizing an Eulerian viewpoint might offer a clearer understanding of the decline in boundary layer temperature. If the Eulerian advection term continues to rise when the surface temperature is already declining, then it is reasonable to infer that advection is not the primary cause. Additionally, the T’ values utilized here represent accumulations, not tendencies. Thus, discussions regarding changes in total T’ should center around the changes in advective T’. I am not requesting additional analysis given the Lagrangian focus of this paper, but anticipate that the authors will address these reservations and refine their discussion accordingly.
Line 271: This paragraph is somewhat unclear to me. It appears that by 29 June, the peak adiabatic T’ has already reached 850 hPa, well below the PBL top. My interpretation is that the positive adiabatic T’, rather than the peak, only descended to the PBL top around 29-30 June. Could the authors clarify whether they intend to convey that the peak of the surface temperature aligns with the time when adiabatically heated air stopped to mix into the boundary layer?
Line 325: Might the RU heatwave exhibit more similarities to the PNW heatwave if evaluated over a longer time frame? There is no need for the authors to change the figures, but a brief comment on this would be beneficial.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1703-RC2 - AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1703', Matthias Röthlisberger, 26 Oct 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1703', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Sep 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1703', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Sep 2023
Drawing inspiration from recent advancements in understanding atmospheric stability and stratification in heatwaves, and leveraging the Lagrangian framework developed by Roethlisberger and Papritz (2023), this paper delivers the first meticulous Lagrangian analysis of the 3-D atmosphere during three extreme heatwaves. This study is technically robust and discusses properly the existing body of literature. It provides a fresh perspective on heatwaves and holds the potential to expand its findings to analyze more events in future research. I believe this manuscript is deserving of publication following some minor revisions.
Line 174: The negative values are likely due to strong entrainment, which dilutes the specific humidity of air parcels as they ascend through the dry boundary layer, as noted by Zhang and Boos.
Line 215: I’m not entirely convinced that the conclusion of the PNW heatwave was primarily due to convective damping rather than changes in advection. Utilizing an Eulerian viewpoint might offer a clearer understanding of the decline in boundary layer temperature. If the Eulerian advection term continues to rise when the surface temperature is already declining, then it is reasonable to infer that advection is not the primary cause. Additionally, the T’ values utilized here represent accumulations, not tendencies. Thus, discussions regarding changes in total T’ should center around the changes in advective T’. I am not requesting additional analysis given the Lagrangian focus of this paper, but anticipate that the authors will address these reservations and refine their discussion accordingly.
Line 271: This paragraph is somewhat unclear to me. It appears that by 29 June, the peak adiabatic T’ has already reached 850 hPa, well below the PBL top. My interpretation is that the positive adiabatic T’, rather than the peak, only descended to the PBL top around 29-30 June. Could the authors clarify whether they intend to convey that the peak of the surface temperature aligns with the time when adiabatically heated air stopped to mix into the boundary layer?
Line 325: Might the RU heatwave exhibit more similarities to the PNW heatwave if evaluated over a longer time frame? There is no need for the authors to change the figures, but a brief comment on this would be beneficial.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1703-RC2 - AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1703', Matthias Röthlisberger, 26 Oct 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
397 | 196 | 22 | 615 | 36 | 19 | 9 |
- HTML: 397
- PDF: 196
- XML: 22
- Total: 615
- Supplement: 36
- BibTeX: 19
- EndNote: 9
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Belinda Hotz
Lukas Papritz
Matthias Röthlisberger
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(4742 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(551 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper