the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Disentangling the drivers of future Antarctic ice loss with a historically-calibrated ice-sheet model
Abstract. We use an observationally-calibrated ice-sheet model to investigate the future trajectory of the Antarctic ice sheet related to uncertainties in the future balance between sub-shelf melting and ice discharge on the one hand, and the surface mass balance on the other. Our ensemble of simulations, forced by a panel of CMIP6 climate models, suggests that the ocean will be the primary driver of short-term Antarctic mass loss, initiating ice loss in West Antarctica already during this century. The atmosphere initially plays a mitigating role through increased snowfall, leading to an Antarctic contribution to global mean sea-level rise by 2100 of 6 (-8 to 15) cm under a low-emission scenario and 5.5 (-10 to 16) cm under a very high-emission scenario. However, under the very high-emission pathway, the influence of the atmosphere shifts beyond the end of the century, becoming an amplifying driver of mass loss as the ice sheet's surface mass balance decreases. We show that this transition occurs when Antarctic near-surface warming exceeds a critical threshold of +7.5 °C, at which the increase in surface runoff outweighs the increase in snow accumulation, a signal that is amplified by the melt–elevation feedback. Therefore, under the very high-emission scenario, oceanic and atmospheric drivers are projected to result in a complete collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet along with significant grounding-line retreat in the marine basins of the East Antarctic ice sheet, leading to a median global mean sea-level rise of 2.75 (6.95) m by 2300 (3000). Under a more sustainable socio-economic pathway, we find that the Antarctic ice sheet may still contribute to a median global mean sea-level rise of 0.62 (1.85) m by 2300 (3000). However, the rate of sea-level rise is significantly reduced as mass loss is likely to remain confined to the Amundsen Sea Embayment, where present-day climate conditions seem sufficient to commit to a continuous retreat of Thwaites Glacier.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(10313 KB)
-
Supplement
(9753 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(10313 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(9753 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1532', Nicholas Golledge, 18 Aug 2023
This paper presents a suite of new ice sheet simulations for Antarctica, that explore a range of critical parameters where substantial uncertainty exists. By using an observationally-constrained starting point and a rigorous statistical framework for assessing ensemble members, the authors are able to disentangle the dominant drivers of ice sheet evolution both through time (out to year 3000), and across different sectors of the continent. Their results are consistent with previous findings, in terms of contributions to sea level, but the paper makes a significant advance through its rigorous and multi-parameter approach. The figures are extremely good - both informative and clear - and the text is very well written.
Overall I could find nothing of much substance to comment on. There is a typo ('adressing') at line 114, but this is I think the only one I found. At line 424 I thought maybe the Robel and Banwell paper could be mentioned - in terms of how meltwater ponds might localise. At line 481 I thought maybe a comment about model resolution could be made, and followed up in more detail in the model description Appendix. I for one am not going to argue that a model resolution of 16 km is insufficient for this kind of study - I think it is entirely pragmatic for an ensemble approach like this - but I know that there are others in the community who might like to see more justification for a 'low res' simulation, or at least some evidence that the GL tracks reliably.
But these are minor points. Overall I found this a fascinating and enjoyable paper to read, and it will almost certainly be of great value for future assessments of SLR.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1532-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Violaine Coulon, 20 Oct 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1532', Daniel Martin, 20 Sep 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1532/egusphere-2023-1532-RC2-supplement.pdf
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Violaine Coulon, 20 Oct 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1532', Nicholas Golledge, 18 Aug 2023
This paper presents a suite of new ice sheet simulations for Antarctica, that explore a range of critical parameters where substantial uncertainty exists. By using an observationally-constrained starting point and a rigorous statistical framework for assessing ensemble members, the authors are able to disentangle the dominant drivers of ice sheet evolution both through time (out to year 3000), and across different sectors of the continent. Their results are consistent with previous findings, in terms of contributions to sea level, but the paper makes a significant advance through its rigorous and multi-parameter approach. The figures are extremely good - both informative and clear - and the text is very well written.
Overall I could find nothing of much substance to comment on. There is a typo ('adressing') at line 114, but this is I think the only one I found. At line 424 I thought maybe the Robel and Banwell paper could be mentioned - in terms of how meltwater ponds might localise. At line 481 I thought maybe a comment about model resolution could be made, and followed up in more detail in the model description Appendix. I for one am not going to argue that a model resolution of 16 km is insufficient for this kind of study - I think it is entirely pragmatic for an ensemble approach like this - but I know that there are others in the community who might like to see more justification for a 'low res' simulation, or at least some evidence that the GL tracks reliably.
But these are minor points. Overall I found this a fascinating and enjoyable paper to read, and it will almost certainly be of great value for future assessments of SLR.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1532-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Violaine Coulon, 20 Oct 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1532', Daniel Martin, 20 Sep 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1532/egusphere-2023-1532-RC2-supplement.pdf
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Violaine Coulon, 20 Oct 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
517 | 260 | 23 | 800 | 51 | 19 | 16 |
- HTML: 517
- PDF: 260
- XML: 23
- Total: 800
- Supplement: 51
- BibTeX: 19
- EndNote: 16
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Violaine Coulon
Ann Kristin Klose
Christoph Kittel
Tamsin Edwards
Fiona Turner
Ricarda Winkelmann
Frank Pattyn
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(10313 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(9753 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper