Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1455
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1455
11 Jul 2023
 | 11 Jul 2023
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

Equity and Justice should underpin the discourse on Tipping Points

Laura M. Pereira, Ignacio Gianelli, Therezah Achieng, Diva Amon, Sally Archibald, Suchinta Arif, Azucena Castro, Tapiwa Prosper Chimbadzwa, Kaera Coetzer, Tracy-Lynn Field, Odirilwe Selomane, Nadia Sitas, Nicola Stevens, Sebastian Villasante, Mohammed Armani, Duncan M. Kimuyu, Ibukun J. Adewumi, Ashish Ghadiali, David Obura, Patricia Pinho, Felipe Roa-Clavijo, Juan Rocha, and U. Rashid Sumaila

Abstract. Radical and quick transformations towards sustainability have winners and losers, with equity and justice embedded to a greater or a lesser extent. According to research, only the wealthiest 1–4 % of the global population will radically need to change their consumption, behaviours, societal values and beliefs in order to make space for an equitable and sustainable future for nature and people. However, narratives around many ‘positive’ tipping points, such as the energy transition, do not take into account the entire spectrum of impacts the proposed alternatives could have or still rely on narratives that maintain current unsustainable behaviours and marginalise many people. One such example is the move from petrol-based to electric vehicles. An energy transition that remains based on natural resource inputs from the Global South must be unpacked with an equity and justice lens to understand the “true cost” of this transition. Another is the role of ‘nature-based solutions’ to address climate resilience, where ‘nature’ in some parts of the world needs to be maintained as an offset for the continued lifestyles of the wealthy, usually in different parts of the world from where this nature is supposed to be maintained. There are two arguments why a critical engagement with these and other similar proposals needs to be made. First, the idea of transitioning through a substitution (e.g., of fuel), whilst maintaining the system structure (e.g., of private vehicles) may not necessarily be conceived as the kind of radical transformation being called for by global scientific or governmental bodies like the IPCC and IPBES. Secondly, and probably more importantly, the question of positive for whom, and positive where must be considered. In this paper, we unpack these narratives in the context of what they mean for the idea of positive tipping points using a critical decolonial view from the South.

Laura M. Pereira et al.

Status: open (until 03 Oct 2023)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1455', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Aug 2023 reply

Laura M. Pereira et al.

Laura M. Pereira et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 491 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
345 136 10 491 4 6
  • HTML: 345
  • PDF: 136
  • XML: 10
  • Total: 491
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jul 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jul 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 481 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 481 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 03 Oct 2023
Download
Short summary
Narratives around many ‘positive’ tipping points, such as the energy transition, do not take into account the entire spectrum of impacts the proposed alternatives could have or still rely on narratives that maintain current unsustainable behaviours and marginalise many people. We unpack these narratives in the context of what they mean for the idea of positive tipping points using a critical decolonial view from the South.