the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Solar FTIR measurements of NOx vertical distributions: Part I) First observational evidence for a seasonal variation in the diurnal increasing rates of stratospheric NO2 and NO
Abstract. Observations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and nitrogen oxide (NO) in the stratosphere are relevant to understand long-term changes and variabilities in stratospheric nitrogen oxide (NOx) and ozone (O3) concentrations. Due to the versatile role of NO2 and NO in stratospheric O3 photochemistry they are important for recovery and build-up of O3 holes in the stratosphere, and therefore can indirectly affect the human life. Thus, we present in this work the evaluation of NO2 and NO stratospheric partial columns (> 16 km altitude) retrieved from ground-based Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) measurements from over 25 years at Zugspitze (47.42° N, 10.98° E, 2964 m a.s.l.) and 18 years at Garmisch (47.47° N, 11.06° E, 745 m a.s.l.), Germany. The obtained stratospheric columns are only weakly influenced by tropospheric pollution and show only a very small bias of (2.5±0.2) % when comparing NO2 above Zugspitze and Garmisch. Stratospheric columns of both NO2 and NO show a diurnal increase in dependence of local solar time (LST). We quantified this behavior by calculating diurnal increasing rates. Here, we find mean values for the NO2 diurnal increasing rate of (0.89±0.14)·1014 cm-2 h-1 and (0.94±0.14)·1014 cm-2 h-1 at Zugspitze and Garmisch, respectively. The mean NO a.m. diurnal increasing rate above Zugspitze can be found to be (1.42±0.12)·1014 cm-2 h-1. Regarding the seasonal dependency of these increasing rates, for the first time, we were able to detect a significant seasonal variation of both NO2 diurnal increasing rates and NO a.m. diurnal increasing rates experimentally with a maximum of (1.13±0.04)·1014 cm-1 h-1 for NO2 and (1.76±0.25)·1014 cm-1 h-1 for NO in September and a minimum of (0.71±0.18)·1014 cm-1 h-1 in December for NO2 and a minimum of (1.18±0.41)·1014 cm-1 h-1 in November for NO. This similar behavior may be explained by the interconnection of both species in stratospheric photochemistry. The outcome of this work is a retrieval and analyzation strategy of FTIR data for NOx stratospheric columns, which can help to further validate photochemical models or improve satellite validations. The first use of this data set is shown in a companion paper (Nürnberg et al., 2023) extracting experiment-based NOx scaling factors describing the diurnal increase out of the retrieved partial columns and validating recently published model-based scaling factors.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(2584 KB)
-
Supplement
(2914 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2584 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2914 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1435', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Sep 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1435/egusphere-2023-1435-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1435', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Sep 2023
General Comments:
In this work, stratospheric partial columns of NO2 and NO obtained from FTIR measurements performed at Zugspitze during 25 years, and at Garmisch during 18 years, are presented. The authors explain how they split into tropospheric and stratospheric columns taking into account the maxima observed in the retrieved concentration vertical profiles, and from their corresponding partial columns averaging Kernels (above and below 16 km of altitude). The proximity of these 2 stations, which are however at very different altitudes (2964 and 745 m.a.s.l, for Zugspitze and Garmish respectively) are used to assess de influence of the tropospheric components on the stratosphere. Results show that stratospheric partial columns are weakly influenced by the tropospheric pollutants. However some stratospheric columns are affected by high pollution tropospheric events. To remove these outliers from the series of measurements, a contamination filter is applied to data. Then, the daily and seasonal evolution of NO2 (Zugspitze and Garmish) and NO (Zugspitze) is obtained. NO2 presents a linear increase along the day that is consistent for both stations. NO has a linear increase during day until noon. Due to the solar elevation and the increase in the O3 concentration, NO2-NO equilibrium changes after noon, and from that moment on, NO concentration has a non-linear behaviour. Thus, only NO data before noon are compared with NO2 daily evolution. NO2 and NO present similar seasonal evolution with maximum values in September and minimum values in December and November respectively.
The entire manuscript (text and figures) is clearly presented. The used approaches/methods are well described. I think that the results and methods used in this work will be useful for the validation of models and satellite data. Thus, I think that this paper should be publish in AMT. However, before publication, some questions should be better clarified.
Specific Comments:
-
Line 34: Please, include some references about the lighting and air traffic controlling the NOx concentration in the upper troposphere.
-
Line 64: MAX-DOAS measurements generally obtain information for lower SZA (compared to the high SZA of the twilights).
-
Lines 66-67: That is not entirely true, if the Free troposphere is considered to be representative of concentrations between the Boundary layer and the tropopause. In fact, by applying the method described in (Gomez et al., 2014), the Free Troposphere NO2 concentration can be estimated from MAX-DOAS measurements performed at mountain stations. In (Gil et al., 2015), for instance, that method was applied to Izaña MAX-DOAS data carried out over 3 years to study the seasonal evolution of NO2.
-
Section 3.2: What temperature and pressure vertical profiles are used in the model?
-
Line 194: Please, explain how are the partial column averaging kernels obtained.
-
Section 4.2: How often are these pollution outliers observed out of the studied cases? It would be interesting to study also the high pollution episodes and how these tropospheric events affect the stratosphere.
-
Section 6.1: How do you explain the difference of the NO2 seasonal evolution observed at both stations between April and June? (Figure 6).
Technical Corrections:
-
Page 91: Do you mean “solid” instead “sound”?
-
Page 112: “excited” instead of “exited”.
-
Line 139: MCT meaning.
-
Line 192: “1a” instead of “1 a”.
-
Line 217: Something is missing in “of ca. 1”?
-
Line 248: you could mention the horizontal distance in km to show clearly how close the stations are.
References:
-
Gil-Ojeda et al; NO2 seasonal evolution in the north subtropical free troposphere. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 15, pp.10567-10579, 2015.
-
Gomez et al; Long-path averaged mixing ratios of O3 and NO2 in the free troposphere from mountain MAX-DOAS. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, vol. 7, pp. 1-14, 2014.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1435-RC2 -
-
AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1435', Pinchas Nürnberg, 23 Nov 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1435/egusphere-2023-1435-AC1-supplement.pdf
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1435', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Sep 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1435/egusphere-2023-1435-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1435', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Sep 2023
General Comments:
In this work, stratospheric partial columns of NO2 and NO obtained from FTIR measurements performed at Zugspitze during 25 years, and at Garmisch during 18 years, are presented. The authors explain how they split into tropospheric and stratospheric columns taking into account the maxima observed in the retrieved concentration vertical profiles, and from their corresponding partial columns averaging Kernels (above and below 16 km of altitude). The proximity of these 2 stations, which are however at very different altitudes (2964 and 745 m.a.s.l, for Zugspitze and Garmish respectively) are used to assess de influence of the tropospheric components on the stratosphere. Results show that stratospheric partial columns are weakly influenced by the tropospheric pollutants. However some stratospheric columns are affected by high pollution tropospheric events. To remove these outliers from the series of measurements, a contamination filter is applied to data. Then, the daily and seasonal evolution of NO2 (Zugspitze and Garmish) and NO (Zugspitze) is obtained. NO2 presents a linear increase along the day that is consistent for both stations. NO has a linear increase during day until noon. Due to the solar elevation and the increase in the O3 concentration, NO2-NO equilibrium changes after noon, and from that moment on, NO concentration has a non-linear behaviour. Thus, only NO data before noon are compared with NO2 daily evolution. NO2 and NO present similar seasonal evolution with maximum values in September and minimum values in December and November respectively.
The entire manuscript (text and figures) is clearly presented. The used approaches/methods are well described. I think that the results and methods used in this work will be useful for the validation of models and satellite data. Thus, I think that this paper should be publish in AMT. However, before publication, some questions should be better clarified.
Specific Comments:
-
Line 34: Please, include some references about the lighting and air traffic controlling the NOx concentration in the upper troposphere.
-
Line 64: MAX-DOAS measurements generally obtain information for lower SZA (compared to the high SZA of the twilights).
-
Lines 66-67: That is not entirely true, if the Free troposphere is considered to be representative of concentrations between the Boundary layer and the tropopause. In fact, by applying the method described in (Gomez et al., 2014), the Free Troposphere NO2 concentration can be estimated from MAX-DOAS measurements performed at mountain stations. In (Gil et al., 2015), for instance, that method was applied to Izaña MAX-DOAS data carried out over 3 years to study the seasonal evolution of NO2.
-
Section 3.2: What temperature and pressure vertical profiles are used in the model?
-
Line 194: Please, explain how are the partial column averaging kernels obtained.
-
Section 4.2: How often are these pollution outliers observed out of the studied cases? It would be interesting to study also the high pollution episodes and how these tropospheric events affect the stratosphere.
-
Section 6.1: How do you explain the difference of the NO2 seasonal evolution observed at both stations between April and June? (Figure 6).
Technical Corrections:
-
Page 91: Do you mean “solid” instead “sound”?
-
Page 112: “excited” instead of “exited”.
-
Line 139: MCT meaning.
-
Line 192: “1a” instead of “1 a”.
-
Line 217: Something is missing in “of ca. 1”?
-
Line 248: you could mention the horizontal distance in km to show clearly how close the stations are.
References:
-
Gil-Ojeda et al; NO2 seasonal evolution in the north subtropical free troposphere. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 15, pp.10567-10579, 2015.
-
Gomez et al; Long-path averaged mixing ratios of O3 and NO2 in the free troposphere from mountain MAX-DOAS. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, vol. 7, pp. 1-14, 2014.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1435-RC2 -
-
AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1435', Pinchas Nürnberg, 23 Nov 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1435/egusphere-2023-1435-AC1-supplement.pdf
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
226 | 81 | 21 | 328 | 34 | 9 | 10 |
- HTML: 226
- PDF: 81
- XML: 21
- Total: 328
- Supplement: 34
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 10
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Pinchas Nürnberg
Markus Rettinger
Ralf Sussmann
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2584 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2914 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper