the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Airborne bacteria viability and air quality: a protocol to quantitatively investigate the possible correlation by an atmospheric simulation chamber
Abstract. Biological Particulate Matter or bioaerosol are a subset of atmospheric aerosol. They influence climate, air quality and health via several mechanisms which often are poorly understood. In particular, the quantitative study of possible relationship between bioaerosol viability and air quality or meteorological conditions is an open and relevant issue. The difficulty of retrieving such possible correlations by analyses of data collected during in-field campaigns, can benefit of targeted experiments conducted in well controlled conditions inside Atmospheric Simulation Chambers, ASCs. ChAMBRe (Chamber for Aerosol Modelling and Bio-aerosol Research) is an ASC in Genoa (Italy) designed and built to perform experimental research on bioaerosol. In this article we focus on bacteria viability. A multi-step protocol was developed and thoroughly tested: cultivation of a suitable bacteria population, nebulization and injection in the chamber of viable cells, exposure and monitoring of the viability variation inside ChAMBRe, hold at selected conditions, and finally incubation and counting of the concentration of viable bacteria. The whole procedure showed a reproducibility at the 20 % level when ChAMBRe is kept in a reference “baseline” condition. This figure quantifies the protocol sensitivity as well to changes in viability when bacteria are exposed in other (e.g., polluted) conditions. First results showing a viability reduction observed exposing the E. coli strain to NOX concentrations and solar irradiation are presented and discussed. Present results pave the way to systematic studies aimed at the definition of dose-effect relationship for several bacteria strain at atmospheric pollutants.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(1401 KB)
-
Supplement
(618 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1401 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(618 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1580', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 Aug 2023
The paper presents an update to a relevant infrastructure for aerobiology, namely the ChAMBRe atmospheric simulation chamber. The paper presents also a protocol alongside baseline experiments to investigate the functioning of the chamber itself as well as the interaction between airborne microorganisms and specific stressors such as atmospheric pollutants and solar radiation. The aim of ChAMBRe is reaching an in-depth understanding of the interactions between microorganisms and atmosphere in the context of their airborne transport in order to better develop chemical transport models. The reviewer thinks that these issues are quite important and therefore that papers like this one should be published. However, the reviewer finds a number of issues in the presentation of the instrumentation, the experiments and the usage of references that do not allow to recommend immediate publication. Specific comments are given in the attached pdf.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Federico Mazzei, 13 Sep 2023
Dear Referee
On behalf of all the authors I thank you for reviewing the manuscript. Your suggestions and comments will lead to a significant improvement in the quality of the manuscript.
Attached, you will find the point-to-point responses to your comments.
Best regards
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Federico Mazzei, 13 Sep 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1580', Pierre Amato, 24 Aug 2023
Comments on “Airborne bacteria viability and air quality: a protocol to quantitatively investigate the possible correlation by an atmospheric simulation chamber” by V. Vernocchi et al.
See file attached.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Federico Mazzei, 13 Sep 2023
Dear Dr. Amato
On behalf of all the authors I thank you for reviewing the manuscript. Your suggestions and comments will lead to a significant improvement in the quality of the manuscript.
Attached, you will find the point-to-point responses to your comments.
Best regards
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Federico Mazzei, 13 Sep 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1580', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 Aug 2023
The paper presents an update to a relevant infrastructure for aerobiology, namely the ChAMBRe atmospheric simulation chamber. The paper presents also a protocol alongside baseline experiments to investigate the functioning of the chamber itself as well as the interaction between airborne microorganisms and specific stressors such as atmospheric pollutants and solar radiation. The aim of ChAMBRe is reaching an in-depth understanding of the interactions between microorganisms and atmosphere in the context of their airborne transport in order to better develop chemical transport models. The reviewer thinks that these issues are quite important and therefore that papers like this one should be published. However, the reviewer finds a number of issues in the presentation of the instrumentation, the experiments and the usage of references that do not allow to recommend immediate publication. Specific comments are given in the attached pdf.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Federico Mazzei, 13 Sep 2023
Dear Referee
On behalf of all the authors I thank you for reviewing the manuscript. Your suggestions and comments will lead to a significant improvement in the quality of the manuscript.
Attached, you will find the point-to-point responses to your comments.
Best regards
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Federico Mazzei, 13 Sep 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1580', Pierre Amato, 24 Aug 2023
Comments on “Airborne bacteria viability and air quality: a protocol to quantitatively investigate the possible correlation by an atmospheric simulation chamber” by V. Vernocchi et al.
See file attached.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Federico Mazzei, 13 Sep 2023
Dear Dr. Amato
On behalf of all the authors I thank you for reviewing the manuscript. Your suggestions and comments will lead to a significant improvement in the quality of the manuscript.
Attached, you will find the point-to-point responses to your comments.
Best regards
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Federico Mazzei, 13 Sep 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
257 | 87 | 19 | 363 | 32 | 6 | 6 |
- HTML: 257
- PDF: 87
- XML: 19
- Total: 363
- Supplement: 32
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Virginia Vernocchi
Elena Abd El
Marco Brunoldi
Silvia Giulia Danelli
Elena Gatta
Tommaso Isolabella
Federico Mazzei
Franco Parodi
Paolo Prati
Dario Massabò
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1401 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(618 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper